Louis J. Glaab
Langley Research Center
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Louis J. Glaab.
The International Journal of Aviation Psychology | 2004
Lawrence J. Prinzel; James R. Comstock; Louis J. Glaab; Lynda J. Kramer; Jarvis J. Arthur; John S. Barry
The retrofit question concerns whether useful and effective synthetic vision displays are usable in aircraft that have limited-size display spaces. Two experiments were conducted to examine the efficacy of these displays and develop field-of-view and terrain texture recommendations for design. The first experiment examined issues of field of view and display size using an Asheville, North Carolina, synthetic vision database and fixed-based simulator. The second experiment was conducted on the NASA B-757 aircraft at Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport and investigated the efficacy of both head-down and head-up displays and generic and photorealistic terrain texture. Both experiments confirmed the retrofit capability and that all sizes and texturing methods were found to be viable candidates for synthetic vision displays. These results, future directions, and implications for meeting national aeronautic safety and capacity goals are discussed.
document analysis systems | 2003
Louis J. Glaab; Monica F. Hughes
The Synthetic Vision Systems General Aviation (SVS-GA) element of NASAs Aviation Safety Program is developing technology to eliminate low visibility induced General Aviation (GA) accidents through the application of synthetic vision techniques. SVS displays present computer generated 3-dimensional imagery of the surrounding terrain to greatly enhance pilots situation awareness (SA), reducing or eliminating Controlled Flight into Terrain (CFIT), as well as Low-Visibility Loss of Control (LVLOC) accidents. In addition to substantial safety benefits, SVS displays have many potential operational benefits that can lead to flight in instrument meteorological conditions (IMC) resembling those conducted in visual meteorological conditions (VMC). Potential benefits could include lower landing minimums, more approach options, reduced training time, etc. SVS conducted research will develop display concepts providing the pilot with an unobstructed view of the outside terrain, regardless of weather conditions and time of day. A critical component of SVS displays is the appropriate presentation of terrain to the pilot. The relationship between the realism of the terrain presentation and resulting enhancements of pilot SA and pilot performance has been largely undefined. Comprised of coordinated simulation and flight test efforts, the terrain portrayal for head-down displays (TP-HDD) test series examined the effects of two primary elements of terrain portrayal: variations of digital elevation model (DEM) resolution and terrain texturing. Variations in DEM resolution ranged from sparsely spaced (30 arc-sec/2,953ft) to very closely spaced data (1 arc-sec/98 ft). Variations in texture involved three primary methods: constant color, elevation-based generic, and photo-realistic, along with a secondary depth cue enhancer in the form of a fishnet grid overlay. The TP-HDD test series was designed to provide comprehensive data to enable design trades to optimize all SVS applications, as well as develop requirements and recommendations to facilitate the implementation and certification of SVS displays. The TP-HDD flight experiment utilized the NASA LaRC Cessna 206 Stationaire and evaluated eight terrain portrayal concepts in an effort to confirm and extend results from the previously conducted TP-HDD simulation experiment. A total of 15 evaluation pilots, of various qualifications, accumulated over 75 hours of dedicated research flight time at Newport News (PHF) and Roanoke (ROA), VA, airports from August through October, 2002. This report will present results from the portion of testing conducted at Roanoke, VA.
document analysis systems | 2004
M.A. Takallu; D.T. Wong; A.P. Bartolone; Monica F. Hughes; Louis J. Glaab
In support of the NASA Aviation Safety Programs Synthetic Vision Systems (SVS) Project, a series of piloted simulations were conducted to explore and quantify the relationship between candidate terrain portrayal concepts and guidance/tunnel symbology concepts, specific to General Aviation (GA). The experiments were conducted in a fixed based flight simulator equipped with two separate 6-inch Liquid Crystal Display (LCD) Head Down Displays, one serving as a glass cockpit style Primary Flight Display (PFD) and the other as a Navigation Display (ND). This work is the second part of a three-part study related to the Symbology Development for Head Down Displays (SD-HDD) test series. The focus of this experiment was on advanced low altitude en route maneuvers simulating a transition into Instrument Metrological Conditions (IMC) in the central mountains of Alaska (Merrill Pass). A total of 18 GA pilots, with three levels of pilot experience, evaluated a test matrix of four terrain portrayal concepts (TPC) and six guidance/tunnel symbology (GSC) concepts. Both quantitative and qualitative measures were recorded and analyzed. Quantitative measures included all pilot/aircraft performance data, flight technical errors (FTE), flight control inputs, and selected physiological data. The qualitative measures included pilot comments and pilot responses to the structured questionnaires such as perceived workload, subjective Situation Awareness (SA), pilot preferences, and the rare event recognition. Only a sample of the results of FTE, SA and workload is reported here. There were statistically significant effects found from GSC and TPC but no significant interactions between TPCs and GSCs for this experiment. Lower FTE and increased SA were achieved using SVS displays, as compared to the baseline Pitch/Roll Flight Director (PRFD) and Blue Sky Brown Ground (BSBG) combination. These results indicate that all pilots performed very well, mostly within the 75ft of vertical and lateral limits indicated by one dot of the course deviation indicators. With the same SVS training provided to all three groups, low time VFR pilots performed as well as IFR pilots in low altitude en-route scenario with IMC. Overall those GSCs that have both Guidance Cue and Tunnel performed better than the other concepts.
