Luigi P. Badano

ESC Guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation

ACE : angiotensin-converting enzyme ACS : acute coronary syndrome ADP : adenosine diphosphate AF : atrial fibrillation AMI : acute myocardial infarction AV : atrioventricular AIDA-4 : Abciximab Intracoronary vs. intravenously Drug Application APACHE II : Acute Physiology Aand Chronic

2013 ESC guidelines on cardiac pacing and cardiac resynchronization therapy: the task force on cardiac pacing and resynchronization therapy of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Developed in collaboration with the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA).

2013 ESC Guidelines on cardiac pacing and cardiac resynchronization therapy : The Task Force on cardiac pacing and resynchronization therapy of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Developed in collaboration with the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA)

Recommendations for cardiac chamber quantification by echocardiography in adults: an update from the American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging.

The rapid technological developments of the past decade and the changes in echocardiographic practice brought about by these developments have resulted in the need for updated recommendations to the previously published guidelines for cardiac chamber quantification, which was the goal of the joint writing group assembled by the American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging. This document provides updated normal values for all four cardiac chambers, including three-dimensional echocardiography and myocardial deformation, when possible, on the basis of considerably larger numbers of normal subjects, compiled from multiple databases. In addition, this document attempts to eliminate several minor discrepancies that existed between previously published guidelines.

Current and evolving echocardiographic techniques for the quantitative evaluation of cardiac mechanics: ASE/EAE consensus statement on methodology and indications: Endorsed by the Japanese Society of Echocardiography

Echocardiographic imaging is ideally suited for the evaluation of cardiac mechanics because of its intrinsically dynamic nature. Because for decades, echocardiography has been the only imaging modality that allows dynamic imaging of the heart, it is only natural that new, increasingly automated techniques for sophisticated analysis of cardiac mechanics have been driven by researchers and manufacturers of ultrasound imaging equipment.Several such technique shave emerged over the past decades to address the issue of readers experience and inter measurement variability in interpretation.Some were widely embraced by echocardiographers around the world and became part of the clinical routine,whereas others remained limited to research and exploration of new clinical applications.Two such techniques have dominated the research arena of echocardiography: (1) Doppler based tissue velocity measurements,frequently referred to as tissue Doppler or myocardial Doppler, and (2) speckle tracking on the basis of displacement measurements.Both types of measurements lend themselves to the derivation of multiple parameters of myocardial function. The goal of this document is to focus on the currently available techniques that allow quantitative assessment of myocardial function via image-based analysis of local myocardial dynamics, including Doppler tissue imaging and speckle-tracking echocardiography, as well as integrated backscatter analysis. This document describes the current and potential clinical applications of these techniques and their strengths and weaknesses,briefly surveys a selection of the relevant published literature while highlighting normal and abnormal findings in the context of different cardiovascular pathologies, and summarizes the unresolved issues, future research priorities, and recommended indications for clinical use.

EAE/ASE recommendations for image acquisition and display using three-dimensional echocardiography.

Roberto M. Lang, MD, FASE*‡, Luigi P. Badano, MD, FESC†‡, Wendy Tsang, MD*, David H. Adams, MD*, Eustachio Agricola, MD†, Thomas Buck, MD, FESC†, Francesco F. Faletra, MD†, Andreas Franke, MD, FESC†, Judy Hung, MD, FASE*, Leopoldo Pérez de Isla, MD, PhD, FESC†, Otto Kamp, MD, PhD, FESC†, Jaroslaw D. Kasprzak, MD, FESC†, Patrizio Lancellotti, MD, PhD, FESC†, Thomas H. Marwick, MBBS, PhD*, Marti L. McCulloch, RDCS, FASE*, Mark J. Monaghan, PhD, FESC†, Petros Nihoyannopoulos, MD, FESC†, Natesa G. Pandian, MD*, Patricia A. Pellikka, MD, FASE*, Mauro Pepi, MD, FESC†, David A. Roberson, MD, FASE*, Stanton K. Shernan, MD, FASE*, Girish S. Shirali, MBBS, FASE*, Lissa Sugeng, MD*, Folkert J. Ten Cate, MD†, Mani A. Vannan, MBBS, FASE*, Jose Luis Zamorano, MD, FESC, FASE†, and William A. Zoghbi, MD, FASE*

Expert consensus for multimodality imaging evaluation of adult patients during and after cancer therapy: a report from the American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging.

Cardiac dysfunction resulting from exposure to cancer therapeutics was first recognized in the 1960s, with the widespread introduction of anthracyclines into the oncologic therapeutic armamentarium. Heart failure (HF) associated with anthracyclines was then recognized as an important side effect. As a result, physicians learned to limit their doses to avoid cardiac dysfunction. Several strategies have been used over the past decades to detect it. Two of them evolved over time to be very useful: endomyocardial biopsies and monitoring of left ven- tricular (LV) ejection fraction (LVEF) by cardiac imaging. Examination of endomyocardial biopsies proved to be the most sensitive and spe- cific parameter for the identification of anthracycline-induced LV dysfunction and became the gold standard in the 1970s. However, the interest in endomyocardial biopsy has diminished over time because of the reduction in the cumulative dosages used to treat ma- lignancies, the invasive nature of the procedure, and the remarkable progress made in noninvasive cardiac imaging. The noninvasive evaluation of LVEF has gained importance, and notwithstanding the limitations of the techniques used for its calculation, has emerged as the most widely used strategy for monitoring the changes in cardiac function, both during and after the administration of potentially car- diotoxic cancer treatment.

Current and Evolving Echocardiographic Techniques for the Quantitative Evaluation of Cardiac Mechanics: ASE/EAE Consensus Statement on Methodology and Indications Endorsed by the Japanese Society of Echocardiography

Echocardiographic imaging is ideally suited for the evaluation of cardiac mechanics because of its intrinsically dynamic nature. Because for decades, echocardiography has been the only imaging modality that allows dynamic imaging of the heart, it is only natural that new, increasingly automated techniques for sophisticated analysis of cardiac mechanics have been driven by researchers and manufacturers of ultrasound imaging equipment. Several such techniques have emerged over the past decades to address the issue of readers experience and inter-measurement variability in interpretation. Some were widely embraced by echocardiographers around the world and became part of the clinical routine, whereas others remained limited to research and exploration of new clinical applications. Two such techniques have dominated the research arena of echocardiography: (1) Doppler-based tissue velocity measurements, frequently referred to as tissue Doppler or myocardial Doppler, and (2) speckle tracking on the basis of displacement measurements. Both types of measurements lend themselves to the derivation of multiple parameters of myocardial function. The goal of this document is to focus on the currently available techniques that allow quantitative assessment of myocardial function via image-based analysis of local myocardial dynamics, including Doppler tissue imaging and speckle-tracking echocardiography, as well as integrated back- scatter analysis. This document describes the current and potential clinical applications of these techniques and their strengths and weaknesses, briefly surveys a selection of the relevant published literature while highlighting normal and abnormal findings in the context of different cardiovascular pathologies, and summarizes the unresolved issues, future research priorities, and recommended indications for clinical use.

2013 ESC Guidelines on cardiac pacing and cardiac resynchronization therapy

### Abbreviations 1st AV : First-degree atrioventricular block AF : atrial fibrillation AT : atrial tachyarrhythmia ATP : Anti-tachycardia pacing AV : atrioventricular BBB : bundle branch block CHF : congestive heart failure CI : confidence interval CPG : Committee for Practice Guidelines CRT : cardiac resynchronization therapy CRT-D : cardiac resynchronization therapy and defibrillator CRT-P : cardiac resynchronization therapy and pacemaker ECG : electrocardiogram EDMD : Emery-Dreifuss muscular dystrophy EF : ejection fraction EPS : electrophysiological study ESC : European Society of Cardiology HCM : hypertrophic cardiomyopathy HF : heart failure HR : hazard ratio HV : His-ventricular ICD : implantable cardioverter defibrillator ILR : implantable loop recorder IVCD : intraventricular conduction delay LBBB : left bundle branch block LQTS : long QT syndrome LV : left ventricular LVEF : left ventricular ejection fraction LVSD : left ventricular systolic dysfunction MR : mitral regurgitation MRI : magnetic resonance imaging NYHA : New York Heart Association PM : pacemaker OR : odds ratio QALY : quality-adjusted life year RBBB : right bundle branch block RCT : randomized controlled trial RV : right ventricular SB : sinus bradycardia SNRT : sinus node recovery time SR : sinus rhythm SSS : sick sinus syndrome TAVI : transcatheter aortic valve implantation VF : ventricular fibrillation VT : ventricular tachycardia VV : interventricular (delay) ### Acronyms of the trials referenced in the recommendations or reported in the tables ADEPT : ADvanced Elements of Pacing Randomized Controlled Trial ADOPT : Atrial Dynamic Overdrive Pacing Trial AOPS : Atrial Overdrive Pacing Study APAF : Ablate and Pace in Atrial Fibrillation ASSERT : ASymptomatic Atrial Fibrillation and Stroke Evaluation in Pacemaker Patients and the Atrial Fibrillation Reduction Atrial Pacing Trial ATTEST : ATrial Therapy Efficacy and Safety Trial AVAIL CLS/CRT : AV Node Ablation with CLS and CRT Pacing Therapies for Treatment of AF trial B4 : Bradycardia detection in Bundle Branch Block BELIEVE : Bi vs. Left Ventricular Pacing: an International Pilot Evaluation on Heart Failure Patients with Ventricular Arrhythmias BIOPACE : Biventricular pacing for atrioventricular block to prevent cardiac desynchronization BLOCK-HF : Biventricular versus right ventricular pacing in patients with AV block B-LEFT : Biventricular versus LEFT Univentricular Pacing with ICD Back-up in Heart Failure Patients CARE-HF : CArdiac REsynchronization in Heart Failure CLEAR : CLinical Evaluation on Advanced Resynchronization COMBAT : COnventional vs. Biventricular Pacing in Heart Failure and Bradyarrhythmia COMPANION : COmparison of Medical Therapy, Pacing and Defibrillation in Heart Failure DANPACE : DANish Multicenter Randomized Trial on Single Lead Atrial PACing vs. Dual Chamber Pacing in Sick Sinus Syndrome DECREASE-HF : The Device Evaluation of CONTAK RENEWAL 2 and EASYTRAK 2: Assessment of Safety and Effectiveness in Heart Failure FREEDOM : Optimization Study Using the QuickOpt Method GREATER-EARTH : Evaluation of Resynchronization Therapy for Heart Failure in Patients with a QRS Duration GREATER Than 120 ms LESSER-EARTH : Evaluation of Resynchronization Therapy for Heart Failure in Patients with a QRS Duration Lower Than 120 ms HOBIPACE : HOmburg BIventricular PACing Evaluation IN-CHF : Italian Network on Congestive Heart Failure ISSUE : International Study on Syncope of Unexplained Etiology MADIT : Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Trial MIRACLE : Multicenter InSync RAndomized CLinical Evaluation MOST : MOde Selection Trial in Sinus-Node Dysfunction MUSTIC : MUltisite STimulation In Cardiomyopathies OPSITE : Optimal Pacing SITE PACE : Pacing to Avoid Cardiac Enlargement PAVE : Left Ventricular-Based Cardiac Stimulation Post AV Nodal Ablation Evaluation PATH-CHF : PAcing THerapies in Congestive Heart Failure II Study Group PIPAF : Pacing In Prevention of Atrial Fibrillation Study PIRAT : Prevention of Immediate Reinitiation of Atrial Tachyarrhythmias POT : Prevention Or Termination Study PREVENT-HF : PREventing VENTricular Dysfunction in Pacemaker Patients Without Advanced Heart Failure PROSPECT : PRedictors Of Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy RAFT : Resynchronization–Defibrillation for Ambulatory Heart Failure Trial RethinQ : Cardiac REsynchronization THerapy IN Patients with Heart Failure and Narrow QRS REVERSE : REsynchronization reVErses Remodelling in Systolic left vEntricular dysfunction SAFARI : Study of Atrial Fibrillation Reduction SCD HeFT : Sudden Cardiac Death in Heart Failure Trial SMART-AV : The SMARTDelay Determined AV Optimization: a Comparison with Other AV Delay Methods Used in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy SYDIT : The SYncope DIagnosis and Treatment SYNPACE : Vasovagal SYNcope and PACing TARGET : TARgeted Left Ventricular Lead Placement to Guide Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy THEOPACE : Effects of Oral THEOphylline and of Permanent PACEmaker on the Symptoms and Complications of Sick Sinus Syndrome VASIS-PM : VAsovagal Syncope International Study on PaceMaker therapy V-HeFT : Vasodilator in HEart Failure Trial VPSII : Second Vasovagal Pacemaker Study (VPS II) Additional references are mentioned with ‘w’ in the main text and can be found on the online addenda along with 5 figures (1, 6, 7, 9, 11, 12) and 10 tables (3, 4, 5, 9, 11, 12, 19, 21, 22, 23). They are available on the ESC website only at http://www.escardio.org/guidelines-surveys/esc-guidelines/Pages/cardiac-pacing-and-cardiac-resynchronisation-therapy.aspx Guidelines summarize and evaluate all available evidence, at the time of the writing process, on a particular issue, with the …

Recommendations for the echocardiographic assessment of native valvular regurgitation: an executive summary from the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging

Valvular regurgitation represents an important cause of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Echocardiography has become the primary non-invasive imaging method for the evaluation of valvular regurgitation. The echocardiographic assessment of valvular regurgitation should integrate the quantification of the regurgitation, assessment of the valve anatomy and function, as well as the consequences of valvular disease on cardiac chambers. In clinical practice, the management of patients with valvular regurgitation thus largely integrates the results of echocardiography. It is crucial to provide standards that aim at establishing a baseline list of measurements to be performed when assessing regurgitation.

EAE/ASE Recommendations for the Use of Echocardiography in New Transcatheter Interventions for Valvular Heart Disease.

The introduction of devices for transcatheter aortic valve implantation, mitral repair, and closure of prosthetic paravalvular leaks has led to a greatly expanded armamentarium of catheter-based approaches to patients with regurgitant as well as stenotic valvular disease. Echocardiography plays an essential role in identifying patients suitable for these interventions and in providing intra-procedural monitoring. Moreover, echocardiography is the primary modality for post-procedure follow-up. The echocardiographic assessment of patients undergoing trans-catheter interventions places demands on echocardiographers that differ from those of the routine evaluation of patients with native or prosthetic valvular disease. Consequently, the European Association of Echocardiography in partnership with the American Society of Echocardiography has developed the recommendations for the use of echocardiography in new transcatheter interventions for valvular heart disease. It is intended that this document will serve as a reference for echocardiographers participating in any or all stages of new transcatheter treatments for patients with valvular heart disease.