Ludwig K. von Segesser

Transcatheter valve implantation for patients with aortic stenosis: a position statement from the European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS) and the European Society of Cardiology (ESC), in collaboration with the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI)

AIMS To critically review the available transcatheter aortic valve implantation techniques and their results, as well as propose recommendations for their use and development. METHODS AND RESULTS A committee of experts including European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery and European Society of Cardiology representatives met to reach a consensus based on the analysis of the available data obtained with transcatheter aortic valve implantation and their own experience. The evidence suggests that this technique is feasible and provides haemodynamic and clinical improvement for up to 2 years in patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis at high risk or with contraindications for surgery. Questions remain mainly concerning safety and long-term durability, which have to be assessed. Surgeons and cardiologists working as a team should select candidates, perform the procedure, and assess the results. Today, the use of this technique should be restricted to high-risk patients or those with contraindications for surgery. However, this may be extended to lower risk patients if the initial promise holds to be true after careful evaluation. CONCLUSION Transcatheter aortic valve implantation is a promising technique, which may offer an alternative to conventional surgery for high-risk patients with aortic stenosis. Today, careful evaluation is needed to avoid the risk of uncontrolled diffusion.

Preconditioning by Sevoflurane Decreases Biochemical Markers for Myocardial and Renal Dysfunction in Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery: A Double-blinded, Placebo-controlled, Multicenter Study

Background Preconditioning by volatile anesthetics is a promising therapeutic strategy to render myocardial tissue resistant to perioperative ischemia. It was hypothesized that sevoflurane preconditioning would decrease postoperative release of brain natriuretic peptide, a biochemical marker for myocardial dysfunction. In addition, several variables associated with the protective effects of preconditioning were evaluated. Methods Seventy-two patients scheduled for coronary artery bypass graft surgery under cardioplegic arrest were randomly assigned to preconditioning during the first 10 min of complete cardiopulmonary bypass with either placebo (oxygen–air mixture only) or sevoflurane 4 vol% (2 minimum alveolar concentration). No other volatile anesthetics were administered at any time during the study. Treatment was strictly blinded to anesthesiologists, perfusionists, and surgeons. Biochemical markers of myocardial dysfunction and injury (brain natriuretic peptide, creatine kinase–MB activity, and cardiac troponin T), and renal dysfunction (cystatin C) were determined. Results of Holter electrocardiography were recorded perioperatively. Translocation of protein kinase C was assessed by immunohistochemical analysis of atrial samples. Results Sevoflurane preconditioning significantly decreased postoperative release of brain natriuretic peptide, a sensitive biochemical marker of myocardial contractile dysfunction. Pronounced protein kinase C &dgr; and &egr; translocation was observed in sevoflurane-preconditioned myocardium. In addition, postoperative plasma cystatin C concentrations increased significantly less in sevoflurane-preconditioned patients. No differences between groups were found for perioperative ST-segment changes, arrhythmias, or creatine kinase–MB and cardiac troponin T release. Conclusions Sevoflurane preconditioning preserves myocardial and renal function as assessed by biochemical markers in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery under cardioplegic arrest. This study demonstrated for the first time translocation of protein kinase C isoforms &dgr; and &egr; in human myocardium in response to sevoflurane.

Endovascular Aortic Repair Versus Open Surgical Repair for Descending Thoracic Aortic Disease A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Comparative Studies

OBJECTIVES The purpose of this study was to determine whether thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) reduces death and morbidity compared with open surgical repair for descending thoracic aortic disease. BACKGROUND The role of TEVAR versus open surgery remains unclear. Metaregression can be used to maximally inform adoption of new technologies by utilizing evidence from existing trials. METHODS Data from comparative studies of TEVAR versus open repair of the descending aorta were combined through meta-analysis. Metaregression was performed to account for baseline risk factor imbalances, study design, and thoracic pathology. Due to significant heterogeneity, registry data were analyzed separately from comparative studies. RESULTS Forty-two nonrandomized studies involving 5,888 patients were included (38 comparative studies, 4 registries). Patient characteristics were balanced except for age, as TEVAR patients were usually older than open surgery patients (p = 0.001). Registry data suggested overall perioperative complications were reduced. In comparative studies, all-cause mortality at 30 days (odds ratio [OR]: 0.44, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.33 to 0.59) and paraplegia (OR: 0.42, 95% CI: 0.28 to 0.63) were reduced for TEVAR versus open surgery. In addition, cardiac complications, transfusions, reoperation for bleeding, renal dysfunction, pneumonia, and length of stay were reduced. There was no significant difference in stroke, myocardial infarction, aortic reintervention, and mortality beyond 1 year. Metaregression to adjust for age imbalance, study design, and pathology did not materially change the results. CONCLUSIONS Current data from nonrandomized studies suggest that TEVAR may reduce early death, paraplegia, renal insufficiency, transfusions, reoperation for bleeding, cardiac complications, pneumonia, and length of stay compared with open surgery. Sustained benefits on survival have not been proven.

