Lucy M. De La Cruz

Restoring Lost Anti-HER-2 Th1 Immunity in Breast Cancer: A Crucial Role for Th1 Cytokines in Therapy and Prevention

The ErbB/B2 (HER-2/neu) oncogene family plays a critical role in the development and metastatic spread of several tumor types including breast, ovarian and gastric cancer. In breast cancer, HER-2/neu is expressed in early disease development in a large percentage of DCIS lesions and its expression is associated with an increased risk of invasion and recurrence. Targeting HER-2 with antibodies such as trastuzumab or pertuzumab has improved survival, but patients with more extensive disease may develop resistance to therapy. Interestingly, response to HER-2 targeted therapies correlates with presence of immune response genes in the breast. Th1 cell production of the cytokines interferon gamma (IFNγ) and TNFα can enhance MHC class I expression, PD-L1 expression, augment apoptosis and tumor senescence, and enhances growth inhibition of many anti-breast cancer agents, including anti-estrogens and HER-2 targeted therapies. Recently, we have identified that a loss of anti-HER-2 CD4 Th1 in peripheral blood occurs during breast tumorigenesis and is dramatically diminished, even in Stage I breast cancers. The loss of anti-HER-2 Th1 response is specific and not readily reversed by standard therapies. In fact, this loss of anti-HER-2 Th1 response in peripheral blood correlates with lack of complete response to neoadjuvant therapy and diminished disease-free survival. This defect can be restored with HER-2 vaccinations in both DCIS and IBC. Correcting the anti-HER-2 Th1 response may have significant impact in improving response to HER-2 targeted therapies. Development of immune monitoring systems for anti-HER-2 Th1 to identify patients at risk for recurrence could be critical to improving outcomes, since the anti-HER-2 Th1 response can be restored by vaccination. Correction of the cellular immune response against HER-2 may prevent recurrence in high-risk patients with DCIS and IBC at risk of developing new or recurrent breast cancer.

Restoring anti-oncodriver Th1 responses with dendritic cell vaccines in HER2/neu-positive breast cancer: progress and potential

HER2/neu is expressed in the majority of in situ breast cancers, but maintained in 20-30% of invasive breast cancer (IBC). During breast tumorigenesis, there is a progressive loss of anti-HER2 CD4(pos) Th1 (anti-HER2Th1) from benign to ductal carcinoma in situ, with almost complete loss in IBC. This anti-HER2Th1 response can predict response to neoadjuvant therapy, risk of recurrence and disease-free survival. Vaccines consisting of HER2-pulsed type I polarized dendritic cells (DC1) administered during ductal carcinoma in situ and early IBC can efficiently correct anti-HER2Th1 response and have clinical impact on the disease. In this review, we will discuss the role of anti-HER2Th1 response in the three phases of immunoediting during HER2 breast cancer development and opportunities for reversing these processes using DC1 vaccines alone or in combination with standard therapies. Correcting the anti-HER2Th1 response may represent an opportunity for improving outcomes and providing a path to eliminate escape variants.

NSQIP Analysis of Axillary Lymph Node Dissection Rates for Breast Cancer: Implications for Resident and Fellow Participation

INTRODUCTION Management of the axilla in invasive breast cancer (IBC) has shifted away from more radical surgery such as axillary lymph node dissection (ALND), towards less invasive procedures, such as sentinel lymph node biopsy. Because of this shift, we hypothesize that there has been a national downward trend in ALND procedures, subsequently impacting surgical trainee exposure to this procedure using the ACS-NSQIP database to evaluate this. METHODS Women with IBC were identified in the ACS-NSQIP database from 2007 to 2014. Procedures including ALND were identified using CPT codes. This number was divided by total cases, given a varying number of participating institutions each year. Next, cases involving resident participation were identified and divided by training level: junior (post graduate year-[PGY] 1-2), senior (PGY 3-5) and fellow (PGY ≥ 6). Two tailed z tests were used to compare proportions, with significance determined when p < 0.05. RESULTS A total of 128,372 women were identified with IBC with 36,844 ALND. ALND rates decreased by an average of 2.43% yearly from 2007 to 2014. Resident participation significantly drops in 2011, from 49.3% before to 29.4% after (p < 0.01). Junior residents experienced a significant decrease in participation rate (43.3%-32.2%, p < 0.05). Senior residents and fellows experienced an upward trend in their participation, although not significant (51.2%-56.3%, p = 0.35, and 5.6%-11.6%, p = 0.056, respectively). CONCLUSIONS Using the ACS-NSQIP database, we demonstrate the downward trend in rate of ALND for IBC with subsequent decrease in resident participation. Junior residents experienced a significant decrease in their participation with no significant change for senior or fellow-level trainees. Awareness of this trend is important when creating future surgical curriculum changes for general surgery and fellowship training programs.

