Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Louise Haynes is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Louise Haynes.


Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes | 2008

Effectiveness of HIV/STD Sexual Risk Reduction Groups for Women in Substance Abuse Treatment Programs : Results of NIDA Clinical Trials Network Trial

Susan Tross; Aimee Campbell; Lisa R. Cohen; Donald A. Calsyn; Martina Pavlicova; Gloria M. Miele; Mei-Chen Hu; Louise Haynes; Nancy Nugent; Weijin Gan; Mary Hatch-Maillette; Raul N. Mandler; Paul McLaughlin; Nabila El-Bassel; Edward V. Nunes

Context:Because drug-involved women are among the fastest growing groups with AIDS, sexual risk reduction intervention for them is a public health imperative. Objective:To test effectiveness of HIV/STD safer sex skills building (SSB) groups for women in community drug treatment. Design:Randomized trial of SSB versus standard HIV/STD Education (HE); assessments at baseline, 3 and 6 months. Participants:Women recruited from 12 methadone or psychosocial treatment programs in Clinical Trials Network of National Institute on Drug Abuse. Five hundred fifteen women with ≥1 unprotected vaginal or anal sex occasion (USO) with a male partner in the past 6 months were randomized. Interventions:In SSB, five 90-minute groups used problem solving and skills rehearsal to increase HIV/STD risk awareness, condom use, and partner negotiation skills. In HE, one 60-minute group covered HIV/STD disease, testing, treatment, and prevention information. Main Outcome:Number of USOs at follow-up. Results:A significant difference in mean USOs was obtained between SSB and HE over time (F = 67.2, P < 0.0001). At 3 months, significant decrements were observed in both conditions. At 6 months, SSB maintained the decrease and HE returned to baseline (P < 0.0377). Women in SSB had 29% fewer USOs than those in HE. Conclusions:Skills building interventions can produce ongoing sexual risk reduction in women in community drug treatment.


American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse | 2011

Comparative Profiles of Men and Women with Opioid Dependence: Results from a National Multisite Effectiveness Trial

Sudie E. Back; Rebecca L. Payne; Amy H. Wahlquist; Rickey E. Carter; Zachary Stroud; Louise Haynes; Maureen Hillhouse; Kathleen T. Brady; Walter Ling

Background: Accumulating evidence indicates important gender differences in substance use disorders. Little is known, however, about gender differences and opioid use disorders. Objectives: To compare demographic characteristics, substance use severity, and other associated areas of functioning (as measured by the Addiction Severity Index-Lite (ASI-Lite)) among opioid-dependent men and women participating in a multisite effectiveness trial. Methods: Participants were 892 adults screened for the National Institute on Drug Abuse Clinical Trials Network investigation of the effectiveness of two buprenorphine tapering schedules. Results: The majority of men and women tested positive for oxycodone (68% and 65%, respectively) and morphine (89% each). More women than men tested positive for amphetamines (4% vs. 1%, p < .01), methamphetamine (11% vs. 4%, p < .01), and phencyclidine (8% vs. 4%, p = .02). More men than women tested positive for methadone (11% vs. 6%, p = .05) and marijuana (22% vs. 15%, p = .03). Craving for opioids was significantly higher among women (p < .01). Men evidenced higher alcohol (p < .01) and legal (p = .04) ASI composite scores, whereas women had higher drug (p < .01), employment (p < .01), family (p < .01), medical (p < .01), and psychiatric (p < .01) ASI composite scores. Women endorsed significantly more current and past medical problems. Conclusions: Important gender differences in the clinical profiles of opioid-dependent individuals were observed with regard to substance use severity, craving, medical conditions, and impairment in associated areas of functioning. The findings enhance understanding of the characteristics of treatment-seeking men and women with opioid dependence, and may be useful in improving identification, prevention, and treatment efforts for this challenging and growing population.


