Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Luís Gustavo Esteves is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Luís Gustavo Esteves.


Test | 2001

On the Bayesianity of Pereira-Stern tests

M. Madruga; Luís Gustavo Esteves; Sergio Wechsler

C. Pereira and J. Stern have recently introduced a measure of evidence of a precise hypothesis consisting of the posterior probability of the set of points having smaller density than the supremum over the hypothesis. The related procedure is seen to be a Bayes test for specific loss functions. The nature of such loss functions and their relation to stylised inference problems are investigated. The dependence of the loss function on the sample is also discussed as well as the consequence of the introduction of Jeffrey’s prior mass for the precise hypothesis on the separability of probability and utility.


Entropy | 2015

A Bayesian Decision-Theoretic Approach to Logically-Consistent Hypothesis Testing

Gustavo Miranda da Silva; Luís Gustavo Esteves; Victor Fossaluza; Rafael Izbicki; Sergio Wechsler

This work addresses an important issue regarding the performance of simultaneous test procedures: the construction of multiple tests that at the same time are optimal from a statistical perspective and that also yield logically-consistent results that are easy to communicate to practitioners of statistical methods. For instance, if hypothesis A implies hypothesis B, is it possible to create optimal testing procedures that reject A whenever they reject B? Unfortunately, several standard testing procedures fail in having such logical consistency. Although this has been deeply investigated under a frequentist perspective, the literature lacks analyses under a Bayesian paradigm. In this work, we contribute to the discussion by investigating three rational relationships under a Bayesian decision-theoretic standpoint: coherence, invertibility and union consonance. We characterize and illustrate through simple examples optimal Bayes tests that fulfill each of these requisites separately. We also explore how far one can go by putting these requirements together. We show that although fairly intuitive tests satisfy both coherence and invertibility, no Bayesian testing scheme meets the desiderata as a whole, strengthening the understanding that logical consistency cannot be combined with statistical optimality in general. Finally, we associate Bayesian hypothesis testing with Bayes point estimation procedures. We prove the performance of logically-consistent hypothesis testing by means of a Bayes point estimator to be optimal only under very restrictive conditions.


Entropy | 2016

The Logical Consistency of Simultaneous Agnostic Hypothesis Tests

Luís Gustavo Esteves; Rafael Izbicki; Julio Michael Stern; Rafael B. Stern

Simultaneous hypothesis tests can fail to provide results that meet logical requirements. For example, if A and B are two statements such that A implies B, there exist tests that, based on the same data, reject B but not A. Such outcomes are generally inconvenient to statisticians (who want to communicate the results to practitioners in a simple fashion) and non-statisticians (confused by conflicting pieces of information). Based on this inconvenience, one might want to use tests that satisfy logical requirements. However, Izbicki and Esteves shows that the only tests that are in accordance with three logical requirements (monotonicity, invertibility and consonance) are trivial tests based on point estimation, which generally lack statistical optimality. As a possible solution to this dilemma, this paper adapts the above logical requirements to agnostic tests, in which one can accept, reject or remain agnostic with respect to a given hypothesis. Each of the logical requirements is characterized in terms of a Bayesian decision theoretic perspective. Contrary to the results obtained for regular hypothesis tests, there exist agnostic tests that satisfy all logical requirements and also perform well statistically. In particular, agnostic tests that fulfill all logical requirements are characterized as region estimator-based tests. Examples of such tests are provided.


Entropy | 2018

Estimating Multivariate Discrete Distributions Using Bernstein Copulas

Victor Fossaluza; Luís Gustavo Esteves; Carlos Alberto Pereira

Measuring the dependence between random variables is one of the most fundamental problems in statistics, and therefore, determining the joint distribution of the relevant variables is crucial. Copulas have recently become an important tool for properly inferring the joint distribution of the variables of interest. Although many studies have addressed the case of continuous variables, few studies have focused on treating discrete variables. This paper presents a nonparametric approach to the estimation of joint discrete distributions with bounded support using copulas and Bernstein polynomials. We present an application in real obsessive-compulsive disorder data.


The American Statistician | 2017

Coherent Hypothesis Testing

Victor Fossaluza; Rafael Izbicki; Gustavo Miranda da Silva; Luís Gustavo Esteves

ABSTRACT Multiple hypothesis testing, an important quantitative tool to report the results of scientific inquiries, frequently leads to contradictory conclusions. For instance, in an analysis of variance (ANOVA) setting, the same dataset can lead one to reject the equality of two means, say μ1 = μ2, but at the same time to not reject the hypothesis that μ1 = μ2 = 0. These two conclusions violate the coherence principle introduced by Gabriel in 1969, and lead to results that are difficult to communicate, and, many times, embarrassing for practitioners of statistical methods. Although this situation is common in the daily life of statisticians, it is usually not discussed in courses of statistics. In this work, we enrich the teaching and discussion of this important topic by investigating through a few examples whether several standard test procedures are coherent or not. We also discuss the relationship between coherent tests and measures of support. Finally, we show how a Bayesian decision-theoretical framework can be used to build coherent tests. These approaches to coherence enlighten when such property is appealing in multiple testing and provide means of obtaining it.


BAYESIAN INFERENCE AND MAXIMUM ENTROPY METHODS IN SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING:#N#Proceedings of the 28th International Workshop on Bayesian Inference and Maximum Entropy#N#Methods in Science and Engineering | 2008

On the Estimation of Process Parameters in the Taguchi’s Approach to the On‐line Control Procedure for Attributes

Wagner Borges; Luís Gustavo Esteves; Sergio Wechsler

Under the model proposed by Nayebpour and Woodall [5] for Taguchi’s on‐line control procedure for attributes, estimators for the process parameter vector are derived both from the Classical (maximum likelihood) and Bayesian standpoints. The likelihood function is generated by the detection time of the first defective item under the control procedure. Under the Classical standpoint, a case of nonidentifiability is disclosed. Under the Bayesian standpoint, posterior probability distributions for the process parameters are determined by taking into account independent beta prior distributions.


Synthese | 2005

Indifference, neutrality and informativeness: Generalizing the three prisoners paradox

Sergio Wechsler; Luís Gustavo Esteves; Adilson Simonis; Cláudia Peixoto

Abstract.The uniform prior distribution is often seen as a mathematical description of noninformativeness. This paper uses the well-known Three Prisoners Paradox to examine the impossibility of maintaining noninformativeness throughout hierarchization. The Paradox has been solved by Bayesian conditioning over the choice made by the Warder when asked to name a(nother) prisoner who will be shot. We generalize the paradox to situations of N prisoners, k executions and m announcements made by the Warder. We then extend the consequences of hierarchically placing uniform and symmetrical priors (for example in the classical N = 3, k = 2, m = 1 scenario) for the probability p of the Warder naming Prisoner B, say. We prove that breaks of indifference and neutrality caused by assignment of uniform and symmetrical priors in lieu of degenerate indifference probabilities hold in general. Speaking of unknown probabilities or of probability of a probability must be forbidden as meaningless. Bruno de Finetti, 1977 I regard the use of hierarchical chains as a technique helping you to sharpen your subjective probabilities. I. J. Good, 1981


The American Statistician | 2017

Teaching decision theory proof strategies using a crowdsourcing problem

Luís Gustavo Esteves; Rafael Izbicki; Rafael B. Stern

ABSTRACT Teaching how to derive minimax decision rules can be challenging because of the lack of examples that are simple enough to be used in the classroom. Motivated by this challenge, we provide a new example that illustrates the use of standard techniques in the derivation of optimal decision rules under the Bayes and minimax approaches. We discuss how to predict the value of an unknown quantity, θ ∈ {0, 1}, given the opinions of n experts. An important example of such crowdsourcing problem occurs in modern cosmology, where θ indicates whether a given galaxy is merging or not, and Y1, …, Yn are the opinions from n astronomers regarding θ. We use the obtained prediction rules to discuss advantages and disadvantages of the Bayes and minimax approaches to decision theory. The material presented here is intended to be taught to first-year graduate students.


Entropy | 2017

Hypothesis Tests for Bernoulli Experiments: Ordering the Sample Space by Bayes Factors and Using Adaptive Significance Levels for Decisions

Carlos Alberto Pereira; Eduardo Yoshio Nakano; Victor Fossaluza; Luís Gustavo Esteves; Mark A. Gannon; Adriano Polpo

The main objective of this paper is to find the relation between the adaptive significance level presented here and the sample size. We statisticians know of the inconsistency, or paradox, in the current classical tests of significance that are based on p-value statistics that are compared to the canonical significance levels (10%, 5%, and 1%): “Raise the sample to reject the null hypothesis” is the recommendation of some ill-advised scientists! This paper will show that it is possible to eliminate this problem of significance tests. We present here the beginning of a larger research project. The intention is to extend its use to more complex applications such as survival analysis, reliability tests, and other areas. The main tools used here are the Bayes factor and the extended Neyman–Pearson Lemma.


Archive | 2015

Bayesian Hypothesis Testing in Finite Populations: Bernoulli Multivariate Variables

Brian Alvarez R. de Melo; Luís Gustavo Esteves

Bayesian hypothesis testing for the (operational) parameter of interest in a Bernoulli (multivariate) process observed in a finite population is the focus of this study. We introduce statistical test procedures for the relevant parameter under the predictivistic perspective of Bruno de Finetti in contrast with the usual superpopulation models. The comparison between these approaches, exemplified in a simple scenario of majority elections, shows considerable differences between the corresponding results for the case of observed large sampling fractions.

Collaboration


Dive into the Luís Gustavo Esteves's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Rafael Izbicki

Federal University of São Carlos

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Adriano Polpo

Federal University of São Carlos

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge