Lorenzo Gemignani

Characteristics of reflux episodes and symptom association in patients with erosive esophagitis and nonerosive reflux disease: study using combined impedance-pH off therapy.

OBJECTIVES:We sought to compare reflux and symptom association patterns in patients with nonerosive reflux disease (NERD), erosive esophagitis (EE), and in healthy volunteers (HVs).METHODS:Patients with EE and NERD underwent combined impedance–pH monitoring. Normal values were defined on the basis of previously collected data from 48 HVs. We evaluated distal esophageal acid exposure time (AET), number and type of reflux episodes (acid, nonacid), acid and bolus clearance times, proximal extension of reflux episodes, and symptom association probability (SAP).RESULTS:Distal AET (percentage time, pH<4) was higher (P<0.01) in 58 EE patients (median 7.4%, 25–75th percentile 4.2–9.9%) compared with 168 NERD patients (4.2% (1.2–6.4%)) and 48 HVs (0.7% (0.2–1.4%)). Patients with EE and NERD had a higher (P<0.01) number of acid reflux episodes compared with HVs (51 (37–66) vs. 34 (22–51) vs. 17 (8–31); P<0.05), but a similar number of nonacid reflux episodes (22 (15–39) vs. 23 (15–38) vs. 18 (14–26); P=NS). The percentage of reflux episodes reaching the proximal esophagus was higher (P<0.01) in EE patients (57% (45–73%)) than in NERD patients (45% (36–60%)) and HVs (33% (19–46%)). A positive SAP for heartburn or regurgitation was found in 161 of 168 (96%) NERD and 54 of 58 (93%) EE patients (P=NS).CONCLUSIONS:Acid reflux episodes, volume, and acid clearance are important factors in the pathogenesis of reflux-induced lesions. Nonacid reflux contributes less to esophageal mucosa damage, but is involved in the development of reflux symptoms in both NERD and EE patients.

The added value of impedance-pH monitoring to Rome III criteria in distinguishing functional heartburn from non-erosive reflux disease

INTRODUCTION Functional heartburn is defined by Rome III criteria as an endoscopy-negative condition with normal oesophageal acid exposure time, negative symptom association to acid reflux and unsatisfactory response to proton pump inhibitors. These criteria underestimated the role of non-acid reflux. AIM To assess the contribution of impedance-pH with symptom association probability (SAP) analysis in identifying endoscopy-negative patients with reflux disease and separating them from functional heartburn. METHODS Consecutive endoscopy-negative patients treated with proton pump inhibitors (n=219) undergoing impedance-pH monitoring off-therapy were analysed. Distal acid exposure time, reflux episodes, SAP and symptomatic response to proton pump inhibitors were measured. RESULTS Based on impedance-pH/SAP, 67 (31%) patients were pH+/SAP+, 6 (2%) pH+/SAP-, 83 (38%) hypersensitive oesophagus and 63 (29%) functional heartburn. According to pH-metry alone/response to proton pump inhibitors, 62 (28%) were pH+/SAP+, 11 (5%) pH+/SAP-, 61 (28%) hypersensitive oesophagus and 85 (39%) functional heartburn. In the normal-acid exposure population the contribution of impedance-pH/SAP compared to pH-metry alone/response to proton pump inhibitors in identifying patients with reflux disease and functional heartburn resulted to be 10%. In patients with abnormal-acid exposure, the contribution of impedance-pH/SAP increased by 3%. CONCLUSION Comparing impedance-pH testing with pH-metry alone plus the response to proton pump inhibitor therapy demonstrated that the latter ones cause underestimation of reflux disease patients and overestimation of functional heartburn patients.

Oesophageal motility and bolus transit abnormalities increase in parallel with the severity of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease.

Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2011; 34: 476–486

Characteristics of gastro-esophageal reflux episodes in Barrett's esophagus, erosive esophagitis and healthy volunteers

Background  Gastro‐esophageal reflux is considered a major culprit in the pathogenesis of Barrett’s esophagus (BE). Still, there is controversy on the role of weakly acidic and weakly alkaline reflux in BE. To compare characteristics of reflux episodes patients with BE, erosive esophagitis (EE), and healthy volunteers (HV).

Overweight is a risk factor for both erosive and non-erosive reflux disease

INTRODUCTION Studies have reported that the association between overweight and erosive oesophagitis is very strong, whilst seeming less consistent with non-erosive reflux disease. AIM We have hypothesized that this difference may be due to the heterogeneity of endoscopy-negative population. METHODS We studied 81 patients with erosive oesophagitis, 48 controls and 295 endoscopy-negative patients classified by impedance-pH-testing as: (1) pH-POS (abnormal acid exposure); (2) hypersensitive oesophagus (normal acid exposure/SAP+); (3) functional heartburn (normal acid exposure/SAP-). Body mass index was also calculated. RESULTS Mean body mass index was significantly higher (p<0.05) in erosive oesophagitis than in endoscopy-negative patients as a whole and controls [27 (18-40) vs. 25 (16-48) vs. 23 (16-34)]. However, the separation of endoscopy-negative patients showed that mean body mass index was higher (p<0.05) in those with increased acid exposure time [26 (18-45)] than in hypersensitive oesophagus [24 (16-48)]. The former subgroup was similar to erosive oesophagitis, whilst the latter one to both functional heartburn [23 (16-34)] and controls (p=ns). Increased body mass index represented a risk factor for erosive oesophagitis (odds ratio 1.4; 95% confidence interval, 1.2-1.6) and non-erosive reflux disease pH-POS subgroup (odds ratio 1.35; 95% confidence interval, 1.2-1.5). CONCLUSION Our study shows that overweight represents an important risk factor for erosive oesophagitis and pH-POS non-erosive reflux disease and not for hypersensitive oesophagus and functional heartburn. This provides an explanation for the previously reported lesser role of this variable in non-erosive reflux disease population.

Clinical Trial: The Association Between Rifaximin And Partially Hydrolyzed Guar Gum Is More Effective Than Rifaximin Alone In Eradicating SIBO

Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2010; 32: 1000–1006

Achalasia with dense eosinophilic infiltrate responds to steroid therapy.

A patient presented with chronic substernal discomfort and intermittent dysphagia for solids. High-resolution impedance manometry (HRIM) of the esophagus showed that there was no peristalsis in the esophageal body but incomplete relaxation of the lower esophageal sphincter and incomplete bolus transit, so the patient was diagnosed with achalasia. Moreover, probably because of esophageal stasis, eosinophilic infiltration that mimicked a pattern of eosinophilic esophagitis was observed, on the basis of multiple biopsies of the esophagus. The patient was given 50 mg prednisolone once daily; the symptoms improved dramatically, and HRIM showed complete recovery of esophageal peristalsis, deeper relaxation of the lower esophageal sphincter, and complete bolus transit profile. HRIM can therefore be used to assess dysmotility abnormalities in patients with achalasia and eosinophilic-like esophagitis, and steroids relieve these symptoms. Treatment with a high dose of prednisolone resulted in a complete disappearance of dysphagia because of improved esophageal motility and reduced eosinophilic infiltrate. It is therefore important to control the inflammatory process in patients with idiopathic achalasia, which is likely to result from an autoimmune reaction.

Lactulose breath test to assess oro-cecal transit delay and estimate esophageal dysmotility in scleroderma patients.

OBJECTIVES To assess the correlation between delayed oro-cecal transit time (OCTT) and esophageal motility abnormalities in a cohort of systemic sclerosis (SSc) patients. METHODS We prospectively enrolled 50 consecutive SSc patients and 60 healthy volunteers (HVs) as controls. Both groups underwent glucose breath test (GBT) to exclude small intestine bacterial overgrowth, lactulose hydrogen, and octanoic acid breath tests (LHBT and OBT) to measure OCTT and gastric emptying (GE), respectively, and manometry to assess esophageal motility. RESULTS Thirty-one (63%) SSc patients presented ineffective esophageal motility (IEM) compared with 3 HVs (5%; P<0.01), 37 (74%) had an abnormal OCTT compared with 4 HVs (7%; P <0.01), and 16 (32%) had an altered GE compared with 4 HVs (7%; P <0.01). The median OCTT and gastric t½ were longer in SSc than in HVs (165 min vs. 101 min and 125 min vs. 78 min, respectively; P <0.01). A delayed GE was present in 12/37 (32%), whereas IEM in 27/37 (73%) SSc patients with prolonged OCTT. The prevalence of IEM increased in parallel with the prolongation of OCTT (31% when OCTT<150 min, 73% when OCTT≥150 min, and up to 85% when OCTT>180 min, P<0.01). CONCLUSIONS Abnormalities of both esophageal and small intestine motility are frequent in SSc patients and esophageal motility is altered in most cases with small bowel involvement. Delayed GE plays a limited role in prolonging OCTT. LHBT is a non-invasive, cheap, well-tolerated diagnostic tool that may be useful to estimate intestinal involvement and also to estimate a higher risk of esophageal hypomotility in SSc patients.

Narrow-band imaging with magnifying endoscopy is accurate for detecting gastric intestinal metaplasia

AIM To investigate the predictive value of narrow-band imaging with magnifying endoscopy (NBI-ME) for identifying gastric intestinal metaplasia (GIM) in unselected patients. METHODS We prospectively evaluated consecutive patients undergoing upper endoscopy for various indications, such as epigastric discomfort/pain, anaemia, gastro-oesophageal reflux disease, suspicion of peptic ulcer disease, or chronic liver diseases. Patients underwent NBI-ME, which was performed by three blinded, experienced endoscopists. In addition, five biopsies (2 antrum, 1 angulus, and 2 corpus) were taken and examined by two pathologists unaware of the endoscopic findings to determine the presence or absence of GIM. The correlation between light blue crest (LBC) appearance and histology was measured. Moreover, we quantified the degree of LBC appearance as less than 20% (+), 20%-80% (++) and more than 80% (+++) of an image field, and the semiquantitative evaluation of LBC appearance was correlated with IM percentage from the histological findings. RESULTS We enrolled 100 (58 F/42 M) patients who were mainly referred for gastro-esophageal reflux disease/dyspepsia (46%), cancer screening/anaemia (34%), chronic liver disease (9%), and suspected celiac disease (6%); the remaining patients were referred for other indications. The prevalence of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection detected from the biopsies was 31%, while 67% of the patients used proton pump inhibitors. LBCs were found in the antrum of 33 patients (33%); 20 of the cases were classified as LBC+, 9 as LBC++, and 4 as LBC+++. LBCs were found in the gastric body of 6 patients (6%), with 5 of them also having LBCs in the antrum. The correlation between the appearance of LBCs and histological GIM was good, with a sensitivity of 80% (95%CI: 67-92), a specificity of 96% (95%CI: 93-99), a positive predictive value of 84% (95%CI: 73-96), a negative predictive value of 95% (95%CI: 92-98), and an accuracy of 93% (95%CI: 90-97). The NBI-ME examination overlooked GIM in 8 cases, but the GIM was less than 5% in 7 of the cases. Moreover, in the 6 false positive cases, the histological examination showed the presence of reactive gastropathy (4 cases) or H. pylori active chronic gastritis (2 cases). The semiquantitative correlation between the rate of LBC appearance and the percentage of GIM was 79% (P < 0.01). CONCLUSION NBI-ME achieved good sensitivity and specificity in recognising GIM in an unselected population. In routine clinical practice, this technique can reliably target gastric biopsies.

Tu1793 Can 3-Hour Post-Prandial Analysis Predict the Diagnosis of GERD Made on 24-Hour Impedance-pH Testing?

CAN 3-HOUR POST-PRANDIAL ANALYSIS PREDICT THE DIAGNOSIS OF GERDMADE ON 24-HOUR IMPEDANCE-pH TESTING? M. Furnari∗ ,1, E. Marabotto 1 , A. Moscatelli 1 , N. De Bortoli 2 , L. Bruzzone1 , L. Gemignani1 , P. Zentilin 1, V. Savarino1 , E. Savarino3 1Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy; 2Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy; 3Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Surgical, Oncological and Gastroenterological Sciences, University of Padua, Padua, Italy