Luis Correia
Rafael Advanced Defense Systems
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Luis Correia.
American Journal of Cardiology | 2013
Luis Correia; Fábio Sodré; Guilherme Garcia; Michael Sabino; Mariana Brito; Felipe Kalil; Bruno Barreto; José C. Lima; Márcia Noya-Rabelo
Vitamin D deficiency is associated with risk for a first cardiovascular event in the general population, possibly because of inflammation, insulin resistance, and neurohumoral activation. However, its relation with outcomes in acute coronary syndromes has not been reported. To test the hypothesis that severe deficiency of vitamin D is independently associated with cardiovascular mortality during ACS, 206 patients admitted for unstable angina, non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, or ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction had 25-hydroxyvitamin D serum levels measured at admission. Severe vitamin D deficiency was defined a priori as a value ≤10 ng/ml. The average concentration of vitamin D was 20 ± 8.2 ng/ml, and 10% of patients were severely deficient (95% confidence interval 6.6% to 15%). Cardiovascular mortality during hospitalization took place in 14 patients, an incidence of 6.8%. Patients with severe vitamin D deficiency had in-hospital cardiovascular mortality of 24%, significantly higher than the 4.9% observed in the remaining patients (relative risk 4.3, 95% confidence interval 1.8 to 10, p = 0.001). After adjustment for Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) score, Gensini angiographic score, and potential confounding variables, severe deficiency of vitamin D remained an independent predictor of in-hospital cardiovascular mortality (odds ratio 14, 95% confidence interval 1.2 to 158, p = 0.03). In conclusion, severe vitamin D deficiency is independently associated with in-hospital cardiovascular mortality in patients with acute coronary syndromes.
Journal of Cardiovascular Medicine | 2016
Fabrizio D'Ascenzo; Emad Abu-Assi; Sergio Raposeiras-Roubín; Simao Henriques Jp; Jorge F. Saucedo; González-Juanatey; Stephen B. Wilton; Wouter J. Kikkert; Iván J. Núñez-Gil; Xiantao Song; Dimitrios Alexopoulos; Christoph Liebetrau; Tetsuma Kawaji; Claudio Moretti; Zenon Huczek; Shao-Ping Nie; Toshiharu Fujii; Luis Correia; Masa-aki Kawashiri; José María García-Acuña; Danielle A. Southern; Emilio Alfonso; Belén Terol; Alberto Garay; Dongfeng Zhang; Yalei Chen; Ioanna Xanthopoulou; Neriman Osman; Helge Möllmann; Hiroki Shiomi
Background Bleeding events after an acute coronary syndrome have a negative impact on prognosis. Available risk scores are limited by suboptimal accuracy, prediction of only in-hospital events and absence of patients treated with new antiplatelet agents in the current era of widespread use of percutaneous coronary intervention. Design The BleeMACS (Bleeding complications in a Multicenter registry of patients discharged after an Acute Coronary Syndrome) project is a multicenter investigator-initiated international retrospective registry that enrolled more than 15 000 patients discharged with a definitive diagnosis of acute coronary syndrome and treated with percutaneous revascularization. The primary end point is the incidence of major bleeding events requiring hospitalization and/or red cell transfusion concentrates within 1 year. An integer risk score for bleeding within the first year after hospital discharge will be developed from a multivariate competing-risks regression. Conclusion The BleeMACS registry collaborative will allow development and validation of a risk score for prediction of major bleeding during follow-up for patients receiving contemporary therapies for acute coronary syndrome.
Arquivos Brasileiros De Cardiologia | 2012
Carolina Esteves Barbosa; Mateus Viana; Mariana Brito; Michael Sabino; Guilherme Garcia; Mayara Maraux; Alexandre C. Souza; Márcia Noya-Rabelo; J. Péricles Esteves; Luis Correia
FUNDAMENTO: A acuracia dos escores GRACE e TIMI em predizer a extensao da doenca coronariana em pacientes com sindromes coronarianas agudas sem supradesnivelamento do segmento ST (SCA) nao esta estabelecida. OBJETIVO: Testar a hipotese de que os escores de risco GRACE e TIMI predizem satisfatoriamente a extensao da doenca coronariana, em pacientes com SCA submetidos a coronariografia. METODOS: Individuos admitidos com criterios objetivos de SCA e que realizaram coronariografia durante o internamento foram consecutivamente analisados. A doenca coronariana angiografica foi descrita de tres formas: quantificacao da extensao da doenca coronariana pelo escore de Gensini; presenca de qualquer obstrucao coronariana (> 70% ou > 50% quando tronco de coronaria esquerda); presenca de doenca severa (triarterial ou tronco de coronaria esquerda). RESULTADOS: Em 112 pacientes avaliados, observou-se correlacao positiva do escore de Gensini com os escores GRACE (p = 0,017) e TIMI (p = 0,02), porem essa associacao foi de fraca magnitude (r = 0,23 e r = 0,27; respectivamente). O escore GRACE nao foi capaz de predizer doenca coronariana obstrutiva (area abaixo da curva ROC = 0,57; 95%IC = 0,46 - 0,69), nem doenca coronariana severa (ROC = 0,59; 95%IC = 0,48 -0,70). O Escore TIMI se mostrou modesto preditor em relacao a presenca de doenca coronariana (ROC = 0,65; 95%IC = 0,55 - 0,76) e presenca de doenca severa (ROC = 0,66; 95%IC = 0,56 - 0,76). CONCLUSAO: (1) Existe associacao positiva entre o valor dos escores TIMI ou GRACE e a extensao da doenca coronaria em pacientes com SCA; (2) No entanto, o grau dessa associacao nao e suficiente para que esses escores sejam preditores acurados dos resultados da coronariografia.
