Luciana Nardinelli

Successful Pregnancy and Delivery in a Patient with Chronic Myeloid Leukemia while on Dasatinib Therapy.

Here we report the case of an 18-year-old woman with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) who became pregnant while undergoing treatment with dasatinib. Before pregnancy, she received imatinib mesylate therapy but could not tolerate the treatment. The regimen was then changed to dasatinib at a dose of 70 mg b.i.d. While she was in hematological remission and on dasatinib therapy, she became pregnant. The unplanned pregnancy was identified after the patient had experienced four weeks of amenorrhea. Because the patient elected to continue the pregnancy to term, dasatinib was stopped immediately. Meanwhile, CML hematological relapse occurred and then she was treated with interferon-α (IFN-α) (9 million IU/day) throughout the pregnancy without a complete hematological response. She successfully gave birth to a male baby at 33 weeks by cesarean section delivery with no sequelae or malformations. Although this experience is limited to a single patient, it provides a useful contribution for counselling patients inadvertently exposed to dasatinib during pregnancy.

Pretherapeutic Expression of the hOCT1 Gene Predicts a Complete Molecular Response to Imatinib Mesylate in Chronic-Phase Chronic Myeloid Leukemia

In this retrospective study we evaluated the pretherapeutic mRNA expression of the hOCT1 (human organic cation transporter 1) gene in patients with chronic-phase (CP) chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) who varied in terms of their response to imatinib (IM). hOCT1 mRNA was quantified by real-time PCR. Patients were classified as expressing either high (n = 44) or low hOCT1 mRNA (n = 44). The complete cytogenetic response rates observed at 6, 12 and 18 months were 47.7, 84.1 and 91%, respectively, in patients with high hOCT1 mRNA and 47.5, 81.8 and 86.3%, respectively, in patients with low hOCT1 transcripts. The major molecular response rates were not significantly different between patients with high and low hOCT1 mRNA after 6 months of therapy (22.7 vs. 9.1%; p = 0.07), but they were significantly different after 12 months (54.5 vs. 31.8%; p = 0.026) and 18 months (77.2 vs. 56.8%; p = 0.034). Complete molecular responses were observed in 5 patients with low and 17 patients with high hOCT1 mRNA (p = 0.003). The 5-year event-free and overall survival analyses revealed no significant differences between the groups. These data imply that knowledge of the pretherapeutic level of hOCT1 could be a useful marker to predict IM therapy outcome in treatment-naïve CP CML patients.

Response to Dasatinib in a Patient with Concomitant Chronic Myeloid Leukemia and Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia

While chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) are common diseases in the elderly, they rarely occur simultaneously in the same patient. Here we present the case of a 77-year-old patient diagnosed with CML in the chronic phase who showed an optimal response to 400 mg/day of imatinib. This patient progressed to Binet B-CLL with an 11q22.3 deletion and CD38 positivity in the 4th month of treatment. During the follow-up, his lymphocyte number doubled in <6 months. Based on previous reports, dasatinib was chosen instead of imatinib. After 6 months of treatment with 100 mg/day of dasatinib, the patient demonstrated a partial response, characterized by the regression of lymph node enlargement, a hemoglobin level of 10.7 g/dl, neutrophils of 1.7 × 109/l, a 82% reduction in the lymphocyte number and an increase in cytotoxic CD8+ and large granular lymphocytes. This partial response has persisted to the present time. While little data have been published regarding the in vitro effect of dasatinib monotherapy for CLL, this case report provides some evidence of the clinical activity of dasatinib in CLL.

BCR-ABL Mutations in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Treated With Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors and Impact on Survival

This is the largest Latin American study of BCR-ABL mutations in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patients, resistant to imatinib (IM). In 195/467 (41%) patients, mutations were detected. The most frequent mutation was T315I (n = 31, 16%). Progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) at 5 years were lower in patients with BCR-ABL mutations (43% vs. 65%, p = 0.07 and 47% vs. 72%, p = 0.03, respectively) and in those with the T315I mutation (p = 0.003 and p = 0.03). OS and PFS were superior in subgroup who switched to second generation inhibitors (SGIs) after IM failure (OS: 50% vs. 39% p = 0.01; PFS: 48% vs. 30% p = 0.02). BCR-ABL mutations conferred a significant poor prognosis in CML patients.

