Luis Masana

Lipoprotein ratios: Physiological significance and clinical usefulness in cardiovascular prevention.

Low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol concentration has been the prime index of cardiovascular disease risk and the main target for therapy. However, several lipoprotein ratios or “atherogenic indices” have been defined in an attempt to optimize the predictive capacity of the lipid profile. In this review, we summarize their pathophysiological aspects, and highlight the rationale for using these lipoprotein ratios as cardiovascular risk factors in clinical practice, specifying their cut-off risk levels and a target for lipid-lowering therapy. Total/high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol and LDL/HDL cholesterol ratios are risk indicators with greater predictive value than isolated parameters used independently, particularly LDL. Future recommendations regarding the diagnosis and treatment of dyslipidemia, including instruments for calculating cardiovascular risk or action guidelines, should include the lipoprotein ratios with greater predictive power which, in view of the evidence-based results, are none other than those which include HDL cholesterol.

Abnormalities of Lipoprotein Metabolism in Patients with the Nephrotic Syndrome

BACKGROUND AND METHODS Patients with the nephrotic syndrome characteristically have multiple abnormalities of lipoprotein metabolism, but the cause and exact nature of these abnormalities are uncertain. In this study, we measured serum lipids and apoproteins in 57 patients with the nephrotic syndrome. We also determined the kinetic indexes of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) metabolism in six patients, and again in three of the six after recovery. RESULTS The patients with the nephrotic syndrome had elevated serum concentrations of cholesterol, triglycerides, and phospholipids, which were confined to the lipoproteins containing apoprotein B. The serum concentrations of high-density lipoproteins and the associated A-I and A-II apoproteins were similar in the patients with the nephrotic syndrome and normal subjects. The relative proportions of lipids and their positive association with the increased serum concentrations of apoproteins B, C-II, C-III, and E suggest quantitative rather than qualitative differences in the lipoproteins. All the patients had lipiduria, which probably reflected the excretion of high-density lipoproteins, although no intact immunoreactive apoprotein A-I was found in urine. Serum albumin concentrations were inversely related to serum lipid concentrations in the patients, the severity of the hypoalbuminemia corresponding to the degree of change in serum lipoprotein concentrations. The kinetic studies of lipoprotein metabolism revealed an overproduction of LDL apoprotein B that returned to normal after recovery. CONCLUSIONS The elevated serum concentrations of LDL cholesterol, other lipids, and apoprotein B in patients with uncomplicated nephrotic syndrome are due to reversible increases in lipoprotein production.

The polygenic nature of hypertriglyceridaemia: implications for definition, diagnosis, and management

Plasma triglyceride concentration is a biomarker for circulating triglyceride-rich lipoproteins and their metabolic remnants. Common mild-to-moderate hypertriglyceridaemia is typically multigenic, and results from the cumulative burden of common and rare variants in more than 30 genes, as quantified by genetic risk scores. Rare autosomal recessive monogenic hypertriglyceridaemia can result from large-effect mutations in six different genes. Hypertriglyceridaemia is exacerbated by non-genetic factors. On the basis of recent genetic data, we redefine the disorder into two states: severe (triglyceride concentration >10 mmol/L), which is more likely to have a monogenic cause; and mild-to-moderate (triglyceride concentration 2-10 mmol/L). Because of clustering of susceptibility alleles and secondary factors in families, biochemical screening and counselling for family members is essential, but routine genetic testing is not warranted. Treatment includes management of lifestyle and secondary factors, and pharmacotherapy. In severe hypertriglyceridaemia, intervention is indicated because of pancreatitis risk; in mild-to-moderate hypertriglyceridaemia, intervention can be indicated to prevent cardiovascular disease, dependent on triglyceride concentration, concomitant lipoprotein disturbances, and overall cardiovascular risk.

Plant sterols and plant stanols in the management of dyslipidaemia and prevention of cardiovascular disease

OBJECTIVE This EAS Consensus Panel critically appraised evidence relevant to the benefit to risk relationship of functional foods with added plant sterols and/or plant stanols, as components of a healthy lifestyle, to reduce plasma low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C) levels, and thereby lower cardiovascular risk. METHODS AND RESULTS Plant sterols/stanols (when taken at 2 g/day) cause significant inhibition of cholesterol absorption and lower LDL-C levels by between 8 and 10%. The relative proportions of cholesterol versus sterol/stanol levels are similar in both plasma and tissue, with levels of sterols/stanols being 500-/10,000-fold lower than those of cholesterol, suggesting they are handled similarly to cholesterol in most cells. Despite possible atherogenicity of marked elevations in circulating levels of plant sterols/stanols, protective effects have been observed in some animal models of atherosclerosis. Higher plasma levels of plant sterols/stanols associated with intakes of 2 g/day in man have not been linked to adverse effects on health in long-term human studies. Importantly, at this dose, plant sterol/stanol-mediated LDL-C lowering is additive to that of statins in dyslipidaemic subjects, equivalent to doubling the dose of statin. The reported 6-9% lowering of plasma triglyceride by 2 g/day in hypertriglyceridaemic patients warrants further evaluation. CONCLUSION Based on LDL-C lowering and the absence of adverse signals, this EAS Consensus Panel concludes that functional foods with plant sterols/stanols may be considered 1) in individuals with high cholesterol levels at intermediate or low global cardiovascular risk who do not qualify for pharmacotherapy, 2) as an adjunct to pharmacologic therapy in high and very high risk patients who fail to achieve LDL-C targets on statins or are statin- intolerant, 3) and in adults and children (>6 years) with familial hypercholesterolaemia, in line with current guidance. However, it must be acknowledged that there are no randomised, controlled clinical trial data with hard end-points to establish clinical benefit from the use of plant sterols or plant stanols.

Low-density lipoproteins cause atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. 1. Evidence from genetic, epidemiologic, and clinical studies. A consensus statement from the European Atherosclerosis Society Consensus Panel

Abstract Aims To appraise the clinical and genetic evidence that low-density lipoproteins (LDLs) cause atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). Methods and results We assessed whether the association between LDL and ASCVD fulfils the criteria for causality by evaluating the totality of evidence from genetic studies, prospective epidemiologic cohort studies, Mendelian randomization studies, and randomized trials of LDL-lowering therapies. In clinical studies, plasma LDL burden is usually estimated by determination of plasma LDL cholesterol level (LDL-C). Rare genetic mutations that cause reduced LDL receptor function lead to markedly higher LDL-C and a dose-dependent increase in the risk of ASCVD, whereas rare variants leading to lower LDL-C are associated with a correspondingly lower risk of ASCVD. Separate meta-analyses of over 200 prospective cohort studies, Mendelian randomization studies, and randomized trials including more than 2 million participants with over 20 million person-years of follow-up and over 150 000 cardiovascular events demonstrate a remarkably consistent dose-dependent log-linear association between the absolute magnitude of exposure of the vasculature to LDL-C and the risk of ASCVD; and this effect appears to increase with increasing duration of exposure to LDL-C. Both the naturally randomized genetic studies and the randomized intervention trials consistently demonstrate that any mechanism of lowering plasma LDL particle concentration should reduce the risk of ASCVD events proportional to the absolute reduction in LDL-C and the cumulative duration of exposure to lower LDL-C, provided that the achieved reduction in LDL-C is concordant with the reduction in LDL particle number and that there are no competing deleterious off-target effects. Conclusion Consistent evidence from numerous and multiple different types of clinical and genetic studies unequivocally establishes that LDL causes ASCVD.

Comparison of genetic versus clinical diagnosis in familial hypercholesterolemia.

Early diagnosis is important in familial hypercholesterolemia (FH), a highly atherogenic condition, but internationally agreed clinical diagnostic criteria are lacking. Genetic testing for low-density lipoprotein (LDL) receptor (LDLR) and apolipoprotein B (APOB) gene defects is the preferable diagnostic method, but the best phenotype indication to proceed with genetic diagnosis has not been established. The aim of this study was to assess the predictive and accuracy values of standard diagnostic criteria for detecting disease-causing mutations in 825 subjects with clinical FH aged > or =14 years from 3 lipid clinics in Spain. All subjects underwent thorough genetic testing for the detection of LDLR and APOB defects using the Lipochip platform. FH-causing mutations were detected in 459 subjects (55.6%). By logistic regression analysis, familial or personal history of tendon xanthoma (TX) and LDL cholesterol were strongly associated with genetic diagnosis (p <0.005, R(2) = 0.41). In subjects without familial or personal histories of TX, the diagnostic criteria for FH of the Make Early Diagnosis to Prevent Early Deaths (MEDPED) project, based on age-specific LDL cholesterol thresholds, showed sensitivity of 72.4%, specificity of 71.1%, and accuracy of 71.6%. LDL cholesterol > or =190 mg/dl in subjects with familial or personal histories of TX and > or =220, > or =225, and > or =235 mg/dl in those without such histories aged <30, 30 to 39, and > or =40 years, respectively, showed sensitivity of 91.1%, specificity of 71.1%, and accuracy of 74.2% for a positive genetic diagnosis. This new set of diagnostic criteria for FH was validated in an independent group of 440 subjects from 6 additional Spanish lipid clinics. In conclusion, TX and age-adjusted LDL cholesterol cut-off values have the highest value for clinical diagnosis and indication of genetic testing in FH.

Premature discontinuation of clinical trial for reasons not related to efficacy, safety, or feasibility

# Premature discontinuation of clinical trial for reasons not related to efficacy, safety, or feasibility {#article-title-2} Editorial by Evans and Pocock When investigators embark on a clinical trial, they naturally expect that the journey will end with the completion of the scheduled patient follow up and publication of the results. Some trials may sink en route because of organisational or ethical reasons, and such misfortunes must be accepted. Sometimes, however, trials are scuttled by their sponsors. Such premature discontinuation not only is frustrating for investigators but may have important medical implications. In this article we analyse the case of a clinical trial that was recently stopped for financial reasons, discuss the consequences of such discontinuations, and make some proposals to avoid recurrence. #### Summary points Some trials are discontinued prematurely by their sponsor for strategic reasons Clinical trials should be discontinued only for reasons pertaining to efficacy, safety, or feasibility Premature discontinuation of trials for strategic reasons deceives the patients, jeopardises the patient-doctor relationship, and harms the medical community Giving more power to steering committees that are mostly independent of the sponsor and include patient representatives, may limit the risk of premature discontinuation of trials for strategic reasons Public financial and scientific participation in some trials and increasing the length of patents may be useful Although two trials have shown the efficacy of statins for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease in middle aged people with hypercholesterolaemia, 1 2 the benefits and costs of such treatments in older men and women are unclear, especially in low cardiovascular risk populations.3-5 In April 1997, a group of French academics submitted to several pharmaceutical companies the protocol of the first placebo controlled trial of a statin for primary prevention in hypercholesterolaemic men and women aged 70 to 85 in low cardiovascular risk countries. Novartis agreed to fund the study in June 1998, when the company executives were convinced that this study was …

The use of statins in people at risk of developing diabetes mellitus: Evidence and guidance for clinical practice

Reducing low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels using statins is associated with significant reductions in cardiovascular (CV) events in a wide range of patient populations. Although statins are generally considered to be safe, recent studies suggest they are associated with an increased risk of developing Type 2 diabetes (T2D). This led the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to change their labelling requirements for statins to include a warning about the possibility of increased blood sugar and HbA1c levels and the European Medicines Agency (EMA) to issue guidance on a small increased risk of T2D with the statin class. This review examines the evidence leading to these claims and provides practical guidance for primary care physicians on the use of statins in people with or at risk of developing T2D. Overall, evidence suggests that the benefits of statins for the reduction of CV risk far outweigh the risk of developing T2D, especially in individuals with higher CV risk. To reduce the risk of developing T2D, physicians should assess all patients for T2D risk prior to starting statin therapy, educate patients about their risks, and encourage risk-reduction through lifestyle changes. Whether some statins are more diabetogenic than others requires further study. Statin-treated patients at high risk of developing T2D should regularly be monitored for changes in blood glucose or HbA1c levels, and the risk of conversion from pre-diabetes to T2D should be reduced by intensifying lifestyle changes. Should a patient develop T2D during statin treatment, physicians should continue with statin therapy and manage T2D in accordance with relevant national guidelines.

Management of Dyslipidemia in the Metabolic Syndrome Recommendations of the Spanish HDL-Forum

In order to characterize the metabolic syndrome it becomes necessary to establish a number of diagnostic criteria. Because of its impact on cardiovascular morbidity/mortality, considerable attention has been focussed on the dyslipidemia accompanying the metabolic syndrome.The aim of this review is to highlight the fundamental aspects of the pathophysiology, diagnosis, and the treatment of the metabolic syndrome dyslipidemia with recommendations to clinicians.The clinical expression of the metabolic syndrome dyslipidemia is characterized by hypertriglyceridemia and low levels of high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (HDL-C). In addition, metabolic syndrome dyslipidemia is associated with high levels of apolipoprotein (apo) B-100-rich particles of a particularly atherogenic phenotype (small dense low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol [LDL-C]. High levels of triglyceride-rich particles (very low-density lipoprotein) are also evident both at baseline and in overload situations (postprandial hyperlipidemia). Overall, the ‘quantitative’ dyslipidemia characterized by hypertriglyceridemia and low levels of HDL-C and the ‘qualitative’ dyslipidemia characterized by high levels of apo B-100- and triglyceride-rich particles, together with insulin resistance, constitute an atherogenic triad in patients with the metabolic syndrome.The therapeutic management of the metabolic syndrome, regardless of the control of the bodyweight, BP, hyperglycemia or overt diabetes mellitus, aims at maintaining optimum plasma lipid levels. Therapeutic goals are similar to those for high-risk situations because of the coexistence of multiple risk factors. The primary goal in treatment should be achieving an LDL-C level of <100 mg/dL (or <70 mg/dL in cases with established ischemic heart disease or risk equivalents). A further goal is increasing the HDL-C level to ≥40 mg/dL in men or 50 mg/dL in women. A non-HDL-C goal of 130 mg/dL should also be aimed at in cases of hypertriglyceridemia.Lifestyle interventions, such as maintaining an adequate diet, and a physical activity program, constitute an essential part of management. Nevertheless, when pharmacologic therapy becomes necessary, fibrates and HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors (statins) are the most effective drugs in controlling the metabolic syndrome hyperlipidemia, and are thus the drugs of first choice. Fibrates are effective in lowering triglycerides and increasing HDL-C levels, the two most frequent abnormalities associated with the metabolic syndrome, and statins are effective in lowering LDL-C levels, even though hypercholesterolemia occurs less frequently. In addition, the combination of fibrates and statins is highly effective in controlling abnormalities of the lipid profile in patients with the metabolic syndrome.

Apolipoprotein E gene mutations in subjects with mixed hyperlipidemia and a clinical diagnosis of familial combined hyperlipidemia.

OBJECTIVE Rare mutations in the APOE gene, undetectable with the usual genotyping technique, are responsible for dominant familial dysbetalipoproteinemia (FD) and therefore could be easily misclassified as familial combined hyperlipidemia (FCHL). We aimed to identify APOE mutations associated with dominant combined hyperlipoproteinemia and to establish their frequency in subjects with a clinical diagnosis of FCHL. METHODS AND RESULTS In 279 unrelated subjects with FCHL in whom a functional LDLR mutation was excluded, sequencing of the entire APOE gene detected 9 carriers of a rare mutation: 5 subjects (1.8%) with the R136S mutation (arginine at residue 136 changed to serine) and 4 subjects (1.4%) with the p.Leu149del mutation, a 3-bp inframe deletion that results in the loss of leucine at position 149. Both genetic defects were detected with similar frequency (2.5% and 1.3%, respectively) in an independent group of 160 FCHL subjects from other locations in Spain. Family studies demonstrated cosegregation of these APOE mutations with hyperlipoproteinemia. R136S carriers showed dysbetalipoproteinemia, while the lipid phenotype of p.Leu149del carriers was IIa or IIb. CONCLUSIONS Rare APOE mutations are responsible for approximately 3.5% of FCHL cases in our population. APOE R136S and p.Leu149del induce autosomal dominant FD and a phenotype indistinguishable from FCHL, respectively.