Ludvig A. Munthe

B-cells and their targeting in rheumatoid arthritis — Current concepts and future perspectives

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic, autoimmune disease that affects primarily the joints and without proper treatment results in their progressive destruction. In addition to T-cells, B-cells play a central role in the pathogenesis of this disease. The synovial tissue is an active site of B-cell accumulation, plasma cell differentiation and in situ antibody-production in RA. As part of the complex role of B-cells in the joints and synovial membrane of RA patients, B cells secrete chemokines and cytokines and may function as antigen presenting cells. The multifaceted pathogenic function of B-cells identifies them as excellent targets for immunosuppressive therapy. B-cell targeting involves a wide spectrum of molecules, for example the B-cell antigen CD20 that allows specific and effective B-cell depletion. Another target, CD79, expressed by B-cell and plasma cell precursors is an obvious candidate that induces apoptosis as well as inhibition of B-cell receptor (BCR) activation and possibly depletion of ectopic germinal centers (GC). Inhibition of B-cell co-stimulatory molecules such as CD40, CD80/86 and ICOS, can lead to diminished B-cell activation. Moreover, anti-chemokine and anti-cytokine therapies can be efficacious in RA by the disruption of B-cell activation and autoantibody production, B-cell synovial migration and ectopic GC formation. Finally, targeting the signal transduction pathways required for proximal BCR signaling has also been found efficacious in early clinical trials in RA. Even so, some B cells inhibit immune responses, these regulatory B cells may play a part in immune regulation in patients and it is unclear what effects B cell depletion strategies have in terms of such B cell subsets. This review discusses current strategies of targeting B-cells as therapeutic candidates in the management of RA. Better insights into the pathogenic role of B-cells provide efficacious opportunities to improve both therapy and prognosis of patients with RA.

How Do CD4+ T Cells Detect and Eliminate Tumor Cells That Either Lack or Express MHC Class II Molecules?

CD4+ T cells contribute to tumor eradication, even in the absence of CD8+ T cells. Cytotoxic CD4+ T cells can directly kill MHC class II positive tumor cells. More surprisingly, CD4+ T cells can indirectly eliminate tumor cells that lack MHC class II expression. Here, we review the mechanisms of direct and indirect CD4+ T cell-mediated elimination of tumor cells. An emphasis is put on T cell receptor (TCR) transgenic models, where anti-tumor responses of naïve CD4+ T cells of defined specificity can be tracked. Some generalizations can tentatively be made. For both MHCIIPOS and MHCIINEG tumors, presentation of tumor-specific antigen by host antigen-presenting cells (APCs) appears to be required for CD4+ T cell priming. This has been extensively studied in a myeloma model (MOPC315), where host APCs in tumor-draining lymph nodes are primed with secreted tumor antigen. Upon antigen recognition, naïve CD4+ T cells differentiate into Th1 cells and migrate to the tumor. At the tumor site, the mechanisms for elimination of MHCIIPOS and MHCIINEG tumor cells differ. In a TCR-transgenic B16 melanoma model, MHCIIPOS melanoma cells are directly killed by cytotoxic CD4+ T cells in a perforin/granzyme B-dependent manner. By contrast, MHCIINEG myeloma cells are killed by IFN-γ stimulated M1-like macrophages. In summary, while the priming phase of CD4+ T cells appears similar for MHCIIPOS and MHCIINEG tumors, the killing mechanisms are different. Unresolved issues and directions for future research are addressed.

Antibodies engineered with IgD specificity efficiently deliver integrated T-cell epitopes for antigen presentation by B cells

We have developed a strategy for improving the stimulation of T cells during immune responses by constructing recombinant antibodies that enhance the delivery of antigen to antigen-presenting cells, such as B cells. These antibodies have variable regions specific for surface molecules on B cells, and a constant region with an inserted antigen. In vitro, such antibodies make B cells approximately 1000-fold more efficient at presenting antigen and stimulating specific T cells. In vivo, the antibodies turn B cells of the spleen into potent stimulators of T cells. This approach may be useful for the generation of new vaccines.

Resting small B cells present endogenous immunoglobulin variable-region determinants to idiotope-specific CD4(+) T cells in vivo.

Antigenic determinants localized within the highly diversified V‐regions of Ig are called idiotopes (Id). Processed Id‐peptides can be presented on MHC class II molecules to CD4+ T cells. If B cells present their endogenous Id‐peptides, T cell activation could occur in the absence of nominal antigen, a potentially important process in T‐B cooperation and immune regulation. To test this idea, we used mice made transgenic for a λ2 L‐chain (Id+ mice). Another transgenic mouse strain expresses TCR transgenes with specificity for the Id (λ2), presented on MHC class II molecules. When highly purified sorted Id+ B cells and Id‐specific T cells were sequentially injected into MHC syngeneic SCID host, T cell became blastoid, CD69+ and proliferated. To exclude any role of host APC, MHC incompatible Rag2– / – mice (H‐2b) were used as recipients for the Id+ B and Id‐specific T cells, with similar results. Exposure to extracellular Id+ immunoglobulin (Ig) was not sufficient for Id priming of B cells in vivo, highlighting the preferential presentation of Id peptides derived from endogenous Ig, by B cells. The results suggest that B cells presenting Id self‐peptides generated by V(D)J recombinations or somatic mutations may directly stimulate T cell in vivo in the absence of conventional antigen.

Lymphomas can develop from B cells chronically helped by idiotype-specific T cells

B cell lymphomas have been associated with chronic infections and autoimmunity. However, most lymphomas develop in the absence of any known chronic antigenic stimulation. B cells process their highly diversified endogenous immunoglobulin and present clonally unique variable-region idiotypic (Id) peptides on their major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class II molecules to Id-specific T cells. We show that B cells chronically helped by Id-specific Th2 cells developed into large B cell lymphomas with cytogenetic DNA aberrations. The lymphomas expressed high amounts of Id, MHC class II, CD80/86, and CD40 and bidirectionally collaborated with Th2 cells. Thus, MHC class II–presented Id peptides may represent a chronic self-antigenic stimulus for T cell–dependent lymphomagenesis. Eventually, B lymphomas grew independent of T cells. Thus, T cells do not only eliminate cancers as currently believed. In fact, Id-specific Th2 cells can induce B lymphomas.

Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Cells Are Activated and Proliferate in Response to Specific T Helper Cells

There is increasing interest in the chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) microenvironment and the mechanisms that may promote CLL cell survival and proliferation. A role for T helper (Th) cells has been suggested, but current evidence is only circumstantial. Here we show that CLL patients had memory Th cells that were specific for endogenous CLL antigens. These Th cells activated autologous CLL cell proliferation in vitro and in human → mouse xenograft experiments. Moreover, CLL cells were efficient antigen-presenting cells that could endocytose and process complex proteins through antigen uptake pathways, including the B cell receptor. Activation of CLL cells by Th cells was contact and CD40L dependent. The results suggest that CLL is driven by ongoing immune responses related to Th cell-CLL cell interaction. We propose that Th cells support malignant B cells and that they could be targeted in the treatment of CLL.

MHC-Restricted Ig V Region-Driven T-B Lymphocyte Collaboration: B Cell Receptor Ligation Facilitates Switch to IgG Production

B cells spontaneously process their endogenous Ig and present V region peptides on their MHC class II molecules. We have here investigated whether B cells collaborate with V region-specific CD4+ T cells in vivo. By use of paired Ig L chain-transgenic and TCR-transgenic mice and cell transfer into normal hosts, we demonstrate that B cell presentation of a VL region peptide to CD4+ T cells results in germinal centers, plasma cells, and Ab secretion. Because the transgenic B cells have a fixed L chain but polyclonal H chains, their B cell receptor (BCR) repertoire is diverse and may bind a multitude of ligands. In a hapten-based system, BCR ligation concomitant with V region-driven T-B collaboration induced germinal center formation and an IgM → IgG isotype switch. In the absence of BCR ligation, mainly IgM was produced. Consistent with this, prolonged V region-driven T-B collaboration resulted in high titers of IgG autoantibodies against ubiquitous self-Ags, while natural-type Abs against exotic bacteria remained IgM. Taken together, V region-driven T-B collaboration may explain induction of natural IgM Abs (absence of BCR ligation) and IgG autoantibodies (BCR ligation by autoantigen) and may be involved in the development of autoimmunity.

Inclusion of an IgG1-Fc spacer abrogates efficacy of CD19 CAR T cells in a xenograft mouse model.