Arquivos Brasileiros De Cardiologia | 2013
Luis Correia; Mariana Brito; Felipe Kalil; Michael Sabino; Guilherme Garcia; Felipe Ferreira; Iracy Matos; Peter Jacobs; Liliana Ronzoni; Márcia Noya-Rabelo
Background An adequate door-to-balloon time (<120 minutes) is the necessary condition for the efficacy of primary angioplasty in infarction to translate into effectiveness. Objective To describe the effectiveness of a quality of care protocol in reducing the door-to-balloon time. Methods Between May 2010 and August 2012, all individuals undergoing primary angioplasty in our hospital were analyzed. The door time was electronically recorded at the moment the patient took a number to be evaluated in the emergency room, which occurred prior to filling the check-in forms and to the triage. The balloon time was defined as the beginning of artery opening (introduction of the first device). The first 5 months of monitoring corresponded to the period of pre-implementation of the protocol. The protocol comprised the definition of a flowchart of actions from patient arrival at the hospital, the teams awareness raising in relation to the prioritization of time, and provision of a periodic feedback on the results and possible inadequacies. Results A total of 50 individuals were assessed. They were divided into five groups of 10 sequential patients (one group pre-and four groups post-protocol). The door-to-balloon time regarding the 10 cases recorded before protocol implementation was 200 ± 77 minutes. After protocol implementation, there was a progressive reduction of the door-to-balloon time to 142 ± 78 minutes in the first 10 patients, then to 150 ± 50 minutes, 131 ± 37 minutes and, finally, 116 ± 29 minutes in the three sequential groups of 10 patients, respectively. Linear regression between sequential patients and the door-to-balloon time (r = - 0.41) showed a regression coefficient of - 1.74 minutes. Conclusion The protocol implementation proved effective in the reduction of the door-to-balloon time.
International Journal of Cardiology | 2016
Sebastiano Gili; Fabrizio D'Ascenzo; Marco Lococo; Claudio Moretti; Fiorenzo Gaita; Sergio Raposeiras-Roubín; Emad Abu-Assi; Jose Paulo Simao Henriques; Jorge F. Saucedo; José Ramón González-Juanatey; Stephen B. Wilton; Wouter J. Kikkert; Iván J. Núñez-Gil; Xiantao Song; Dimitrios Alexopoulos; Christoph Liebetrau; Tetsuma Kawaji; Zenon Huczek; Shao-Ping Nie; Toshiharu Fujii; Luis Correia; Masa-aki Kawashiri; José María García-Acuña; Danielle A. Southern; Emilio Alfonso; Belén Terol; Alberto Garay; Dongfeng Zhang; Yalei Chen; Ioanna Xanthopoulou
BACKGROUND Blood transfusions (BTs) may worsen the prognosis of patients affected by acute coronary syndromes (ACS), although few data detail their impact on short-term events according to clinical presentation (ST Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction, STEMI vs. Non-ST Segment Elevation ACS, NSTE-ACS). METHODS Patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for ACS, with data on BTs, were selected from the BleeMACS registry. The primary end point was the incidence of myocardial infarction during hospitalization (reAMI), the secondary end-points were 30-day mortality and the combined end-point of 30-day mortality and reAMI. Sensitivity analyses were performed according to clinical presentation (STEMI vs. NSTE-ACS). RESULTS Overall, 13,975 patients were included: mean age was 64.1years, 10,651 (76.2%) were male and 7711 (55.2%) had STEMI. BTs were administered during hospitalization to 465 (3.3%) patients, who were older and presented a more relevant burden of risk factors. The primary end-point of reAMI occurred in 197 (1.4%) patients, of whom 102 (1.1%) with STEMI. After controlling for confounding variables, BTs independently predicted the primary end-point reAMI in patients admitted for STEMI (OR 4.059, 95% CI 2244-7.344) and not in those admitted for NSTE-ACS. Moreover, BTs independently related to 30-day mortality in STEMI and NSTE-ACS patients and to the composite of 30-day mortality and reAMI in STEMI patients. CONCLUSIONS In patients undergoing PCI for ACS, BTs increase the risk of reAMI only in those admitted for STEMI, and not in those with NSTE-ACS. These results may help physicians to choose appropriate BT administration according to the admission diagnosis.
International Journal of Cardiology | 2018
Sergio Raposeiras-Roubín; Jonas Faxén; Andrés Íñiguez-Romo; Jose Paulo Simao Henriques; Fabrizio D'Ascenzo; Jorge F. Saucedo; Karolina Szummer; Tomas Jernberg; Stefan James; José Ramón González Juanatey; Stephen B. Wilton; Wouter J. Kikkert; Iván J. Núñez-Gil; Xiantao Song; Dimitrios Alexopoulos; Christoph Liebetrau; Tetsuma Kawaji; Claudio Moretti; Zenon Huczek; Shao-Ping Nie; Toshiharu Fujii; Luis Correia; Masa-aki Kawashiri; Berenice Caneiro-Queija; Rafael Cobas-Paz; José María García Acuña; Danielle A. Southern; Emilio Alfonso; Belén Terol; Alberto Garay
BACKGROUND Accurate 1-year bleeding risk estimation after hospital discharge for acute coronary syndrome (ACS) may help clinicians guide the type and duration of antithrombotic therapy. Currently there are no predictive models for this purpose. The aim of this study was to derive and validate a simple clinical tool for bedside risk estimation of 1-year post-discharge serious bleeding in ACS patients. METHODS The risk score was derived and internally validated in the BleeMACS (Bleeding complications in a Multicenter registry of patients discharged with diagnosis of Acute Coronary Syndrome) registry, an observational international registry involving 15,401 patients surviving admission for ACS and undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) from 2003 to 2014, engaging 15 hospitals from 10 countries located in America, Europe and Asia. External validation was conducted in the SWEDEHEART population, with 96,239 ACS patients underwent PCI and 93,150 without PCI. RESULTS Seven independent predictors of bleeding were identified and included in the BleeMACS score: age, hypertension, vascular disease, history of bleeding, malignancy, creatinine and hemoglobin. The BleeMACS risk score exhibited a C-statistic value of 0.71 (95% CI 0.68-0.74) in the derivation cohort and 0.72 (95% CI 0.67-0.76) in the internal validation sample. In the SWEDEHEART external validation cohort, the C-statistic was 0.65 (95% CI 0.64-0.66) for PCI patients and 0.63 (95% CI 0.62-0.64) for non-PCI patients. The calibration was excellent in the derivation and validation cohorts. CONCLUSIONS The BleeMACS bleeding risk score is a simple tool useful for identifying those ACS patients at higher risk of serious 1-year post-discharge bleeding. ClinicalTrials.govIdentifier: NCT02466854.
Arquivos Brasileiros De Cardiologia | 2014
Luis Correia; Guilherme Garcia; Felipe Kalil; Felipe Ferreira; Manuela Carvalhal; Ruan Oliveira; André Barcelos da Silva; Isis Vasconcelos; Caio Henri; Márcia Noya-Rabelo
Background The TIMI Score for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) was created and validated specifically for this clinical scenario, while the GRACE score is generic to any type of acute coronary syndrome. Objective Between TIMI and GRACE scores, identify the one of better prognostic performance in patients with STEMI. Methods We included 152 individuals consecutively admitted for STEMI. The TIMI and GRACE scores were tested for their discriminatory ability (C-statistics) and calibration (Hosmer-Lemeshow) in relation to hospital death. Results The TIMI score showed equal distribution of patients in the ranges of low, intermediate and high risk (39 %, 27 % and 34 %, respectively), as opposed to the GRACE Score that showed predominant distribution at low risk (80 %, 13 % and 7%, respectively). Case-fatality was 11%. The C-statistics of the TIMI score was 0.87 (95%CI = 0.76 to 0.98), similar to GRACE (0.87, 95%CI = 0.75 to 0.99) - p = 0.71. The TIMI score showed satisfactory calibration represented by χ2 = 1.4 (p = 0.92), well above the calibration of the GRACE score, which showed χ2 = 14 (p = 0.08). This calibration is reflected in the expected incidence ranges for low, intermediate and high risk, according to the TIMI score (0 %, 4.9 % and 25 %, respectively), differently to GRACE (2.4%, 25% and 73%), which featured middle range incidence inappropriately. Conclusion Although the scores show similar discriminatory capacity for hospital death, the TIMI score had better calibration than GRACE. These findings need to be validated populations of different risk profiles.
BMC Anesthesiology | 2017
Rogério da Hora Passos; João Gabriel Rosa Ramos; Evandro José Bulhões Mendonça; Eva Alves Miranda; Fábio Ricardo Dantas Dutra; Maria Fernanda R. Coelho; Andrea C. Pedroza; Luis Correia; Paulo Benigno Pena Batista; Etienne Macedo; Margarida Maria Dantas Dutra
BackgroundThis study aimed to identify predictors of early (7-day) mortality in patients with septic acute kidney injury (AKI) who required continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT).MethodsProspective cohort of 186 septic AKI patients undergoing CRRT at a tertiary hospital, from October 2005 to November 2010.ResultsAfter multivariate adjustment, five variables were associated to early mortality: norepinephrine utilization, liver failure, medical condition, lactate level, and pre-dialysis creatinine level. These variables were combined in a score, which demonstrated good discrimination, with a C-statistic of 0.82 (95% CI = 0.76–0.88), and good calibration (χ2 = 4.3; p = 0.83). SAPS 3, APACHE II and SOFA scores demonstrated poor performance in this population.ConclusionsThe HEpatic failure, LactatE, NorepInephrine, medical Condition, and Creatinine (HELENICC) score outperformed tested generic models. Future studies should further validate this score in different cohorts.
Journal of Geriatric Cardiology | 2016
Yan Yan; Xiao Wang; Jing-Yao Fan; Shao-Ping Nie; Sergio Raposeiras-Roubín; Emad Abu-Assi; José P.S. Henriques; Fabrizio D'Ascenzo; Jorge F. Saucedo; José Ramón González-Juanatey; Stephen B. Wilton; Wouter J. Kikkert; Iván J. Núñez-Gil; Xiantao Song; Dimitrios Alexopoulos; Christoph Liebetrau; Tetsuma Kawaji; Claudio Moretti; Zenon Huczek; Toshiharu Fujii; Luis Correia; Masa-aki Kawashiri; Sasko Kedev
Background There is great debate on the possible adverse interaction between proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) and clopidogrel. In addition, whether the use of PPIs affects the clinical efficacy of ticagrelor remains less known. We aimed to determine the impact of concomitant administration of PPIs and clopidogrel or ticagrelor on clinical outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Methods We retrospectively analyzed data from a “real world”, international, multi-center registry between 2003 and 2014 (n = 15,401) and assessed the impact of concomitant administration of PPIs and clopidogrel or ticagrelor on 1-year composite primary endpoint (all-cause death, re-infarction, or severe bleeding) in patients with ACS after PCI. Results Of 9429 patients in the final cohort, 54.8% (n = 5165) was prescribed a PPI at discharge. Patients receiving a PPI were older, more often female, and were more likely to have comorbidities. No association was observed between PPI use and the primary endpoint for patients receiving clopidogrel (adjusted HR: 1.036; 95% CI: 0.903–1.189) or ticagrelor (adjusted HR: 2.320; 95% CI: 0.875–6.151) (Pinteraction = 0.2004). Similarly, use of a PPI was not associated with increased risk of all-cause death, re-infarction, or a decreased risk of severe bleeding for patients treated with either clopidogrel or ticagrelor. Conclusions In patients with ACS following PCI, concomitant use of PPIs was not associated with increased risk of adverse outcomes in patients receiving either clopidogrel or ticagrelor. Our findings indicate it is reasonable to use a PPI in combination with clopidogrel or ticagrelor, especially in patients with a higher risk of gastrointestinal bleeding.
The Cardiology | 2012
Luis Correia; A.C. Souza; M. Sabino; M. Brito; M. Maraux; G. Garcia; J.P. Esteves; Márcia Noya-Rabelo
Objective: We aimed to test the hypothesis that hemoglobin values add prognostic information to the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) score at admission in patients with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes (ACS). Methods: A total of 225 consecutive patients with non-ST elevation ACS were studied. Hemoglobin was measured at admission, and its prognostic value was evaluated in relation to cardiovascular events during hospitalization, defined as the composite of death or myocardial infarction. Results: The incidence of major in-hospital events was 7% (10 deaths and 5 nonfatal myocardial infarctions). Hemoglobin significantly predicted events, with a C statistic of 0.67 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.53–0.81; p = 0.03], with 12.1 g/dl as the cutoff point of best performance. After adjustment for the GRACE score, low hemoglobin (≤12.1 g/dl) remained an independent predictor of events (odds ratio 3.9, 95% CI 1.2–13; p = 0.028). The C statistic of the GRACE score for prediction of events improved from 0.80 to 0.84 after hemoglobin was taken into account. Finally, the addition of hemoglobin to the GRACE score promoted a net reclassification improvement of 16% in identifying high-risk patients (p = 0.025). Conclusions: The present study provides preliminary evidence that hemoglobin level independently predicts recurrent events during hospitalization and improves the prognostic performance of the GRACE score in patients with non-ST elevation ACS.