Lucile Amrouche

Urinary C-X-C Motif Chemokine 10 Independently Improves the Noninvasive Diagnosis of Antibody–Mediated Kidney Allograft Rejection

Urinary levels of C-X-C motif chemokine 9 (CXCL9) and CXCL10 can noninvasively diagnose T cell-mediated rejection (TCMR) of renal allografts. However, performance of these molecules as diagnostic/prognostic markers of antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) is unknown. We investigated urinary CXCL9 and CXCL10 levels in a highly sensitized cohort of 244 renal allograft recipients (67 with preformed donor-specific antibodies [DSAs]) with 281 indication biopsy samples. We assessed the benefit of adding these biomarkers to conventional models for diagnosing/prognosing ABMR. Urinary CXCL9 and CXCL10 levels, normalized to urine creatinine (Cr) levels (CXCL9:Cr and CXCL10:Cr) or not, correlated with the extent of tubulointerstitial (i+t score; all P<0.001) and microvascular (g+ptc score; all P<0.001) inflammation. CXCL10:Cr diagnosed TCMR (area under the curve [AUC]=0.80; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.68 to 0.92; P<0.001) and ABMR (AUC=0.76; 95% CI, 0.69 to 0.82; P<0.001) with high accuracy, even in the absence of tubulointerstitial inflammation (AUC=0.70; 95% CI, 0.61 to 0.79; P<0.001). Although mean fluorescence intensity of the immunodominant DSA diagnosed ABMR (AUC=0.75; 95% CI, 0.68 to 0.82; P<0.001), combining urinary CXCL10:Cr with immunodominant DSA levels improved the diagnosis of ABMR (AUC=0.83; 95% CI, 0.77 to 0.89; P<0.001). At the time of ABMR, urinary CXCL10:Cr ratio was independently associated with an increased risk of graft loss. In conclusion, urinary CXCL10:Cr ratio associates with tubulointerstitial and microvascular inflammation of the renal allograft. Combining the urinary CXCL10:Cr ratio with DSA monitoring significantly improves the noninvasive diagnosis of ABMR and the stratification of patients at high risk for graft loss.

MicroRNAs as biomarkers of graft outcome

Dramatic improvements in short-term graft outcomes after solid organ transplantation over the past decade have not translated into major improvements in long-term allograft acceptance and patient survival. Innovative approaches to develop individualized therapy for the graft recipient are critically needed and have stimulated active research in the field of biomarker discovery. MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are small non-coding RNAs that function as important regulators of gene and protein expression by RNA interference. They are implicated in many biological processes and diseases. Their characteristics prompted their evaluation as candidate molecular markers to evaluate the transplant patient: their expression profile is specifically altered in pathological conditions, they can be easily detected and quantified in tissues, and they are highly stable in almost all body fluids, allowing the development of non-invasive approaches. We aimed to review the existing knowledge about miRNA biogenesis and function and summarize the recent findings demonstrating their potential use as biomarkers in solid organ transplantation. Although they still need to be validated in larger patient cohorts, miRNAs are not far from being used in transplant clinical practice as usefulness biomarkers. Ongoing multi-center trials should help to further define the clinical utility of miRNA profiles as biomarkers of allograft status and outcome.

Early Low Urinary CXCL9 and CXCL10 Might Predict Immunological Quiescence in Clinically and Histologically Stable Kidney Recipients.

We monitored the urinary C‐X‐C motif chemokine (CXCL)9 and CXCL10 levels in 1722 urine samples from 300 consecutive kidney recipients collected during the first posttransplantation year and assessed their predictive value for subsequent acute rejection (AR). The trajectories of urinary CXCL10 showed an early increase at 1 month (p = 0.0005) and 3 months (p = 0.0009) in patients who subsequently developed AR. At 1 year, the AR‐free allograft survival rates were 90% and 54% in patients with CXCL10:creatinine (CXCL10:Cr) levels <2.79 ng/mmoL and >2.79 ng/mmoL at 1 month, respectively (p < 0.0001), and 88% and 56% in patients with CXCL10:Cr levels <5.32 ng/mmoL and >5.32 ng/mmoL at 3 months (p < 0.0001), respectively. CXCL9:Cr levels also associate, albeit less robustly, with AR‐free allograft survival. Early CXCL10:Cr levels predicted clinical and subclinical rejection and both T cell– and antibody‐mediated rejection. In 222 stable patients, CXCL10:Cr at 3 months predicted AR independent of concomitant protocol biopsy results (p = 0.009). Although its positive predictive value was low, a high negative predictive value suggests that early CXCL10:Cr might predict immunological quiescence on a triple‐drug calcineurin inhibitor–based immunosuppressive regimen in the first posttransplantation year, even in clinically and histologically stable patients. The clinical utility of this test will need to be addressed by dedicated prospective clinical trials.

