Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Louis J. M. Aslett is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Louis J. M. Aslett.


Risk Analysis | 2015

Bayesian Inference for Reliability of Systems and Networks Using the Survival Signature

Louis J. M. Aslett; Frank P. A. Coolen; Simon P. Wilson

The concept of survival signature has recently been introduced as an alternative to the signature for reliability quantification of systems. While these two concepts are closely related for systems consisting of a single type of component, the survival signature is also suitable for systems with multiple types of component, which is not the case for the signature. This also enables the use of the survival signature for reliability of networks. In this article, we present the use of the survival signature for reliability quantification of systems and networks from a Bayesian perspective. We assume that data are available on tested components that are exchangeable with those in the actual system or network of interest. These data consist of failure times and possibly right-censoring times. We present both a nonparametric and parametric approach.


Reliability Engineering & System Safety | 2017

Multilevel Monte Carlo for Reliability Theory.

Louis J. M. Aslett; Tigran Nagapetyan; Sebastian J. Vollmer

As the size of engineered systems grows, problems in reliability theory can become computationally challenging, often due to the combinatorial growth in the cut sets. In this paper we demonstrate how Multilevel Monte Carlo (MLMC) - a simulation approach which is typically used for stochastic differential equation models - can be applied in reliability problems by carefully controlling the bias-variance tradeoff in approximating large system behaviour. In this first exposition of MLMC methods in reliability problems we address the canonical problem of estimating the expectation of a functional of system lifetime and show the computational advantages compared to classical Monte Carlo methods. The difference in computational complexity can be orders of magnitude for very large or complicated system structures.


International Journal of Approximate Reasoning | 2017

Bayesian nonparametric system reliability using sets of priors

Gm Gero Walter; Louis J. M. Aslett; Frank P. A. Coolen

An imprecise Bayesian nonparametric approach to system reliability with multiple types of components is developed. This allows modelling partial or imperfect prior knowledge on component failure distributions in a flexible way through bounds on the functioning probability. Given component level test data these bounds are propagated to bounds on the posterior predictive distribution for the functioning probability of a new system containing components exchangeable with those used in testing. The method further enables identification of prior-data conflict at the system level based on component level test data. New results on first-order stochastic dominance for the Beta-Binomial distribution make the technique computationally tractable. Our methodological contributions can be immediately used in applications by reliability practitioners as we provide easy to use software tools. System reliability bounds for arbitrarily complex system layouts.Nonparametric modelling of component reliability functions.Vague and partial specification of prior component reliability functions possible.Wider reliability bounds on component and system level in case of prior-data conflict.Freely available and easy to use software: implemented in R package Reliability Theory.


soft methods in probability and statistics | 2018

Imprecise Probability Inference on Masked Multicomponent System

Daniel Krpelik; Frank P. A. Coolen; Louis J. M. Aslett

Outside of controlled experiment scope, we have only limited information available to carry out desired inferences. One such scenario is when we wish to infer the topology of a system given only data representing system lifetimes without information about states of components in time of system failure, and only limited information about lifetimes of the components of which the system is composed. This scenario, masked system inference, has been studied before for systems with only one component type, with interest of inferring both system topology and lifetime distribution of component composing it. In this paper we study similar scenario in which we consider systems consisting of multiple types of components. We assume that distribution of component lifetimes is known to belong to a prior-specified set of distributions and our intention is to reflect this information via a set of likelihood functions which will be used to obtain an imprecise posterior on the set of considered system topologies.


Scientific Reports | 2018

Statistical machine learning of sleep and physical activity phenotypes from sensor data in 96,220 UK Biobank participants

Matthew Willetts; Sven Hollowell; Louis J. M. Aslett; Christopher Holmes; Aiden R. Doherty

Current public health guidelines on physical activity and sleep duration are limited by a reliance on subjective self-reported evidence. Using data from simple wrist-worn activity monitors, we developed a tailored machine learning model, using balanced random forests with Hidden Markov Models, to reliably detect a number of activity modes. We show that physical activity and sleep behaviours can be classified with 87% accuracy in 159,504 minutes of recorded free-living behaviours from 132 adults. These trained models can be used to infer fine resolution activity patterns at the population scale in 96,220 participants. For example, we find that men spend more time in both low- and high- intensity behaviours, while women spend more time in mixed behaviours. Walking time is highest in spring and sleep time lowest during the summer. This work opens the possibility of future public health guidelines informed by the health consequences associated with specific, objectively measured, physical activity and sleep behaviours.


arXiv: Machine Learning | 2015

A review of homomorphic encryption and software tools for encrypted statistical machine learning

Louis J. M. Aslett; Pedro M. Esperança; Christopher Holmes


arXiv: Machine Learning | 2015

Encrypted statistical machine learning: new privacy preserving methods

Louis J. M. Aslett; Pedro M. Esperança; Christopher Holmes


ISI 2011 Proceedings | 2011

Markov chain Monte Carlo for Inference on Phase-type Models

Louis J. M. Aslett; Simon P. Wilson


international conference on applied mathematics | 2016

Imprecise system reliability using the survival signature

Frank P. A. Coolen; Tahani Coolen-Maturi; Louis J. M. Aslett; Gm Gero Walter


arXiv: Methodology | 2018

Reliability analysis of general phased mission systems with a new survival signature.

Xianzhen Huang; Louis J. M. Aslett; Frank P. A. Coolen

Collaboration


Dive into the Louis J. M. Aslett's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge