Lori Buswell

RTOG's first quality of life study--RTOG 90-20: a phase II trial of external beam radiation with etanidazole for locally advanced prostate cancer.

PURPOSE To assess institutional and patient compliance with quality of life (QL) instruments in RTOG clinical trials. To assess feasibility of using the Functional Assessment Cancer Therapy (FACT), Sexual Adjustment Questionnaire (SAQ), and Changes in Urinary Function (CUF) QL instruments in a prostate clinical trial and to compare patient self-report of symptoms to medical professional ratings of the same symptoms using the RTOG acute toxicity rating scales. METHODS AND MATERIALS Three self-assessment QL instruments, the FACT, the SAQ, and CUF, were to be administered to patients on a Phase II locally advanced prostate trial at specified time points. Specific instructions for both data managers and for patients on when, how, and why to fill out the questionnaires were included. RESULTS Sixty-seven percent (24 out of 36) of patients accrued to RTOG 90-20 completed both the initial FACT and SAQ. Eighty-five percent completed FACT at end of RT and 73% at 3 months. Eighty-one percent completed SAQ at end of treatment, while 69% completed this form at 3 months. Compliance drops off thereafter. Seventy-five percent of patients who had their symptom of dysuria rated by a medical professional as 0 on the RTOG toxicity rating scale self-reported the same. Only 56% of patient self-reports on FACT regarding diarrhea were in agreement with the medical professionals RTOG rating of 0 toxicity. The measures were determined to be in moderate agreement when the patient evaluated a symptom as a 1 on the FACT and the medical professional rated the same symptom as a 0 on the RTOG toxicity rating scale. There was moderate agreement in 13% of patients with dysuria and 31% of patients with diarrhea. Low agreement occurred when the patient evaluated a symptom as a 2 or 3 on the FACT and the medical professional rated the same symptom as a 0 on the RTOG scale. Low agreement occurred in 13% of both patients reporting dysuria and diarrhea. Differences between how medical professionals and patients were able to rate erectile function make direct comparisons difficult, but the trend towards significant discrepancies is still noteworthy. CONCLUSIONS Quality of life assessments are necessary and attainable in RTOG clinical trials. Compliance rates for both institutional and patient participation were acceptable at initial and 3 month follow-up. Reasons for noncompliance were predominantly institution related and not patient related. Strategies to address both institution and patient compliance have been developed and implemented within the RTOG. Serious disagreement between patient self-reports of symptoms on the FACT QL scale and medical professional ratings on the RTOG acute toxicity rating scales of the same symptoms was 13% at 3 months follow-up. This warrants continued use of QL self-assessments in clinical trials.

Radiation-Associated Morbidity in Patients Undergoing Small-Field External Beam Irradiation for Prostate Cancer

PURPOSE To quantify complication rates after small-field external beam irradiation for adenocarcinoma of the prostate in a uniformly treated patient population with long follow-up using a simple tool designed to identify subtle treatment-related side effects; and to identify clinical and technical variables associated with increased morbidity after irradiation. METHODS AND MATERIALS A total of 441 patients with nonmetastatic adenocarcinoma of the prostate treated at the Joint Center for Radiation Therapy between 1985 and 1989 were eligible for analysis. Gastrointestinal, genitourinary, and sexual function were assessed retrospectively using a patient self-scoring, five-grade toxicity scale. Seven clinical and 15 technical variables were recorded for each patient. The association between the clinical and technical variables and rectal, bladder, and sexual side effects was examined. The 375 patients who received small-field (<12.5 x 12.5-cm) external beam irradiation via a four-field box on a 6-MV (n = 74, or 20% of patients), 8-MV (n = 140, or 37%), or 15-MV (n = 161, or 43%) linear accelerator form the basis for the study. Ninety-one percent of patients received treatment with 1.8-2.0 Gy fractions to a delivered dose of at least 66 Gy. Follow-up was complete through 62 months in living patients, with five (1%) of the entire group lost to follow-up. RESULTS A total of 137 of 354 evaluable patients (39%) reported rectal complications after treatment; however, 20 patients(6%) had heme-positive stools as their only symptom and 66 (19%) had mild symptoms not requiring treatment. Only 14% of the entire group required intervention. Of 356 patients, 117 (33%) evaluable for bladder complications developed genitourinary changes: In 14 patients (4%) asymptomatic hematuria occurred, 71 (20%) had mild symptoms not requiring treatment, and 32 (9%) required treatment. Of the 171 patients who were potent prior to radiation, 106 (62%) reported impotence after treatment. No statistically significant association was identified between any clinical or technical variables (including machine energy) assessed and complications. CONCLUSIONS In this retrospective review, treatment-related bowel and bladder side effects were not identified in the majority of patients despite the use of a grading system designed to identify subtle changes. Impotence, however, was common. Although pretreatment clinical characteristics varied among patients, they could not be used to predict the subsequent development of complications. The only treatment-related characteristic that varied in this study was machine energy, which did not correlate with complications.

Phase I trial of the hypoxic cell cytotoxin tirapazamine with concurrent radiation therapy in the treatment of refractory solid tumors

PURPOSE Patients with refractory solid tumors were treated with the combination of fractionated radiation therapy and multiple-dose intravenous tirapazamine to determine the toxicities and maximum tolerated dose of tirapazamine when given concurrently with radiation therapy. METHODS Patients received radiation therapy in accordance with standard treatment practice in relation to fraction size and number of fractions for their particular cancer. In all cases, the course of radiation therapy exceeded the time of tirapazamine administration. Initially, tirapazamine was administered 5 days per week for 2 weeks for a total of 10 doses. After the first 8 patients, the schedule was changed to 3 times per week (Monday, Wednesday, Friday) for 4 weeks for a total of 12 doses. Between 3 and 6 patients were treated at each dose level. RESULTS A total of 43 patients were treated in the study between 1991 and 1995. All patients were 18 years old or older, had a Karnofsky performance status of > or = 60% and had adequate hematologic, hepatic, and renal function. Dose escalation began at 9 mg/m(2)/dose and was increased using a modified Fibonacci schema. The maximum tolerated dose was not reached and dose escalation was stopped at 260 mg/m(2) because of other data that became available suggesting 330 mg/m(2) was associated with dose-limiting toxicity (1, 2). CONCLUSION Tirapazamine in doses of up to 260 mg/m(2) times 12 doses can be given safely with fractionated radiation therapy. This dose appears to result in adequate plasma exposure (2) for radiation sensitization, and this schedule is being tested in a Phase II trial by the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group to determine if tirapazamine is a radiation enhancer in the clinic.

The efficacy of pharmacokinetic monitoring and dose modification of etanidazole on the incidence of neurotoxicity : results from a phase II trial of etanidazole and radiation therapy in locally advanced prostate cancer

Fifty-four patients have been entered on a Phase II trial to study the efficacy of etanidazole (ETA) for locally advanced prostate cancer. The primary goal was to study the incidence of and time to a complete response for patients receiving ETA and radiation therapy. The secondary goal was to prospectively evaluate the utility of pharmacokinetic monitoring and dose-modification of the incidence and severity of the dose-limiting peripheral neurotoxicity. Within a constant radiation therapy regimen, the dose of ETA was either (a) unmodified (2 g/m2, 3 times weekly for 17 doses); (b) altered by a schedule modification of either number of doses or dose adjustment; or (c) individualization of single dose size so that the total number of doses (19 doses) were maintained but the single dose size was adjusted to keep the total AUC of plasma concentration versus time to less than 40 mM-hr. Sufficient efficacy data are not yet available. The use of drug dose modification has reduced the incidence of neurotoxicity from (a) unmodified: 17/26 = 65% (1 grade II); (b) schedule adjustment: 5/9 = 55% (no grade II); and (c) individualized dose modification: 1/19 (no grade II) = 6%. The minimum number of time points needed to accurately assess the AUC will be determined. Pharmacokinetic monitoring will be important in the use of ETA so that drug underdosing can be avoided while minimizing the risk of serious neurotoxicity.

Provider Practice Models in Ambulatory Oncology Practice: Analysis of Productivity, Revenue, and Provider and Patient Satisfaction

Physicians, nurse practitioners, and physician assistants often work in teams to deliver cancer care in ambulatory oncology practices. This is likely to become more prevalent as the demand for oncology services rises, and the number of providers increases only slightly.