American Journal of Public Health | 2012

Implementing rapid HIV testing with or without risk-reduction counseling in drug treatment centers: Results of a randomized trial

Lisa R. Metsch; Daniel J. Feaster; Lauren Gooden; Tim Matheson; Raul N. Mandler; Louise Haynes; Susan Tross; Tiffany Kyle; Dianne Gallup; Andrzej S. Kosinski; Antoine Douaihy; Bruce R. Schackman; Moupali Das; Robert Lindblad; Sarah J. Erickson; P. Todd Korthuis; Steve Martino; James L. Sorensen; José Szapocznik; Rochelle P. Walensky; Bernard M. Branson; Grant Colfax

OBJECTIVES We examined the effectiveness of risk reduction counseling and the role of on-site HIV testing in drug treatment. METHODS Between January and May 2009, we randomized 1281 HIV-negative (or status unknown) adults who reported no past-year HIV testing to (1) referral for off-site HIV testing, (2) HIV risk-reduction counseling with on-site rapid HIV testing, or (3) verbal information about testing only with on-site rapid HIV testing. RESULTS We defined 2 primary self-reported outcomes a priori: receipt of HIV test results and unprotected anal or vaginal intercourse episodes at 6-month follow-up. The combined on-site rapid testing participants received more HIV test results than off-site testing referral participants (P<.001; Mantel-Haenszel risk ratio=4.52; 97.5% confidence interval [CI]=3.57, 5.72). At 6 months, there were no significant differences in unprotected intercourse episodes between the combined on-site testing arms and the referral arm (P=.39; incidence rate ratio [IRR]=1.04; 97.5% CI=0.95, 1.14) or the 2 on-site testing arms (P=.81; IRR=1.03; 97.5% CI=0.84, 1.26). CONCLUSIONS This study demonstrated on-site rapid HIV testings value in drug treatment centers and found no additional benefit from HIV sexual risk-reduction counseling.


JAMA | 2013

Effect of risk-reduction counseling with rapid HIV testing on risk of acquiring sexually transmitted infections: The AWARE randomized clinical trial

Lisa R. Metsch; Daniel J. Feaster; Lauren Gooden; Bruce R. Schackman; Tim Matheson; Moupali Das; Matthew R. Golden; Shannon Huffaker; Louise Haynes; Susan Tross; C. Kevin Malotte; Antoine Douaihy; P. Todd Korthuis; Wayne A. Duffus; Sarah Henn; Robert Bolan; Susan S. Philip; Jose G. Castro; Pedro C. Castellon; Gayle McLaughlin; Raul N. Mandler; Bernard M. Branson; Grant Colfax

IMPORTANCE To increase human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) testing rates, many institutions and jurisdictions have revised policies to make the testing process rapid, simple, and routine. A major issue for testing scale-up efforts is the effectiveness of HIV risk-reduction counseling, which has historically been an integral part of the HIV testing process. OBJECTIVE To assess the effect of brief patient-centered risk-reduction counseling at the time of a rapid HIV test on the subsequent acquisition of sexually transmitted infections (STIs). DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS From April to December 2010, Project AWARE randomized 5012 patients from 9 sexually transmitted disease (STD) clinics in the United States to receive either brief patient-centered HIV risk-reduction counseling with a rapid HIV test or the rapid HIV test with information only. Participants were assessed for multiple STIs at both baseline and 6-month follow-up. INTERVENTIONS Participants randomized to counseling received individual patient-centered risk-reduction counseling based on an evidence-based model. The core elements included a focus on the patients specific HIV/STI risk behavior and negotiation of realistic and achievable risk-reduction steps. All participants received a rapid HIV test. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The prespecified outcome was a composite end point of cumulative incidence of any of the measured STIs over 6 months. All participants were tested for Neisseria gonorrhoeae, Chlamydia trachomatis, Treponema pallidum (syphilis), herpes simplex virus 2, and HIV. Women were also tested for Trichomonas vaginalis. RESULTS There was no significant difference in 6-month composite STI incidence by study group (adjusted risk ratio, 1.12; 95% CI, 0.94-1.33). There were 250 of 2039 incident cases (12.3%) in the counseling group and 226 of 2032 (11.1%) in the information-only group. CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE Risk-reduction counseling in conjunction with a rapid HIV test did not significantly affect STI acquisition among STD clinic patients, suggesting no added benefit from brief patient-centered risk-reduction counseling. TRIAL REGISTRATION clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01154296.


Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry | 2011

Randomized Controlled Trial of Osmotic-Release Methylphenidate with Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy in Adolescents with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder and Substance Use Disorders.

Paula D. Riggs; Theresa Winhusen; Robert D. Davies; Jeffrey D. Leimberger; Susan K. Mikulich-Gilbertson; Constance Klein; Marilyn J. Macdonald; Michelle Lohman; Genie L. Bailey; Louise Haynes; William B. Jaffee; Nancy Haminton; Candace C. Hodgkins; Elizabeth A. Whitmore; Kathlene Trello-Rishel; Leanne Tamm; Michelle C. Acosta; Charlotte Royer-Malvestuto; Geetha Subramaniam; Marc Fishman; Beverly W. Holmes; Mary Elyse Kaye; Mark A. Vargo; George E. Woody; Edward V. Nunes; David Liu

OBJECTIVE To evaluate the efficacy and safety of osmotic-release methylphenidate (OROS-MPH) compared with placebo for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), and the impact on substance treatment outcomes in adolescents concurrently receiving cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) for substance use disorders (SUD). METHOD This was a 16-week, randomized, controlled, multi-site trial of OROS-MPH + CBT versus placebo + CBT in 303 adolescents (aged 13 through 18 years) meeting DSM-IV diagnostic criteria for ADHD and SUD. Primary outcome measures included the following: for ADHD, clinician-administered ADHD Rating Scale (ADHD-RS), adolescent informant; for substance use, adolescent-reported days of use in the past 28 days. Secondary outcome measures included parent ADHD-RS and weekly urine drug screens (UDS). RESULTS There were no group differences on reduction in ADHD-RS scores (OROS-MPH: -19.2, 95% confidence interval [CI], -17.1 to -21.2; placebo, -21.2, 95% CI, -19.1 to -23.2) or reduction in days of substance use (OROS-MPH: -5.7 days, 95% CI, 4.0-7.4; placebo: -5.2 days, 95% CI, 3.5-7.0). Some secondary outcomes favored OROS-MPH, including lower parent ADHD-RS scores at 8 (mean difference = 4.4, 95% CI, 0.8-7.9) and 16 weeks (mean difference =6.9; 95% CI, 2.9-10.9) and more negative UDS in OROS-MPH (mean = 3.8) compared with placebo (mean = 2.8; p = .04). CONCLUSIONS OROS-MPH did not show greater efficacy than placebo for ADHD or on reduction in substance use in adolescents concurrently receiving individual CBT for co-occurring SUD. However, OROS-MPH was relatively well tolerated and was associated with modestly greater clinical improvement on some secondary ADHD and substance outcome measures. Clinical Trial Registration Information-Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) in Adolescents with Substance Use Disorders (SUD); http://www.clinicaltrials.gov; NCT00264797.


JAMA | 2016

Effect of Patient navigation with or without financial incentives on viral suppression among hospitalized patients with HIV infection and substance use a randomized clinical trial

Lisa R. Metsch; Daniel J. Feaster; Lauren Gooden; Tim Matheson; Maxine L. Stitzer; Moupali Das; Mamta K. Jain; Allan Rodriguez; Wendy S. Armstrong; Gregory M. Lucas; Ank E. Nijhawan; Mari-Lynn Drainoni; Patricia Herrera; Pamela Vergara-Rodriguez; Jeffrey M. Jacobson; Michael J. Mugavero; Meg Sullivan; Eric S. Daar; Deborah McMahon; David C. Ferris; Robert Lindblad; Paul Van Veldhuisen; Neal L. Oden; Pedro C. Castellon; Susan Tross; Louise Haynes; Antoine Douaihy; James L. Sorensen; David S. Metzger; Raul N. Mandler

IMPORTANCE Substance use is a major driver of the HIV epidemic and is associated with poor HIV care outcomes. Patient navigation (care coordination with case management) and the use of financial incentives for achieving predetermined outcomes are interventions increasingly promoted to engage patients in substance use disorders treatment and HIV care, but there is little evidence for their efficacy in improving HIV-1 viral suppression rates. OBJECTIVE To assess the effect of a structured patient navigation intervention with or without financial incentives to improve HIV-1 viral suppression rates among patients with elevated HIV-1 viral loads and substance use recruited as hospital inpatients. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS From July 2012 through January 2014, 801 patients with HIV infection and substance use from 11 hospitals across the United States were randomly assigned to receive patient navigation alone (n = 266), patient navigation plus financial incentives (n = 271), or treatment as usual (n = 264). HIV-1 plasma viral load was measured at baseline and at 6 and 12 months. INTERVENTIONS Patient navigation included up to 11 sessions of care coordination with case management and motivational interviewing techniques over 6 months. Financial incentives (up to


