Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Luca Pantaleo is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Luca Pantaleo.


Archive | 2018

Anti-terrorism Smart Sanctions and Armed Conflicts

Luca Pantaleo

Since the early 2000s, states and international organisations have intensified their efforts against terrorism, in particular to combat the financing of terrorism. The use of so-called smart sanctions has been a core element of this large-scale strategy. One question that had seldom been raised until very recently was that relating to the application of such sanctions to entities that are supposedly involved in an armed conflict against a State. The aim of this chapter is to address this question from a general international law perspective. The EU practice and case law is used as a starting point in order to assess whether the application of restrictive measures conflicts with the rights and privileges conferred by international humanitarian law (IHL) to the parties to an armed conflict, and in particular to the non-State party to that conflict.


Archive | 2017

Beyond Parallel Powers. EU Treaty-Making Power Post-Lisbon

Mads Andenas; Luca Pantaleo

This chapter examines the competence divide between the EU and the Member States in the field of the common commercial policy, and its relation to the internal division of competence relating to the common market. It considers that in light of the novelties introduced by the Treaty of Lisbon and the developments that have occurred in recent case law and practice, there seems to be an emerging trend pointing to a conceptual and practical separation of EU external and internal powers—which would mark a departure from the so-called principle of parallel powers. As is well known, the latter requires that EU internal competences be mirrored by corresponding parallel external competences. However, it is argued that it does not impose a parallel in the other direction, bringing the authors to the conclusion that the EU has the power to conclude an agreement even in areas where the corresponding internal powers belong to the Member States. The competence of the latter would not be infringed or encroached upon by the conclusion of such an agreement to the extent that the Member States retain the power to implement the agreement at the internal level. This chapter demonstrates that this trend has clearly emerged in the framework of the common commercial policy but it may in principle also apply to other EU external powers.


Archive | 2016

The European Union as a Global Model for Trade and Investment

Luca Pantaleo; Mads Andenas; Cristina Reul


European Business Law Review | 2017

Investment Disputes under CETA: From Gold Standards to Best Practices?

Luca Pantaleo


Student Undergraduate Research E-journal | 2017

The clash between mutual recognition, fundamental rights and public security: Recent developments in the CJEU's case-law in the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice.

Elena Emilia Popa; Luca Pantaleo


SURE! Student Undergraduate Research E-journal! | 2017

The Clash between Fundamental Rights, Mutual Recognition & Public Security : Recent developments in the CJEU’s case law in the field of AFSJ

Elena Emilia Popa; Luca Pantaleo


Archive | 2017

The Reach of Free Movement

Mads Andenas; Tarjei Bekkedal; Luca Pantaleo


European Business Law Review | 2017

Introduction: The European Union as a Global (Legal) Role Model for Trade and Investment?

Luca Pantaleo; Mads Andenas


Archive | 2016

Tiptoeing to TTIP: What Kind of Agreement for What Kind of Partnership?

Luca Pantaleo


Archive | 2016

Anti-Terrorism Measures and Armed Conflicts

Luca Pantaleo

Collaboration


Dive into the Luca Pantaleo's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Mads Andenas

School of Advanced Study

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Elena Emilia Popa

The Hague University of Applied Sciences

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge