Lyndon Chie

Induction of oocyte maturation by jun-N-terminal kinase (JNK) on the oncogenic ras-p21 pathway is dependent on the raf-MEK-MAP kinase signal transduction pathway

Purpose: We have previously found that microinjection of activated MEK (mitogen activated kinase kinase) and ERK (mitogen-activated protein; MAP kinase) fails to induce oocyte maturation, but that maturation, induced by oncogenic ras-p21 and insulin-activated cell ras-p21, is blocked by peptides from the ras-binding domain of raf. We also found that jun kinase (JNK), on the stress-activated protein (SAP) pathway, which is critical to the oncogenic ras-p21 signal transduction pathway, is a strong inducer of oocyte maturation. Our purpose in this study was to determine the role of the raf-MEK-MAP kinase pathway in oocyte maturation and how it interacts with JNK from the SAP pathway. Methods: We microinjected raf dominant negative mutant mRNA (DN-raf) and the MAP kinase-specific phosphatase, MKP-T4, either together with oncogenic p21 or c-raf mRNA, into oocytes or into oocytes incubated with insulin to determine the effects of these raf-MEK-MAP kinase pathway inhibitors. Results: We found that oocyte maturation induced by both oncogenic and activated normal p21 is inhibited by both DN-raf and by MKP-T4. The latter more strongly blocks the oncogenic pathway. Also an mRNA encoding a constitutively activated MEK strongly induces oocyte maturation that is not inhibited by DN-raf or by MKP-T4. Surprisingly, we found that oocyte maturation induced by JNK is blocked both by DN-raf and MKP-T4. Furthermore, we discovered that c-raf induces oocyte maturation that is inhibited by glutathione-S-transferase (GST), which we have found to be a potent and selective inhibitor of JNK. Conclusion: We conclude that there is a strong reciprocal interaction between the SAP pathway involving JNK and the raf-MEK-MAP kinase pathway and that oncogenic ras-p21 can be preferentially inhibited by MAP kinase inhibitors. The results imply that blockade of both MAP kinase and JNK-oncogenic ras-p21 interactions may constitute selective synergistic combination chemotherapy against oncogenic ras- induced tumors.

Peptides designed from molecular modeling studies of the ras-p21 protein induce phenotypic reversion of a pancreatic carcinoma cell line but have no effect on normal pancreatic acinar cell growth.

PurposeFrom molecular modeling studies we found that two ras-p21 peptides, corresponding to p21 residues 35–47 (PNC-7) and 96–110 (PNC-2), selectively block oncogenic (Val 12-p21), but not insulin-activated wild-type, p21-induced oocyte maturation. Our purpose was to determine if these peptides block the growth of mammalian cancer cells but not their normal counterpart cells.MethodsSince oncogenic ras has been implicated as a causative factor in over 90% of human pancreatic cancers, we have established a normal pancreatic acinar cell line (BMRPA1) and the corresponding ras-transformed pancreatic cancer cell line (TUC-3). We treated both cell lines with PNC-7 and PNC-2 and the unrelated negative control peptide, X13, attached to the penetratin sequence that allows membrane penetration and also transfected these cell lines with plasmids encoding all three peptides.ResultsTreatment of TUC-3 cells with each peptide resulted in their complete phenotypic reversion to the untransformed phenotype as revealed by the lack of tumor formation of these revertant cells implanted in the peritoneal cavities of nude mice. In contrast, treatment with X13-leader resulted in no inhibition of cell growth. Identical results were obtained when TUC-3 cells were transfected with plasmids expressing PNC-2, PNC-7 and X13. None of these peptides affected the normal growth of BMRPA1 cells.ConclusionsPNC-2 and PNC-7 peptides induce phenotypic reversion of ras-induced pancreatic cancer cells and have no effect on normal pancreatic cell growth. Since the plasmid encoding PNC-2 without penetratin also had the same effect on the TUC-3 cell line, we conclude that the penetratin sequence has no effect on the activity of this peptide. Since X13 attached to penetratin had no effect on TUC-3 cells, the effect is specific for PNC-2 and PNC-7 and further confirms that the effect is not caused by the penetratin sequence. PNC-2- and PNC-7-penetratin may therefore be useful in the treatment of ras-induced pancreatic carcinomas.

Inhibition of Oncogenic and Activated Wild-Type ras–p21 Protein-Induced Oocyte Maturation by Peptides from the Guanine-Nucleotide Exchange Protein, SOS, Identified from Molecular Dynamics Calculations. Selective Inhibition of Oncogenic ras–p21

In the preceding paper we performed molecular dynamics calculations of the average structures of the SOS protein bound to wild-type and oncogenic ras–p21. Based on these calculations, we have identified four major domains of the SOS protein, consisting of residues 631–641, 676–691, 718–729, and 994–1004, which differ in structure between the two complexes. We have now microinjected synthetic peptides corresponding to each of these domains into Xenopus laevis oocytes either together with oncogenic (Val 12)-p21 or into oocytes subsequently incubated with insulin. We find that the first three peptides inhibit both oncogenic and wild-type p21-induced oocyte maturation, while the last peptide much more strongly inhibits oncogenic p21 protein-induced oocyte maturation. These results suggest that each identified SOS region is involved in ras–stimulated signal transduction and that the 994–1004 domain is involved uniquely with oncogenic ras–p21 signaling.

