Louise Ackers
University of Leeds
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Louise Ackers.
Ageing & Society | 2004
Louise Ackers; Peter Dwyer
This paper presents key findings of a recently completed socio-legal study of international retirement migration in the European Union (EU). It highlights the diverse nature of retirement migration and the differential citizenship status that is formally granted to various groups of retired migrants. ‘Citizenship of the European Union’ (Articles 17–22 of the Treaty establishing the European Community) bestows important social and political rights on nationals of EU Member States (‘Community nationals’). These rights are not, however, universal or based on nationality as such. In practice, the residency and social rights that a mobile EU national can claim in another Member State depend on the type of social contribution they have made and their personal relationships. Contributions through paid employment and/or membership of the family of a mobile EU worker gives rise to maximum social benefit. Whilst the European Union citizenship provisions extend residency rights to all EU nationals (irrespective of work status), those whose mobility is not connected to employment derive significantly inferior social entitlements when resident in a host Member State. Put simply, the rights of people (and members of their family) who move following retirement in their home country differ substantially from those who retire following a period of working in another Member State (and achieve the status of ‘community migrant worker’ prior to retirement). This formal ‘discrimination’ is further compounded by the diversity of the social welfare systems of the member states that results in distinct social, economic and spatial inequalities across the EU. To that extent, the ‘choice’ of retirement location significantly impacts on citizenship status. However, retired migrants are not merely passive spectators of formal rights and policies. Many show considerable skill in actively managing their rights (at both national and EU levels) and other resources to optimise personal benefit. This ability to maximise wellbeing is unevenly distributed.
Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law | 1996
Louise Ackers
Abstract The following paper reports on the findings of a comparative study of gender and internal migration in the EU which involved over 400 life-history interviews with EU migrant women (Community nationals residing in another Member State than that of their nationality) in five Member States. It focuses on a sub-sample of these interviews conducted in Ireland which raised a distinctive set of issues concerning migrant women‘s response to Irish policy on divorce and reproductive rights. The findings illustrate not only the impact of a framework of constraint structuring women’s experience of citizenship, but also the extent to which women are able to negotiate, within that framework, to maximize their personal autonomy.
International Migration | 2005
Louise Ackers
Womens Studies International Forum | 2004
Louise Ackers
Archive | 2008
Louise Ackers; Bryony Gill
Archive | 2008
Louise Ackers; Bryony Gill
Archive | 2002
Louise Ackers; Peter Dwyer
International Studies of Management and Organization | 2007
Louise Ackers; Liz Oliver
European Law Journal | 2007
Louise Ackers
Archive | 2006
Keleigh Coldron; Louise Ackers; Liz Oliver; Bryony Gill