Determination of serum levels of imatinib mesylate in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia: validation and application of a new analytical method to monitor treatment compliance

Objective The goal of this study was to monitor imatinib mesylate therapeutically in the Tumor Biology Laboratory, Department of Hematology and Hemotherapy, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo (USP). A simple and sensitive method to quantify imatinib and its metabolite (CGP74588) in human serum was developed and fully validated in order to monitor treatment compliance. Methods The method used to quantify these compounds in serum included protein precipitation extraction followed by instrumental analysis using high performance liquid chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry. The method was validated for several parameters, including selectivity, precision, accuracy, recovery and linearity. Results The parameters evaluated during the validation stage exhibited satisfactory results based on the Food and Drug Administration and the Brazilian Health Surveillance Agency (ANVISA) guidelines for validating bioanalytical methods. These parameters also showed a linear correlation greater than 0.99 for the concentration range between 0.500 µg/mL and 10.0 µg/mL and a total analysis time of 13 minutes per sample. This study includes results (imatinib serum concentrations) for 308 samples from patients being treated with imatinib mesylate. Conclusion The method developed in this study was successfully validated and is being efficiently used to measure imatinib concentrations in samples from chronic myeloid leukemia patients to check treatment compliance. The imatinib serum levels of patients achieving a major molecular response were significantly higher than those of patients who did not achieve this result. These results are thus consistent with published reports concerning other populations.

Molecular measurement of BCR-ABL transcript variations in chronic myeloid leukemia patients in cytogenetic remission

BackgroundThe monitoring of BCR-ABL transcript levels by real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) has become important to assess minimal residual disease (MRD) and standard of care in the treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). In this study, we performed a prospective, sequential analysis using RT-qPCR monitoring of BCR-ABL gene rearrangements in blood samples from 91 CML patients in chronic phase (CP) who achieved complete cytogenetic remission (CCyR) and major molecular remission (MMR) throughout imatinib treatment.MethodsThe absolute level of BCR-ABL transcript from peripheral blood was serially measured every 4 to 12 weeks by RT-qPCR. Only level variations > 0.5%, according to the international scale, was considered positive. Sequential cytogenetic analysis was also performed in bone marrow samples from all patients using standard protocols.ResultsBased on sequential analysis of BCR-ABL transcripts, the 91 patients were divided into three categories: (A) 57 (62.6%) had no variation on sequential analysis; (B) 30 (32.9%) had a single positive variation result obtained in a single sample; and (C) 4 (4.39%) had variations of BCR-ABL transcripts in at least two consecutive samples. Of the 34 patients who had elevated levels of transcripts (group B and C), 19 (55.8%) had a < 1% of BCR-ABL/BCR ratio, 13 (38.2%) patients had a 1% to 10% increase and 2 patients had a >10% increase of RT-qPCR. The last two patients had lost a CCyR, and none of them showed mutations in the ABL gene. Transient cytogenetic alterations in Ph-negative cells were observed in five (5.5%) patients, and none of whom lost CCyR.ConclusionsDespite an increase levels of BCR-ABL/BCR ratio variations by RT-qPCR, the majority of CML patients with MMR remained in CCyR. Thus, such single variations should neither be considered predictive of subsequent failure and nor an indication for altering imatinib dose or switching to second generation therapy. Changing of imatinib on the basis of BCR-ABL/BCR% sustained increase and mutational studies is a prudent approach for preserving other therapeutic options in imatinib-resistant patients.

Evaluation of Long-Term Outcomes, Cytogenetic and Molecular Responses with Imatinib Mesylate in Early and Late Chronic-Phase Chronic Myeloid Leukemia: A Report from a Single Institute

Here we compare the management and survival outcomes of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patients who had early or late imatinib mesylate (IM) therapy. The cytogenetic and molecular responses of 189 CML patients were analyzed. Of this group, 121 patients were classified as the early chronic phase (ECP) group and started IM within 12 months of diagnosis. The other 68 patients were classified as the late chronic phase (LCP) group who had been treated with interferon (IFN)-alpha-2 and crossed over to IM more than 12 months after diagnosis. The overall rates of complete cytogenetic response (CCyR) and major molecular response (MMR) at last follow-up were 83.6 and 78.1% in the ECP and LCP groups, respectively. The CCyR rates were 89.3 (for ECP patients) versus 73.5% (for LCP patients; p < 0.0001). At last follow-up, 82.4% ECP and 64.2% LCP patients had achieved an MMR (p < 0.0001). No significant differences were noted between the two groups with regard to survival outcomes. Our experience reveals that IM is an effective rescue therapy in most CML LCP patients who are intolerant or in whom IFN-alpha therapy fails. Such therapeutic options should be considered in LCP patients, particularly in countries where IM may not be available.

Comparative study of different methodologies to detect the JAK2 V617F mutation in chronic BCR-ABL1 negative myeloproliferative neoplasms

Objectives A mutation in the JAK2 gene, V617F, has been identified in several BCR-ABL1 negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN): polycythemia vera (PV), essential thrombocythemia (ET), and primary myelofibrosis (PMF). Defining the presence or absence of this mutation is an essential part of clinical diagnostic algorithms and patient management. Here, we aimed to evaluate the performance of three PCR-based assays: Amplification Refractory Mutation System (ARMS), High-Resolution Melting analysis (HRM), and Sanger direct sequencing, and compare their results with those obtained by a PCR restriction fragment polymorphism assay (PCR-RFLP). Design and methods We used blood samples from 136 patients (PV=20; PMF=20; ET=28, and other MPN suspected cases=68). Results Comparable results were observed among the four assays in patients with PV, PMF, and MPN suspected cases. In patients with a diagnosis of ET, the JAK2 V617F mutation was detected in 67.8% of them by the PCR-ARMS and PCR-HRM assay and in 64% of them by the conventional Sanger sequence approach. The PCR-ARMS and PCR-HRM assays were 100% concordant. With these tests, only one of the 20 patients with ET and one of the three patients with clinically suspected MPN gave different results compared with those obtained by the PCR-RFLP. Conclusions Our results have demonstrated that the PCR-ARMS and PCR-HRM assays could detect the JAK2 V617F mutation effectively in MPN patients, but PCR-HRM assays are rapid and the most cost-effective procedures.

Deletion of RUNX1 exons 1 and 2 associated with familial platelet disorder with propensity to acute myeloid leukemia

Familial platelet disorder with propensity to acute myeloid leukemia (FPD/AML) associated with RUNX1 mutations is an autosomal dominant disorder included in the group of the myeloid neoplasms with germ line predisposition. We describe two brothers who were diagnosed with hematological malignancies (one with AML and the other with T-cell lymphoblastic lymphoma). There was a history of leukemia in the paternal family and two of their siblings presented with low platelet counts and no history of significant bleeding. A microdeletion encompassing exons 1-2 of RUNX1 (outside the cluster region of the Runt Homology domain and the transactivation domain) was detected in six family members using array-CGH and MLPA validation. A low platelet count was not present in all deletion carriers and, therefore, it should not be used as an indication for screening in suspected families and family members.

Acknowledgements to Referees

Gregory A. Abel, Boston, USA Athanasios Aessopos, Athens, Greece Xabier Agirre, Navarra, Spain Graciela S. Alarcon, Birmingham, USA J.P. Allain, Cambridge, UK S.D. Anker, Berlin, Germany Jane F. Apperley, London, UK A. Arai, Tokyo, Japan Aderson Araújo, Recife, Brazil Luca Arcaini, Pavia, Italy Paolo Arese, Torino, Italy Maurizio Aricò, Florence, Italy Scott A. Armstrong, Boston, USA Roopen Arya, London, UK Giuseppe Avvisati, Rome, Italy Yesim Aydinok, Izmir, Turkey Ulrike Bacher, Hamburg, Germany Andrea Bacigalupo, Genoa, Italy Catherine Bagot, Glasgow, UK Carmen Baldazzi, Bologna, Italy Bernadett Balla, Budapest, Hungary David Barnett, Sheffield, UK Giovanni Barosi, Pavia, Italy Sharon L. Barrans, Leeds, UK Eva Bartova, Brno, Czech Republic Christian Bastard, Rouen, France Heiko Becker, Freiburg, Germany John M. Bennett, Rochester, USA M. Bennett, Afula, Israel J.A. Bernstein, Cincinnati, USA Erik Berntorp, Malmo, Sweden Alain Berrebi, Rehovot, Israel Caroline Besson, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France Wolfgang A. Bethge, Tübingen, Germany Deepa Bhojwani, Memphis, USA Janet J. Bijl, Montréal, Canada Douglas P. Blackall, Little Rock, USA Olga Blau, Berlin, Germany Dominique Bonnefont-Rousselot, Paris, France X. Bosch, Barcelona, Spain Reda Bouabdallah, Marseille, France Vassiliki A. Boussiotis, Boston, USA From September 1, 2011 to August 31, 2012 a number of additional referees assisted the editors with reviews of the submitted papers. The editors would like to thank the following colleagues: