Louis A. Leone

A randomized combined modality trial in small cell carcinoma of the lung comparison of combination chemotherapy-radiation therapy versus cyclophosphamide-radiation therapy effects of maintenance chemotherapy and prophylactic whole brain irradiation

A randomized trial of combined modality therapy employing combination chemotherapy (cyclophosphamide (CTX) and methotrexate (MTX), CTX, MTX and Vincristine (VCR) and CTX, VCR and high‐dose MTX with citrovorum rescue) and radiation therapy was compared to cyclophosphamide and radiation therapy in 258 patients with pulmonary small cell carcinoma. Patients were also randomized: 1) to determine the effects of prophylactic whole brain irradiation; and 2) to establish the effects of maintenance chemotherapy. Survival, frequency of response and site of relapse were different in patients with limited disease (LD) (disease confined to lung, mediastinum and supraclavicular lymph nodes) when compared with disease spread beyond these sites (extensive disease) (ED). No survival advantage was seen in LD when combination chemotherapy was employed, although the frequency of complete remission was greater with three drugs than with one or two drugs (48% vs. 32%). In ED frequency of response was greater for three drugs than for one and two drugs (60% vs. 40%), but there was no survival advantage. The median survival time for complete responders was similar for limited or extensive disease (12.1 months), but 23.8% were alive at 24 months with LD compared to none with ED. Maintenance chemotherapy significantly prolonged survival by 16.8 months with 33% alive at 24 months compared to 9% who were unmaintained. Prophylactic whole brain irradiation prevented brain metastases with only 4% developing this complication as compared to 18% of control subjects, but did not influence survival.

Combination chemotherapy with mastectomy or radiotherapy for stage III breast carcinoma: a Cancer and Leukemia Group B study.

One hundred thirteen evaluable patients with previously untreated stage III breast carcinoma were treated with three monthly cycles of cyclophosphamide (CYC), doxorubicin (DOX), 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), vincristine (VCR), and prednisone (PRED) (CAFVP). Subsequently, 91 (81%) were deemed operable. Patients were then randomized to receive surgery or radiotherapy (RT) to determine which of these modalities afforded better local tumor control. All patients also received 2 additional years of CAFVP in a further attempt to eradicate local disease and systemic micrometastases. Forty-one of the randomized patients have relapsed. Approximately half of the initial relapses in each arm were local. The overall duration of disease control was similar following either modality, with a median of 29.2 months for surgery patients and 24.4 months for RT patients. Similarly, there was no major difference in survival related to randomized treatment with an overall median of 39 months (median follow-up 37 months). Pre- or perimenopausal status and inflammatory disease were associated with shorter disease control and survival. Treatment was generally well tolerated and toxicity was acceptable. This study demonstrates that prolonged control of stage III breast carcinoma can be achieved with combined modality therapy in which cytotoxic chemotherapy precedes and follows treatment directly primarily at the breast tumor, using either surgery or RT. Nevertheless, new regimens must be designed if significant advances that may lead to the cure of this disease are to be achieved.

Phase I study to determine the maximum-tolerated dose of radiation in standard daily and hyperfractionated-accelerated twice-daily radiation schedules with concurrent chemotherapy for limited-stage small-cell lung cancer

PURPOSE An improvement in radiation dose schedule is necessary to increase local tumor control and survival in limited-stage small-cell lung cancer. The goal of this study was to determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) of radiation (RT) in both standard daily and hyperfractionated-accelerated (HA) twice-daily RT schedules in concurrent chemoradiation. METHODS The study design consisted of a sequential dose escalation in both daily and HA twice-daily RT regimens. RT dose to the initial volume was kept at 40 to 40.5 Gy, while it was gradually increased to the boost volume by adding a 7% to 11 % increment of total dose to subsequent cohorts. The MTD was defined as the radiation dose level at one cohort below that which resulted in more than 33% of patients experiencing grade > or = 4 acute esophagitis and/or grade > or = 3 pulmonary toxicity. The study plan included nine cohorts, five on HA twice-daily and four on daily regimens for the dose escalation. Chemotherapy consisted of three cycles of cisplatin 33 mg/m2/d on days 1 to 3 over 30 minutes, cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m2 on day 1 intravenously (IV) over 1 hour, and etoposide 80 mg/m2/d on days 1 to 3 over 1 hour every 3 weeks (PCE) and two cycles of PE. RT was started at the initiation of the fourth cycle of chemotherapy. RESULTS Fifty patients were enrolled onto the study. The median age was 60 years (range, 38-79), sex ratio 2.3:1 for male to female, weight loss less than 5% in 73%, and performance score 0 to 1 in 94% and 2 in 6% of patients. In HA twice-daily RT, grade > or = 4 acute esophagitis was noted in two of five (40%), two of seven (29%), four of six (67%), and five of six patients (86%) at 50 (1.25 Gy twice daily), 45, 50, and 55.5 Gy in 1.5 Gy twice daily, 5 d/wk, respectively. Grade > or = 3 pulmonary toxicity was not seen in any of these 24 patients. Therefore, the MTD for HA twice-daily RT was judged to be 45 Gy in 30 fractions over 3 weeks. In daily RT, grade > or = 4 acute esophagitis was noted in zero of four, zero of four, one of five (20%), and two of six patients (33%) at 56, 60, 66, and 70 Gy on a schedule of 2 Gy per fraction per day, five fractions per week. Grade > or = 3 pneumonitis was not observed in any of the 19 patients. Thus, the MTD for daily RT was judged to be at least 70 Gy in 35 fractions over 7 weeks. Grade 4 granulocytopenia and thrombocytopenia were observed in 53% and 6% of patients, respectively, during the first three cycles of PCE. During chemotherapy cycles 4 to 5, grade 4 granulocytopenia and thrombocytopenia were noted in 43% and 29% of patients at 45 Gy in 30 fractions over 3 weeks (MTD) by HA twice-daily RT and 50% and 17% at 70 Gy in 35 fractions over 7 weeks (MTD) by daily RT, respectively. The overall tumor response consisted of complete remission (CR) in 51% (24 of 47), partial remission (PR) in 38% (1 8 of 47), and stable disease in 2% (one of 47). The median survival time of all patients was 24.4 months and 2- and 3-year survival rates were 53% and 28%, respectively. With regard to the different radiation schedules, 2- and 3-year survival rates were 52% and 25% for the HA twice-daily and 54% and 35% for the daily RT cohorts. CONCLUSION The MTD of HA twice-daily RT was determined to be 45 Gy in 30 fractions over 3 weeks, while it was judged to be at least 70 Gy in 35 fractions over 7 weeks for daily RT. A phase III randomized trial to compare standard daily RT with HA twice-daily RT at their MTD for local tumor control and survival would be a sensible research in searching for a more effective RT dose-schedule than those that are being used currently.

Phase I trial of outpatient weekly paclitaxel and concurrent radiation therapy for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.

PURPOSE To determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) and dose-limiting toxicities of paclitaxel administered weekly on an outpatient basis with concurrent thoracic radiation to patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS In this phase I clinical trial, paclitaxel was administered as a 3-hour intravenous (IV) infusion, repeated every week for 6 weeks. The starting dose of paclitaxel was 10 mg/m2. Doses were escalated at 10-mg/m2 increments in successive cohorts of three new patients if tolerated. Unacceptable toxicity was defined as grade 3 nonhematologic toxicity, excluding nausea and vomiting, and grade 4 hematologic toxicity according to Cancer and Leukemia Group B expanded common toxicity criteria. Radiation was administered to the primary tumor and regional lymph nodes (40 Gy) followed by a boost to the tumor (20 Gy). RESULTS Twenty-seven patients were entered onto this study through seven dose escalations (from 10 mg/m2/wk to 70 mg/m2/wk for 6 weeks). Severe esophagitis occurred at 70 mg/m2 (two patients with grade 4 disease and one patient with grade 2). One of six patients at 60 mg/m2 developed grade 3 esophagitis and three of seven patients had grade 2 esophagitis. One of 27 patients developed a hypersensitivity reaction. One of 27 patients developed grade 3 neutropenia. CONCLUSION Esophagitis is the principle dose-limiting toxicity of weekly paclitaxel and thoracic radiation in the outpatient setting. A phase II trial using concurrent radiation and paclitaxel at the MTD of 60 mg/m2/wk is underway.

