Loukas M
St. George's University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Loukas M.
Clinical Anatomy | 2012
Andrea Porzionato; Veronica Macchi; Carla Stecco; Loukas M; R. Shane Tubbs; Raffaele De Caro
The pectoral nerves (PNs) may be selectively injured through various traumatic mechanisms such as direct trauma, hypertrophic muscle compression, and iatrogenic injuries (breast surgery and axillary node dissection, pectoralis major muscle transfers). The PN may be surgically recovered through nerve transfers. They may also be used as donors to the musculocutaneous, axillary, long thoracic, and spinal accessory nerves and for reinnervation of myocutaneous free flaps. Thus, in this article, we reviewed the surgical anatomy of PN. A meta‐analysis of the available literature showed that the lateral pectoral nerve (LPN) arises most frequently with two branches from the anterior divisions of the upper and middle trunks (33.8%) or as a single root from the lateral cord (23.4%). The medial pectoral nerve (MPN) usually arises from the medial cord (49.3%), anterior division of the lower trunk (43.8%), or lower trunk (4.7%). The two PN are usually connected immediately distal to the thoracoacromial artery by the so‐called ansa pectoralis. The MPN may also show communications with the intercostobrachial nerve. In 50%–100% of cases, it may pass, at least with some branches, through the pectoralis minor muscle. The LPN supplies the upper portions of the pectoralis major muscle; the MPN innervates the lower parts of the pectoralis major and the pectoralis minor muscle. Among the accessory muscles of the pectoral girdle, the LPN may also innervate the tensor semivaginae articulationis humero‐scapularis, pectoralis minimus, sternoclavicularis, axillary arch, sternalis, and infraclavicularis muscles; the MPN may innervate the pectoralis quartus, chondrofascialis, axillary arch, chondroepitrochlearis, and sternalis muscles. Clin. Anat. 25:559–575, 2012.
Neurosurgery | 2010
Tubbs Rs; Christoph J. Griessenauer; Loukas M; Mohammadali M. Shoja; Aaron A. Cohen-Gadol
OBJECTIVETo further elucidate the importance of anatomic variations in morphology of the foramen magnum and associated clinical implications, we conducted a morphometric study. METHODSSeventy-two dry skulls were used for this study. Digital images were obtained of the foramen magnum from an inferior view. These images were studied using a computer-assisted image analysis system. Next, an image processor was used to calculate pixel differences between 2 selected points, which allowed accurate translation of pixel differences into metric measurements. RESULTSWe found that the mean surface area of the foramen magnum was 558 mm2, the mean anteroposterior diameter was 3.1 cm, and the mean horizontal diameter was 2.7 cm. For comparison, surface areas were classified into 3 types based on size. Type I foramina were identified in 20.8% of the dry skulls (15 skulls) and exhibited a surface area of less than 500 mm2. Type II (66.6%, 48 skulls) was applied to foramina of an intermediate size with surface areas ranging between 500 to 600 mm2. Type III (12.5%, 9 skulls) was applied to large foramina with surface areas of more than 600 mm2. CONCLUSIONThese data may be of use as a morphometric database for description of “normal” variants of foramen magnum morphology.
Neurosurgery | 2007
Mohammadali M. Shoja; R.S. Tubbs; Mohammadreza Ardalan; Loukas M; Eknoyan G; E.G. Salter; Oakes Wj
ESMAIL JORJANI WAS an influential Persian physician and anatomist of the 12th century who did most of his writing after his seventh decade of life. Jorjanis comprehensive textbook of medicine, Zakhirey-e Khwarazmshahi (The Treasure of the Khwarazm Shah) was written in approximately AD 1112 and is considered to be the oldest medical encyclopedia written in Persian. This was an essential textbook for those studying medicine during this time. We describe the life and times of Jorjani and provide a translation and interpretations of his detailed descriptions of the cranial nerves, which were written almost a millennium ago. Medieval Persian and Muslim scholars have contributed to our current knowledge of the cranial nerves. Some of these descriptions, such as the eloquent ones provided by Jorjani, were original and have gone mostly unknown to post-Vesalian European scholars.
Annals of Anatomy-anatomischer Anzeiger | 2010
Mohammadali M. Shoja; R. Shane Tubbs; Loukas M; Ghaffar Shokouhi; Kamyar Ghabili; Paul S. Agutter
Sir William Turner (1832-1916) was Professor of Anatomy at the University of Edinburgh. His classic paper of 1863 on the anastomoses between the parietal and visceral branches of the abdominal aorta, later known as the sub-peritoneal arterial plexus of Turner, has mostly been forgotten. Located in the retroperitoneum and surrounding the kidneys and other adjacent structures, this plexus is an important route of collateral circulation. In the current paper, we discuss the sub-peritoneal arterial plexus as described by Turner in 1863 and review the literature concerning its potential clinical significance in the kidney, emphasizing its probable role in the metastatic spread of various tumors of abdominal organs and in the continuing viability of the kidney after renal artery occlusion. A biographical sketch of Sir William Turner is also presented.
Transplantation Proceedings | 2008
Mohammad Reza Ardalan; Mohammad Kazem Tarzamni; A. Ghafari; R.S. Tubbs; Loukas M; Mohammadali M. Shoja
INTRODUCTION Anatomy of the renal artery is an important issue in the renal transplantation era. Multi-detector computed tomography angiography (MDCTA) is an accurate modality for the preoperative assessment of live renal donors, and it provides excellent details of donor arterial anatomy. We studied the relationship between the angle of emergence of the renal artery from the aorta and its branching pattern. METHODS In this study, the MDCTA images obtained from the 138 kidneys of 77 potential renal transplant donors were studied. The courses of the right and left renal arteries from the aorta to the kidney hilus were delineated. The branching angle of the renal artery from the aorta (beta, angle) and the length of the renal artery from the aorta until its first division were measured (Delta, distance). The renal artery deviation from the perpendicular plane of the aorta (D, factor of deviation) was calculated by the following formula: D = (1 - sin [beta]). The cosine of this angle (cos [beta]) was also calculated. Statistical analyses were performed with Pearson correlation tests. The P value was set at .05. RESULTS The mean age of patients was 28.7 +/- 4.3 with a male to female ratio of 63:14. The mean Delta distance and small de, Cyrillic diameter were 34.37 +/- 10.68 mm (range, 10-58) and 6.13 +/- 1.37 mm (range, 2.8-9.9), respectively. The mean beta angle, factor of deviation, and cos (beta) were 62.19 degrees +/- 16.44, 0.15 +/- 0.14, and 0.45 +/- 0.25, respectively. Significant negative correlations were found between the beta angle, and Delta distance (r = -0.308; P < .001), and small de, Cyrillic diameter (r = -0.303; P = .003). Factor of deviation and cos (beta) were directly associated Delta distance and small de, Cyrillic diameter. CONCLUSION These findings indicated that with the main renal artery axis deviating from the perpendicular plane of the aorta or with a smaller branching angle, this artery had a greater diameter and underwent late branching. This study suggested that the renal artery diameter and branching pattern might be determined by the mechanical fluid laws.
Spinal Cord | 2008
Tubbs Rs; J E McKinley; D B Joseph; J Atchison; Loukas M; Jeffrey Pugh; Mohammadali M. Shoja
Study design:Case report.Objective:To report an intramedullary germinoma associated with congenital adrenal hyperplasia (CAH).Method:We report a 14-year-old white male with CAH who was found to have an intramedullary germinoma of the conus medullaris. Presentation and evaluation were for progressive urinary incontinence. A brief review of relevant literature was presented.Results:Cases where germinomas have occurred simultaneously with CAH have been identified intracranially, but to our knowledge, this is the first case of CAH and intramedullary spinal cord germinoma occurring simultaneously.Conclusion:Although rare, primary intramedullary germinomas do occur. The association between CAH and spinal cord germinoma should be considered by clinicians.
Clinical Anatomy | 2018
S. Kim; M. Dennis; Jessica Holland; Mark Terrell; Loukas M; Justine M. Schober
Transgender surgeries are becoming more frequent and visual interpretation of anatomy is essential for both surgeons and patients. Since the forearm free flap phalloplasty was introduced in 1984, it has been known to provide reliable cosmetic and functional results for transitioning men compared with phalloplasty by different flaps. Surgical text descriptions were enhanced by the creation of new anatomic illustrations. The forearm free flap consists of the anterior forearm skin, subcutaneous tissue, fascia containing the radial artery as the perforator and its venae comitantes, cephalic and basilic veins, and lateral and medial antebrachial cutaneous nerves are demonstrated in relation to the surgically derived flap. Songs forearm free flap phalloplasty requires two surgical stages with a three‐month interval between the stages: prelamination of a neourethra and construction of a neophallus. The neophallus created by forearm flap phalloplasty is reported to achieve acceptable aesthetical and psychological satisfaction, appropriate size and shape, and satisfying sexual intercourse. Despite increasing experiences in gender confirming surgery with modifications made by many authors, urethral complications including fistula and/or stricture formation are the leading causes of reoperation. The poor esthetic outcome of the forearm donor site and a decrease in rigidity of the neophallus are the main limitations. Illustrations of anatomy help inform surgical choice and understanding of risks and benefits by patients. The anatomy of the free forearm flap phalloplasty supports creation of a neophallus for transsexual anatomy revision. Clin. Anat. 31:145–151, 2018.
British Journal of Neurosurgery | 2015
Paul M. Foreman; Mark R. Harrigan; Christoph J. Griessenauer; Loukas M; Tubbs Rs
Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is a common and efficacious surgical procedure for the prevention of ischemic stroke due to atherosclerosis of the internal carotid artery (ICA). A high common carotid artery bifurcation can make CEA technically difficult due to limited carotid artery exposure. A cadaveric study was performed to evaluate the efficacy of nasotracheal intubation for improving access to a high carotid artery bifurcation. Based on this study, nasotracheal intubation does not improve access to a high carotid artery bifurcation as compared with orotracheal intubation.
Vasa-european Journal of Vascular Medicine | 2008
Abolhassan Shakeri; Mohammadali M. Shoja; Tubbs Rs; Loukas M; Mohammad Reza Ardalan
BACKGROUND The prevalence of atherosclerotic renal artery disease has increased with improved life expectancy. Because renal artery stenosis is a potentially correctable cause of hypertension and ischemic nephropathy, early identification of this entity may lead to proper hypertension control and improved renal function and survival. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence and patterns of subclinical renal artery stenosis in patients with aorticoiliac atherosclerosis. PATIENTS AND METHODS The abdominal angiographies of 44 patients with high-grade aorticoiliac occlusive disease (> 70% stenosis) were reviewed for evidence of renal artery stenosis. This was compared to a group of 20 patients with mild-to-moderate aorticoiliac disease (< 70% stenosis). These patients had no history of renal artery disease or renal failure. RESULTS In patients with high-grade aorticoiliac occlusive disease, renal artery stenosis was found in 25 patients (56.8%); 13 with unilateral (29.5%) and 12 (27.3%) with bilateral involvement. A hemodynamically significant stenosis (> 50%) was found in 11 patients (25%), one of whom had bilateral stenosis (2.3%). High-grade renal artery stenosis (> 70%) or complete arterial occlusion was noted on seven sides (7.9%). The most common sites of stenosis were the origin and first centimeter of the renal artery. In patients with mild-to-moderate aorticoiliac disease, renal artery stenosis was found in two patients (10%). CONCLUSIONS The present study revealed that subclinical renal artery disease may be present in more than half of the patients with high-grade aorticoiliac atherosclerosis highlighting the need for proper risk stratifications and screening programs. Based on our results, we suggest that examination of the renal arteries in these patients may be necessary in order to delay or prevent complications. Additionally, such information may have important therapeutic implications in planning reconstructive vascular surgeries or percutaneous angioplasties.
Clinical Anatomy | 2018
Brandon Michael Henry; Bendik Skinningsrud; Jens Vikse; Przemysław A. Pękala; Jerzy A. Walocha; Loukas M; R. Shane Tubbs; Krzysztof A. Tomaszewski
Two main types of review articles with distinct characteristics and goals are commonly found in the scientific literature: systematic reviews and narrative (also called expert or traditional) reviews. Narrative reviews are publications that describe and discuss the state of science on a specific topic or theme from a theoretical and contextual point of view with little explicit structure for gathering and presenting evidence. Systematic reviews are overviews of the literature undertaken by identifying, critically appraising and synthesizing the results of primary research studies using an explicit methodological approach. With the recent rise of evidence‐based anatomy, important questions arise with respect to the utility of narrative reviews in clinical anatomy. The goal of this perspective article is to address the key differences between narrative and systematic reviews in the context of clinical anatomy, to provide guidance on which type of review is most appropriate for a specific issue, and to summarize how the two types of reviews can work in unison to enhance the quality of anatomical research and its delivery to clinicians and anatomists alike. Clin. Anat. 31:364–367, 2018.