Lu Shi Chen

Comparative bioavailability of three ibuprofen formulations in healthy human volunteers

OBJECTIVE To assess the bioequivalence of three ibuprofen formulations (Test formulation: ibuprofen (400 mg capsule) manufactured by Cardinal Health Brasil 402 Ltda. (Sorocaba, Brazil) and licensed to Boehringer Ingelheim do Brasil Quim. e Farm. Ltda. (SA poundo Paulo, Brazil); Reference formulation (1): ibuprofen (AdvilA(R); 2 A 200 mg coated tablet) from Wyeth-Whitehall Ltda. (Itapevi, Brazil); Reference formulation (2): ibuprofen (AliviumA; 8 ml A 50 mg/ml solution) from Schering Plough S.A. (Rio de Janeiro, Brazil)) in 24 healthy volunteers of both sexes. METHODS The study was conducted using an open, randomized, three-period crossover design with at least 5-day washout interval. Plasma samples were obtained over a 24-h period. Plasma ibuprofen concentrations were analyzed by liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) with negative ion electrospray ionization using multiple reaction monitoring (MRM). The following pharmacokinetic parameters were obtained from the ibuprofen plasma concentration vs. time curves: AUC(last), AUC(trunctmax), AUC(inf) and C(max). RESULTS The limit of quantification for ibuprofen was 0.1 microg A ml(1). The geometric mean with corresponding 90% confidence interval (CI) for Test/Reference (1) percent ratios were 114.24% (90% CI = 105.67, 123.50%) for C(max), 98.97% (90% CI = 94.69, 103.44%) for AUC(last) and 99.40% (90% CI = 95.21, 103.78%) for AUC(inf). The geometric mean and respective 90% confidence interval (CI) for Test/Reference (2) percent ratios were 108.38% (90% CI = 100.19, 117.25%) for C(max), 100.79% (90% CI = 96.39, 105.40%) for AUC(last) and 101.26% (90% CI = 96.94, 105.77%) for AUC(inf); t(max) for the 400 mg Test capsule was shorter than that for the 2 A 200 mg Reference (1) tablets (p < 0.002). CONCLUSION Since the 90% CI for AUC(last), AUC(inf) and Cmax ratios were within the 80 - 125% interval proposed by the US FDA, it was concluded that ibuprofen formulation manufactured by Cardinal Health Brasil 402 Ltda. and licensed to Boehringer Ingelheim do Brasil Quim. e Farm. Ltda. is bioequivalent to the AdvilA and AliviumA formulations with regard to both the rate and the extent of absorption.

Quantification of cyproheptadine in human plasma by high-performance liquid chromatography coupled to electrospray tandem mass spectrometry in a bioequivalence study

A rapid, sensitive and specific method to quantify cyproheptadine in human plasma using amitriptyline as the internal standard (IS) is described. The analyte and the IS were extracted from plasma by liquid-liquid extraction using a diethyl-ether/dichloromethane (70/30; v/v) solvent. After removing and drying the organic phase, the extracts were reconstituted with a fixed volume of acetonitrile/water (50/50 v/v)+0.1% of acetic acid. The extracts were analyzed by high performance liquid chromatography coupled to electrospray tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). Chromatography was performed isocratically using an Alltech Prevail C18 5 µm analytical column, (150 mm x 4.6 mm I.D.). The method had a chromatographic run time of 4 min and a linear calibration curve ranging from 0.05 to 10 ng/mL (r2 > 0.99). The limit of quantification was 0.05 ng/mL. This HPLC/MS/MS procedure was used to assess the bioequivalence of cyproheptadine in two cyproheptadine + cobamamide (4 mg + 1 mg) tablet formulations (Cobactin® [cyproheptadine + cobamamide] test formulation supplied from Zambon Laboratórios Farmacêuticos Ltda. and Cobavital® from Solvay Farma (standard reference formulation)). A single 4 mg + 1 mg [cyproheptadine + cobamamide] dose of each formulation was administered to healthy volunteers. The study was conducted using an open, randomized, two-period crossover design with a 1-week washout interval. Since the 90% CI for Cmax and AUCs ratios were all within the 80-125% bioequivalence limit proposed by the US Food and Drug Administration, it was concluded that the cyproheptadine test formulation (Cobactin®) is bioequivalent to the Cobavital® formulation for both the rate and the extent of absorption of cyproheptadine.

Ciprofibrate quantification in human plasma by high-performance liquid chromatography coupled with electrospray tandem mass spectrometry for pharmacokinetic studies.

A rapid, sensitive and specific method for quantifying ciprofibrate in human plasma using bezafibrate as the internal standard (IS) is described. The sample was acidified prior extraction with formic acid (88%). The analyte and the IS were extracted from plasma by liquid-liquid extraction using an organic solvent (diethyl ether/dichloromethane 70/30 (v/v)). The extracts were analyzed by high performance liquid chromatography coupled with electrospray tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS/MS). Chromatography was performed using Genesis C18 4 μm analytical column (4.6 × 150 mm i.d.) and a mobile phase consisting of acetonitrile/water (70/30, v/v) and 1mM acetic acid. The method had a chromatographic run time of 3.4 min and a linear calibration curve over the range 0.1-60 μg/mL (r>0.99). The limit of quantification was 0.1 μg/mL. The intra- and interday accuracy and precision values of the assay were less than 13.5%. The stability tests indicated no significant degradation. The recovery of ciprofibrate was 81.2%, 73.3% and 76.2% for the 0.3, 5.0 and 48.0 ng/mL standard concentrations, respectively. For ciprofibrate, the optimized parameters of the declustering potential, collision energy and collision exit potential were -51 V, -16 eV and -5 V, respectively. The method was also validated without the use of the internal standard. This HPLC-MS/MS procedure was used to assess the bioequivalence of two ciprofibrate 100mg tablet formulations in healthy volunteers of both sexes. The following pharmacokinetic parameters were obtained from the ciprofibrate plasma concentration vs. time curves: AUC(last), AUC(0-168 h), C(max) and T(max). The geometric mean with corresponding 90% confidence interval (CI) for test/reference percent ratios were 93.80% (90% CI=88.16-99.79%) for C(max,) 98.31% (90% CI=94.91-101.83%) for AUC(last) and 97.67% (90% CI=94.45-101.01%) for AUC(0-168 h). Since the 90% CI for AUC(last), AUC(0-168 h) and C(max) ratios were within the 80-125% interval proposed by the US FDA, it was concluded that ciprofibrate (Lipless 100mg tablet) formulation manufactured by Biolab Sanus Farmacêutica Ltda. is bioequivalent to the Oroxadin (100 mg tablet) formulation for both the rate and the extent of absorption.

Comparative bioavailability of betahistine tablet formulations administered in healthy subjects.

OBJECTIVE To assess the comparative bioavailability of two formulations (16 mg tablet) of betahistine (CAS 5579-84-0) in healthy volunteers of both sexes. METHODS The study was conducted using an open, randomized, two-period crossover design with a 1-week washout interval. Plasma samples were obtained for up to 36 h post dose. Plasma 2-pyridylacetic acid concentrations were analyzed by liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS-MS) with positive ion electrospray ionization using multiple reaction monitoring (MRM). From the 2-pyridylacetic acid plasma concentration vs. time curves, the following pharmacokinetic parameters were obtained for AUCIast and Cmax. RESULTS The limit of quantification was 4 ng/mL for plasma 2-pyridylacetic acid analysis. The geometric mean and 90% confidence interval (CI) of test/reference percent ratios were: 98.94% (92.21%-106.16%) for Cmax, 95.42% (91.74%-99.25%) for AUClast. CONCLUSION Since the 90% CI for Cmax and AUCs ratios were all within the 80-125% interval proposed by the US Food and Drug Administration Agency, it was concluded that the test formulation is bioequivalent to the reference for both the rate and the extent of absorption.

Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic evaluation of a nanotechnological topical formulation of lidocaine/prilocaine (nanorap) in healthy volunteers.

Background: Nanorap is a new nanotechnological formulation for topical anesthesia composed of lidocaine (2.5%) and prilocaine (2.5%). This study evaluated the pharmacokinetics of Nanorap. For the determination of lidocaine and prilocaine in human plasma, a new method using high-performance liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry was developed. Nanorap pharmacodynamic (PD) and its physical proprieties were also evaluated. Methods: Nanorap was administered by topical application of 2 g to healthy volunteers, and blood samples were collected for the pharmacokinetics analysis. The drugs were extracted from plasma by liquid–liquid extraction with ether/hexane (80/20, vol/vol). The chromatography separation was performed on a Genesis C18 analytical column 4 &mgr;m (100 × 2.1 mm i.d.) with a mobile phase of methanol/acetonitrile/water (40/30/30, for lidocaine, and 50/30/20, for prilocaine, vol/vol/vol) + 2 mM of ammonium acetate and ropivacaine as internal standard. The drugs were quantified using a mass spectrometer with an electrospray source in the electrospray ionization positive mode configured for multiple reaction monitoring. The PD of Nanorap was evaluated with the use of a visual analog scale. Nanorap was characterized by cryofracture. Results: The chromatography run-time was 5.5 minutes for lidocaine and 3.3 minutes for prilocaine, and the lower limit of quantification was 0.05 ng/mL for both drugs. Mean Cmax was 6.62 and 1.72 ng/mL for lidocaine and prilocaine, respectively. Median Tmax was 6.5 hours for both drugs. Nanocapsules had a mean size of 88 nm and mean drug association of 92.5% and 89% for lidocaine and prilocaine, respectively. The PD study showed that Nanorap has a sufficient analgesic effect (>30% reduction in pain) after 10 minutes of application. Conclusions: A new simple, selective, and sensitive method for determination of lidocaine and prilocaine in human plasma was developed. Nanorap generated safe plasma levels of the drugs and satisfactory analgesic effect.