American Journal on Addictions | 2007

Telephone Enhancement of Long-term Engagement (TELE) in Continuing Care for Substance Abuse Treatment: A NIDA Clinical Trials Network (CTN) study

Robert Hubbard; Jeffrey D. Leimberger; Louise Haynes; Ashwin A. Patkar; John Holter; Michael R. Liepman; Kathi Lucas; Breque Tyson; Tammy Day; Elizabeth A. Thorpe; Briar Faulkner; Albert Hasson

1160) were provided for achieving targeted behaviors aimed at reducing substance use, increasing engagement in HIV care, and improving HIV outcomes. Treatment as usual was the standard practice at each hospital for linking hospitalized patients to outpatient HIV care and substance use disorders treatment. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The primary outcome was HIV viral suppression (≤200 copies/mL) relative to viral nonsuppression or death at the 12-month follow-up. RESULTS Of 801 patients randomized, 261 (32.6%) were women (mean [SD] age, 44.6 years [10.0 years]). There were no differences in rates of HIV viral suppression versus nonsuppression or death among the 3 groups at 12 months. Eighty-five of 249 patients (34.1%) in the usual-treatment group experienced treatment success compared with 89 of 249 patients (35.7%) in the navigation-only group for a treatment difference of 1.6% (95% CI, -6.8% to 10.0%; P = .80) and compared with 98 of 254 patients (38.6%) in the navigation-plus-incentives group for a treatment difference of 4.5% (95% CI -4.0% to 12.8%; P = .68). The treatment difference between the navigation-only and the navigation-plus-incentives group was -2.8% (95% CI, -11.3% to 5.6%; P = .68). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Among hospitalized patients with HIV infection and substance use, patient navigation with or without financial incentives did not have a beneficial effect on HIV viral suppression relative to nonsuppression or death at 12 months vs treatment as usual. These findings do not support these interventions in this setting. TRIAL REGISTRATION clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01612169.


The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry | 2014

A randomized trial of concurrent smoking-cessation and substance use disorder treatment in stimulant-dependent smokers

Theresa Winhusen; Gregory S. Brigham; Frankie Kropp; Robert Lindblad; John G. Gardin; Pat Penn; Candace C. Hodgkins; Thomas M. Kelly; Antoine Douaihy; Michael McCann; Lee Love; Eliot DeGravelles; Ken Bachrach; Susan C. Sonne; Bob Hiott; Louise Haynes; Gaurav Sharma; Daniel Lewis; Paul VanVeldhuisen; Jeff Theobald; Udi E. Ghitza

The TELE study examined the feasibility and potential efficacy of phone calls to patients after discharge from short- term inpatient and residential substance abuse treatment programs to encourage compliance with continuing care plans. After review of their continuing care plans, 339 patients from four programs were randomized either to receive calls or to have no planned contact. Ninety-two percent of patients randomized to receive calls received at least one call. No difference was found between groups in self-reported attendance at one or more outpatient counseling sessions after discharge (p = .89). When program records of all participants were examined, those receiving calls had a greater likelihood of documented attendance (48%) than those not called (37%). Results were not statistically significant (p < .003) because of the Hochberg correction for multiple tests. While the phone calls were feasible, the lack of clear evidence of efficacy of the calls suggests the need for further investigation of the role of telephone intervention to encourage compliance and improve outcomes.


The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry | 2014

Multisite, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled pilot clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy of buspirone as a relapse-prevention treatment for cocaine dependence.