Phase I trial of weekly paclitaxel in advanced lung cancer.

PURPOSE We conducted a phase I study in chemotherapy-naive patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) to determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) of paclitaxel using an extended weekly schedule. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with stage IIIB/IV NSCLC were treated with paclitaxel administered weekly over 3 hours for 6 weeks of an 8-week cycle. Doses were modified for granulocyte counts less than 1,800/microL or neurotoxicity greater than grade I. Groups of three patients were entered at each dose level. The dose was escalated to the next level if less than 50% of patients developed unacceptable toxicity and received more than 80% of the intended first-cycle dose. RESULTS Twenty-six patients were entered through six dose levels (100, 125, 135, 150, 175, and 200 mg/m2/wk). Four of six patients at the 175-mg/m2 dose level and only one of six patients at the 200-mg/m2 level received all scheduled doses of paclitaxel during cycle 1. Neutropenia was dose-limiting. Fourteen patients were treated with subsequent cycles of paclitaxel. Grade II to III neuropathy developed in five of 24 patients. It occurred more commonly with greater duration of therapy, but improved following dose reduction. Nine of 26 (35% +/- 10%) patients demonstrated an objective response. CONCLUSION The MTD of paclitaxel using a weekly schedule is 175 mg/m2/wk for 6 of 8 weeks. Neutropenia limits dosing acutely, but neuropathy is limiting with sustained therapy. This schedule of paclitaxel results in a twofold to threefold increase in dose-intensity with less toxicity than anticipated from conventional dosing. Further evaluation of this schedule is warranted to assess efficacy and toxicity of prolonged administration.

A randomized comparison of melphalan versus melphalan plus hexamethylmelamine versus adriamycin plus cyclophosphamide in ovarian carcinoma

A prospective randomized study was conducted in women with suboptimal (>3 cm residual) Stage III, Stage IV, and recurrent ovarian adenocarcinoma to determine if combination chemotherapy is more effective than melphalan alone in achieving remission and improving survival. Of 233 evaluable patients with measurable disease, there were 64 treated with melphalan alone, of whom 20% achieved a clinical complete response and 17%, a partial response. Of the 97 patients receiving melphalan plus hexamethylmelamine, 28% achieved complete response compared with 32% of 72 patients given Adriamycin plus cyclophosphamide. The partial response rates for the combinations were 24% and 17%, respectively. The effect of these treatments was assessed in an additional 136 evaluable patients without measurable disease by progression‐free interval and duration of survival. After statistically adjusting for distribution of cell type and grade, the clinical complete response rate for Adriamycin and cyclophosphamide (32%) in measurable cases was significantly higher (P = 0.04) than for melphalan alone. However, this combination did not improve median survival (12.3, 13.5, and 14.2 months, respectively, for M, M + H, and A + C). None of the other parameters showed a statistically significant advantage for combination chemotherapy, but the combinations caused more hematologic and gastrointestinal toxicity.

Treatment of carcinoma of the head and neck with intravenous methotrexate

Partial (9 patients) or complete (11 patients) remission occurred in 20 of 35 patients (57%) with epidermoid carcinoma of the head and neck treated with high‐dose intravenous methotrexate. Weekly doses of 60 mg/sq m injected intravenously were used for periods up to 8 to 12 weeks to induce remission. Remission duration ranged from 23 to 604 days, with a mean of 128 days. The same dose administered at 3‐ to 4‐week intervals served to maintain remission. Moderate toxicity occurred except in patients treated twice weekly at a dose of 40 mg/sq m (5 patients) when intoxication was severe.

A comparison of intermittent vs. continuous and of adriamycin vs. methotrexate 5-drug chemotherapy for advanced breast cancer A Cancer and Leukemia Group B study

THE THERAPEUTIC EFFECTIVENESS OF INTERMITTENT vs. continuous combination chemotherapy and of the substitution of adriamycin for methotrexate in a 5-drug regimen was evaluated in women with metastatic breast carcinoma. Patients were randomly allocated to receive continuous therapy with cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, 5-fluo-rouracil, vincristine, prednisone (CMFVP-C, 86 patients), intermittent CMFVP (CMFVP-I, 109 patients), or intermittent CAFVP (107 patients). The CR + PR rate with CAFVP (71%) was superior to CMFVP-C (50%, p = 0.003) and to CMFVP-I (50%, p = 0.002). The remission duration with CAFVP (14 months, median) was superior to CMFVP-I (7 months) (p < 0.01), and tended to be superior to CMFVP-C (9 months) (p = 0.07). There was a survival advantage of CAFVP (19 months, median) over CMFVP-I (13 months) (p = 0.01), but not over CMFVP-C (16 months) (p = 0.24). Among CR + PR patients, the survival with CAFVP (29 months, median) was superior (p = 0.02) to both CMFVP-I (18 months) and CMFVP-C (21 months). The CMFVP-C regimen was associated with the highest incidence of leukopenia and neurologic toxicity, but the lowest incidence of GI toxicity. The results indicate that the CAFVP regimen is well tolerated and is superior to the CMFVP regimens.

A randomized trial of five and three drug chemotherapy and chemoimmunotherapy in women with operable node positive breast cancer.

Women with breast carcinoma and four or more involved ipsilateral axillary lymph nodes were randomly assigned to receive an induction course and 2 yr of maintenance chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil (CMF, 150 patients), CMF plus vincristine and prednisone (CMFVP, 166 patients), or chemoimmunotherapy with CMF plus the methanol extraction residue of BCG (CMF-MER, 85 patients). After 5 yr of accrual and a median follow-up of 34 mo, CMFVP is superior to CMF (p less than 0.01) with disease-free survival estimates at 4 yr of 60% for CMFVP compared to 45% for CMF. The disease-free survival advantage of CMFVP over CMF was greater in postmenopausal (p = 0.02) than in premenopausal patients (p = 0.09). CMF-MER was similar to CMF alone. CMF related side effects were similar in each regimen (see text), except for a greater incidence of leukopenia during induction with CMF than with CMFVP (p less than 0.01).

Surgical Resection Is Necessary To Maximize Tumor Control in Function-Preserving, Aggressive Chemoradiation Protocols for Advanced Squamous Cancer of the Head and Neck (Stage III and IV)

Background:The role of surgery in aggressive chemoradiation protocols for advanced head and neck cancer has been questioned because of the quoted high clinical response rates in many series.Methods:The role of surgical resection was examined in an aggressive neoadjuvant protocol of weekly paclitaxel, carboplatin, and radiation for stage III and IV with completion of radiation to 72 Gy if biopsy at the primary site was negative after administration of 45 Gy. Of 43 patients enrolled, 38 completed the protocol. The clinical response was 100% (including 18 complete and 20 partial responses).Results:The complete pathologic response (negative primary site biopsy at 45 Gy) was 25 of 38 (66%). Of patients who presented with N1 to N3 nodes, neck dissection revealed residual nodal metastases in 22%. Surgical resection of the primary site was required in 13 patients, including 5 with larynx cancer and 2 with base of tongue cancers. Four patients had resection with reconstruction for advanced mandible floor of mouth cancer, and one had resection of nasal-maxillary cancer. Functional resection was performed in 9 of 12 patients. The median progression free and overall survival was 64% and 68%, respectively, at median follow-up of 50 months. Nine patients developed recurrence (three local and six distant). There were no failures in the neck. Salvage surgery was performed in one patient with local and one with distant disease.Conclusions:Surgical resection is an essential component of aggressive chemoradiation protocols to ensure tumor control at the primary site and in the neck.