Luca Croci

The ART score is not effective to select patients for transarterial chemoembolization retreatment in an Italian series.

Background: The ART score (a point score for the assessment of retreatment with transarterial chemoembolization, TACE) has been recently developed in Austria to differentiate patients who may benefit from multiple sessions of TACE for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treatment. The primary aim of the study was to test the validity of the ART score in an Italian study cohort. The secondary aims were to evaluate overall survival (OS) and clinical determinants of improved survival in patients treated with multiple TACE sessions. Methods: The ART score and the clinical outcome of 51 consecutive patients with HCC submitted to multiple TACE sessions from April 2002 to December 2009 were retrospectively analyzed. Results: Median OS was 26.0 months (95% confidence interval 18.4-33.6) with 1-, 3- and 5-year survival rates of 75, 33 and 11%, respectively). Thirty-three patients had an ART score of 0-1.5 and in 18 it was ≥2.5, but in our patient series, the ART score was not found to be a predictor of survival (p = 0.173). At univariate analysis, tumor extent (uni- vs. bilobar: 34.0 vs. 9.0 months; p < 0.001), Child-Pugh score before the second TACE (A vs. B7 vs. B8-9: 26.0 vs. 16.0 vs. 5.0 months; p = 0.005) and Child-Pugh score increase between the first and second TACE (absent vs. + 1 point vs. + ≥2 points: 27.0 vs. 4.0 vs. 5.0 months; p < 0.001) were statistically related with survival. At multivariate analysis, only Child-Pugh score increase remained a significant predictor of worse survival (p = 0.001, hazard rate = 11.6). Conclusions: The ART score was not found to work as an objective tool to guide TACE retreatment in our Italian patient series, only the Child-Pugh score increase was an independent predictor of a shorter survival.

Contents Vol. 32, 2014

Europe F. Bazzoli, Bologna M.W. Büchler, Heidelberg P. Dítě, Brno J.E. Domínguez-Muñoz, Santiago de Compostela P. Ferenci, Vienna J.-P. Galmiche, Nantes G. Gasbarrini, Bologna S.D. Ladas, Athens L. Lundell, Stockholm K.E.L. McColl, Strathblane P. Michetti, Lausanne C. O’Morain, Dublin G. Rogler, Zürich Z. Tulassay, Budapest G.N.J. Tytgat, Amsterdam Asia Pacifi c M. Asaka, Sapporo J.-Y. Fang, Shanghai K.M. Fock, Singapore K.L. Goh, Kuala Lumpur J.D. Sollano, Manila K. Sugano, Shimotsuke J.Y. Sung, Hong Kong N.J. Talley, Callaghan, N.S.W.

A case of inflammatory ascites

Abstract Case background: Ascites appears mainly as a consequence of portal hypertension in patients with liver cirrhosis, or can be caused by several other causes, such us congestive heart failure, peritoneal malignancy, or tuberculosis. In some cases, ascites can pose a diagnostic challenge for clinicians and in some patients, despite thorough and extensive work-up, the origin of this ascites remains unknown. Case report: In the unusual case hereby reported, a 52-year-old man developed severe ascites in a few weeks, in the absence of known liver disease or congestive hearth failure. We performed laboratory analysis, endoscopic, and imaging investigations, including abdominal contrast-enhanced computed tomography and 18-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography. Peritoneal fluid analysis showed exudative fluid without neoplastic cells. A diagnostic laparoscopy with multiple diagnostic biopsies was carried out, but no macroscopic cause of the ascites was found; histopathological examination showed minimal aspects of diffuse and non-specific chronic inflammation. Conclusions: We decided to empirically treat the patient with steroid therapy (methylprednisolone: 0·5 mg/kg/day). Over a period of 6 weeks, his ascites resolved and at 2 months, he was in remission on low-dose methylprednisolone. Our final hypothesis was reactive inflammatory ascites. The literature on ascites and its management has also been reviewed.