Theresa Winhusen; Frankie Kropp; Robert Lindblad; Antoine Douaihy; Louise Haynes; Candace C. Hodgkins; Karen Chartier; Kyle M. Kampman; Gaurav Sharma; Daniel Lewis; Paul VanVeldhuisen; Jeff Theobald; Jeanine May; Gregory S. Brigham

OBJECTIVE To evaluate the impact of concurrent treatments for substance use disorder and nicotine-dependence for stimulant-dependent patients. METHOD A randomized, 10-week trial with follow-up at 3 and 6 months after smoking quit date conducted at 12 substance use disorder treatment programs between February 2010 and July 2012. Adults meeting DSM-IV-TR criteria for cocaine and/or methamphetamine dependence and interested in quitting smoking were randomized to treatment as usual (n = 271) or treatment as usual with smoking-cessation treatment (n = 267). All participants received treatment as usual for substance use disorder treatment. Participants assigned to treatment as usual with concurrent smoking-cessation treatment received weekly individual smoking cessation counseling and extended-release bupropion (300 mg/d) during weeks 1-10. During post-quit treatment (weeks 4-10), participants assigned to treatment as usual with smoking-cessation treatment received a nicotine inhaler and contingency management for smoking abstinence. Weekly proportion of stimulant-abstinent participants during the treatment phase, as assessed by urine drug screens and self-report, was the primary outcome. Secondary measures included other substance/nicotine use outcomes and treatment attendance. RESULTS There were no significant treatment effects on stimulant-use outcomes, as measured by the primary outcome and stimulant-free days, on drug-abstinence, or on attendance. Participants assigned to treatment as usual with smoking-cessation treatment, relative to those assigned to treatment as usual, had significantly better outcomes for drug-free days at 6-month follow-up (χ(2)(1) = 4.09, P <.05), with a decrease in drug-free days from baseline of -1.3% in treatment as usual with smoking-cessation treatment and of -7.6% in treatment as usual. Participants receiving treatment as usual with smoking-cessation treatment, relative to those receiving treatment as usual, had significantly better outcomes on smoking point-prevalence abstinence (25.5% vs 2.2%; χ(2)(1) = 44.69, P < .001; OR =18.2). CONCLUSIONS These results suggest that providing smoking-cessation treatment to illicit stimulant-dependent patients in outpatient substance use disorder treatment will not worsen, and may enhance, abstinence from nonnicotine substance use. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01077024.


Contemporary Clinical Trials | 2014

Achieving Cannabis Cessation — Evaluating N-acetylcysteine Treatment (ACCENT): Design and implementation of a multi-site, randomized controlled study in the National Institute on Drug Abuse Clinical Trials Network

Erin A. McClure; Susan C. Sonne; Theresa Winhusen; Kathleen M. Carroll; Udi E. Ghitza; Aimee L. McRae-Clark; Abigail G. Matthews; Gaurav Sharma; Paul Van Veldhuisen; Ryan Vandrey; Frances R. Levin; Roger D. Weiss; Robert Lindblad; Colleen Allen; Larissa Mooney; Louise Haynes; Gregory S. Brigham; Steve Sparenborg; Albert L. Hasson; Kevin M. Gray

OBJECTIVE To evaluate the potential efficacy of buspirone as a relapse-prevention treatment for cocaine dependence. METHOD A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 16-week pilot trial was conducted at 6 clinical sites between August 2012 and June 2013. Adult crack cocaine users meeting DSM-IV-TR criteria for current cocaine dependence who were scheduled to be in inpatient/residential substance use disorder (SUD) treatment for 12-19 days when randomized and planning to enroll in local outpatient treatment through the end of the active treatment phase were randomized to buspirone titrated to 60 mg/d (n = 35) or placebo (n = 27). All participants received psychosocial treatment as usually provided by the SUD treatment programs in which they were enrolled. Outcome measures included maximum days of continuous cocaine abstinence (primary), proportion of cocaine use days, and days to first cocaine use during the outpatient treatment phase (study weeks 4-15) as assessed by self-report and urine drug screens. RESULTS There were no significant treatment effects on maximum continuous days of cocaine abstinence or days to first cocaine use. In the female participants (n = 23), there was a significant treatment-by-time interaction effect (χ²₁ = 15.26, P < .0001), reflecting an increase in cocaine use by those receiving buspirone, relative to placebo, early in the outpatient treatment phase. A similar effect was not detected in the male participants (n = 39; χ²₁ = 0.14, P = .70). CONCLUSIONS The results suggest that buspirone is unlikely to have a beneficial effect on preventing relapse to cocaine use and that buspirone for cocaine-dependent women may worsen their cocaine use outcomes. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01641159.

Collaboration


Dive into the Louise Haynes's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Lisa R. Metsch

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Raul N. Mandler

National Institute on Drug Abuse

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Grant Colfax

University of California

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Tim Matheson

University of California

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge