Lx Lokien van Nunen
Eindhoven University of Technology
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Lx Lokien van Nunen.
The Lancet | 2015
Lx Lokien van Nunen; Frederik M. Zimmermann; Pim A.L. Tonino; Emanuele Barbato; Andreas Baumbach; Thomas Engstrøm; Volker Klauss; Philip MacCarthy; Ganesh Manoharan; Keith G. Oldroyd; Peter N. Ver Lee; M Marcel van 't Veer; William F. Fearon; Bernard De Bruyne; Nico H.J. Pijls
BACKGROUND In the Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation (FAME) study, fractional flow reserve (FFR)-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) improved outcome compared with angiography-guided PCI for up to 2 years of follow-up. The aim in this study was to investigate whether the favourable clinical outcome with the FFR-guided PCI in the FAME study persisted over a 5-year follow-up. METHODS The FAME study was a multicentre trial done in Belgium, Denmark, Germany, the Netherlands, Sweden, the UK, and the USA. Patients (aged ≥ 18 years) with multivessel coronary artery disease were randomly assigned to undergo angiography-guided PCI or FFR-guided PCI. Before randomisation, stenoses requiring PCI were identified on the angiogram. Patients allocated to angiography-guided PCI had revascularisation of all identified stenoses. Patients allocated to FFR-guided PCI had FFR measurements of all stenotic arteries and PCI was done only if FFR was 0·80 or less. No one was masked to treatment assignment. The primary endpoint was major adverse cardiac events at 1 year, and the data for the 5-year follow-up are reported here. Analysis was by intention to treat. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00267774. FINDINGS After 5 years, major adverse cardiac events occurred in 31% of patients (154 of 496) in the angiography-guided group versus 28% (143 of 509 patients) in the FFR-guided group (relative risk 0·91, 95% CI 0·75-1·10; p=0·31). The number of stents placed per patient was significantly higher in the angiography-guided group than in the FFR-guided group (mean 2·7 [SD 1·2] vs 1·9 [1·3], p<0·0001). INTERPRETATION The results confirm the long-term safety of FFR-guided PCI in patients with multivessel disease. A strategy of FFR-guided PCI resulted in a significant decrease of major adverse cardiac events for up to 2 years after the index procedure. From 2 years to 5 years, the risks for both groups developed similarly. This clinical outcome in the FFR-guided group was achieved with a lower number of stented arteries and less resource use. These results indicate that FFR guidance of multivessel PCI should be the standard of care in most patients. FUNDING St Jude Medical, Friends of the Heart Foundation, and Medtronic.
Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions | 2015
Woo-Hyun Lim; Bon-Kwon Koo; Chang-Wook Nam; Joon-Hyung Doh; Jin Joo Park; Han-Mo Yang; Kyung Woo Park; Hyo-Soo Kim; Hiroaki Takashima; Katsuhisa Waseda; Tetsuya Amano; Daiki Kato; Akiyoshi Kurita; Maki Oi; Mamoru Toyofuku; Lx Lokien van Nunen; Nico H.J. Pijls
We performed this study to evaluate the variability of fractional flow reserve (FFR) values which were measured from various methods of hyperemia induction.
American Journal of Cardiology | 2016
Lx Lokien van Nunen; Marko Noc; Navin K. Kapur; Manesh R. Patel; Divaka Perera; Nico H.J. Pijls
Intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) counterpulsation is the most widely used mechanical circulatory support device because of its ease of use, low complication rate, and fast manner of insertion. Its benefit is still subject of debate, and a considerable gap exists between guidelines and clinical practice. Retrospective nonrandomized studies and animal experiments show benefits of IABP therapy. However, recent large randomized trials do not show benefit of IABP therapy, which has led to a downgrading in the guidelines. In our view, this dichotomy between trials and practice might be the result of insufficient understanding of the prerequisites needed for effective IABP therapy, that is, exhausted autoregulation, and of not including the right patient population in trials. The population included in recent large randomized trials has been heterogeneous, also including patients in whom benefit of IABP could not be expected. The clinical condition in which most benefit is expected, that is persistent ischemia in acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction, is discussed in this review. In conclusion, this review aims to explain the physiological principles needed for effective IABP therapy, to reflect critically on the large randomized trials, and to solve some of the controversies in this field.
Eurointervention | 2015
Lx Lokien van Nunen; M Marcel van 't Veer; S Stéphanie Schampaert; Mcm Marcel Rutten; Fn Frans van de Vosse; Manesh R. Patel; Nhj Nico Pijls
AIMS This substudy investigated IABP support in large STEMI complicated by persistent ischaemia within the original CRISP-AMI trial. METHODS AND RESULTS Patients were included if the ECG at admission showed summed ST deviation (ST-D) ≥15 mm and the ECG post PCI showed poor ST resolution (<50%). Endpoints evaluated were all-cause mortality at six months and the composite endpoint of death, cardiogenic shock or new or worsening heart failure at six months. One hundred and forty-nine patients had ST-D ≥15 mm (mean ST-D 24±8 mm). Of these patients, 36 (24%) showed poor ST resolution (15 patients in the IABP group; 21 patients in the control group). Mean age was 55±11 years, 89% were male. Mean systolic and diastolic blood pressures were 135±31 mmHg and 83±22 mmHg, respectively. The left anterior descending coronary artery was the infarct-related artery in all cases, primary PCI was successful in 94%. At six months, zero patients in the IABP group died versus five patients in the control group (0% versus 24%; p=0.046). There was a trend towards statistical significance in the composite endpoint (one patient [7%] versus seven patients [33%]; p=0.06). CONCLUSIONS In this substudy, use of IABP was associated with decreased six-month mortality in large STEMI complicated by persistent ischaemia after PCI.
Asaio Journal | 2013
S Stéphanie Schampaert; Mcm Marcel Rutten; M Marcel van 't Veer; Lx Lokien van Nunen; Pal Tonino; Nhj Nico Pijls; Fn Frans van de Vosse
Because of the large number of interaction factors involved, the effects of the intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) have not been investigated deeply. To enhance its clinical efficiency and to better define indications for use, advanced models are required to test the interaction between the IABP and the cardiovascular system. A patient with mild blood pressure depression and a lowered cardiac output is modeled in a lumped parameter computational model, developed with physiologically representative elements for relevant components of circulation and device. IABP support is applied, and the moments of balloon inflation and deflation are varied around their conventional timing modes. For validation purposes, timing is adapted within acceptable ranges in ten patients undergoing IABP therapy for typical clinical indications. In both model and patients, the IABP induces a diastolic blood pressure augmentation as well as a systolic reduction in afterload. The support capabilities of the IABP benefit the most when the balloon is deflated simultaneously with ventricular contraction, whereas inflation before onset of diastole unconditionally interferes with ejection. The physiologic response makes the model an excellent tool for testing the interaction between the IABP and the cardiovascular system, and how alterations of specific IABP parameters (i.e., timing) affect this coupling.
Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine | 2015
Nico H.J. Pijls; Lx Lokien van Nunen
Currently, there is little doubt that interpretation of coronary artery disease and decision making with respect to revascularization based on visualassessmentoftheangiogramisafundamentally flawedapproach. The importance of additional functional testing to assess the hemodynamic severity of a coronary stenosis is undisputable. Over the decades, a number of physiologic indices have emerged to assess the functional significance of coronary artery disease. Of these, fractional flow reserve (FFR) is most commonly used. There is incontrovertible proof now that stenting of ischemic stenoses as indicated by a FFR ≤0.80 generally improvesoutcome, whereasstentingofnon-ischemicstenosisasindicated by a FFR N0.80 offers nobenefit compared to medical treatment and can mostly be avoided [1–6]. To assess the true strength or quality of anything in the world around us—whether in science, engineering, or biology—testing under conditionsof stress is mandatory. In analogy,therefore, the windtunnel for physiologic testing of coronary arteries is maximum hyperemia. Accurate assessment of FFR can be done only during maximum hyperemic conditions. An interesting analysis of a rather new hyperemic drug, regadenoson, is published in the current issue of Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine (CRM) [7].
Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions | 2016
Luuk C. Otterspoor; M Marcel van 't Veer; Lx Lokien van Nunen; Inge Wijnbergen; Pim A.L. Tonino; Nico H.J. Pijls
In ST‐elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), reduction in time to reperfusion of the occluded coronary artery reduces infarct size. In animal models, an additional reduction of infarct size was observed when hypothermia was induced before reperfusion, despite a longer ischemic time. However, several human studies did not corroborate this positive effect, which is believed to be in part due to the inability of systemic induced hypothermia to induce sufficient decrease of local myocardial temperature before reperfusion. Providing rapid local myocardial hypothermia by intracoronary infusion of saline before reperfusion in patients with STEMI may overcome this problem. In this study, we evaluate the safety and feasibility of providing rapid intracoronary myocardial hypothermia in patients undergoing intracoronary blood flow measurements based on thermodilution with continuous infusion of saline at room temperature.
