Lucie Galand
Paris Dauphine University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Lucie Galand.
european conference on artificial intelligence | 2012
Denis Cornaz; Lucie Galand; Olivier Spanjaard
This paper is devoted to the proportional representation (PR) problem when the preferences are clustered single-peaked. PR is a multi-winner election problem, that we study in Chamberlin and Courants scheme [6]. We define clustered single-peakedness as a form of single-peakedness with respect to clusters of candidates, i.e. subsets of candidates that are consecutive (in arbitrary order) in the preferences of all voters. We show that the PR problem becomes polynomial when the size of the largest cluster of candidates (width) is bounded. Furthermore, we establish the polynomiality of determining the single-peaked width of a preference profile (minimum width for a partition of candidates into clusters compatible with clustered single-peakedness) when the preferences are narcissistic (i.e., every candidate is the most preferred one for some voter).
multiple criteria decision making | 2010
Lucie Galand; Patrice Perny; Olivier Spanjaard
This paper is devoted to the search for Choquet-optimal solutions in multicriteria combinatorial optimization with application to spanning tree problems and knapsack problems. After recalling basic notions concerning the use of Choquet integrals for preference aggregation, we present a condition (named preference for interior points) that characterizes preferences favoring well-balanced solutions, a natural attitude in multicriteria optimization. When using a Choquet integral as preference model, this condition amounts to choosing a submodular (resp. supermodular) capacity when criteria have to be minimized (resp. maximized). Under this assumption, we investigate the determination of Choquet-optimal solutions in the multicriteria spanning tree problem and the multicriteria 0-1 knapsack problem. For both problems, we introduce a linear bound for the Choquet integral, computable in polynomial time, and propose a branch and bound procedure using this bound. We provide numerical experiments that show the actual efficiency of the algorithms on various instances of different sizes.
Computers & Operations Research | 2012
Lucie Galand; Olivier Spanjaard
This paper deals with the multiobjective version of the optimal spanning tree problem. More precisely, we are interested in determining the optimal spanning tree according to an Ordered Weighted Average (OWA) of its objective values. We first show that the problem is weakly NP-hard. We then propose different mixed integer programming formulations, according to different subclasses of OWA functions. Furthermore, we provide various preprocessing procedures, the validity scopes of which depend again on the considered subclass of OWA functions. For designing such procedures, we propose generalized optimality conditions and efficiently computable bounds. These procedures enable to reduce the size of the instances before launching an off-the-shelf software for solving the mixed integer program. Their impact on the resolution time is evaluated on the basis of numerical experiments.
Computers & Operations Research | 2014
Lyes Belhoul; Lucie Galand; Daniel Vanderpooten
In this paper, we consider the problem of determining a best compromise solution for the multi-objective assignment problem. Such a solution minimizes a scalarizing function, such as the weighted Tchebychev norm or reference point achievement functions. To solve this problem, we resort to a ranking (or k-best) algorithm which enumerates feasible solutions according to an appropriate weighted sum until a condition, ensuring that an optimal solution has been found, is met. The ranking algorithm is based on a branch and bound scheme. We study how to implement efficiently this procedure by considering different algorithmic variants within the procedure: choice of the weighted sum, branching and bounding schemes. We present an experimental analysis that enables us to point out the best variants, and we provide experimental results showing the remarkable efficiency of the procedure, even for large size instances.
algorithmic decision theory | 2015
Lucie Galand; Thibaut Lust
This paper deals with biobjective combinatorial optimization problems where both objectives are required to be well-balanced. Lorenz dominance is a refinement of the Pareto dominance that has been proposed in economics to measure the inequalities in income distributions. We consider in this work the problem of computing the Lorenz optimal solutions to combinatorial optimization problems where solutions are evaluated by a two-component vector. This setting can encompass fair optimization or robust optimization. The computation of Lorenz optimal solutions in biobjective combinatorial optimization is however challenging it has been shown intractable and NP-hard on certain problems. Nevertheless, to our knowledge, very few works address this problem. We propose thus in this work new methods to generate Lorenz optimal solutions. More precisely, we consider the adaptation of the well-known two-phase method proposed in biobjective optimization for computing Pareto optimal solutions to the direct computing of Lorenz optimal solutions. We show that some properties of the Lorenz dominance can provide a more efficient variant of the two-phase method. The results of the new method are compared to state-of-the-art methods on various biobjective combinatorial optimization problems and we show that the new method is more efficient in a majority of cases.
Conference of the Spanish Association for Artificial Intelligence | 2013
Enrique Machuca; Lawrence Mandow; Lucie Galand
This work evaluates two different approaches for multicriteria graph search problems using compromise preferences. This approach focuses search on a single solution that represents a balanced tradeoff between objectives, rather than on the whole set of Pareto optimal solutions. We review the main concepts underlying compromise preferences, and two main approaches proposed for their solution in heuristic graph problems: naive Pareto search (NAMOA*), and a k-shortest-path approach (kA*). The performance of both approaches is evaluated on sets of standard bicriterion road map problems. The experiments reveal that the k-shortest-path approach looses effectiveness in favor of naive Pareto search as graph size increases. The reasons for this behavior are analyzed and discussed.
international joint conference on artificial intelligence | 2013
Denis Cornaz; Lucie Galand; Olivier Spanjaard
the florida ai research society | 2007
Lucie Galand; Olivier Spanjaard
international joint conference on artificial intelligence | 2013
Lucie Galand; Julien Lesca; Patrice Perny
8ème Congrès de la Société Française de Recherche Opérationnelle et d'Aide à la Décision (ROADEF 2007) | 2007
Lucie Galand; Olivier Spanjaard