Lukas Zak

Evaluation of Cartilage Repair Tissue After Matrix-Associated Autologous Chondrocyte Transplantation Using a Hyaluronic-Based or a Collagen-Based Scaffold With Morphological MOCART Scoring and Biochemical T2 Mapping Preliminary Results

Background In cartilage repair, bioregenerative approaches using tissue engineering techniques have tried to achieve a close resemblance to hyaline cartilage, which might be visualized using advanced magnetic resonance imaging. Purpose To compare cartilage repair tissue at the femoral condyle noninvasively after matrix-associated autologous chondrocyte transplantation using Hyalograft C, a hyaluronic-based scaffold, to cartilage repair tissue after transplantation using CaReS, a collagen-based scaffold, with magnetic resonance imaging using morphologic scoring and T2 mapping. Study Design Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods Twenty patients after matrix-associated autologous chondrocyte transplantation (Hyalograft C, n = 10; CaReS, n = 10) underwent 3-T magnetic resonance imaging 24 months after surgery. Groups were matched by age and defect size/localization. For clinical outcome, the Brittberg score was assessed. Morphologic analysis was applied using the magnetic resonance observation of cartilage repair tissue score, and global and zonal biochemical T2 mapping was performed to reflect biomechanical properties with regard to collagen matrix/content and hydration. Results The clinical outcome was comparable in each group. The magnetic resonance observation of cartilage repair tissue score showed slightly but not significantly (P = .210) better results in the CaReS group (76.5) compared to the Hyalograft C group (70.0), with significantly better (P = .004) constitution of the surface of the repair tissue in the CaReS group. Global T2 relaxation times (milliseconds) for healthy surrounding cartilage were comparable in both groups (Hyalograft C, 49.9; CaReS, 51.9; P = .398), whereas cartilage repair tissue showed significantly higher results in the CaReS group (Hyalograft C, 48.2; CaReS, 55.5; P = .011). Zonal evaluation showed no significant differences (P ≥ .05). Conclusion Most morphologic parameters provided comparable results for both repair tissues. However, differences in the surface and higher T2 values for the cartilage repair tissue that was based on a collagen scaffold (CaReS), compared to the hyaluronic-based scaffold, indicated differences in the composition of the repair tissue even 2 years postimplantation. Clinical Relevance In the follow-up of cartilage repair procedures using matrix-associated autologous chondrocyte transplantation, differences due to scaffolds have to be taken into account.

Effect of Accelerated Weightbearing After Matrix-Associated Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation on the Femoral Condyle on Radiographic and Clinical Outcome After 2 Years: A Prospective, Randomized Controlled Pilot Study

Background There is no consensus about the optimal time for weightbearing activities after matrix-associated autologous chon-drocyte implantation (MACI) of the femoral condyle. Hypothesis A comprehensive protocol after MACI on the femoral condyle with accelerated weightbearing leads to a better functional and radiographic outcome compared with the same comprehensive protocol with delayed weightbearing. Study Design Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 1. Methods Thirty-one patients (22 male, 9 female) after MACI on the femoral condyle were randomly assigned to the accelerated weightbearing group (group A) or the delayed weightbearing group (group B). Aside from increase and time of full weightbearing, both groups adhered to the same rehabilitation protocol and exercises. Patients were assessed preoperatively and at 4, 12, 24, 52, and 104 weeks after surgery. Clinical evaluation was performed by determining the subjective form of the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC), the Tegner activity scale, and the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS). Radiological outcome was evaluated by the MOCART score and the size and amount of bone marrow edema and effusion. Results In both groups, there were no differences with regard to the clinical outcome. For the radiological outcome, group A showed a higher prevalence of bone marrow edema after 6 months without correlation to the clinical outcome (P 5 .06-.1). However, after 104 weeks, there were no differences in the radiological outcome between group A and group B. Conclusion A rehabilitation protocol with accelerated weightbearing leads to good clinical and functional outcome after 2 years without jeopardizing the healing graft.

