Louise Clark
University of Liverpool
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Louise Clark.
Psychological Medicine | 2011
Jonathan Hill; Christopher Holcombe; Louise Clark; M. R. K. Boothby; A. Hincks; Jean Fisher; S. Tufail; Peter Salmon
BACKGROUND Depression and anxiety are common after diagnosis of breast cancer. We examined to what extent these are recurrences of previous disorder and, controlling for this, whether shame, self-blame and low social support after diagnosis predicted onset of depression and anxiety subsequently. METHOD Women with primary breast cancer who had been treated surgically self-reported shame, self-blame, social support and emotional distress post-operatively. Psychiatric interview 12 months later identified those with adult lifetime episodes of major depression (MD) or generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) before diagnosis and onset over the subsequent year. Statistical analysis examined predictors of each disorder in that year. RESULTS Of the patients, two-thirds with episodes of MD and 40% with episodes of GAD during the year after diagnosis were experiencing recurrence of previous disorder. Although low social support, self-blame and shame were each associated with both MD and GAD after diagnosis, they did not mediate the relationship of disorder after diagnosis with previous disorder. Low social support, but not shame or self-blame, predicted recurrence after controlling for previous disorder. CONCLUSIONS Anxiety and depression during the first year after diagnosis of breast cancer are often the recurrence of previous disorder. In predicting disorder following diagnosis, self-blame and shame are merely markers of previous disorder. Low social support is an independent predictor and therefore may have a causal role.
Psycho-oncology | 2015
Peter Salmon; Louise Clark; Elly McGrath; Peter Fisher
Although health policy for cancer care promotes screening of patients for emotional distress, the utility and validity of screening have been questioned. Continued research to refine detection of distress or to evaluate outcomes of screening programmes is unlikely to end this controversy. Instead, we need to identify more fundamental research questions that address the validity or utility of screening in this context.
Journal of Psychosomatic Research | 2007
Peter Salmon; Christopher Holcombe; Louise Clark; Rita Krespi; Jean Fisher; Jonathan Hill
European Journal of Cancer | 2006
Peter Salmon; Jonathan Hill; Rita Krespi; Louise Clark; Jean Fisher; Christopher Holcombe
Journal of Applied Social Psychology | 2010
Mark Burgess; Louise Clark
General Hospital Psychiatry | 2011
Louise Clark; Helen Beesley; Christopher Holcombe; Peter Salmon
Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England | 2009
Louise Clark; Christopher Holcombe; Jonathan Hill; Hilary Downey; Jean Fisher; Margorit Rita Krespi; Peter Salmon
Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England | 2011
Louise Clark; Christopher Holcombe; Jonathan Hill; Margorit Rita Krespi-Boothby; Jean Fisher; Joanna Seward; Peter Salmon
Turkish journal of psychiatry | 2010
Krespi Boothby; Jonathan Hill; Christopher Holcombe; Louise Clark; Jean Fisher; Peter Salmon
Ejc Supplements | 2010
Louise Clark; Chris Holcombe; Helen Beesley; Peter Salmon