Loren H. Engrav

Early excision and grafting vs. nonoperative treatment of burns of indeterminant depth: a randomized prospective study.

Compared to nonoperative treatment with silver sulfadiazine cream, early excision and grafting of 22 patients with indeterminant burns of less than 20% TBSA resulted in an average shorter hospitalization, lower cost, and less time away from work than 25 patients treated nonoperatively. While early excision and grafting resulted in increased use of blood products and operating room facilities, this did not result in increased patient morbidity. Long-term followup demonstrated no difference in need for reconstruction, incidence of blisters, incidence of loss of motion, or contour irregularities. Those patients treated nonoperatively required more late grafts for closure and demonstrated more hypertrophic scarring. Those treated by early excision demonstrated more mesh graft irregularity. We conclude that in otherwise healthy patients with dermal burns of indeterminant depth less than 20% total body surface area, early excision and grafting is the preferred form of treatment.

Diagnostic peritoneal lavage: Fourteen years and 2,586 patients later☆☆☆

During a fourteen year period, diagnostic peritoneal lavage was 98.5 per cent accurate in determining the presence or absence of blunt intraabdominal injuries among 2,586 patients. Of these, 69.4 per cent had a negative lavage and 29.2 per cent a positive lavage. Six patients (0.2 per cent) had a false-positive lavage. Thirty-two patients (1.2 per cent) had a false-negative lavage; however, all but one of these patients underwent exploratory laparotomy on the basis of clinical acumen or other diagnostic tests.

Early surgical excision versus conventional therapy in patients with 20 to 40 percent burns: A comparative study

Using the records of 72 patients treated at the University of Washington Burn Center, this study compared the results of early surgical excision (by 14 days postburn) and autografting to those of autografting after spontaneous separation and bedside debridement of burn eschar. Excised patients had shorter hospitalizations and lower rates of burn wound sepsis and serious burn wound contamination, and less use of potentially toxic antibiotics (p less than 0.05) than did the prognostically equivalent group treated before the introduction of early excision. Excised patients required more blood transfusions (p less than 0.05), but did not differ significantly from controls in rates of mortality or other inpatient complications, in the number of operations performed, or in the adjusted hospital costs. Evaluation of patients treated over the entire study period for more shallow burns indicated no concurrent change in other aspects of burn care which might account for the observed results. We conclude that early excision and grafting in young, otherwise healthy patients with 20 to 40 percent total body surface area burns that are likely to heal within 3 weeks is more effective than the more traditional management of slow wound separation and debridement.

Diagnostic peritoneal lavage in blunt abdominal trauma.

: Diagnostic peritoneal lavage is accurate and safe. It leads to fewer unnecessary laparotomies than if clinical examination alone is used and nearly eliminates deaths from undiagnosed abdominal injuries. Persons with clinical abdominal findings, shock, altered sensorium, and severe chest injuries after blunt trauma should undergo the procedure.

Results of 268 pressure sores in 158 patients managed jointly by plastic surgery and rehabilitation medicine.

&NA; Despite improvements in surgical repair of pressure sores, recurrence rates greater than 80 percent are reported, thus indicating that this difficult problem is not yet solved. Recurrence results in additional hospitalizations and increased medical expenses. Because associated general clinical and social issues are numerous for these patients, our physical medicine and rehabilitation colleagues are active participants in their perioperative medical care. In addition, the Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation also directs a complete postreconstruction rehabilitation and education program for them. The results of surgically repaired pressure sores for patients managed in this collaborative fashion have not been previously reported. Pressure sore patients at the Harborview and University of Washington Medical Centers are evaluated by plastic surgery colleagues together with the Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. Patients believed to be candidates for complete postoperative rehabilitation are offered surgical repair and constitute this study cohort. Individuals who cannot cooperate with our protocol are treated nonoperatively and are not included in this study. A retrospective analysis of all 158 patients (mean age 34.5 years) operated on for 268 grade III and IV pressure sores between October of 1977 and December of 1989 was performed. Following surgical debridement and reconstruction, patients receive their principal medical care from the Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation service while the Plastic Surgery Department manages the surgical wounds. Graduated patient mobilization is initiated in accord with a mutually agreed upon standardized protocol. New or primary sores numbered 174 (65 percent), and recurrent or secondary sores numbered 94 (35 percent). Mean patient follow‐up was 3.7 years. The overall pressure sore recurrence rate (recurrence at the same site) was 19 percent, and the overall patient recurrence rate (previous patient developing a new sore) was 25 percent. Recurrence rates of 22 and 15 percent were noted for primary and secondary pressure sores, respectively. On most recent examination, 131 patients (83 percent) had intact pelvic and perineal skin. These results support a collaborative approach to the management of high‐grade pressure sore patients. Our protocol of mutual patient evaluation followed by surgical reconstruction and postoperative rehabilitation yields notably low recurrence rates of both primary and secondary sores. In addition, the high percentage of patients who manifest long‐term maintenance of skin integrity demonstrates the excellent education in personal skin and selfcare that this approach provides. Not only do patients enjoy successful and durable reconstructive results, but additional hospitalizations and health care expenses implicit to pressure sore recurrence are consequently diminished. This collaborative clinical effort remains our standard of care. (Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 102: 765, 1998.)

Burn Depth Estimation—Man or Machine

A Burn Depth Indicator, utilizing reflectance ratios of red, green, and infrared light, has been devised and clinically tested for 18 months at our Burn Center. Using the endpoint of wound healing in less than or more than 3 weeks, clinical assessment by two experienced surgeons of intermediate depth wounds was compared to readings from the BDI . In about one third of cases the surgeons were unwilling to commit themselves to a prediction. In the cases where the surgeons were willing to make a prediction, they were incorrect about 25% of the time. The BDI was significantly more accurate than the clinical assessment in those predicted not to heal by the surgeons and maintained an accuracy of 79% in the wounds where the surgeons would not make a prediction. The BDI is portable, noninvasive, and provides an immediate reading. It may have utility as a triage tool for emergency rooms or combat situations, and has utility at present in our Burn Center as a more accurate tool than our clinical judgment in predicting which wounds should be excised and grafted during the first few days after injury.

Burden of burn: A norm-based inquiry into the influence of burn size and distress on recovery of physical and psychosocial function

This prospective, longitudinal study examined the influence of baseline physical and psychological burden on serial assessments of health-related quality of life among adults with major burns from three regional burn centers (n = 162). Physical burden groups were defined by % TBSA burned: <10%, 10% to 30%, or >30%. Psychological burden groups were defined by in-hospital distress using the Brief Symptom Inventory Global Severity Index T-score with scores of < 63 or > or = 63. Analyses compared groups across level of burden and with published normative data. Assessments reflected health and function (Short Form 36) during the month before burn, at discharge, and at 6 and 12 months after burn. Physical functioning was significantly more impaired and the rate of physical recovery slower among those with either large physical burden or large psychological burden. Notably, psychosocial functioning also was more impaired and the rate of psychosocial recovery slower among those with greater psychological burden. These results suggest that, in addition to aggressive wound closure, interventions that reduce in-hospital distress may accelerate both physical and psychosocial recovery.

Time off work and return to work rates after burns: systematic review of the literature and a large two-center series

The literature on time off work and return to work after burns is incomplete. This study addresses this and includes a systematic literature review and two-center series. The literature was searched from 1966 through October 2000. Two-center data were collected on 363 adults employed outside of the home at injury. Data on employment, general demographics, and burn demographics were collected. The literature search found only 10 manuscripts with objective data, with a mean time off work of 10 weeks and %TBSA as the most important predictor of time off work. The mean time off work for those who returned to work by 24 months was 17 weeks and correlated with %TBSA. The probability of returning to work was reduced by a psychiatric history and extremity burns and was inversely related to %TBSA. In the two-center study, 66% and 90% of survivors had returned to work at 6 and 24 months post-burn. However, in the University of Washington subset of the data, only 37% had returned to the same job with the same employer without accommodations at 24 months, indicating that job disruption is considerable. The impact of burns on work is significant.

Neurologic consequences of electrical burns.

Permanent neurologic damage following major electric injury is a dreaded and often discussed complication. The incidence, severity, and sequelae are not clear from the literature. Therefore we reviewed the charts of 90 consecutive patients admitted to the University of Washington Burn Center between 1980 and 1986 looking at neurologic consequences. Electric injuries accounted for 4% of 2,305 admissions. The mean age was 31 +/- 13 years, total body surface area involved (TBSA), 6 +/- 11%, and length of stay, 13 +/- 20 days. There were 82 males and eight females. There were four deaths, for a mortality rate of 4%. Fourteen patients had 18 amputations. Twenty-two patients sustained low-voltage injury; 50% had immediate neurologic symptoms which resolved in nine of 11 patients. Eleven patients (50%) were asymptomatic. Sixty-four patients sustained high-voltage injury and 33% were asymptomatic. Forty-three patients (67%) had immediate central and/or peripheral neurologic symptoms. Loss of consciousness accounted for the largest fraction of CNS sequelae in the high-voltage group (45%). Twenty-three patients (79%) recovered consciousness before arrival at the hospital. Six patients remained comatose, three died, and three awoke but had neurologic sequelae. Twenty-two patients in the high-voltage group had one or more acute peripheral neuropathies. Sixty-four per cent of these neuropathies resolved or improved. Five patients had transient initial paralysis, but there were no delayed spinal cord symptoms. Eleven patients developed one or more delayed peripheral neuropathies. Half of these delayed neuropathies resolved or improved.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

12-Year within-wound study of the effectiveness of custom pressure garment therapy.

Pressure garment therapy is standard of care for prevention and treatment of hypertrophic scarring after burn injury. Nevertheless there is little objective data that confirms effectiveness. The purpose of this study was to determine the effectiveness of pressure garment therapy with objective data obtained with a randomized within-wound comparison. We enrolled consecutive patients with forearm injuries over a 12-year period. The subjects wore custom garments with normal and low compression randomized to either the proximal or distal zones. Hardness, color and thickness of wounds were objectively measured using appropriate devices; clinical appearance was measured by a panel masked to the identity of the pressure treated area. Wounds treated with normal compression were significantly softer, thinner, and had improved clinical appearance. There was no interaction of any effect with patient ethnicity. However, these findings were clinically evident only with moderate to severe scarring. We conclude that pressure garment therapy is effective, but that the clinical benefit is restricted to those patients with moderate or severe scarring.