Quantification of dapaconazole in human plasma using high-performance liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry: application to a phase I study.

A simple, selective and sensitive method based on high-performance liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS/MS) has been developed for the determination of dapaconazole in human plasma using tioconazole as internal standard. The drugs were extracted from plasma by liquid-liquid extraction with ether/hexane (80/20, v/v). The chromatography separation was performed on a Genesis(®) C18 reversed phase analytical column 4μm (100×2.1mm i.d.) with a mobile phase of methanol/acetonitrile/water (80/10/10, v/v/v)+ammonium acetate (0.5mM). Dapaconazole was quantified using a mass spectrometer with an electrospray source in the ESI positive mode (ES+) configured for multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) to monitor the transitions 415.1>159.2 and 387.0>131.0 for dapaconazole and tioconazole, respectively. The method had a chromatography run time of 3.8min and a linear calibration curve over the range 0.2-100ng/mL (r=0.9998). The lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) was 0.2ng/mL. The precision and accuracy values of the assay were within ±10%. The stability tests indicate no significant degradation under the conditions of the experiment. This method was used for a phase I study of topical administration of dapaconazole tosylate in healthy human male volunteers.

Comparative bioavailability of two escitalopram formulations in healthy human volunteers

OBJECTIVE To assess the bioequivalence of two escitalopram formulations (Test formulation: escitalopram (10 mg tablet) manufactured by Apsen Farmacêutica S.A.) Reference formulation: escitalopram (Lexapro; 10 mg tablet) from Lundbeck Brasil Ltda) in healthy volunteers of both sexes. METHODS The study was conducted using an open, randomized, two-period crossover design with at least a 21-day washout interval. Plasma samples were obtained over a 168 h period. Plasma escitalopram concentrations were analyzed by liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS-MS) with positive ion electrospray ionization using multiple reaction monitoring (MRM). The following pharmacokinetic parameters were obtained from the escitalopram plasma concentration vs. time curves: AUC(last), AUC(inf) and C(max). RESULTS The limit of quantification for escitalopram was 0.2 ng x ml(-1). The geometric mean with corresponding 90% confidence interval (CI) for Test/Reference percent ratios were 97.35% (90% CI = 90.28-104.96%) for C(max), 99.60% (90% CI = 92.93-106.74%) for AUC(last) and 99.92% (90% CI = 93.34-106.97%) for AUC(inf). CONCLUSION Since the 90% CI for AUClast, AUCinf and Cmax ratios were within the 80-125% interval proposed by the US FDA, it was concluded that escitalopram formulation manufactured by Apsen Farmacêutica S.A. is bioequivalent to the Lexapro formulation in regard to both the rate and the extent of absorption.

The rabbit vagina as an in vivo model for vaginal fenticonazole permeability and toxicity

INTRODUCTION Vaginal route is often used in topical antifungal formulations. Vaginal permeability assays are generally performed as in vitro tests. METHOD An in vivo vaginal permeability assay was developed using female rabbits. Fenticonazole permeability was evaluated by assessing fenticonazole bioavailability in plasma by liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS-MS). Toxicity was monitored histopathologically after 8 consecutive days of antifungal treatment (20 mg/animal). RESULTS The method of quantification was linear with a lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) of (0.1 ng/mL). The area-under-the-curves (AUC) of fenticonazole on day 1 and 8 of treatment were 280.3 ± 86.1 ng/mL ∗ h and 805.7 ± 252.4 ng/mL ∗ h, respectively. The calculated systemic bioavailability was 12.73% ± 0.14%. No signs of toxicity were observed both macroscopically and histologically after 8 days fenticonazole treatment. DISCUSSION The plasma levels of fenticonazole observed in rabbits are similar to that observed in human. Rabbit vagina may be a suitable model to evaluate vaginal antifungal formulations.