The impact of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging and lumpectomy cavity shavings on re-excision rate in pure ductal carcinoma in situ-A single institution's experience

The impact of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (pMRI) and cavity shave margins (CSM) on re‐excision rate (RR) in DCIS is unclear. We investigated whether either modality was associated with RR in DCIS.

Quality of life and sexual well-being after nipple sparing mastectomy: A matched comparison of patients using the breast Q

Nipple sparing mastectomy (NSM) is considered safe for select patients. Our objective was to examine quality of life (QOL) and satisfaction for NSM compared with skin sparing mastectomy (SSM). We aimed to evaluate these using the BREAST‐Q.

‘Under’ Surveillance: Impact of Race and Socioeconomic Status on Post-Treatment Breast Cancer Imaging

In patients with breast cancer, screening, diagnostics, treatment, and surveillance all contribute to their outcome. Disparities in cancer care and outcomes have been attributed to several patient-specific factors, such as age, ethnicity/race, and socioeconomic status, in a myriad of studies. Some have attributed this disparity to a lack of access to healthcare, delayed diagnosis, number of comorbidities, and worse tumor biology, all potentially leading to lower breast cancer survival. In particular, the transition between active treatment and post-treatment care has been identified as a place where patients can be vulnerable to failing to receive recommended care, not only relating to their cancer care but also in a patient’s general medical care such as diabetes monitoring, etc. This was highlighted in the Institute of Medicine’s 2005 report ‘‘From Cancer Patient to Cancer Survivor: Lost in Transition.’’ Few studies have looked at the impact of social and economic factors in the utilization of post-treatment imaging during the survivorship period. After breast cancer treatment, patients are at increased risk of local recurrence in the ipsilateral breast, and a twofold increased risk of a second breast cancer in either breast. Routine breast imaging has the goal of earlier detection of either of these events. Local recurrence is considered an independent predictor of survival, with increased relative risks of developing distant metastases or breast cancer-related deaths when compared with patients without a recurrence. In this issue, Adesoye and coauthors examine the patterns of utilization and factors associated with the use of screening mammography and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) using the National Cancer Data Base (NCDB), as well as manual chart abstraction for a random sample of over 9000 patients who had undergone surgery for stages II and III breast cancer in 2006–2007. Patient charts were audited for the subsequent 4 years to determine the frequency of both mammography and breast MRI. By combining data from the NCDB, which contains patient demographics including age, socioeconomic status, race, ethnicity, comorbidities, stage and treatment, and chart abstraction, to most accurately determine imaging frequency, the authors have assembled one of the more robust databases to explore issues of post-treatment surveillance. They found that in year 1 after surgery, only 69.5% of patients underwent mammography, and by year 4 the rate had declined to 61%. Age (\ 50 or[ 80 years), race (Black), lack of insurance or government insurance, and low socioeconomic status were associated with underutilization of surveillance imaging. In addition, women with nodepositive disease or larger tumors ([ 5 cm) also had lower rates of post-treatment imaging. Some of these patient groups would be considered at higher risk for locoregional recurrences, and one might expect better post-treatment imaging surveillance rates. Of note, even in groups without these risk factors for underutilization, one-quarter of patients did not receive recommended surveillance imaging. There was no difference in the use of imaging by hospital type, and academic teaching hospitals versus comprehensive community hospitals, versus community hospitals. A recent publication from the Commission on Cancer (CoC) and NCDB showed that risk-adjusted survival for stage III breast cancer varied by hospital type, with the best survivals at National Cancer Institute-designated comprehensive cancer centers and academic cancer centers, and poorer survival at community hospitals. The Author(s) 2018. This article is an open access publication

Impact of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy on Breast Cancer Subtype: Does Subtype Change and, if so, How?

BackgroundBreast cancer subtype, as determined by the expression of estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR), together defined as hormone receptor (HR) status, and the HER2/neu receptor (HER2), is important in predicting prognosis and guiding therapy. Knowledge regarding how tumors evolve during treatment and whether subtype is influenced by neoadjuvant chemotherapy (nCT) is limited. The purpose of this study was to compare the HR and HER2 status between core needle biopsy and residual tumor after surgery of breast cancer patients treated with nCT and to evaluate the impact of status change on therapeutic management.MethodsAfter institutional review board approval, we performed a retrospective review of all patients with a diagnosis of breast cancer who received nCT and had their initial biopsy and post-nCT surgical specimens evaluated for tumor subtype between January 2009 and December 2014 at our institution. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) of ER, PR, HER2, and fluorescence in situ hybridization for HER2 expression, when indicated, was performed using identical technique and measured by a single pathologist who specializes in breast pathology. Pre- and post-nCT subtype was cross-tabulated to assess change. Standard diagnostic metrics were computed.ResultsFifty-two patients with 54 cancers were identified to have their initial biopsy and post-nCT surgical specimens evaluated for tumor subtype in identical fashion. There was a complete pathologic response after nCT in 23 cancers (42.6%). Residual disease was noted in 31 cancers (57.4%). Five of these (16.1%) had a change in tumor subtype, of which four changes were based on IHC. HR status changed from positive to negative in two cases and from negative to positive in one case. HER2 status changed from positive to negative in one case and from negative to positive in one case. Subtype change led to treatment change in all five cases, with either the addition or discontinuation of adjuvant therapies.ConclusionsPatients with breast cancer may experience alterations in their tumor subtype after nCT. At our institution, this led to a change in adjuvant treatment in 100% of such patients. This implies that retesting receptor status of residual tumors after nCT should be routinely performed to tailor adjuvant therapy after nCT.