Three-dimensional magnetic resonance observation of cartilage repair tissue (MOCART) score assessed with an isotropic three-dimensional true fast imaging with steady-state precession sequence at 3.0 Tesla

Introduction:Cartilage defects are common pathologies and surgical cartilage repair shows promising results. In its postoperative evaluation, the magnetic resonance observation of cartilage repair tissue (MOCART) score, using different variables to describe the constitution of the cartilage repair tissue and the surrounding structures, is widely used. High-field magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and 3-dimensional (3D) isotropic sequences may combine ideal preconditions to enhance the diagnostic performance of cartilage imaging.Aim of this study was to introduce an improved 3D MOCART score using the possibilities of an isotropic 3D true fast imaging with steady-state precession (True-FISP) sequence in the postoperative evaluation of patients after matrix-associated autologous chondrocyte transplantation (MACT) as well as to compare the results to the conventional 2D MOCART score using standard MR sequences. Material and Methods:The study had approval by the local ethics commission. One hundred consecutive MR scans in 60 patients at standard follow-up intervals of 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, and 60 months after MACT of the knee joint were prospectively included. The mean follow-up interval of this cross-sectional evaluation was 21.4 ± 20.6 months; the mean age of the patients was 35.8 ± 9.4 years. MRI was performed at a 3.0 Tesla unit. All variables of the standard 2D MOCART score where part of the new 3D MOCART score. Furthermore, additional variables and options were included with the aims to use the capabilities of isotropic MRI, to include the results of recent studies, and to adapt to the needs of patients and physician in a clinical routine examination. A proton-density turbo spin-echo sequence, a T2-weighted dual fast spin-echo (dual-FSE) sequence, and a T1-weighted turbo inversion recovery magnitude (TIRM) sequence were used to assess the standard 2D MOCART score; an isotropic 3D-TrueFISP sequence was prepared to evaluate the new 3D MOCART score. All 9 variables of the 2D MOCART score were compared with the corresponding variables obtained by the 3D MOCART score using the Pearson correlation coefficient; additionally the subjective quality and possible artifacts of the MR sequences were analyzed. Results:The correlation between the standard 2D MOCART score and the new 3D MOCART showed for the 8 variables “defect fill,” “cartilage interface,” “surface,” “adhesions,” “structure,” “signal intensity,” “subchondral lamina,” and “effusion”—a highly significant (P < 0.001) correlation with a Pearson coefficient between 0.566 and 0.932. The variable “bone marrow edema” correlated significantly (P < 0.05; Pearson coefficient: 0.257).The subjective quality of the 3 standard MR sequences was comparable to the isotropic 3D-TrueFISP sequence. Artifacts were more frequently visible within the 3D-TrueFISP sequence. Conclusion:In the clinical routine follow-up after cartilage repair, the 3D MOCART score, assessed by only 1 high-resolution isotropic MR sequence, provides comparable information than the standard 2D MOCART score. Hence, the new 3D MOCART score has the potential to combine the information of the standard 2D MOCART score with the possible advantages of isotropic 3D MRI at high-field. A clear limitation of the 3D-TrueFISP sequence was the high number of artifacts. Future studies have to prove the clinical benefits of a 3D MOCART score.

Long-term results 8 years after autologous osteochondral transplantation: 7 T gagCEST and sodium magnetic resonance imaging with morphological and clinical correlation

OBJECTIVE To correlate long-term clinical outcome and the results of morphological as well as advanced biochemical magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) techniques [T2-mapping, glycosaminoglycan chemical exchange saturation transfer (gagCEST), sodium-23-imaging] in patients after autologous osteochondral transplantation (AOT) in knee joints. METHOD Nine AOT patients (two female and seven male; median age, 49) had clinical [International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC), modified Lysholm, visual analog scale (VAS)] and radiological long-term follow-up examinations at a median of 7.9 years (inter-quartile range, 7.7-8.2). Standard morphological MRI and T2-mapping of cartilage were performed on a 3 T MR unit. Biochemical imaging further included sodium-23-imaging and chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) imaging at 7 T. The Magnetic resonance Observation of CArtilage Repair Tissue (MOCART) score was used for quantitative assessment of morphological MRI. RESULTS Clinical outcome was good with a median modified Lysholm score of 90. Median VAS revealed 1.0 and median MOCART score 75 points. The difference between native and repair cartilage was statistically significant for all three biochemical imaging techniques. The strongest correlation was found between the results of the advanced biochemical imaging methods sodium-23 and CEST [ρ = 0.952, 95% confidence interval (CI): (0.753; 0.992)]. Comparing the results from morphological and biochemical imaging, a correlation was found between MOCART score and CEST ratio [ρ = -0.749, 95% CI: (-0.944; -0.169)]. Comparing the results from clinical scores with MRI, a correlation between modified Lysholm and T2-mapping [ρ = -0.667, 95% CI: (-0.992; -0.005)] was observed. CONCLUSION Long-term clinical outcome in patients 7.9 years after AOT was good, but did not correlate with morphological and biochemical imaging results except for T2-mapping.