Identification of the Site of Inhibition of Oncogenic ras–p21-Induced Signal Transduction by a Peptide from a ras Effector Domain

We have previously found that a peptide corresponding to residues 35–47 of the ras-p21 protein, from its switch 1 effector domain region, strongly inhibits oocyte maturation induced by oncogenic p21, but not by insulin-activated cellular wild-type p21. Another ras–p21 peptide corresponding to residues 96–110 that blocks ras–jun and jun kinase (JNK) interactions exhibits a similar pattern of inhibition. We have also found that c-raf strongly induces oocyte maturation and that dominant negative c-raf strongly blocks oncogenic p21-induced oocyte maturation. We now find that the p21 35–47, but not the 96–110, peptide completely blocks c-raf-induced maturation. This finding suggests that the 35–47 peptide blocks oncogenic ras at the level of raf; that activated normal and oncogenic ras–p21 have differing requirements for raf-dependent signaling; and that the two oncogenic-ras-selective inhibitory peptides, 35–47 and 96–110, act at two different critical downstream sites, the former at raf, the latter at JNK/jun, both of which are required for oncogenic ras-p21 signaling.

Identification of the Site of Inhibition of Mitogenic Signaling by Oncogenic ras-p21 by a ras Effector Peptide

We have previously found that a ras switch 1 domain peptide (PNC-7, residues 35–47) selectively blocks oocyte maturation induced by oncogenic (Val 12–containing) ras-p21 protein and also blocks c-raf–induced oocyte maturation. We now find that oncogenic ras-p21 does not inhibit oocyte maturation of a constitutively activated raf protein (raf BXB) that is lacking most of the first 301 amino terminal amino acids, including the major ras binding domain and accessory ras-binding regions. We also find that a dominant negative raf that completely blocks c-raf–induced maturation likewise does not block raf-BXB–induced maturation. We conclude that PNC-7 blocks ras by binding to the amino-terminal domain of raf and that raf BXB must initiate signal transduction in the cytosol.

Inhibition of ras-induced oocyte maturation by peptides from ras-p21 and GTPase activating protein (GAP) identified as being effector domains from molecular dynamics calculations

In the accompanying article, using molecular dynamics calculations, we found that the 66–77 and 122–138 domains in ras-p21 and the 821–827, 832–845, 917–924, 943–953, and 1003–1020 domains in GAP have different conformations in complexes of GAP with wild-type and oncogenic ras-p21. We have now synthesized peptides corresponding to each of these domains and coinjected them into oocytes with oncogenic p21, which induces oocyte maturation, or injected them into oocytes incubated with insulin that induces maturation by activating wild-type cellular ras-p21. We find that all of these peptides inhibit both agents but do not inhibit progesterone-induced maturation that occurs by a ras-independent pathway. The p21 66–77 and 122–138 peptides cause greater inhibition of oncogenic p21. On the other hand, the GAP 832–845 and 1003–1021 peptides inhibit insulin-induced maturation to a significantly greater extent. Since we have found that activated wild-type and oncogenic p21 activate downstream targets like raf differently, these GAP peptides may be useful probes for identifying elements unique to the wild-type ras-p21 pathway.

Plasmid expression of a peptide that selectively blocks oncogenic ras-p21-induced oocyte maturation.

Abstract. Purpose: We have previously found that a synthetic peptide corresponding to ras-p21 residues 96–110 (PNC2) selectively blocks oncogenic (Val 12-containing) ras-p21 protein-induced oocyte maturation. With a view to introducing this peptide into ras-transformed human cells to inhibit their proliferation, we synthesized an inducible plasmid that expressed this peptide sequence. Our purpose was to test this expression system in oocytes to determine if it was capable of causing selective inhibition of oncogenic ras-p21. Methods: We injected this plasmid and a plasmid expressing a control peptide into oocytes either together with oncogenic p21 or in the presence of insulin (that induces maturation that is dependent on normal cellular ras-p21) in the presence and absence of the inducer isopropylthioglucose (IPTG). Results: Microinjection of this plasmid into oocytes together with Val 12-p21 resulted in complete inhibition of maturation in the presence of inducer. Another plasmid encoding the sequence for the unrelated control peptide, X13, was unable to inhibit Val 12-p21-induced maturation. In contrast, PNC2 plasmid had no effect on the ability of insulin-activated normal cellular or wild-type ras-p21 to induce oocyte maturation, suggesting that it is selective for blocking the mitogenic effects of oncogenic (Val 12) ras p21. Conclusion: We conclude that the PNC2 plasmid selectively inhibits oncogenic ras-p21 and may therefore be highly effective in blocking proliferation of ras-induced cancer cells. Also, from the patterns of inhibition, by PNC2 and other ras- and raf-related peptides, of raf- and constitutively activated MEK-induced maturation, we conclude that PNC2 peptide inhibits oncogenic ras p21 downstream of raf.