Immunotherapy for Breast Cancer is Finally at the Doorstep: Immunotherapy in Breast Cancer

BackgroundAlthough immunotherapy is making rapid inroads as a major treatment method for melanoma, lung, bladder, and hereditary colon cancer, breast cancer (BC) remains one of the tumors yet to experience the cellular immunology explosion despite the fact that heavy lymphocyte responses in breast tumors improve response to therapy and can predict for long-term survival.ResultsImmunotherapies in the form of monoclonal antibodies such as trastuzumab and pertuzumab have had an impact on HER2-positive breast cancer (HER2+BC) treatment through antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity. Current evidence suggests that checkpoint inhibitors and other cellular therapies are at the doorstep of improving outcomes in triple-negative BC (TNBC) and HER2+BC, especially when combined with standard therapies.ConclusionsAlthough this approach has benefitted small numbers of patients to date, numerous clinical trials are underway to define the relative role immunotherapy may play in the treatment of BC.Although immunotherapy is making rapid inroads as a major treatment method for melanoma, lung, bladder, and hereditary colon cancer, breast cancer (BC) remains one of the tumors yet to experience the cellular immunology explosion despite the fact that heavy lymphocyte responses in breast tumors improve response to therapy and can predict for long-term survival. Immunotherapies in the form of monoclonal antibodies such as trastuzumab and pertuzumab have had an impact on HER2-positive breast cancer (HER2+BC) treatment through antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity. Current evidence suggests that checkpoint inhibitors and other cellular therapies are at the doorstep of improving outcomes in triple-negative BC (TNBC) and HER2+BC, especially when combined with standard therapies. Although this approach has benefitted small numbers of patients to date, numerous clinical trials are underway to define the relative role immunotherapy may play in the treatment of BC.

Anti-HER2 CD4+ T-Helper Type 1 Immune Response is Superior to Breast MRI for Assessing Response to Neoadjuvant Therapy in Patients with HER2-Positive Breast Cancer

BackgroundIn human epidermal growth factor 2-positive breast cancer (HER2+BC), neoadjuvant chemotherapy and anti-HER2-targeted therapy (nCT) achieves a complete pathologic response (pCR) in 40–67% of patients. Posttreatment magnetic resonance imaging (pMRI) is considered the gold standard, with high specificity but lower sensitivity for assessing response. The authors previously determined that anti-HER2Th1 immune response is associated with pathologic response after nCT in HER2+BC patients. This study contrasted pMRI with anti-HER2Th1 response for assessing pCR in HER2+BC.MethodsA retrospective review of HER2+BC patients at the authors’ institution was performed. Original pMRI reports were collected, and images were reviewed by a breast radiologist blinded to pCR and immune response. The post-nCT imaging-based tumor response was assessed by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors. The anti-HER2Th1 response was determined by ex vivo stimulation of peripheral blood mononuclear cells with six major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class 2-derived HER2 peptides via enzyme-linked immunospot (ELISPOT). Posttreatment MRI and anti-HER2Th1 responses were cross-tabulated with pCR. Standard diagnostic metrics were computed.ResultsFor 30 patients, pMRI and anti-HER2Th1 immune response were measured, with 13 patients (43.3%) achieving pCR. The mean anti-HER2Th1 response in pCR was 167 (range 53–418), and <pCR was 24 (range 0.4–53). The distributions were nearly non-overlapping. The anti-HER2Th1 response was superior to the original pMRI and had higher accuracy than the blinded pMRI review (area under the curve 0.97 vs 0.55; sensitivity 100 vs 46.2%; specificity 94.1 vs 64.7%; overall accuracy 96.7 vs 56.7%).ConclusionThe presence of a high anti-HER2Th1 response is superior to pMRI for the assessment of pCR in HER2+BC. This assay has considerable promise, and validation in a large-scale study is warranted.