Evaluation and comparison of cartilage repair tissue of the patella and medial femoral condyle by using morphological MRI and biochemical zonal T2 mapping

The objective of this study was to use advanced MR techniques to evaluate and compare cartilage repair tissue after matrix-associated autologous chondrocyte transplantation (MACT) in the patella and medial femoral condyle (MFC). Thirty-four patients treated with MACT underwent 3-T MRI of the knee. Patients were treated on either patella (n = 17) or MFC (n = 17) cartilage and were matched by age and postoperative interval. For morphological evaluation, the MR observation of cartilage repair tissue (MOCART) score was used, with a 3D-True-FISP sequence. For biochemical assessment, T2 mapping was prepared by using a multiecho spin-echo approach with particular attention to the cartilage zonal structure. Statistical evaluation was done by analyses of variance. The MOCART score showed no significant differences between the patella and MFC (p ≥ 0.05). With regard to biochemical T2 relaxation, higher T2 values were found throughout the MFC (p < 0.05). The zonal increase in T2 values from deep to superficial was significant for control cartilage (p < 0.001) and cartilage repair tissue (p < 0.05), with an earlier onset in the repair tissue of the patella. The assessment of cartilage repair tissue of the patella and MFC afforded comparable morphological results, whereas biochemical T2 values showed differences, possibly due to dissimilar biomechanical loading conditions.

Results 2 Years After Matrix-Associated Autologous Chondrocyte Transplantation Using the Novocart 3D Scaffold An Analysis of Clinical and Radiological Data

Background: A range of scaffolds is available from various manufacturers for cartilage repair through matrix-associated autologous chondrocyte transplantation (MACT), with good medium- to long-term results. Purpose: To evaluate clinical and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) outcomes 2 years after MACT on the knee joint using the Novocart 3D scaffold based on a bilayered collagen type I sponge. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: Of 28 initial patients, 23 were clinically and radiologically evaluated 24 months after transplantation. Indications for MACT were chondral or osteochondral lesions on the knee joint with a defect size >2 cm2, no instability, and no malalignment (axis deviation <5°). Then, MRI was performed on a 3-T scanner to assess the magnetic resonance observation of cartilage repair tissue (MOCART) and 3-dimensional (3D) MOCART scores. A variety of subjective scores (International Knee Documentation Committee [IKDC], Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score [KOOS], Noyes sports activity rating scale, Tegner activity scale, and visual analog scale [VAS] for pain) were used for clinical evaluation. Results: Two years after MACT, the MRI evaluation showed a mean MOCART score of 73.2 ± 12.4 and a 3D MOCART score of 73.4 ± 9.7. Clinical results showed mean values of 69.8 ± 15.2 for the IKDC; 51.6 ± 21.2, 86.5 ± 13.9, 54.5 ± 23.6, 65.0 ± 8.0, and 91.5 ± 10.6 for the KOOS subscales (Quality of Life, Pain, Sports and Recreation, Symptoms, and Activities of Daily Living, respectively); 77.5 ± 12.7 for the Noyes scale; 4.4 ± 1.6 for the Tegner activity scale; and 1.8 ± 1.7 for the VAS, with statistically significant improvement in all scores other than KOOS-Symptoms. Conclusion: Undergoing MACT using the Novocart 3D scaffold is an applicable method to treat large focal chondral and osteochondral defects, with good short-term clinical and radiological results.

Clinical and Radiological Long-term Outcomes After Matrix-Induced Autologous Chondrocyte Transplantation A Prospective Follow-up at a Minimum of 10 Years

Background: It is unclear whether matrix-associated autologous chondrocyte transplantation (MACT) results in objective and subjective clinical improvements at 10 years after surgery. Hypothesis: Matrix-associated autologous chondrocyte transplantation will result in clinical and radiological improvements in patients with symptomatic, traumatic chondral defects of the knee joint. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: A total of 16 patients with chondral defects of the knee were treated with MACT between November 2000 and April 2002 and evaluated for up to 10 years after the intervention. The International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) form, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), Tegner activity score, Brittberg score, Noyes sports activity rating scale, and visual analog scale (VAS) for pain as well as 3-T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) using the magnetic resonance observation of cartilage repair tissue (MOCART) score and functional evaluation by the limb symmetry index (LSI) formed the basis of this study. The Friedman test and the Wilcoxon signed-rank test were performed for a comparison between all time points and 2 separate time points, respectively. If significant differences were revealed, a Bonferroni adjustment to the α level was applied so that P values <.007 (<.05/7) were regarded as significant in the paired comparisons. Results: Significant improvements (P < .05) from baseline to 120 months postoperatively were observed for the IKDC score (mean, 44.1 ± 26.9 to 59.0 ± 27.4), Noyes sports activity rating score (mean, 37.7 ± 30.1 to 62.1 ± 31.3), and KOOS Quality of Life and Pain subscores, whereas no statistically significant improvement was detected for the Brittberg score, Tegner activity score, or VAS score. After 5 years, a slight downward tendency of all clinical scores was evident. After 10 years, the mean MOCART score was 70.4 ± 16.1. Complete filling of the defect was observed in 73.9% of cases, and osteophytes were present in 78.3%. In 65.2% of the cases, a subchondral bone edema <1 cm was visible, whereas in 21.7% of the cases, a subchondral bone edema >1 cm was seen. The mean LSI for the single-legged hop test was 95.6% ± 16.2% and for the triple hop test for distance was 91.3% ± 12.2%. The mean VAS score for self-perceived stability was 60.2 ± 3.5 (range, 0-9.5) for the injured and 60.7 ± 3.8 (range, 0-10) for the uninjured leg. No adhesions or effusions were seen regarding the clinical and radiological outcomes. Conclusion: The significantly improved results on 3 outcome measures after 10 years suggest that MACT represents a suitable option in the treatment of local cartilage defects in the knee.

Ability to Return to Sports 5 Years After Matrix-Associated Autologous Chondrocyte Transplantation in an Average Population of Active Patients

Background: Cartilage injuries often occur during sports activities, and return to sports after cartilage surgery is an important outcome parameter for different treatment methods in the competitive as well as the recreationally active population. Hypothesis: At the time of midterm follow-up after matrix-associated autologous chondrocyte transplantation (MACT), return to recreational sports at the preinjury level will be possible. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: Seventy patients (51 men, 19 women; age [mean ± standard deviation], 34.9 ± 8.6 y; range, 18-55 y) were clinically evaluated 5 years after MACT through subjective clinical scores such as the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) sport and recreation subscales, the Tegner activity scale, and the Noyes sports activity rating scale. The level of sports participation was included in the investigation. Results: The results 5 years after MACT showed mean values of 60.1 for the KOOS–sport, 67.4 for the Noyes, and 3.8 for the Tegner scores, meaning that regular sports activity such as cycling or running on flat ground, as well as medium-level manual labor, is possible. We noted that 74.3% of our patients returned to at least their preinjury sports level. Conclusion: Midterm postoperative results after MACT show that in a moderately active population, participation in regular sports is possible for most patients, at least at their preinjury recreational level and intensity, and there is a good rate of return to sports.

Effect of Accelerated Weightbearing After Matrix-Associated Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation on the Femoral Condyle A Prospective, Randomized Controlled Study Presenting MRI-Based and Clinical Outcomes After 5 Years

Background: Long-term effects of different weightbearing (WB) modalities after matrix-associated autologous chondrocyte implantation (MACI) on changes in knee articular cartilage and clinical outcomes are needed to establish more evidence-based recommendations for postoperative rehabilitation. Hypothesis: There will be no differences between accelerated WB compared with delayed WB regarding knee articular cartilage or patient self-reported knee function or activity level 5 years after MACI. Furthermore, significant correlations between magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)–based outcomes and patient-reported outcome measures 5 years postoperatively will exist. Study Design: Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 1. Methods: After MACI, 31 patients (23 male, 8 female) were randomly assigned to the accelerated WB group (AWB group) or to the delayed WB group (DWB group). With the exception of time and increase to full WB, both groups underwent the same rehabilitation program. The AWB group was allowed full WB after 6 weeks and the DWB group after 10 weeks. Assessments were performed 3 months, 2 years, and 5 years postoperatively, but this long-term follow-up study only included changes from 2 to 5 years postoperatively. The magnetic resonance observation of cartilage repair tissue (MOCART) score (primary outcome), the MRI-based variables of bone edema and effusion, the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), and the Tegner scale were included. In addition, the association between MRI-based outcomes and the KOOS at 5 years postoperatively was investigated. Results: There was a significant decrease in the MOCART score and a significant increase in bone edema 2 and 5 years postoperatively but no significant group differences. The only significant correlation between the MRI-based variables and the KOOS was found for bone edema and the KOOS subscale of pain (r = −0.435, P < .05) at 5-year follow-up. Conclusion: There were no significant differences in the MRI-based or clinical outcomes between the AWB group and DWB group 5 years after MACI. While the clinical outcomes remained stable, a decline of the MRI-based findings was observed between 2 and 5 years postoperatively. Furthermore, a significant association between bone edema and pain was found. No occurrence of unintended effects was observed.

Quantitative MRI analysis of menisci using biexponential T2* fitting with a variable echo time sequence

The goal of this study was to differentiate between normal, degenerative meniscus, and meniscal tears using monoexponentially and biexponentially calculated T2*. Meniscal disease, characterized by an altered collagen fiber matrix, might be detectable in vivo using quantitative T2* mapping.