Artificial Organs | 2015
S Stéphanie Schampaert; Lx Lokien van Nunen; Nhj Nico Pijls; Mcm Marcel Rutten; Sjoerd van Tuijl; Fn Frans van de Vosse; M Marcel van 't Veer
The blood pressure changes induced by the intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) are expected to create clinical improvement in terms of coronary perfusion and myocardial oxygen consumption. However, the measured effects reported in literature are inconsistent. The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of ischemia on IABP efficacy in healthy hearts and in shock. Twelve slaughterhouse porcine hearts (hearts 1-12) were connected to an external circulatory system, while physiologic cardiac performance was restored. Different clinical scenarios, ranging from healthy to cardiogenic shock, were simulated by step-wise administration of negative inotropic drugs. In hearts 7-12, severe global myocardial ischemia superimposed upon the decreased contractile states was created. IABP support was applied in all hearts under all conditions. Without ischemia, the IABP induced a mild increase in coronary blood flow and cardiac output. These effects were strongly augmented in the presence of persisting ischemia, where coronary blood flow increased by 49 ± 24% (P < 0.01) and cardiac output by 17 ± 6% (P < 0.01) in case of severe pump failure. As expected, myocardial oxygen consumption increased in case of ischemia (21 ± 17%; P < 0.01), while it slightly decreased without (-3 ± 6%; P < 0.01). In case of progressive pump failure due to persistent myocardial ischemia, the IABP increased hyperemic coronary blood flow and cardiac output significantly, and reversed the progressive hemodynamic deterioration within minutes. This suggests that IABP therapy in acute myocardial infarction is most effective in patients with viable myocardium, suffering from persistent myocardial ischemia, despite adequate epicardial reperfusion.
Eurointervention | 2017
Lc Otterspoor; M Marcel van 't Veer; Lx Lokien van Nunen; Brg Brueren; Pal Tonino; Inge Wijnbergen; Harold Helmes; Frederik M. Zimmermann; Hagen, Van, Eduard; Nils P. Johnson; Nhj Nico Pijls
AIMS Hypothermia reduces reperfusion injury and infarct size in animal models of acute myocardial infarction if started before reperfusion. Human studies have not confirmed benefit, probably due to insufficient myocardial cooling and adverse systemic effects. This study sought to assess the safety and feasibility of a novel method for selective, sensor-monitored intracoronary hypothermia. METHODS AND RESULTS Ten patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) were included. Saline at room temperature was administered distal to the culprit lesion through an inflated overthe- wire balloon (OTWB) in order to cool the endangered myocardium for 10 minutes (occlusion phase). Next, the OTWB was deflated and cooling continued with saline at 4°C for another 10 minutes (reperfusion phase). A sensor-tipped temperature wire in the distal coronary artery allowed titration of the infusion rate to achieve the desired coronary temperature (6°C below body temperature). Target coronary temperature was achieved within 27 seconds (median; IQR 21-46). Except for two patients with inferior wall infarction experiencing transient conduction disturbances, no side effects occurred. Systemic temperature remained unchanged. Finally, PPCI was performed as per routine. CONCLUSIONS Selective hypothermia of the infarct area by intracoronary infusion of saline provides a novel method to reduce coronary temperature quickly and guarantee local myocardial hypothermia. In anterior wall myocardial infarctions, the protocol appeared safe, without serious haemodynamic or systemic side effects. In inferior wall myocardial infarctions, transient conduction abnormalities of short duration occurred. Potentially, selective intracoronary delivery of hypothermia could attenuate reperfusion injury caused by traditional PPCI.
Therapeutic hypothermia and temperature management | 2017
Lc Otterspoor; Lx Lokien van Nunen; M Marcel van 't Veer; Nils P. Johnson; Nhj Nico Pijls
Because current reperfusion strategies in acute myocardial infarction (AMI) seem to be exhausted in terms of additional mortality benefit, there remains a need for new methods to attenuate reperfusion injury and, thereby, further reduce myocardial infarct size and improve long-term survival. Therapeutic hypothermia (32-35°C) diminishes reperfusion injury and reduces infarct size in a variety of animal models of AMI if provided before reperfusion. In human studies this reduction has not been confirmed so far, most likely because systemic cooling acts slowly, and therefore, the target temperature is not reached in time or at all in a substantial number of patients. Furthermore, systemic cooling can cause adverse effects such as severe shivering, volume overload, and an enhanced adrenergic state. In most randomized clinical trials, however, subgroups of patients with anterior myocardial infarction that reached the target temperature before reperfusion did show a reduction in infarct size. To transform therapeutic hypothermia into a clinically feasible treatment for AMI, its method must be modified. An ideal technique should be quick enough to achieve sufficient myocardial hypothermia before reperfusion, without significant delay and without the adverse effects of systemic cooling. In this review, we propose a novel, potentially feasible method of selective intracoronary hypothermia to overcome the problems encountered with prior techniques.