Outcome of cardiovascular surgery and pregnancy: A systematic review of the period 1984-1996 ☆ ☆☆

The outcomes of cardiovascular operations during pregnancy, at delivery, and post partum were reviewed from published material in the period 1984-1996. Surgery during pregnancy resulted in fetal-neonatal morbidity and mortality of 9% and 30%, respectively, and in maternal morbidity and mortality of 24% and 6%, respectively. Duration of pregnancy at surgery and duration and temperature of cardiopulmonary bypass did not influence fetal-neonatal outcome. Maternal complications and mortality of surgery immediately after delivery were 29% and 12%, respectively, and for surgery performed with a postpartum interval the respective rates were 38% and 14%. Hospitalization after week 27 of gestation and extreme emergency contributed significantly to poor maternal outcome. Maternal deaths were reported in 9% of valvular procedures and in 22% of aortic or arterial dissection repairs and pulmonary embolectomies. Fetal-neonatal risks of maternal surgery during pregnancy are high and unpredictable. Maternal risks of cardiovascular procedures during pregnancy are moderate, significantly increase if an operation is performed at or after delivery, and, overall, should be considered as higher than those in nonpregnant cardiovascular surgical patients.

Transcatheter valve implantation for patients with aortic stenosis: a position statement from the European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS) and the European Society of Cardiology (ESC), in collaboration with the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI).

AIMS To critically review the available transcatheter aortic valve implantation techniques and their results, as well as propose recommendations for their use and development. METHODS AND RESULTS A committee of experts including European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery and European Society of Cardiology representatives met to reach a consensus based on the analysis of the available data obtained with transcatheter aortic valve implantation and their own experience. The evidence suggests that this technique is feasible and provides haemodynamic and clinical improvement for up to 2 years in patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis at high risk or with contraindications for surgery. Questions remain mainly concerning safety and long-term durability, which have to be assessed. Surgeons and cardiologists working as a team should select candidates, perform the procedure, and assess the results. Today, the use of this technique should be restricted to high-risk patients or those with contraindications for surgery. However, this may be extended to lower risk patients if the initial promise holds to be true after careful evaluation. CONCLUSION Transcatheter aortic valve implantation is a promising technique, which may offer an alternative to conventional surgery for high-risk patients with aortic stenosis. Today, careful evaluation is needed to avoid the risk of uncontrolled diffusion.

Management of pulmonary embolism during acrylic vertebroplasty

A 55-year-old man diagnosed with osteogenesis imperfecta had multiple pulmonary embolism from acrylic cement during vertebroplasty. The patient immediately developed respiratory distress, renal failure, and right cardiac failure. A computed tomographic scan showed the presence of cement in the right and left pulmonary arteries, and in both lungs. Cardiac and respiratory functions did not improve with medical treatment, therefore the patient underwent pulmonary artery embolectomy. Cement was easily removed from both pulmonary arteries. The patient quickly recovered from respiratory and cardiac failure. We believe pulmonary embolectomy is a reliable and effective procedure to treat this rare and dreadful complication of acrylic vertebroplasty.

Transcatheter valve implantation for patients with aortic stenosis: a position statement from the European association of cardio-thoracic surgery (EACTS) and the European Society of Cardiology (ESC), in collaboration with the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI).

Aims To critically review the available transcatheter aortic valve implantation techniques and their results, as well as propose recommendations for their use and development. Methods and results A committee of experts including European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery and European Society of Cardiology representatives met to reach a consensus based on the analysis of the available data obtained with transcatheter aortic valve implantation and their own experience. The evidence suggests that this technique is feasible and provides haemodynamic and clinical improvement for up to 2 years in patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis at high risk or with contraindications for surgery. Questions remain mainly concerning safety and long-term durability, which have to be assessed. Surgeons and cardiologists working as a team should select candidates, perform the procedure, and assess the results. Today, the use of this technique should be restricted to high-risk patients or those with contraindications for surgery. However, this may be extended to lower risk patients if the initial promise holds to be true after careful evaluation. Conclusion Transcatheter aortic valve implantation is a promising technique, which may offer an alternative to conventional surgery for high-risk patients with aortic stenosis. Today, careful evaluation is needed to avoid the risk of uncontrolled diffusion.