Pharmacokinetic monitoring and dose modification of etanidazole in the RTOG 85-27 phase III head and neck trial.

PURPOSE To prospectively evaluate the pharmacokinetic monitoring and drug dose adjustment of Etanidazole (Eta) in patients treated on the RTOG randomized trial for Stage III and IV head and neck cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS From June, 1986 to October, 1991, 521 patients were randomized to conventional RT alone or RT plus Eta. The primary goal was to determine whether the addition of Eta to conventional radiation therapy improves local-regional control and tumor-free survival. Of the 264 patients who received Eta, 233 had their drug exposure calculated and the Eta dose and schedule adjusted accordingly to prevent the occurrence of serious peripheral neuropathy. Drug exposure was assessed using the area under the curve (AUC) for a single treatment that was calculated by the integral over time of the serum concentration of Eta. The total drug exposure (total-AUC) was estimated by multiplying the AUC by the number of drug administrations. RESULTS Eighteen percent of patients developed Grade I and 6% developed Grade II peripheral neuropathy. There was no Grade 3 or 4 peripheral neuropathy. There is a trend for an increased risk of neuropathy by single dose AUC. The minimal difference in incidence of neuropathy by single-dose AUC was due to the use of dose and schedule modification for patients with the higher values. CONCLUSIONS The pharmacokinetics investigated in this study confirm previous work that monitoring Eta levels, with dose adjustment, allows it to be used safely in the clinic. In a subset analysis there was a statistically significant improvement in local-regional control and survival rates for patients with N0 and N1 disease, that will require confirmation (14). However, the clinical efficacy of Eta in this trial proved to be of little overall benefit.

Final report of the phase I trial of continuous infusion etanidazole (SR 2508): A radiation therapy oncology group study

Seventy-eight patients have been treated on a Phase I trial using continuous infusion etanidazole while undergoing brachytherapy for locally advanced tumors. There were two sequential schemata, the first treated 63 patients with doses ranging from 8-23 g/m2 over 48 hr and the second treated 15 patients with doses ranging from 20-23 g/m2 over 96 hr. The tumor sites were: brain (n = 42), cervix (n = 22), and breast (n = 14). Patients received a loading dose of etanidazole of 2 g/m2 followed by a continuous infusion for a total of 48 or 96 hr while radioactive implants were in place. Of the 63 patients in the 48-hr study, 52 were entered at doses of less than or equal to 21 g/m2 and there were no definite neuropathies but two patients with the cramping/arthralgia syndrome. Of the 11 patients entered at 22-23 g/m2, 1 patient had symptoms of peripheral neuropathy (Grade II) and 6 had the cramping/arthralgia syndrome. This is a new syndrome, distinct from the peripheral neuropathy, characterized by transient alterations in sensations consisting of cramping, arthralgias, or tingling that resolved completely at intervals varying from a few hours to about 1 week post-treatment. The cramping/arthralgia syndrome limited dose escalation; therefore, the maximum tolerated dose over 48 hr was determined to be 20-21 g/m2. The 96-hr infusion was limited to patients with recurrent gliomas undergoing stereotactic implantation. To date, 15 patients have been treated with doses of 20-23 g/m2. No toxicity was encountered at doses less than or equal to 22 g/m2. At 23 g/m2, one patient developed Grade III neuropathy and three patients had mild cramping/arthralgia syndrome, for whom the drug was discontinued. Therefore, it appears the maximum tolerated dose at 96 hr will be approximately 23 g/m2, which is 10-15% higher than for the 48-hr infusion.