Cancer therapy with T cells expressing chimeric antigen receptors (CARs) has produced remarkable clinical responses in recent trials, but also severe side effects. Whereas most protocols use permanently reprogrammed T cells, we have developed a platform for transient CAR expression by mRNA electroporation. This approach may be useful for safe clinical testing of novel receptors, or when a temporary treatment period is desirable. Herein, we investigated therapy with transiently redirected T cells in vitro and in a xenograft mouse model. We constructed a series of CD19-specific CARs with different spacers and co-stimulatory domains (CD28, OX40 or CD28-OX40). The CAR constructs all conferred T cells with potent CD19-specific activity in vitro. Unexpectedly, the constructs incorporating a commonly used IgG1-CH2CH3 spacer showed lack of anti-leukemia activity in vivo and induced severe, partly CD19-independent toxicity. By contrast, identical CAR constructs without the CH2-domain eradicated leukemia in vivo, without notable toxicity. Follow-up studies demonstrated that the CH2CH3-spacer bound soluble mouse Fcγ-receptor I and mediated off-target T-cell activation towards murine macrophages. Our findings highlight the importance of non-signalling CAR elements and of in vivo studies. Finally, the results show that transiently redirected T cells control leukemia in mice and support the rationale for developing an mRNA-CAR platform.

Deletion of Idiotype (Id)-Specific T Cells in Multiple Myeloma

Myeloma cells secrete monoclonal immunoglobulin (Ig), called myeloma protein. The variable (V) regions of myeloma proteins are unique to each plasma cell tumor, and therefore contain highly tumor-speci® c antigenic determinants called idiotopes (Id). T cells with speci® city for Id are thought to be of importance in eradication of multiple myeloma. In ongoing clinical trials, myeloma patients are vaccinated against the Id of their own myeloma protein, with the aim of inducing Id-speci® c T cells. However, this strategy will only succeed if Id-speci® c T cells are present in patients, and are able to respond. In an experimental animal model, we have shown that Id-speci® c T cells become progressively deleted as the myeloma protein serum concentration exceeds 50 mg:ml. This indicates that the ability of multiple myeloma patients to respond to Id-vaccination might be seriously handicapped. We suggest that Id-vaccination should be reserved for eradication of minimal residual disease, e.g. after high-dose chemotherapy and stem-cell transplantation.Mycloma cells secrete monoclonal immunoglobulin (Ig), called myeloma protein. The variable (V) regions of myeloma proteins are unique to each plasma cell tumor, and therefore contain highly tumor-specific antigenic determinants called idiotopes (Id). T cells with specificity for Id are thought to be of importance in eradication of multiple myeloma. In ongoing clinical trials, myeloma patients are vaccinated against the Id of their own myeloma protein, with the aim of inducing Id-specific T cells. However, this strategy will only succeed if Id-specific T cells are present in patients, and are able to respond. In an experimental animal model, we have shown that [d-specific T cells become progressively deleted as the myeloma protein serum concentration exceeds 50 microg/ml. This indicates that the ability of multiple myeloma patients to respond to Id-vaccination might be seriously handicapped. We suggest that Id-vaccination should be reserved for eradication of minimal residual disease, e.g. after high-dose chemotherapy and stem-cell transplantation.

The cellular mechanism by which complementary Id + and anti-Id antibodies communicate: T cells integrated into idiotypic regulation

The V region antigenic determinants (idiotopes (Ids)) of antibodies (Abs) have been suggested to be involved in regulating the immune system. Certain diseases such as diabetes mellitus have recently been associated with a disequilibrium between Id+ and anti‐Id Abs. However, it is unknown how Abs carrying complementary idiotypes (that is, Id+ and anti‐Id Abs) regulate each other at the level of B and T cells. In this study, we show that B lymphoma cells genetically equipped with anti‐Id BCR V regions receive a signal when exposed to Id+Ig. Moreover, they become × 104 more efficient at presenting exogenous Id+ Ab to CD4+ T cells in vitro. Activated Id‐specific T cells in turn regulated the Id‐specific B lymphoma cells. Similar results were obtained in vivo in a surrogate model in which an Id‐peptide was incorporated genetically into the C‐region of a recombinant Ab that targeted IgD on B cells. The findings suggest that conventional T–B collaboration can explain communication between complementary Id+ and anti‐Id Ab at the cellular level. A model is suggested that integrates present and previous data on B‐cell regulation by Id‐specific T cells.