Cryopreserved arterial allografts in the treatment of major vascular infection: A comparison with conventional surgical techniques

OBJECTIVE Recent findings with cryopreserved heart valve allografts in the treatment of infectious endocarditis suggest that the use of cryopreserved arterial allografts may improve the outcome in patients with vascular infections. METHODS Seventy-two patients with mycotic aneurysms (n = 29) or infected vascular prostheses (n = 43) of the thoracic (n = 26) or abdominal aorta (n = 46) were treated with in situ repair and extra-anatomic reconstruction using prosthetic material (n = 38) or implantation of a cryopreserved arterial allograft (n = 34). Disease-related survival and survival free of reoperation were assessed. Morbidity, cumulative lengths of intensive care, hospitalization, antibiotic treatment, and costs were calculated per year of follow-up. RESULTS The use of cryopreserved arterial allografts was superior to conventional surgery in terms of disease-related survival (P =.008), disease-related survival free of reoperation (P =.0001), duration of intensive care per year of follow-up (median 1 vs 11 days; range 1 to 42 vs 2 to 120 days; P =.001), hospitalization (14 vs 30 days; range 7 to 150 vs 15 to 240 days; P =.002), duration of postoperative antibiotic therapy (21 vs 40 days; range 21 to 90 vs 60 to 365 days; P =.002), incidence of complications (24% vs 63%; P =.005), and elimination of infection (91% vs 53%; P =.001). In addition, costs were 40% lower in the group treated by allografts (P =.005). CONCLUSIONS The use of cryopreserved arterial allografts is a more effective treatment for mycotic aneurysms and infected vascular prostheses than conventional surgical techniques.

Risk and benefit of low systemic heparinization during open heart operations

Heparin surface-coated perfusion equipment with improved thromboresistance was evaluated in 104 consecutive patients undergoing open heart operation in a prospective, randomized trial with low versus full systemic heparinization. Surgical procedures included coronary artery revascularization in 47 of 54 (87%) for low versus 44 of 50 patients (88%; not significant [NS]) for full, valve repair/replacement in 8 of 54 (15%) for low versus 5 of 50 patients (10%; NS) for full, left ventricular aneurysm repair in 1 of 54 (2%) for low versus 2 of 50 patients (4%; NS) for full, and other in 3 of 54 (6%) for low versus 3 of 50 patients (6%; NS) for full. Cross-clamp time was 39.2 +/- 10.7 minutes for low versus 39.5 +/- 10.5 minutes for full (NS). Cardiopulmonary bypass time was 68.6 +/- 20.1 minutes for low versus 69.3 +/- 16.6 minutes for full (NS). Lowest activated coagulation time during perfusion was 255 +/- 75 seconds for low versus 537 +/- 205 seconds for full (p < 0.0005). In the low group, the target activated coagulation time of more than 180 seconds was not reached during perfusion in 4 of 54 patients (7%), the lowest value being 164 seconds. No oxygenator failure occurred. Hospital mortality was 0 of 54 (0%) for low versus 1 of 50 patients (2%) for full (NS). Bleeding required surgical revision in 0 of 54 (0%) for low versus 4 of 50 patients (8%) for full (p = 0.05). Drainage (24 hours) was 790 +/- 393 mL for low versus 1,039 +/- 732 mL for full (p < 0.025).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Normothermia versus hypothermia during cardiopulmonary bypass: a randomized, controlled trial.

To evaluate the influence of perfusion temperature on systemic effects of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), 30 patients undergoing elective coronary artery bypass grafting were randomly assigned to either normothermic (warm, n = 14, 36 degrees C) or hypothermic (cold, n = 16, 28 degrees C) CPB. Serial hemodynamic measurements and blood samples were obtained before, during and after the CPB procedure. During CPB, there were no differences between both groups in the need for vasopressors (norepinephrine, phenylephrine), urinary output, or fluid balance. In the early postoperative period, normothermic CPB patients had significantly lower systemic vascular resistance and higher cardiac index measurements (mean +/- standard error: systemic vascular resistance, 880 +/- 27 versus 1,060 +/- 57 dyne.s.cm-5, p = 0.025; cardiac index, 3.6 +/- 0.1 versus 2.9 +/- 0.1 L.min-1.m-2, p = 0.01) without differences in the administration of vasoactive drugs. Blood loss was significantly higher in patients after hypothermic CPB (median [range] body surface area: 370 [180-560] versus 490 [280-2,120] mL/m2, p = 0.0006), with a greater need for transfusion of erythrocytes and fresh frozen plasma. Plasma levels of tumor necrosis factor and soluble tumor necrosis factor receptors increased during and after CPB, independent of perfusion temperature. This study suggests a significant influence of CPB temperature and respective perfusion management on postoperative hemodynamics and blood loss. Normothermic CPB is not associated with additional systemic adverse effects.