Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Louis L. Scharf is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Louis L. Scharf.


IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing | 1994

Matched subspace detectors

Louis L. Scharf; Benjamin Friedlander

We formulate a general class of problems for detecting subspace signals in subspace interference and broadband noise. We derive the generalized likelihood ratio (GLR) for each problem in the class. We then establish the invariances for the GLR and argue that these are the natural invariances for the problem. In each case, the GLR is a maximal invariant statistic, and the distribution of the maximal invariant statistic is monotone. This means that the GLR test (GLRT) is the uniformly most powerful invariant detector. We illustrate the utility of this finding by solving a number of problems for detecting subspace signals in subspace interference and broadband noise. In each case we give the distribution for the detector and compute performance curves. >


IEEE Transactions on Information Theory | 1998

A multistage representation of the Wiener filter based on orthogonal projections

J.S. Goldstein; Irving S. Reed; Louis L. Scharf

The Wiener filter is analyzed for stationary complex Gaussian signals from an information theoretic point of view. A dual-port analysis of the Wiener filter leads to a decomposition based on orthogonal projections and results in a new multistage method for implementing the Wiener filter using a nested chain of scalar Wiener filters. This new representation of the Wiener filter provides the capability to perform an information-theoretic analysis of previous, basis-dependent, reduced-rank Wiener filters. This analysis demonstrates that the cross-spectral metric is optimal in the sense that it maximizes mutual information between the observed and desired processes. A new reduced-rank Wiener filter is developed based on this new structure which evolves a basis using successive projections of the desired signal onto orthogonal, lower dimensional subspaces. The performance is evaluated using a comparative computer analysis model and it is demonstrated that the low-complexity multistage reduced-rank Wiener filter is capable of outperforming the more complex eigendecomposition-based methods.


IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing | 2001

Adaptive subspace detectors

Shawn Kraut; Louis L. Scharf; L.T. McWhorter

We use the theory of generalized likelihood ratio tests (GLRTs) to adapt the matched subspace detectors (MSDs) of Scharf (1991) and of Scharf and Frielander (1994) to unknown noise covariance matrices. In so doing, we produce adaptive MSDs that may be applied to signal detection for radar, sonar, and data communication. We call the resulting detectors adaptive subspace detectors (ASDs). These include Kellys (1987) GLRT and the adaptive cosine estimator (ACE) of Kaurt and Scharh (see ibid., vol.47, p.2538-41, 1999) and of Scharf and McWhorter (see Proc. 30th Asilomar Conf. Signals, Syst., Comput., Pacific Grove, CA, 1996) for scenarios in which the scaling of the test data may deviate from that of the training data. We then present a unified analysis of the statistical behavior of the entire class of ASDs, obtaining statistically identical decompositions in which each ASD is simply decomposed into the nonadaptive matched filter, the nonadaptive cosine or t-statistic, and three other statistically independent random variables that account for the performance-degrading effects of limited training data.


IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing | 2011

Sensitivity to Basis Mismatch in Compressed Sensing

Yuejie Chi; Louis L. Scharf; Ali Pezeshki; A. Robert Calderbank

The theory of compressed sensing suggests that successful inversion of an image of the physical world (broadly defined to include speech signals, radar/sonar returns, vibration records, sensor array snapshot vectors, 2-D images, and so on) for its source modes and amplitudes can be achieved at measurement dimensions far lower than what might be expected from the classical theories of spectrum or modal analysis, provided that the image is sparse in an apriori known basis. For imaging problems in spectrum analysis, and passive and active radar/sonar, this basis is usually taken to be a DFT basis. However, in reality no physical field is sparse in the DFT basis or in any apriori known basis. No matter how finely we grid the parameter space the sources may not lie in the center of the grid cells and consequently there is mismatch between the assumed and the actual bases for sparsity. In this paper, we study the sensitivity of compressed sensing to mismatch between the assumed and the actual sparsity bases. We start by analyzing the effect of basis mismatch on the best k-term approximation error, which is central to providing exact sparse recovery guarantees. We establish achievable bounds for the l1 error of the best k -term approximation and show that these bounds grow linearly with the image (or grid) dimension and the mismatch level between the assumed and actual bases for sparsity. We then derive bounds, with similar growth behavior, for the basis pursuit l1 recovery error, indicating that the sparse recovery may suffer large errors in the presence of basis mismatch. Although, we present our results in the context of basis pursuit, our analysis applies to any sparse recovery principle that relies on the accuracy of best k-term approximations for its performance guarantees. We particularly highlight the problematic nature of basis mismatch in Fourier imaging, where spillage from off-grid DFT components turns a sparse representation into an incompressible one. We substantiate our mathematical analysis by numerical examples that demonstrate a considerable performance degradation for image inversion from compressed sensing measurements in the presence of basis mismatch, for problem sizes common to radar and sonar.


IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing | 1994

Signal processing applications of oblique projection operators

Richard T. Behrens; Louis L. Scharf

Oblique projection operators are used to project measurements onto a low-rank subspace along a direction that is oblique to the subspace. They may be used to enhance signals while nulling interferences. In the paper, the authors give several basic results for oblique projections, including formulas for constructing oblique projections with desired range and null space. They analyze the algebra and geometry of oblique projections in order to understand their properties. They then show how oblique projections can be used to separate signals from structured noise (such as impulse noise), damped or undamped interfering sinusoids (such as power line interference), and narrow-band noise. In some of the problems addressed, the oblique projection provides an alternative way to implement an already known solution. Expressing these solutions as oblique projections brings geometrical insight to the study of the solution. The geometry of oblique projections enables one to compute performance in terms of angles between signal and noise subspaces. As a special case of removing impulse noise, the authors can use oblique projections to interpolate missing data samples. In array processing, oblique projections can be used to simultaneously steer beams and nulls. In communications, oblique projections can be used to remove intersymbol interference. >


IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing | 1999

The CFAR adaptive subspace detector is a scale-invariant GLRT

Shawn Kraut; Louis L. Scharf

The constant false alarm rate (CFAR) matched subspace detector (CFAR MSD) is the uniformly most-powerful-invariant test and the generalized likelihood ratio test (GLRT) for detecting a target signal in noise whose covariance structure is known but whose level is unknown. Previously, the CFAR adaptive subspace detector (CFAR ASD), or adaptive coherence estimator (ACE), was proposed for detecting a target signal in noise whose covariance structure and level are both unknown and whose covariance structure is estimated with a sample covariance matrix based on training data. We show here that the CFAR ASD is GLRT when the test measurement is not constrained to have the same noise level as the training data, As a consequence, this GLRT is invariant to a more general scaling condition on the test and training data than the well-known GLRT of Kelly (1986).


IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing | 2003

Second-order analysis of improper complex random vectors and processes

Louis L. Scharf

We present a comprehensive treatment of the second-order theory of complex random vectors and wide-sense stationary (WSS) signals. The main focus is on the improper case, in which the complementary covariance does not vanish. Accounting for the information present in the complementary covariance requires the use of widely linear transformations. Based on these, we present the eigenanalysis of complex vectors and apply it to the problem of rank reduction through principal components. We also investigate joint properties of two complex vectors by introducing canonical correlations, which paves the way for a discussion of the Wiener filter and its rank-reduced version. We link the concepts of propriety and joint propriety to eigenanalysis and canonical correlation analysis, respectively. Our treatment is extended to WSS signals. In particular, we give a result on the asymptotic distribution of eigenvalues and examine the connection between WSS, proper, and analytic signals.


IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing | 1986

An algorithm for pole-zero modeling and spectral analysis

Ramdas Kumaresan; Louis L. Scharf; Arnab K. Shaw

An explicit connection between fitting exponential models and pole-zero models to observed data is made. The fitting problem is formulated as a constrained nonlinear minimization problem. This problem is then solved using a simplified iterative algorithm. The algorithm is applied to simulated data, and the performance of the algorithm is compared to previous results.


Signal Processing | 1991

The SVD and reduced rank signal processing

Louis L. Scharf

Abstract The basic ideas of reduced-rank signal processing are evident in the original work of Shannon, Bienvenu, Schmidt, and Tufts and Kumaresan. In this paper we extend these ideas to a number of fundamental problems in signal processing by showing that rank reduction may be applied whenever a little distortion may be exchanged for a lot of variance. We derive a number of quantitative rules for reducing the rank of signal models that are used in signal processing algorithms.


IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing | 2011

Complex-Valued Signal Processing: The Proper Way to Deal With Impropriety

Tülay Adali; Louis L. Scharf

Complex-valued signals occur in many areas of science and engineering and are thus of fundamental interest. In the past, it has often been assumed, usually implicitly, that complex random signals are proper or circular. A proper complex random variable is uncorrelated with its complex conjugate, and a circular complex random variable has a probability distribution that is invariant under rotation in the complex plane. While these assumptions are convenient because they simplify computations, there are many cases where proper and circular random signals are very poor models of the underlying physics. When taking impropriety and noncircularity into account, the right type of processing can provide significant performance gains. There are two key ingredients in the statistical signal processing of complex-valued data: 1) utilizing the complete statistical characterization of complex-valued random signals; and 2) the optimization of real-valued cost functions with respect to complex parameters. In this overview article, we review the necessary tools, among which are widely linear transformations, augmented statistical descriptions, and Wirtinger calculus. We also present some selected recent developments in the field of complex-valued signal processing, addressing the topics of model selection, filtering, and source separation.

Collaboration


Dive into the Louis L. Scharf's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Ali Pezeshki

Colorado State University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Pooria Pakrooh

Colorado State University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Michael L. McCloud

University of Colorado Boulder

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Clifford T. Mullis

University of Colorado Boulder

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Shawn Kraut

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

John A. Gubner

University of Wisconsin-Madison

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge