Lorenzo Alibardi

Hard cornification in reptilian epidermis in comparison to cornification in mammalian epidermis

Abstract:  The structure of reptilian hard (beta)‐keratins, their nucleotide and amino acid sequence, and the organization of their genes are presented. These 13–19 kDa proteins are basic, rich in glycine, proline and serine, and different from cytokeratins. Their mRNAs are expressed in beta‐cells. The central part of beta‐keratins (this region has been previously termed ‘core‐box’ and is peculiar of all sauropsid proteins) is composed of two beta‐folded regions and shows a high identity with avian beta‐keratins. This central part present in all beta‐keratins, including feather keratins, is the site of polymerization to build the framework of beta‐keratin filaments. Beta‐keratins appear cytokeratin‐associated proteins. Their central region might have originated in an ancestral glycine‐rich protein present in stem reptiles from which beta‐keratins evolved and diversified into reptiles and birds. Stem reptiles of the Carboniferous period might have possessed glycine‐rich proteins derived from exons/domains corresponding to the variable, glycine‐rich region of cytokeratins. Beta‐keratins might have derived from a gene coding for small glycine‐rich keratin‐associated proteins. The glycine‐rich regions evolved differently in the lineage leading to modern reptiles and birds versus that leading to mammals. In the reptilian lineage some amino acid regions produced by point mutations and amino acid changes might have given rise to originate the central beta‐pleated region. The latter allowed the formation of filamentous proteins (beta‐keratins) associated with intermediate filament keratins and replaced them in beta‐keratin cells. In the mammalian lineage no beta‐pleated region was generated in their matrix proteins, the glycine‐rich keratin‐associated proteins. The latter evolved as glycine‐tyrosine‐rich, sulphur‐rich, and ultra‐sulphur‐rich proteins that are used for building hairs, horns and nails.

The epidermis of scales in gecko lizards contains multiple forms of beta-keratins including basic glycine-proline-serine-rich proteins.

The epidermis of scales of gecko lizards comprises alpha- and beta-keratins. Using bidimensional electrophoresis and immunoblotting, we have characterized keratins of corneous layers of scales in geckos, especially beta-keratins in digit pad lamellae. In the latter, the formation of thin bristles (setae) allow for the adhesion and climbing vertical or inverted surfaces. alpha-Keratins of 55-66 kDa remain in the acidic and neutral range of pI, while beta-keratins of 13-18 kDa show a broader variation of pI (4-10). Some protein spots for beta-keratins correspond to previously sequenced, basic glycine-proline-serine-rich beta-keratins of 169-191 amino acids. The predicted secondary structure shows that a large part of the molecule has a random-coiled conformation, small alpha helix regions, and a central region with 2-3 strands (beta-folding). The latter, termed core-box, shows homology with feather-scale-claw keratins of birds and is involved in the formation of beta-keratin filaments. Immunolocalization of beta-keratins indicates that these proteins are mainly present in the beta-layer and oberhautchen layer, including setae. The sequenced proteins of setae form bundles of keratins that determine their elongation. This process resembles that of feather-keratin on the elongation of barbule cells in feathers. It is suggested that small proteins rich in glycine, serine, and proline evolved in reptiles and birds to reinforce the mechanical resistance of the cytokeratin cytoskeleton initially present in the epidermis of scales and feathers.

Cell structure of developing downfeathers in the zebrafinch with emphasis on barb ridge morphogenesis

The present ultrastructural and immunocytochemical study on the embryonic feathers of the zebrafinch, an altricial passerine bird, describes cellular differentiation of developing downfeathers. Barb ridges are folds of the original epidermis of the embryonic feather germ in which the basal–apical polarity of epidermal cells is upset. The result is the loss of most germinal activity of basal cells of the barb ridges so that only the embryonic epidermal layers remain. The more external layer is the primary periderm, followed by 4–6 layers of inner‐periderm cells that mature into feather sheath and barb vane ridge cells. The following layer, the subperiderm, produces a small type of beta‐keratin typical of feathers. In barb ridges, the subperiderm layer is displaced to form barbule plates and barb cells. The formation of branching barbules occurs by the presence of barb vane ridge cells that function as spacers between barbule cells. The fourth layer is homologous to the germinal layer of the epidermis, but in barb ridges it rapidly loses the germinal capability and becomes the cyclindrical layer of marginal plates. The study indicates that a necrotic process determines the carving out of the final feather shape, although apoptosis may also play a role. In fact, after barb and barbule cells have formed a keratinized syncitium, retraction of the vascular bed determines anoxia with the resultant necrosis of all feather cells. Only those of the keratinized syncitium remain to form the feather while supportive cells disappear. The sheath covering the barb and barbule syncitium is lost by the formation of a sloughing layer following degeneration of external barb ridge vane cells and loss of the sheath. It is proposed that the evolution of the morphogenetic process of barb ridge formation was peculiar to tubular outgrowths of the integument of archosaurian reptiles that evolved into birds. Once established in the embryonic programmes of skin morphogenesis of ancient birds, variations in the process of barb ridge morphogenesis allowed the fusion of ridges into large or branched ridges that originated the rachis. This process produced pennaceous feathers, among which were those later used for flight. The present study stresses that the morphogenetic process of barb ridge formation determines the concomitant appearance of barbs and barbules. As a consequence, intermediate forms of evolving feathers with only barbs but not barbules are unlikely or are derived from alteration of the above basic morphogenetic mechanism.

Distribution and characterization of keratins in the epidermis of the tuatara (Sphenodon punctatus; Lepidosauria, Reptilia).

Abstract Reptilian scales are mainly composed of alpha- and beta-keratins. Epidermis and molts from adult individuals of an ancient reptilian species, the tuatara (Sphenodon punctatus), were analysed by immunocytochemistry, mono- and bi-dimensional electrophoresis, and western blotting for alpha-and beta-keratins. The epidermis of this reptilian species with primitive anatomical traits should represent one of the more ancient amniotic epidermises available. Soft keratins (AE1- and AE3-positive) of 40–63 kDa and with isoelectric points (pI) at 4.0–6.8 were found in molts. The AE3 antibody was diffusely localised over the tonofilaments of keratinocytes. The lack of basic cytokeratins may be due to keratin alteration in molts, following corneification or enzymatic degradation of keratins. Hard (beta-) keratins of 16–18 kDa and pI at 6.8, 8.0, and 9.2 were identified using a beta-1 antibody produced against chick scale beta-keratin. The antibody also labeled filaments of beta-cells and of the mature, compact beta-layer. We have shown that beta-keratins in the tuatara resemble those of lizards and snakes, and that they are mainly basic proteins. These proteins replace cytokeratins in the pre-corneoum beta-layers, from which a hard, mechanically resistant corneoum layer is formed over scales. Beta-keratins may have both a fibrous and a matrix role in forming the hard texture of corneoum scales in this ancient species, as well as in more recently evolved reptiles.

Soft epidermis of a scaleless snake lacks beta-keratin

Beta-keratins are responsible for the mechanical resistance of scales in reptiles. In a scaleless crotalus snake (Crotalus atrox), large areas of the skin are completely devoid of scales, and the skin appears delicate and wrinkled. The epidermis of this snake has been assessed for the presence of beta-keratin by immunocytochemistry and immunoblotting using an antibody against chicken scale beta-keratin. This antibody recognizes beta-keratins in normal snake scales with molecular weights of 15-18 kDa and isoelectric points at 6.8, 7.5, 8.3 and 9.4. This indicates that beta-keratins of the stratum corneum are mainly basic proteins, so may interact with cytokeratins of the epidermis, most of which appear acidic (isoelectric points 4.5-5.5). A beta-layer and beta-keratin immunoreactivity are completely absent in moults of the scaleless mutant, and the corneous layer comprises a multi-layered alpha-layer covered by a flat oberhautchen. In conclusion, the present study shows that a lack of beta-keratins is correlated with the loss of scales and mechanical protection in the skin of this mutant snake.

Epidermal differentiation in embryos of the tuatara Sphenodon punctatus (Reptilia, Sphenodontidae) in comparison with the epidermis of other reptiles

Studying the epidermis in primitive reptiles can provide clues regarding evolution of the epidermis during land adaptation in vertebrates. With this aim, the development of the skin of the relatively primitive reptile Sphenodon punctatus in representative embryonic stages was studied by light and electron microscopy and compared with that of other reptiles previously studied. The dermis organizes into a superficial and deep portion when the epidermis starts to form the first layers. At embryonic stages comparable with those of lizards, only one layer of the inner periderm is formed beneath the outer periderm. This also occurs in lizards and snakes so far studied. The outer and inner periderm form the embryonic epidermis and accumulate thick, coarse filaments (25–30 nm thick) and sparse alpha‐keratin filaments as in other reptiles. Beneath the embryonic epidermis an oberhautchen and beta‐cells form small horny tips that represent overlapping borders along the margin of beta‐cells that overlap other beta‐cells (in a tile‐like arrangement). The tips resemble those of agamine lizards but at a small scale, forming a lamellate‐spinulated pattern as previously described in adult epidermis. The embryonic epidermis matures by the dispersion of coarse filaments among keratin at the end of embryonic development and is shed around hatching. The presence of these matrix organelles in the embryonic epidermis of this primitive reptile further indicates that amniote epidermis acquired interkeratin matrix proteins early for land adaptation. Unlike the condition in lizards and snakes, a shedding complex is not formed in the epidermis of embryonic S. punctatus that is like that of the adult. Therefore, as in chelonians and crocodilians, the epidermis of S. punctatus also represents an initial stage that preceded the evolution of the shedding complex for moulting.