Distribution of etanidzole into human brain tumors: Implications for treating high grade gliomas

Etanidazole was developed as an oxygen-mimetic radiosensitizer less lipophilic than misonidazole. Sensitization depends on an adequate concentration of drug in the tumor at the time of irradiation. Therefore, due to the presence of the blood-brain barrier, brain tumors may theoretically be difficult to radiosensitize due to the hydrophilic characteristics of etanidazole. Based on previous reports of loss of BBB integrity in brain tumors, we investigated the ability of etanidazole to penetrate into malignant gliomas of patients receiving etanidazole as part of a Phase I continuous infusion protocol. The patients had completed previous external beam irradiation. Twenty-two patients were studied and their etanidazole plasma and biopsy data were compared to the 2-compartment model derived from a second group of 19 patients with bolus etanidazole. Etanidazole concentration in brain tumor biopsies varied widely and appeared to be clustered into a higher and a lower pharmacokinetic group having mean tumor to well-perfused second compartment ratios of 1 and 0.25, respectively. Both high and low etanidazole concentrations were evident in different biopsies obtained from the same patient. Correlations between histology and tissue concentrations suggested that the higher level correspond to malignant tissue. These data indicate that the blood brain barrier is disrupted to varying degrees by the brain tumor and/or prior irradiation and that etanidazole penetrates into brain tumors.

Phase II trial of external beam radiation with etanidazole (SR 2508) for the treatment of locally advanced prostate cancer

PURPOSE To evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of the addition of etanidazole (ETA) to external beam radiation. METHODS AND MATERIALS Fifty eight previously untreated patients with locally advanced adenocarcinoma of the prostate were entered on a Phase II trial of etanidazole (ETA) combined with standard external beam radiation therapy. ETA was given concurrently with irradiation. Four patients received less than 25% of the intended dose of ETA and were ineligible for further analysis. The stage of the remaining patients were T2c-11, T3-39, T4-1, bulky local recurrence after prostatectomy-1, and T3, N1-2. RESULTS Forty-five of 54 patients (83.3%) achieved a clinical complete response (CCR) in the prostate and seminal vesicles as judged by digital rectal exam (DRE). Responses were rapid with a median time to CCR of 3.4 months, range 0-22.8 months. Local control was maintained in 82% of the patients who achieved a CCR. Fifteen of 32 eligible patients with a normal DRE underwent prostate biopsies from 12-20 months after treatment, seven had negative biopsies (46.6%). Distant metastases occurred in 18 patients (33.3%). Pretreatment prostatic specific antigen (PSA), Gleason score, and stage were not associated with treatment outcome in a univariate analysis. CONCLUSION While ETA plus radiation was associated with a rapid CCR, the overall treatment outcome of these patients appeared to be similar to published reports of patients receiving RT alone. The rapid response rate may imply biologic activity of the ETA. In future trials, it may be reasonable to focus on patients at lower risk for the subsequent development of distant disease.

Combined-modality therapy of esophageal cancer with radiotherapy, etanidazole, and cisplatin-fluorouracil, with or without surgery: Neurotoxicity, other toxicities and outcome

PURPOSE To investigate whether etanidazole and cisplatin can be given safely together and to evaluate the relationship between incidence of peripheral neuropathy and cumulative exposure to etanidazole and cisplatin, as well as other toxicities and treatment outcome. METHODS AND MATERIALS Thirty-two previously untreated patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer were entered on a Phase I study of etanidazole combined with radiation therapy and chemotherapy. Cisplatin/5-FU (two cycles, weeks 1 and 4) and etanidazole (weeks 2, 3 and 5) were given concurrently with radiation therapy. Eligible patients then underwent surgical resection. All patients were scheduled to receive two additional cycles of cisplatin/5-FU chemotherapy after completion of radiation therapy (definitive arm) or surgery (preoperative arm). RESULTS Of 19 fully evaluable patients, nine (47%) developed peripheral neuropathy. Six of six patients, 65 years or older, experienced peripheral neuropathy, compared with three of 13 patients less than 65 years old (p = .003). For patients younger than 65 years, two of the two patients with single dose area under the curve (AUC) > 4.0 mMhr experienced peripheral neuropathy, compared with one of 11 patients with single-dose AUC < 4.0 mMhr (p = .03). Grade 4 toxicity included neutropenia (23%) and thrombocytopenia (26%). No other Grade 4 toxicity was observed. The pathologic complete response rate in patients who underwent surgical resection was 29%. CONCLUSION This regime of chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and etanidazole had acceptable toxicity. However, combining etanidazole and cisplatin appears to increase the risk of developing peripheral neuropathy for at least some categories of patients. Further studies of these interactions are needed.