General Aviation Technology Conference & Exhibition | 2002
Louis J. Glaab; Mohammad A. Takallu
ABSTRACT An experimental investigation was conducted to study the effectiveness of Synthetic Vision Systems (SVS) flight displays as a means of eliminating Low Visibility Loss of Control (LVLOC) and Controlled Flight Into Terrain (CFIT) accidents by low time general viation a(GA) pilots. A series of basic maneuvers were performed by 18 subject pilots during transition from Visual Meteorological Conditions (VMC) to Instrument Meteorological Conditions (IMC), with continued flight into IMC, employing a fixed-based flight simulator. A total of three display concepts were employed for this evaluation. One display concept, referred to as the Attitude Indicator (AI) replicated instrumentation common in today’s General Aviation (GA) aircraft. The second display concept, referred to as the Electronic Attitude Indicator (EAI), featured an enlarged attitude indicator that was more representative of a “glass display” that also included advanced flight symbology, such as a velocity vector. The third concept, referred to as the VS display, Swas identical to the EAI except that computer-generated terrain imagery replaced the conventional blue-sky/brown-ground of the EAI. Pilot performance parameters, pilot control inputs and physiological data were recorded for post-test analysis. Situation awareness (SA) and qualitative pilot comments were obtained through questionnaires and free-form interviews administered immediately after the experimental session. Initial pilot performance data were obtained by instructor pilot observations. Physiological data (skin temperature, heart rate, and muscle flexure) were also recorded. Preliminary results indicate that far less errors were committed when using the EAI and SVS displays than when using conventional instruments. The specific data example examined in this report illustrates the benefit from SVS displays to avoid massive loss of SA conditions. All pilots acknowledged the enhanced situation awareness provided by the SVS display concept. Levels of pilot stress appear to be correlated ith skin temperaturew measurements.
Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting | 2003
Lawrence J. Prinzel; Monica F. Hughes; Jarvis J. Arthur; Lynda J. Kramer; Louis J. Glaab; Randy E. Bailey; Russell V. Parrish; Michael D. Uenking
Because restricted visibility has been implicated in the majority of commercial and general aviation accidents, solutions will need to focus on how to enhance safety during instrument meteorological conditions (IMC). The NASA Synthetic Vision Systems (SVS) project is developing technologies to help achieve these goals through the synthetic presentation of how the outside world would look to the pilot if vision were not reduced. The potential safety outcome would be a significant reduction in several accident categories, such as controlled-flight-into-terrain (CFIT), that have restricted visibility as a causal factor. The paper describes two experiments that demonstrated the efficacy of synthetic vision technology to prevent CFIT accidents for both general aviation and commercial aircraft.
Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering | 2005
Anthony P. Bartolone; Louis J. Glaab; Monica F. Hughes; Russell V. Parrish
Synthetic Vision Systems (SVS) displays provide pilots with a continuous view of terrain combined with integrated guidance symbology in an effort to increase situation awareness (SA) and decrease workload during operations in Instrument Meteorological Conditions (IMC). It is hypothesized that SVS displays can replicate the safety and operational flexibility of flight in Visual Meteorological Conditions (VMC), regardless of actual out-the-window (OTW) visibility or time of day. Throughout the course of recent SVS research, significant progress has been made towards evolving SVS displays as well as demonstrating their ability to increase SA compared to conventional avionics in a variety of conditions. While a substantial amount of data has been accumulated demonstrating the capabilities of SVS displays, the ability of SVS to replicate the safety and operational flexibility of VMC flight performance in all visibility conditions is unknown to any specific degree. The previous piloted simulations and flight tests have shown better SA and path precision is achievable with SVS displays without causing an increase in workload, however none of the previous SVS research attempted to fully capture the significance of SVS displays in terms of their contribution to safety or operational benefits. In order to more fully quantify the relationship of flight operations in IMC with SVS displays to conventional operations conducted in VMC, a fundamental comparison to current day general aviation (GA) flight instruments was warranted. Such a comparison could begin to establish the extent to which SVS display concepts are capable of maintaining an “equivalent level of safety” with the round dials they could one day replace, for both current and future operations. Such a comparison was the focus of the SVS-ES experiment conducted under the Aviation Safety and Security Programs (AvSSP) GA Element of the SVS Project at NASA Langley Research Center in Hampton, Virginia. A combination of subjective and objective data measures were used in this preliminary research to quantify the relationship between selected components of safety that are associated with flying an approach. Four information display methods ranging from a “round dials” baseline through a fully integrated SVS package that includes terrain, pathway based guidance, and a strategic navigation display, were investigated in this high fidelity simulation experiment. In addition, a broad spectrum of pilots, representative of the GA population, were employed for testing in an attempt to enable greater application of the results and determine if “equivalent levels of safety” are achievable through the incorporation of SVS technology regardless of a pilots flight experience.
AIAA Infotech @ Aerospace | 2016
Michael J. Logan; Louis J. Glaab; Timothy Craig
This paper describes the results of a set of experiments and analyses conducted to evaluate the capability of small unmanned aircraft systems (sUAS) to spot nascent fires in the Great Dismal Swamp (GDS) National Wildlife Refuge. This work is the result of a partnership between the National Aeronautics and Space Administration and the US Fish and Wildlife service specifically to investigate sUAS usage for fire-spotting. The objectives of the current effort were to: 1) Determine suitability and utility of low-cost Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems (sUAS) to detect nascent fires at GDS; 2) Identify and assess the necessary National Airspace System (NAS) integration issues; and 3) Provide information to GDS and the community on system requirements and concepts-of-operation (CONOPS) for conducting fire detection/support mission in the National Airspace and (4) Identify potential applications of intelligent autonomy that would enable or benefit this high-value mission. In addition, data on the ability of various low-cost sensors to detect smoke plumes and fire hot spots was generated during the experiments as well as identifying a path towards a future practical mission utility by using sUAS in beyond visual-line-of-sight operation in the National Airspace System (NAS).
48th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference & Exhibit | 2012
David J. Anderson; Eric J. Pencil; Todd Peterson; Daniel Vento; Michelle M. Munk; Louis J. Glaab; John Dankanich
Since 2001, the In-Space Propulsion Technology (ISPT) program has been developing in-space propulsion technologies that will enable or enhance NASA robotic science missions. These in-space propulsion technologies have broad applicability to future competed Discovery and New Frontiers mission solicitations, and are potentially enabling for future NASA flagship and sample return missions currently being considered. This paper provides status of the technology development of several in-space propulsion technologies that are ready for infusion into future missions. The technologies that are ready for flight infusion are: 1) the high-temperature Advanced Material Bipropellant Rocket (AMBR) engine providing higher performance; 2) NASA s Evolutionary Xenon Thruster (NEXT) ion propulsion system, a 0.6-7 kW throttle-able gridded ion system; and 3) Aerocapture technology development with investments in a family of thermal protection system (TPS) materials and structures; guidance, navigation, and control (GNC and aerothermal effect models. Two component technologies that will be ready for flight infusion in FY12/13 are 1) Advanced Xenon Flow Control System, and 2) ultra-lightweight propellant tank technology advancements and their infusion potential will be also discussed. The paper will also describe the ISPT project s future focus on propulsion for sample return missions: 1) Mars Ascent Vehicles (MAV); 2) multi-mission technologies for Earth Entry Vehicles (MMEEV) needed for sample return missions from many different destinations; and 3) electric propulsion for sample return and low cost missions. These technologies are more vehicle-focused, and present a different set of technology infusion challenges. Systems/Mission Analysis focused on developing tools and assessing the application of propulsion technologies to a wide variety of mission concepts.
2018 Aviation Technology, Integration, and Operations Conference | 2018
Andrew J. Moore; Swee Balachandran; Steven D. Young; Evan T. Dill; Michael J. Logan; Louis J. Glaab; César A. Muñoz; Maria C. Consiglio
A set of more than 100 flight operations were conducted at NASA Langley Research Center using small UAS (sUAS) to demonstrate, test, and evaluate a set of technologies and an overarching air-ground system concept aimed at enabling safety. The research vehicle was tracked continuously during nominal traversal of planned flight paths while autonomously operating over moderately populated land. For selected flights, off-nominal risks were introduced, including vehicle-to-vehicle (V2V) encounters. Three contingency maneuvers were demonstrated that provide safe responses. These maneuvers made use of an integrated air/ground platform and two on-board autonomous capabilities. Flight data was monitored and recorded with multiple ground systems and was forwarded in real time to a UAS traffic management (UTM) server for airspace coordination and supervision.
17th AIAA Aviation Technology, Integration, and Operations Conference | 2017
Michael J. Logan; Louis J. Glaab
The Unmanned Aerial Systems (UAS) Traffic Management (UTM) project is working to provide a structure for small UAS (sUAS) operations and provide air traffic management and information services in support of future envisioned sUAS operations. One primary aspect of the UTM project is the development of the UTM server that sUAS operators would interface with to perform their missions. Another aspect of the UTM project is to perform research and analysis towards the development of sUAS vehicles that could safely operate in the UTM system. These vehicles would be required to operate beyond visual line of sight (BVLOS) of the operator, be capable of allowing one operator to operate multiple vehicles, perform missions in lowand high-density populated areas and operate in areas with significant manned aircraft activity. The risk of these sUAS operations needs to be acceptable to the general public.