Midterm Outcomes of 12 Renal Transplant Recipients Treated With Eculizumab to Prevent Atypical Hemolytic Syndrome Recurrence

Background Atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome (aHUS) is an orphan disease with a high rate of recurrence after kidney transplantation. However, reports of successful prevention of posttransplant aHUS recurrence with eculizumab emerged a few years ago. To further delineate its optimal use, we describe the largest series of kidney transplant recipients treated with prophylactic eculizumab. Methods Twelve renal transplant recipients with aHUS-related end-stage renal disease received eculizumab: 10 from day 0 and 2 at the time of recurrence (days 6 and 25). Clinical and histological features, complement assessment, and free eculizumab measurements were analyzed. The median follow-up was 24.6 months. Results Five patients had failed at least 1 previous renal transplant from aHUS. A genetic mutation was identified in 9 patients, anti-H antibodies were found in 2. No patient demonstrated biological recurrence of thrombotic microangiopathy under treatment. Three antibody-mediated rejections (AMRs) occurred without detectable C5 residual activity. AMR was associated with subclinical thrombotic microangiopathy in 2 patients. One patient lost his graft after several complications, including AMR. One patient experienced posttransplant C3 glomerulonephritis. The last median serum creatinine was 128.2 ± 40.8 &mgr;mol/L. Conclusions These data confirm that eculizumab is highly effective in preventing posttransplantation aHUS recurrence, yet may not fully block AMR pathogenesis.

Urinary mRNA for the Diagnosis of Renal Allograft Rejection: The Issue of Normalization

Urinary messenger RNA (mRNA) quantification is a promising method for noninvasive diagnosis of renal allograft rejection (AR), but the quantification of mRNAs in urine remains challenging due to degradation. RNA normalization may be warranted to overcome these issues, but the strategies of gene normalization have been poorly evaluated. Herein, we address this issue in a case‐control study of 108 urine samples collected at time of allograft biopsy in kidney recipients with (n = 52) or without (n = 56) AR by comparing the diagnostic value of IP‐10 and CD3ε mRNAs—two biomarkers of AR—after normalization by the total amount of RNA, normalization by one of the three widely used reference RNAs—18S, glyceraldehyde‐3‐phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) and Hypoxanthine‐guanine phosphoribosyltransferase (HPRT)—or normalization using uroplakin 1A (UPK) mRNA as a possible urine‐specific reference mRNA. Our results show that normalization based on the total quantity of RNA is not substantially improved by additional normalization and may even be worsened with some classical reference genes that are overexpressed during rejection. However, considering that normalization by a reference gene is necessary to ensure polymerase chain reaction (PCR) quality and reproducibility and to suppress the effect of RNA degradation, we suggest that GAPDH and UPK1A are preferable to 18S or HPRT RNA.

Long-term outcomes of kidney transplantation in patients with high levels of preformed DSA: the Necker high-risk transplant program.

Background There is an increasing number of anti-HLA sensitized and highly sensitized renal transplant candidates on waiting lists, and the presence of donor-specific alloantibodies (DSAs) at the time of transplantation leads to acute and chronic antibody-mediated rejection (AMR). Acceptable short-term outcomes have been described, notably because of desensitization protocols, but mid- and long-term data are still required. Methods Our high immunologic risk program included 95 patients with high peak or day 0 DSA levels (mean fluorescence intensity [MFI] > 3000) with a complement-dependent cytotoxicity-negative crossmatch, who received a posttransplant desensitization protocol starting at day 0 with high-dose intravenous immunoglobulin, plasma exchanges, and eventually rituximab. Their characteristics were compared with a control group including 39 patients with a lower immunologic risk (MFI between 500 and 3000 at day 0) who received the same posttransplant desensitization. Results The median MFI of the immunodominant class I or II DSA in the peak or day 0 serum was 9421 (interquartile range, 4959-12 610). An AMR occurred during the first posttransplant year in 31 patients (32.6%), and at one year, the rate of chronic AMR was 39.5%. The 1-, 3-, 5- and 7-year death-censored allograft survival rates were 98%, 91%, 86%, and 78%, respectively, with concomitant recipient survival rates of 97%, 93%, 85%, and 79%, respectively. Conclusions These results suggest that DSA-sensitized patients with high MFI levels can receive transplantation across the HLA-barrier, with the use of an intensified posttransplant immunosuppressive therapy starting at day 0 combined with close clinical, immunologic, and histologic monitoring.

Reduction in late onset cytomegalovirus primary disease after discontinuation of antiviral prophylaxis in kidney transplant recipients treated with de novo everolimus

Donor (D)+/recipient (R)− serostatus is closely associated with a higher risk of cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection and disease. Antiviral prophylaxis is conventionally used in such patients, but late onset CMV infection/disease still occurs after the discontinuation of prophylaxis.