Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Lorenza Magliano is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Lorenza Magliano.


Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology | 2011

Metaphoric and non-metaphoric use of the term “schizophrenia” in Italian newspapers

Lorenza Magliano; John Read; Riccardo Marassi

PurposeThis study examines how the term “schizophrenia” is used in Italian newspapers.MethodsThe survey was carried out on the 22 Italian newspapers which allow word scanning on their online website. In each newspaper, the terms “schizophrenia” and “schizophrenic” were scanned in all articles, from January 1, 2008 to December 31, 2008. Each article containing these terms was analyzed in relation to metaphorical usage to describe or denigrate people or groups not diagnosed “schizophrenic” and in relation to non-metaphoric, direct descriptions of people using mental health services, or the illness itself.Results“Schizophrenia/schizophrenic” was reported in 1,087 articles. It was used far more frequently as a metaphor (73.7%) than in reference to people actually given the diagnosis (19.2%) or to the disorder itself (7.1%). The 801 metaphoric uses were classified into the following categories: incoherence/contradiction/split (682, 85.1%), dangerousness/aggressiveness (34, 4.4%), and eccentricity/oddness (84, 10.5%). 117 out of 209 (55.9%) articles on people diagnosed with the disorder were in news section of which 57 (48.7%) referred to homicides, 17 (14.5%) to other assaults by the person, and 33 (28.2%) to assaults directed at the person.ConclusionsThese data confirm previous studies showing that the media disproportionately report negative stories about people diagnosed with “schizophrenia”, and in particular, equate the diagnosis with violence. The study also demonstrates that the metaphorical use of the term to denigrate groups or individuals may be an equal or greater contributor to the stigma and prejudice experienced by people with this mental disorder.


Journal of Affective Disorders | 2015

Beliefs of people taking antidepressants about the causes of their own depression

John Read; Claire Cartwright; Kerry Gibson; Christopher Shiels; Lorenza Magliano

BACKGROUND The beliefs of people receiving treatment about the causes of their own mental health problems are researched less often than the causal beliefs of the public, but have important implications for relationships with prescribers, treatment choices and recovery. METHOD An online survey on a range of beliefs about depression, and experiences with antidepressants, was completed by 1829 New Zealand adults prescribed anti-depressants in the preceding five years, 97.4% of whom proceeded to take antidepressants. RESULTS Six of 17 beliefs about the causes of their own depression were endorsed by more than half the sample: chemical imbalance, family stress, work stress, heredity, relationship problems and distressing events in childhood. There were some marked differences in content, structure and level of conviction of beliefs about one׳s own depression and the sample׳s previously published beliefs about depression in general. There were also significant differences between the beliefs of demographic groupings. Regression analyses revealed that self-reported effectiveness of the antidepressants was positively associated with bio-genetic causal beliefs. The quality of the relationship with the prescribing doctor was positively related to a belief in chemical imbalance as a cause and negatively related to a belief in unemployment as a cause. LIMITATIONS The convenience sample may have been biased towards a favourable view of bio-genetic explanations, since 83% reported that the medication reduced their depression. CONCLUSIONS People experiencing depression hold complex, multifactorial and idiosyncratic sets of beliefs about the causes of their own depression, apparently based at least in part on their own life experiences and circumstances. Exploring those beliefs may enhance the doctor-patient relationship and selection of appropriate treatment modality.


Muscle & Nerve | 2015

Burden, professional support, and social network in families of children and young adults with muscular dystrophies

Lorenza Magliano; Melania Patalano; Alessandra Sagliocchi; Marianna Scutifero; Antonella Zaccaro; Maria Grazia D'Angelo; Federica Civati; Erika Brighina; Giuseppe Vita; Gian Luca Vita; Sonia Messina; Maria Sframeli; Marika Pane; Maria Elena Lombardo; Roberta Scalise; Adele D'Amico; Giulia Colia; Michela Catteruccia; Umberto Balottin; Angela Berardinelli; Maria Chiara Motta; Corrado Angelini; Alessandra Gaiani; Claudio Semplicini; Luca Bello; Roberta Battini; Guja Astrea; Luisa Politano

Introduction: This study explores burden and social and professional support in families of young patients with muscular dystrophies (MDs) in Italy. Methods: The study was carried out on 502 key relatives of 4‐ to 25‐year‐old patients suffering from Duchenne, Becker, or Limb‐Girdle MD who were living with at least 1 adult relative. Results: A total of 77.1% of relatives reported feelings of loss, 74.0% had feelings of sadness, and 59.1% had constraints in leisure activities. Burden was higher among relatives of patients with higher disability and who spent more daily hours in caregiving. Practical difficulties were higher among relatives who perceived lower help in patient emergencies and less practical support by their social network. Psychological burden was higher in those relatives who were unemployed, those with poorer support in emergencies, and those with lower social contacts. Conclusions: Caring for patients with MDs may be demanding for relatives even in the early stages of these disorders, especially when social support is poor and the patients disability increases. Muscle Nerve 52: 13–21, 2015


International Journal of Social Psychiatry | 2017

Effects of the diagnostic label ‘schizophrenia’, actively used or passively accepted, on general practitioners’ views of this disorder:

Lorenza Magliano; Antonella Strino; Rosanna Punzo; Roberta Acone; Gaetana Affuso; John Read

Background: General practitioners (GPs) play a key role in the care of somatic and psychiatric problems in people diagnosed with schizophrenia (PWS). It is probable that, like other health professionals, GPs are not all free of prejudices toward PWS. In clinical practice, GPs sometimes interact with clients diagnosed with schizophrenia by specialists, passively accepting this diagnosis. Other times, GPs interact with clients having symptoms of schizophrenia but who have not been diagnosed. In this case, GPs are expected to actively make a diagnosis. Giving the key role of GPs in the process of care, it is worthwhile examining whether passive acceptance and active usage of the diagnosis schizophrenia have differential effects on GPs’ attitudes toward people with this disorder. Aims: To investigate GPs’ views of schizophrenia and whether they were influenced by a ‘schizophrenia’ label, passively accepted or actively used. Methods: A total of 430 randomly selected GPs were invited to complete a questionnaire about their views of schizophrenia, either after reading a description of this disorder and making a diagnosis, or without being provided with a description but passively accepting the label ‘schizophrenia’ given in the questionnaire. Results: The GPs who passively accepted the label schizophrenia (n = 195) and those who actively identified schizophrenia from the description (n = 127) had similar views. Compared to the GPs who did not identify schizophrenia in the description (n = 65), those who used the diagnosis, actively or passively: more frequently reported heredity and less frequently psychosocial factors as causes of the disorder; were more skeptical about recovery; were more convinced of the need for long-term pharmacotherapies; believed more strongly that PWS should be discriminated against when in medical hospital; and perceived PWS as more dangerous and as kept at greater social distance. Conclusion: The diagnosis ‘schizophrenia’, however used, is associated with pessimistic views. Stigma education should be provided to GPs.


American Journal of Orthopsychiatry | 2017

General Practitioners' Beliefs About People With Schizophrenia and Whether They Should Be Subject to Discriminatory Treatment When in Medical Hospital: The Mediating Role of Dangerousness Perception.

Lorenza Magliano; Rosanna Punzo; Antonella Strino; Roberta Acone; Gaetana Affuso; John Read

This study explored the relationships between General Practitioners’ (GPs) beliefs about People With Schizophrenia (PWS) and GPs’ recommendations regarding restrictions for such people when in medical (nonpsychiatric) hospital, and whether these relationships were mediated by dangerousness perception. There were 322 randomly selected Italian GPs who completed a questionnaire measuring beliefs about PWS. Structural Equation Model (SEM) was used to explore the effects of these beliefs on the GPs’ views about the need for restrictive rules in hospital. Thirty-1 percent of GPs firmly believed that, in medical wards, PWS should be supervised and 18% that they should be separated from other patients. SEM revealed that belief in such differential treatment was positively related to a belief that PWS need medication for the rest of their lives, and to perceptions of others’ need for social distance, and of dangerousness. Dangerousness was, in turn, positively related to the belief that PWS need medication for their lives, and to a perception of the need for social distance, but negatively related to perceived capacity to report health problems. Analyses of indirect effects showed that the relationships of belief in discriminatory treatment with belief in medication for life and with perceived social distance were mediated by perceived dangerousness. GPs’ attitudes about PWS appear closely with their beliefs on discriminatory behaviors in hospital, and the mediating role of dangerousness perceptions. Providing GPs with education about schizophrenia treatments and prognosis, and countering stereotypes about dangerousness, could be helpful to reduce GPs’ beliefs in the need for discriminatory treatment of PWS.


Archives of Environmental & Occupational Health | 2016

Working conditions and mental health: Results from the CARESUN study

Daniela Feola; Paola Pedata; Francesco D'Ancicco; Laura Santalucia; Nicola Sannolo; Eduardo Ascione; Albert Nienhaus; Lorenza Magliano; Monica Lamberti

ABSTRACT The authors conducted a work-related stress surveillance study in 2013 on 6,558 public-sector employees in Italy, examining how they perceived their jobs, via the Job Content Questionnaire, and their mental health status, via the General Health Questionnaire 12 (GHQ-12). Of the 2,094 employees completing the questionnaires, 60% were male, 52% had a medium-level education, and 76% had a medium-level job. Three hundred and eighty-five employees (18%) had a GHQ-12 score >3 and were classified as GHQ-12 cases: these were more often female (54%), medium-to-highly educated (54%), and had more often reported health problems over the previous year (51%). Thus, GHQ-12 cases represented a significant percentage of the examined population, indicating that work-related stress surveillance programs are needed for the planning of psychosocial interventions aimed at the reintegration of individuals with mental health problems.


The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry | 2006

Agitated "Unipolar" Major Depression: Prevalence, Phenomenology, and Outcome

Mario Maj; Raffaele Pirozzi; Lorenza Magliano; Andrea Fiorillo; Luca Bartoli


The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry | 2007

Phenomenology and prognostic significance of delusions in major depressive disorder: a 10-year prospective follow-up study.

Mario Maj; Raffaele Pirozzi; Lorenza Magliano; Andrea Fiorillo; Luca Bartoli


American Journal of Orthopsychiatry | 2003

The effect of social network on burden and pessimism in relatives of patients with schizophrenia.

Lorenza Magliano; Andrea Fiorillo; Claudio Malangone; Cecilia Marasco; Manuela Guarneri; Mario Maj


Psychiatric Services | 2006

Implementing Psychoeducational Interventions in Italy for Patients With Schizophrenia and Their Families

Lorenza Magliano; Andrea Fiorillo; Claudio Malangone; Corrado De Rosa; Mario Maj

Collaboration


Dive into the Lorenza Magliano's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

John Read

University of East London

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Mario Maj

University of Naples Federico II

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Alessandra Sagliocchi

Seconda Università degli Studi di Napoli

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Melania Patalano

Seconda Università degli Studi di Napoli

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Andrea Fiorillo

Seconda Università degli Studi di Napoli

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Antonella Zaccaro

Seconda Università degli Studi di Napoli

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Claudio Malangone

University of Naples Federico II

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge