Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Lorenzo Tosco is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Lorenzo Tosco.


Urologic Oncology-seminars and Original Investigations | 2015

Natural history of surgically treated high-risk prostate cancer

Alberto Briganti; R.J. Karnes; Giorgio Gandaglia; M. Spahn; Paolo Gontero; Lorenzo Tosco; Burkhard Kneitz; Felix K.-H. Chun; E. Zaffuto; Maxine Sun; Markus Graefen; Giansilvio Marchioro; D. Frohneberg; Simone Giona; Pierre I. Karakiewicz; Hein Van Poppel; Francesco Montorsi; Steven Joniau

BACKGROUND No data exist on the patterns of biochemical recurrence (BCR) and their effect on survival in patients with high-risk prostate cancer (PCa) treated with surgery. The aim of our investigation was to evaluate the natural history of PCa in patients treated with radical prostatectomy (RP) alone. MATERIALS AND METHODS Overall, 2,065 patients with high-risk PCa treated with RP at 7 tertiary referral centers between 1991 and 2011 were identified. First, we calculated the probability of experiencing BCR after surgery. Particularly, we relied on conditional survival estimates for BCR after RP. Competing-risks regression analyses were then used to evaluate the effect of time to BCR on the risk of cancer-specific mortality (CSM). RESULTS Median follow-up was 70 months. Overall, the 5-year BCR-free survival rate was 55.2%. Given the BCR-free survivorship at 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 years, the BCR-free survival rates improved by+7.6%,+4.1%,+4.8%,+3.2%, and+3.7%, respectively. Overall, the 10-year CSM rate was 14.8%. When patients were stratified according to time to BCR, patients experiencing BCR within 36 months from surgery had higher 10-year CSM rates compared with those experiencing late BCR (19.1% vs. 4.4%; P<0.001). At multivariate analyses, time to BCR represented an independent predictor of CSM (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS Increasing time from surgery is associated with a reduction of the risk of subsequent BCR. Additionally, time to BCR represents a predictor of CSM in these patients. These results might help provide clinicians with better follow-up strategies and more aggressive treatments for early BCR.


European Urology | 2013

Survival and impact of clinical prognostic factors in surgically treated metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

Lorenzo Tosco; Hendrik Van Poppel; Bruno Frea; Giorgia Gregoraci; Steven Joniau

BACKGROUND The survival impact of metastasectomy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) is still an active research field, particularly in the multimodal/targeted therapy era. OBJECTIVE To determine the survival impact of clinical prognostic factors and their application to stratification of patients according to their prognosis so clinicians may be aided in their management of mRCC. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Retrospective, bi-institutional cohort study of 109 consecutive patients (71 male and 38 female; median age: 62 yr (range: 25-82 yr) with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) who underwent partial or radical nephrectomy and at least one metastasectomy for mRCC. INTERVENTION Metastasis resection from various anatomic sites with the aim of completely removing detected lesions. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS Univariable and multivariable Cox regression models were used to analyse the impact of clinical prognostic factors on cancer-specific survival (CSS). Kaplan-Meier analysis with the log-rank test was used to compare CSS. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed to test accuracy of prognostic groups. The α error for statistical significance was set at 0.05. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS Multivariable analysis revealed that primary tumour T stage ≥ 3 (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.8; p<0.01), primary tumour Fuhrman grade ≥ 3 (HR: 2.3; p<0.03), nonpulmonary metastases (HR: 3.1; p<0.03), disease-free interval ≤ 12 mo (HR: 2.3; p<0.058), and multiorgan metastases (HR: 2.5; p<0.04) were independent pretreatment prognostic factors. Leuven-Udine (LU) prognostic groups based on these covariates were created and analysed with Kaplan-Meier and log-rank tests. The 2- and 5-yr CSS were significantly different; the respective group A CSS rates were 95.8% and 83.1%; group B, 89.9% and 56.4%; group C, 65.6% and 32.6%; and group D, 24.7% and 0% (p<0.0001). ROC analysis on the accuracy of prognostic grouping revealed respective areas under the curve of 0.87 and 0.88 at 2 and 5 yr. Main limitations to present study are the retrospective design and the presence of different metastasis sites. CONCLUSIONS LU prognostic groups could be considered an accurate clinical tool to stratify patients according to prognosis and aid clinicians in the management of mRCC.


