Lucas P. Spaete

Vegetation and Slope Effects on Accuracy of a LiDAR-Derived DEM in the Sagebrush Steppe

This study analysed the errors associated with vegetation cover type and slope in a Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) derived digital elevation model (DEM) in a semiarid environment in southwest Idaho, USA. Reference data were collected over a range of vegetation cover types and slopes. Reference data were compared to bare-ground raster values and root mean square error (RMSE) and mean signed error (MSE) were used to quantify errors. Results indicate that vegetation cover type and slope have statistically significant effects on the accuracy of a LiDAR-derived bare-earth DEM. RMSE and MSE ranged from 0.072 to 0.220 m and from −0.154 to 0.017 m, respectively, with the largest errors associated with herbaceous cover and steep slopes. The lowest errors were associated with low sagebrush and low-slope environments. Although the RMSEs in this study were lower than those reported by others, further refinement of the accuracy of LiDAR systems may be needed for fine-scale vegetation and terrain applications in rangeland environments.

Airborne LiDAR and Terrestrial Laser Scanning Derived Vegetation Obstruction Factors for Visibility Models

Research presented here explores the feasibility of leveraging vegetation data derived from airborne light detection and ranging (LiDAR) and terrestrial laser scanning (TLS) for visibility modeling. Using LiDAR and TLS datasets of a lodgepole pine (Pinus contorta) dominant ecosystem, tree canopy and trunk obstructions were isolated relevant to a discrete visibility beam in a short-range line-of-sight model. Cumulative obstruction factors from vegetation were compared with reference visibility values from digital photographs along sightline paths. LiDAR-derived tree factors were augmented with single-scan TLS data for obstruction prediction. Good correlation between datasets was found up to 10 m from the terrestrial scanner, but fine scale visibility modeling was problematic at longer distances. Analysis of correlation and regression results reveal the influence of obstruction shadowing inherent to discrete LiDAR and TLS, potentially limiting the feasibility of modeling visibility over large areas with similar technology. However, the results support the potential for TLS-derived subcanopy metrics for augmenting large amounts of aerial LiDAR data to significantly improve models of forest structure. Subtle LiDAR processing improvements, including more accurate tree delineation through higher point density aerial data, combined with better vegetation quantification processes for TLS data, will advance the feasibility and accuracy of data integration.

Improved visibility calculations with tree trunk obstruction modeling from aerial LiDAR

Viewshed and line-of-sight are spatial analysis functions used in applications ranging from urban design to archaeology to hydrology. Vegetation data, a difficult variable to effectively emulate in computer models, is typically omitted from visibility calculations or unrealistically simulated. In visibility analyzes performed on a small scale, where calculation distances are a few hundred meters or less, ineffective incorporation of vegetation can lead to significant modeling error. Using an aerial LiDAR (light detection and ranging) data set of a lodgepole pine (Pinus contorta) dominant ecosystem in Idaho, USA, tree obstruction metrics were derived and integrated into a short-range visibility model. A total of 15 visibility plots were set at a micro-scale level, with visibility modeled to a maximum of 50 m from an observation point. Digital photographs of a 1 m2 target set at 5 m increments along three sightline paths for each visibility plot were used to establish control visibility values. Trunk obstructions, derived from mean vegetation height LiDAR data and processed through a series of tree structure algorithms, were factored into visibility calculations and compared to reference data. Results indicate the model calculated using trunk obstructions with LiDAR demonstrated a mean error of 8.8% underestimation of target visibility, while alternative methods using mean vegetation height and bare-earth models have an underestimation of 65.7% and overestimation of 31.1%, respectively.

Lidar Aboveground Vegetation Biomass Estimates in Shrublands: Prediction, Uncertainties and Application to Coarser Scales

Our study objectives were to model the aboveground biomass in a xeric shrub-steppe landscape with airborne light detection and ranging (Lidar) and explore the uncertainty associated with the models we created. We incorporated vegetation vertical structure information obtained from Lidar with ground-measured biomass data, allowing us to scale shrub biomass from small field sites (1 m subplots and 1 ha plots) to a larger landscape. A series of airborne Lidar-derived vegetation metrics were trained and linked with the field-measured biomass in Random Forests (RF) regression models. A Stepwise Multiple Regression (SMR) model was also explored as a comparison. Our results demonstrated that the important predictors from Lidar-derived metrics had a strong correlation with field-measured biomass in the RF regression models with a pseudo R2 of 0.76 and RMSE of 125 g/m2 for shrub biomass and a pseudo R2 of 0.74 and RMSE of 141 g/m2 for total biomass, and a weak correlation with field-measured herbaceous biomass. The SMR results were similar but slightly better than RF, explaining 77–79% of the variance, with RMSE ranging from 120 to 129 g/m2 for shrub and total biomass, respectively. We further explored the computational efficiency and relative accuracies of using point cloud and raster Lidar metrics at different resolutions (1 m to 1 ha). Metrics derived from the Lidar point cloud processing led to improved biomass estimates at nearly all resolutions in comparison to raster-derived Lidar metrics. Only at 1 m were the results from the point cloud and raster products nearly equivalent. The best Lidar prediction models of biomass at the plot-level (1 ha) were achieved when Lidar metrics were derived from an average of fine resolution (1 m) metrics to minimize boundary effects and to smooth variability. Overall, both RF and SMR methods explained more than 74% of the variance in biomass, with the most important Lidar variables being associated with vegetation structure and statistical measures of this structure (e.g., standard deviation of height was a strong predictor of biomass). Using our model results, we developed spatially-explicit Lidar estimates of total and shrub biomass across our study site in the Great Basin, U.S.A., for monitoring and planning in this imperiled ecosystem.

A first overview of SnowEx ground-based remote sensing activities during the winter 2016–2017

NASA SnowExs goal is estimating how much water is stored in Earths terrestrial snow-covered regions. To that end, two fundamental questions drive the mission objectives: (a) What is the distribution of snow-water equivalent (SWE), and the snow energy balance, among different canopy and topographic situations?; and (b) What is the sensitivity and accuracy of different SWE sensing techniques among these different areas? In situ, ground-based and airborne remote sensing observations were collected during winter 2016–2017 in Colorado to provide the scientific community with data needed to work on these key questions. An intensive period of observations occurred in February 2017 during which over 30 remote sensing instruments were used. Their observations were coordinated with in situ measurements from snowpits (e.g. profiles of stratigraphy, density, grain size and type, specific surface area, temperature) and along transects (mainly for snow depth measurements). Both remote sensing and in situ data will be archived and publicly distributed by the National Snow and Ice Data Center at nsidc.org/data/snowex.

Emerging technology to measure habitat quality and behavior of grouse: Examples from studies of greater sage-grouse

An increasing number of threats, both natural (e.g. fires, drought) and anthropogenic (e.g. agriculture, infrastructure development), are likely to affect both availability and quality of plants that grouse rely on for cover and food. As such, there is an increasing need to monitor plants and their use by grouse over space and time to better predict how changes in habitat quality influence the behavior of grouse. We use the greater sage-grouse Centrocercus urophasianus to showcase how new technology can be used to advance our understanding of the ecology, behavior and conservation of grouse. We demonstrate how laser, spectral and chemical detectors and unmanned aerial systems can be used to measure structural and phytochemical predictors of habitat quality at several spatial scales. We also demonstrate how advanced biotelemetry systems and robotic animals can be used to measure how habitat quality influences fine-scale habitat use, movement and reproductive effort of grouse. Integrating these technologies will allow researchers to better assess and manage the links among habitat quality (safety and food), resource acquisition (foraging behavior) and reproductive behaviors of grouse.

Spatial pattern of soil organic carbon acquired from hyperspectral imagery at reynolds creek critical zone observatory (RC-CZO)

Soil Organic Carbon (SOC) is a key soil property and is important for understanding carbon storage and soil-vegetation dynamics. Hyperspectral imagery (imaging spectroscopy) providing detailed spectral signatures of vegetation and soil make it possible to continuously map SOC content over a watershed scale. In this paper, the Next Generation Airborne Visible / Infrared Imaging Spectrometer (AVTPJSng) was used with an unmixing algorithm, the Multiple Endmember Spectral Mixture Analysis, to differentiate fractional cover of healthy vegetation, stressed vegetation and soil at the Reynolds Creek Critical Zone Observatory (PC-CZO). The fractional cover information was used to remove noisy spectra and the resulting residual spectra were used to predict SOC by Partial Least Squares Regression (PLSP). The results showed that the root mean standard error and mean bias of the predicted SOC (%) are 0.75 and 2.4, respectively. We found the best relationship between SOC and spectra after filtering out the influence of green vegetation from mixed spectra. The resulting residual, spectra comprised of stressed vegetation and soil, contained enough information for mapping SOC distribution within the shrub dominated regions of the watershed. This may provide a method to better understand the interaction of soil and vegetation in semiarid ecosystems.