Louis A. VanderMolen

Treatment of Kidney Cancer with Autologous Tumor Cell Vaccines of Short-Term Cell Lines Derived from Renal Cell Carcinoma

BACKGROUND We established short-term cultures of autologous tumors from patients with renal carcinoma for use as active specific immunotherapy (i.e., autologous vaccine). METHODS Between 9/91 and 9/99 the cell biology laboratory of the Hoag Cancer Center received 69 kidney tumor samples that had been surgically excised, including 43 primary tumors and 26 metastatic lesions. Efforts were made to establish short-term tumor cell cultures to use as autologous tumor cell vaccines. Prior to treatment, patients underwent a baseline skin test for delayed tumor hypersensitivity (DTH) and then received s.c. injections of 10 million irradiated tumor cells that were given with various adjuvants weekly x3 and then monthly x5. RESULTS Cell lines were established for 55/69 patients (80%) including 36/43 (84%) from primary tumors and 19/26 (73%) from distant metastases. Vaccines were prepared for 41 patients; 27 were treated. At the time of this analysis, follow up data was available for 26 patients with a median follow up > 5 years. Treatment was well-tolerated. Of 10 patients who had no evident disease at the time of treatment, nine were alive 1-8 years later; 5/8 had conversion of their DTH test from negative to positive. For 16 patients with measurable metastatic disease at the time of treatment, there were no objective tumor responses; their median survival was 5.0 months. Among these 16 patients, only 1/8 DTH tests converted, but three had a positive baseline DTH test; one was previously treated with interleukin-2 and tumor infiltrating lymphocytes and two others were previously treated with autolymphocyte therapy. CONCLUSIONS Vaccine therapy with short-term cultures of autologous tumor cells is feasible, well-tolerated and associated with conversion of DTH and long-term survival in patients who are free of disease at the time treatment is initiated. However, significant anti-tumor responses were not seen in patients with measurable disease at the time vaccine treatment was initiated.

Should High-Dose Interleukin-2 Still Be the Preferred Treatment for Patients with Metastatic Melanoma?

For more than 20 years interleukin-2 (IL2) was the preferred treatment for medically fit metastatic melanoma patients, but recently two new agents, ipilimumab and vemurafenib, were approved for stage IV disease. Single-institution data were used to determine the long-term survival rate for IL2-treated melanoma patients, and whether use of inpatient IL2 had declined recently. Between May 1987 and April 2010, 150 patients were hospitalized for high-dose, intravenous (i.v.) IL2. The average number of IL2 patients increased from 5.4 per year during 1987-1991 to 5.8 during 1992-1997 after regulatory approval of IL2, to 8.3 during 1998-2006 after a marketing indication in metastatic melanoma was granted, but dropped to 3.0 during 2007-2010. At the time of treatment, median age was 52 years; 27% were 60 years of age or older. At the time of analysis 122 patients were deceased. Median survival from the start date of IL2 treatment was 15.6 months, with a 20% 5-year survival. Among patients enrolled in clinical trials, there were as many nonresponders who survived 5 years as responders, which is consistent with a delayed immunotherapy benefit. In the absence of long-term survival data for these newer agents, IL2 probably should still be the preferred initial treatment for most patients with metastatic melanoma who are medically fit.

Should high-dose interleukin-2 still be the preferred treatment for patients with metastatic renal cell cancer?

Interleukin-2 (IL-2) was the preferred treatment for medically fit patients with advanced kidney cancer, but recently, several targeted therapies have been approved for metastatic renal cell carcinoma. We wished to determine the long-term survival rate for patients with kidney cancer treated with IL-2 and whether the use of intense inpatient IL-2 has declined since the introduction of targeted therapies. Patients who received IL-2 were identified from clinical trial enrollment, pharmacy logs, and financial billing records. Survival was determined from the earliest date of IL-2 therapy. There were 79 patients hospitalized for high-dose infusional IL-2 between March 1989 and March 2009. Median age was 58 years, and 27% were older than 65 years at the time of treatment. At the time of this analysis, 72 patients had deceased. Median survival was 9.9 months, but 5-year survival was 19.4%. The average number of patients with IL-2 increased from 2.2 per year during 1989-1992 to 5.6 during 1993-2001 after FDA approval, but dropped to 2.0 during 2002-2009. High-dose IL-2 is associated with a 5-year survival rate that is higher than objective response rates, suggesting a delayed immunotherapy benefit for some patients. The use of intensive IL-2 has declined dramatically in recent years, but unless a long-term survival benefit can be shown for these new targeted products, we feel that inpatient IL-2 remains the preferred initial treatment.

High-dose Chemotherapy and Autologous Stem Cell Rescue for Metastatic Breast Cancer: Superior Survival for Tandem Compared With Single Transplants

During 1990–1999, we treated 60 patients with breast cancer who had distant metastases with high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell rescue (HDC) after they had responded to induction chemotherapy. HDC regimens were MiTepa (60 mg/m2 mitoxantrone by continuous intravenous infusion over 3 days plus 300 mg/m2 thiotepa intravenously over 2 hours daily × 3 days) and ICE (12 g/m2 ifosfamide, 1800 mg/m2 carboplatin, 2 g/m2 etoposide; all 3 by continuous intravenous over 4 days). At a median follow up >8 years, the median failure-free survival (FFS) was 13.9 months, median overall survival (OS) 29.1 months, 5-year FFS 12%s and 5-year OS 25%. Thirty-three patients underwent tandem (T) transplants; 27 underwent a single (S) HDC. Median ages for these 2 groups were 45 and 48 years; bone and liver metastases were more prevalent in the T cohort, whereas lung metastases were more prevalent in the S cohort. At a median follow up of 6.5 years for the S group and >9 years for the T group, there were 52 deaths. FFS was better for T: median 15.7 versus 7.7 months (p2 = 0.010) as was OS: median 32.7 versus 17.7 months, 2-year survival 68% versus 41%, and 5-year survival 32% versus 15% (p2 = 0.010). As a group, patients with distant metastatic breast cancer who underwent tandem transplants had a better posttransplant survival than patients who underwent a single HDC.

Does continuous-infusion interleukin-2 increase survival in metastatic melanoma?

&NA Pharmacy logbooks and clinical trial records were used to identify all 60 patients with metastatic melanoma who were treated as inpatients with intermediate-dose, continuous-infusion interleukin-2 (IL-2) in Hoag Hospital during 1987 to 1998. The hospital tumor registry was used to identify contemporary controls who had not received inpatient IL-2, matched for having distant metastatic melanoma, and by year and stage at original diagnosis, gender, and age. The mean time from original diagnosis to the documentation of distant metastatic disease was similar in both groups, 24 to 26 months. From the date of starting IL-2 therapy, patients had a median survival of 8.8 months, 38% 1‐year survival, and 20% 5‐year survival, with 8 patients alive beyond 5 years. However, there was no difference in survival from the first date of distant metastatic disease (median 25.8 months for IL‐2 versus 31.5 months for controls, with survival rates 5 years after metastatic disease of 26% versus 31%). There was also no difference in overall survival from the date of original diagnosis (60.1 months for the IL‐2 group versus 86.3 months for controls, with 5‐year survival rates of 51% versus 64%, and 10‐year survival rates of 29% versus 33%). This single‐institution study failed to establish a survival advantage for patients with metastatic melanoma who received intermediate‐dose, continuous‐infusion IL‐2 administered in the inpatient setting, compared to contemporary, matched‐control patients who never received inpatient IL‐2 therapy. However, the 5‐year survival rates after a diagnosis of distant metastatic disease were a surprisingly high 26% to 31% in both groups. In the absence of a control group, the survival impact of IL‐2 has probably been overestimated from singlearm phase II and III trials.

A retrospective study of induction chemotherapy with docetaxel, cisplatinum, and 5-fluorouracil followed by concurrent radiotherapy with cetuximab in locally advanced head and neck cancer.

BACKGROUND The objective was to study the results of induction chemotherapy followed by external beam radiation therapy with concurrent cetuximab in the treatment of locally advanced head and neck cancer. METHODS Seventeen patients with stage III or IV squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck who received docetaxel, cisplatinum, and 5-fluorouracil followed by radiation therapy with concurrent cetuximab were retrospectively analyzed. All radiation was delivered with image-guided intensity-modulated radiation treatments. Primary end points analyzed were local control and overall survival. RESULTS With a median follow-up of 17 months, the approximate 2-year local control was 85%, with overall survival being 91%. At time of last follow-up, only 1 death was observed, with the cause of death unknown. Two local failures were observed, and the patients were under active management for their recurrences at time of last follow-up. No distant metastatic failures were noted among the patients. CONCLUSIONS Induction chemotherapy with docetaxel, cisplatinum, and 5-fluorouracil followed by concurrent radiation with cetuximab provides for excellent locoregional control of disease. Future prospective studies can better establish the efficacy of this treatment regimen to current favored protocols.

Abstract 5027: Steadily improving survival in lung cancer

Background and Purpose: There have been many improvements in the diagnosis and management of lung cancer during the past 25 years, including better imaging and the potential for earlier diagnosis, better surgical staging and introduction of minimally invasive surgery, improved radiation technology, and introduction of several systemic cancer drugs, including targeted therapies, and acceptance of multidisciplinary approaches rather than focusing on single modalities of therapy. We examined how treatment has changed in successive eras and how this relates to survival. Patients and Methods: The Hoag Cancer Institute data base was used to identify patients with lung cancer diagnosed during 1986-2009, who were diagnosed and/or received some or all of their lung cancer treatment at Hoag Hospital within four months of diagnosis. For the four successive 5-year periods, data was summarized for patient demographics and treatment, and observed and relative 5-year survival rates were calculated. Results: Data is summarized in the table below. Conclusion: Over time there have been steady increases in median age, and in the proportion that have adenocarcinoma, are female, have local stage disease, undergo surgery alone as therapy, and receive systemic therapy with surgery as initial treatment. These changes have been associated with a 13.3 percentage point absolute increase in observed survival and an 81% relative increase. Relative 5-year survival increased from 18% to 34%, which contrasts with national data showing an increase from only 14% to 16% in the U.S. Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 102nd Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2011 Apr 2-6; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2011;71(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 5027. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2011-5027