European Urology | 2017

Long-term Impact of Adjuvant Versus Early Salvage Radiation Therapy in pT3N0 Prostate Cancer Patients Treated with Radical Prostatectomy: Results from a Multi-institutional Series ☆

Nicola Fossati; R. Jeffrey Karnes; Stephen A. Boorjian; Marco Moschini; Alessandro Morlacco; Alberto Bossi; Thomas Seisen; C. Cozzarini; C. Fiorino; Barbara Noris Chiorda; Giorgio Gandaglia; Paolo Dell’Oglio; Steven Joniau; Lorenzo Tosco; Shahrokh F. Shariat; Gregor Goldner; Wolfgang Hinkelbein; Detlef Bartkowiak; Karin Haustermans; Bertrand Tombal; Francesco Montorsi; Hein Van Poppel; Thomas Wiegel; Alberto Briganti

BACKGROUND Three prospective randomised trials reported discordant findings regarding the impact of adjuvant radiation therapy (aRT) versus observation for metastasis-free survival (MFS) and overall survival (OS) among patients with pT3N0 prostate cancer treated with radical prostatectomy (RP). None of these trials systematically included patients who underwent early salvage radiation therapy (esRT). OBJECTIVE To test the hypothesis that aRT was associated with better cancer control and survival compared with observation followed by esRT. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Using a multi-institutional cohort from seven tertiary referral centres, we retrospectively identified 510 pT3pN0 patients with undetectable prostate-specific antigen (PSA) after RP between 1996 and 2009. Patients were stratified into two groups: aRT (group 1) versus observation followed by esRT in case of PSA relapse (group 2). Specifically, esRT was administered at a PSA level ≤0.5ng/ml. INTERVENTION We compared aRT versus observation followed by esRT. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS The evaluated outcomes were MFS and OS. Multivariable Cox regression analyses tested the association between groups (aRT vs observation followed by esRT) and oncologic outcomes. Covariates consisted of pathologic stage (pT3a vs pT3b or higher), pathologic Gleason score (≤6, 7, or ≥8), surgical margin status (negative vs positive), and year of surgery. An interaction with groups and baseline patient risk was tested for the hypothesis that the impact of aRT versus observation followed by esRT was different by pathologic characteristics. The nonparametric curve fitting method was used to explore graphically the relationship between MFS and OS at 8 yr and baseline patient risk (derived from the multivariable analysis). RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS Overall, 243 patients (48%) underwent aRT, and 267 (52%) underwent initial observation. Within the latter group, 141 patients experienced PSA relapse and received esRT. Median follow-up after RP was 94 mo (interquartile range [IQR]: 53-126) and 92 mo (IQR: 70-136), respectively (p=0.2). MFS (92% vs 91%; p=0.9) and OS (89% vs 92%; p=0.9) at 8 yr after surgery were not significantly different between the two groups. These results were confirmed in multivariable analysis, in which observation followed by esRT was not associated with a significantly higher risk of distant metastasis (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.35; p=0.4) and overall mortality (HR: 1.39; p=0.4) compared with aRT. Using the nonparametric curve fitting method, a comparable proportion of MFS and OS at 8 yr among groups was observed regardless of pathologic cancer features (p=0.9 and p=0.7, respectively). Limitations consisted of the retrospective nature of the study and the relatively small size of the patient population. CONCLUSIONS At long-term follow-up, no significant differences between aRT and esRT were observed for MFS and OS. Our study, although based on retrospective data, suggests that esRT does not compromise cancer control and potentially reduces overtreatment associated with aRT. PATIENT SUMMARY At long-term follow-up, no significant differences in terms of distant metastasis and mortality were observed between immediate postoperative adjuvant radiation therapy (aRT) and initial observation followed by early salvage radiation therapy (esRT) in case of prostate-specific antigen relapse. Our study suggests that esRT does not compromise cancer control and potentially reduces overtreatment associated with aRT.


BioMed Research International | 2014

The Role of Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms in Predicting Prostate Cancer Risk and Therapeutic Decision Making

Thomas Van den Broeck; Steven Joniau; Liesbeth Clinckemalie; Christine Helsen; Stefan Prekovic; Lien Spans; Lorenzo Tosco; Hendrik Van Poppel; Frank Claessens

Prostate cancer (PCa) is a major health care problem because of its high prevalence, health-related costs, and mortality. Epidemiological studies have suggested an important role of genetics in PCa development. Because of this, an increasing number of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) had been suggested to be implicated in the development and progression of PCa. While individual SNPs are only moderately associated with PCa risk, in combination, they have a stronger, dose-dependent association, currently explaining 30% of PCa familial risk. This review aims to give a brief overview of studies in which the possible role of genetic variants was investigated in clinical settings. We will highlight the major research questions in the translation of SNP identification into clinical practice.


Current Opinion in Urology | 2013

Results of surgery for high-risk prostate cancer

Steven Joniau; Lorenzo Tosco; Alberto Briganti; Thomas Van den Broeck; Paolo Gontero; R. Jeffrey Karnes; M. Spahn; Hein Van Poppel

Purpose of review Surgery for high-risk prostate cancer (PCa) is applied frequently nowadays. Nevertheless, this approach is still surrounded by many controversies. The present review discusses the most recent literature regarding surgery for high-risk PCa. Recent findings As there is no standard definition of high-risk PCa, outcome comparison between series and treatment approaches is hampered. Nevertheless, recent radical prostatectomy series have shown excellent cancer-specific survival in patients with high-risk PCa. Even for very-high-risk PCa (cT3b-T4 or any cT, N1), surgery may be applied to highly selected patients as a first step of a multimodality approach. Recent experience with robot-assisted surgery opens new possibilities for a minimally invasive approach in this field. Patient selection for surgery was also addressed in recent studies. Excellent cancer-specific survival is seen when specimen-confined PCa is found at final histopathology; a recently published nomogram enables the prediction of specimen-confined disease. Another issue in high-risk PCa is the impact of age and comorbidities on cancer-specific and overall mortality. In a recent study, it was shown that patients with low comorbidity scores, even when at least 70 years old, had a significant risk of dying from their cancer and may benefit most from a surgical approach. A modified extended pelvic lymphadenectomy template was presented, providing optimal removal of positive lymph nodes. Summary Radical prostatectomy with extended pelvic lymphadenectomy delivers very good cancer-related outcomes in high-risk and very-high-risk PCa, often within a multimodal approach. Minimally invasive surgery and improved patient selection will be key to further improve oncological and functional outcomes.


European Urology | 2015

Pretreatment Tables Predicting Pathologic Stage of Locally Advanced Prostate Cancer

Steven Joniau; M. Spahn; Alberto Briganti; Giorgio Gandaglia; Bertrand Tombal; Lorenzo Tosco; Giansilvio Marchioro; Chao-Yu Hsu; Jochen Walz; Burkhard Kneitz; Pia Bader; D. Frohneberg; Alessandro Tizzani; Markus Graefen; Paul Van Cangh; R. Jeffrey Karnes; Francesco Montorsi; Hein Van Poppel; Paolo Gontero

BACKGROUND Pretreatment tables for the prediction of pathologic stage have been published and validated for localized prostate cancer (PCa). No such tables are available for locally advanced (cT3a) PCa. OBJECTIVE To construct tables predicting pathologic outcome after radical prostatectomy (RP) for patients with cT3a PCa with the aim to help guide treatment decisions in clinical practice. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This was a multicenter retrospective cohort study including 759 consecutive patients with cT3a PCa treated with RP between 1987 and 2010. INTERVENTION Retropubic RP and pelvic lymphadenectomy. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS Patients were divided into pretreatment prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and biopsy Gleason score (GS) subgroups. These parameters were used to construct tables predicting pathologic outcome and the presence of positive lymph nodes (LNs) after RP for cT3a PCa using ordinal logistic regression. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS In the model predicting pathologic outcome, the main effects of biopsy GS and pretreatment PSA were significant. A higher GS and/or higher PSA level was associated with a more unfavorable pathologic outcome. The validation procedure, using a repeated split-sample method, showed good predictive ability. Regression analysis also showed an increasing probability of positive LNs with increasing PSA levels and/or higher GS. Limitations of the study are the retrospective design and the long study period. CONCLUSIONS These novel tables predict pathologic stage after RP for patients with cT3a PCa based on pretreatment PSA level and biopsy GS. They can be used to guide decision making in men with locally advanced PCa. PATIENT SUMMARY Our study might provide physicians with a useful tool to predict pathologic stage in locally advanced prostate cancer that might help select patients who may need multimodal treatment.


Oncotarget | 2016

Genomic and epigenomic analysis of high-risk prostate cancer reveals changes in hydroxymethylation and TET1

Lien Spans; Thomas Van den Broeck; Elien Smeets; Stefan Prekovic; Bernard Thienpont; Diether Lambrechts; R. Jeffrey Karnes; Nicholas Erho; Mohammed Alshalalfa; Elai Davicioni; Christine Helsen; Thomas Gevaert; Lorenzo Tosco; Karin Haustermans; Evelyne Lerut; Steven Joniau; Frank Claessens

The clinical heterogeneity of prostate cancer (PCa) makes it difficult to identify those patients that could benefit from more aggressive treatments. As a contribution to a better understanding of the genomic changes in the primary tumor that are associated with the development of high-risk disease, we performed exome sequencing and copy number determination of a clinically homogeneous cohort of 47 high-risk PCas. We confirmed recurrent mutations in SPOP, PTEN and TP53 among the 850 point mutations we detected. In seven cases, we discovered genomic aberrations in the TET1 (Ten-Eleven Translocation 1) gene which encodes a DNA hydroxymethylase than can modify methylated cytosines in genomic DNA and thus is linked with gene expression changes. TET1 protein levels were reduced in tumor versus non-tumor prostate tissue in 39 of 40 cases. The clinical relevance of changes in TET1 levels was demonstrated in an independent PCa cohort, in which low TET1 mRNA levels were significantly associated with worse metastases-free survival. We also demonstrate a strong reduction in hydroxymethylated DNA in tumor tissue in 27 of 41 cases. Furthermore, we report the first exploratory (h)MeDIP-Seq analyses of eight high-risk PCa samples. This reveals a large heterogeneity in hydroxymethylation changes in tumor versus non-tumor genomes which can be linked with cell polarity.


Urologic Oncology-seminars and Original Investigations | 2016

Very long-term survival patterns of young patients treated with radical prostatectomy for high-risk prostate cancer

Paolo Dell’Oglio; R.J. Karnes; Steven Joniau; M. Spahn; Paolo Gontero; Lorenzo Tosco; Nicola Fossati; Burkhard Kneitz; Piotr Chlosta; Markus Graefen; Giansilvio Marchioro; Marco Bianchi; Rafael Sanchez-Salas; Pierre I. Karakiewicz; Hendrik Van Poppel; Francesco Montorsi; Alberto Briganti

OBJECTIVE In patients with a long life expectancy with high-risk (HR) prostate cancer (PCa), the chance to die from PCa is not negligible and may change significantly according to the time elapsed from surgery. The aim of this study was to evaluate long-term survival patterns in young patients treated with radical prostatectomy (RP) for HRPCa. MATERIALS AND METHODS Within a multiinstitutional cohort, 600 young patients (≤59 years) treated with RP between 1987 and 2012 for HRPCa (defined as at least one of the following adverse characteristics: prostate specific antigen>20, cT3 or higher, biopsy Gleason sum 8-10) were identified. Smoothed cumulative incidence plot was performed to assess cancer-specific mortality (CSM) and other cause mortality (OCM) rates at 10, 15, and 20 years after RP. The same analyses were performed to assess the 5-year probability of CSM and OCM in patients who survived 5, 10, and 15 years after RP. A multivariable competing risk regression model was fitted to identify predictors of CSM and OCM. RESULTS The 10-, 15- and 20-year CSM and OCM rates were 11.6% and 5.5% vs. 15.5% and 13.5% vs. 18.4% and 19.3%, respectively. The 5-year probability of CSM and OCM rates among patients who survived at 5, 10, and 15 years after RP, were 6.4% and 2.7% vs. 4.6% and 9.6% vs. 4.2% and 8.2%, respectively. Year of surgery, pathological stage and Gleason score, surgical margin status and lymph node invasion were the major determinants of CSM (all P≤0.03). Conversely, none of the covariates was significantly associated with OCM (all P≥ 0.09). CONCLUSIONS Very long-term cancer control in young high-risk patients after RP is highly satisfactory. The probability of dying from PCa in young patients is the leading cause of death during the first 10 years of survivorship after RP. Thereafter, mortality not related to PCa became the main cause of death. Consequently, surgery should be consider among young patients with high-risk disease and strict PCa follow-up should enforce during the first 10 years of survivorship after RP.


Frontiers in Surgery | 2016

Impact of Lymph Node Burden on Survival of High-risk Prostate Cancer Patients Following Radical Prostatectomy and Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection

Lisa Moris; Thomas Van den Broeck; Lorenzo Tosco; Anthony Van Baelen; Paolo Gontero; R.J. Karnes; Wouter Everaerts; Maarten Albersen; Patrick J. Bastian; Piotr Chlosta; Frank Claessens; Felix K.-H. Chun; Markus Graefen; Christian Gratzke; Burkhard Kneitz; Giansilvio Marchioro; Rafael Sanchez Salas; Bertrand Tombal; Henk G. van der Poel; Jochen Walz; Gert De Meerleer; Alberto Bossi; Karin Haustermans; Francesco Montorsi; Hendrik Van Poppel; Martin Spahn; Alberto Briganti; Steven Joniau

Aim To determine the impact of the extent of lymph node invasion (LNI) on long-term oncological outcomes after radical prostatectomy (RP). Material and methods In this retrospective study, we examined the data of 1,249 high-risk, non-metastatic PCa patients treated with RP and pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) between 1989 and 2011 at eight different tertiary institutions. We fitted univariate and multivariate Cox models to assess independent predictors of cancer-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS). The number of positive lymph node (LN) was dichotomized according to the most informative cutoff predicting CSS. Kaplan–Meier curves assessed CSS and OS rates. Only patients with at least 10 LNs removed at PLND were included. This cutoff was chosen as a surrogate for a well performed PNLD. Results Mean age was 65 years (median: 66, IQR 60–70). Positive surgical margins were present in 53.7% (n = 671). Final Gleason score (GS) was 2–6 in 12.7% (n = 158), 7 in 52% (n = 649), and 8–10 in 35.4% (n = 442). The median number of LNs removed during PLND was 15 (IQR 12–17). Of all patients, 1,128 (90.3%) had 0–3 positive LNs, while 126 (9.7%) had ≥4 positive LNs. Patients with 0–3 positive LNs had significantly better CSS outcome at 10-year follow-up compared to patients with ≥4 positive LNs (87 vs. 50%; p < 0.0001). Similar results were obtained for OS, with a 72 vs. 37% (p < 0.0001) survival at 10 years for patients with 0–3 vs. ≥4 positive LNs, respectively. At multivariate analysis, final GS of 8–10, salvage ADT therapy, and ≥4 (vs. <4) positive LNs were predictors of worse CSS and OS. Pathological stage pT4 was an additional predictor of worse CSS. Conclusion Four or more positive LNs, pathological stage pT4, and final GS of 8–10 represent independent predictors for worse CSS in patients with high-risk PCa. Primary tumor biology remains a strong driver of tumor progression and patients having ≥4 positive LNs could be considered an enriched patient group in which novel treatment strategies should be studied.


The Prostate | 2017

Tumor Volume and Clinical Failure in High-Risk Prostate Cancer Patients Treated With Radical Prostatectomy.

Fabio Castiglione; Paolo Dell'Oglio; Lorenzo Tosco; Wouter Everaerts; Maarten Albersen; Lukman Hakim; Thomas Van den Broeck; Lisa Moris; Frank Claessens; Alberto Briganti; Francesco Montorsi; Hein Van Poppel; Steven Joniau

To identify the most significant cut‐off of tumor volume (TV) for prediction of clinical failure (CF) among high‐risk prostate cancer (hPCa) patients.

Collaboration


Dive into the Lorenzo Tosco's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Bertrand Tombal

Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Alberto Briganti

Vita-Salute San Raffaele University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Giansilvio Marchioro

University of Eastern Piedmont

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Hendrik Van Poppel

Katholieke Universiteit Leuven

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Karin Haustermans

Katholieke Universiteit Leuven

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge