Lyndsey Highton
University Hospital of South Manchester NHS Foundation Trust
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Lyndsey Highton.
Journal of Plastic Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery | 2012
Lyndsey Highton; Chidi Ekwobi; Victoria Rose
BACKGROUND Following massive weight loss, patients are left with folds of redundant skin that may cause physical and psychological problems. These problems can be addressed through body contouring procedures such as abdominoplasty and the thigh lift. Despite an exponential rise in the number of bariatric surgery procedures performed in the United Kingdom, there are no national guidelines on the provision of body contouring procedures after massive weight loss. We conducted a survey of UK Bariatric Surgeons to determine the pre-operative counselling that patients receive on this issue, their opinions towards post-bariatric surgery body contouring and current referral patterns to Plastic Surgery. By exploring the relationship between Bariatric and Plastic Surgery, we aimed to identify how the comprehensive treatment of patients undergoing bariatric surgery could be improved. METHOD A questionnaire was sent to 86 surgeon members of the British Obesity and Metabolic Surgery Society. Questionnaires were analysed from the 61/86 respondents (71% response rate). RESULTS 92% of the responding surgeons feel that patients face functional problems relating to skin redundancy after massive weight loss, and a high percentage of patients complain about this problem. However, only 66% of surgeons routinely counsel patients about these problems before they undergo bariatric surgery. 96% of respondents feel that body contouring for these patients should be funded on the NHS in selected cases. However, it is difficult for patients to access consultation with a Plastic Surgeon and there are no explicit guidelines on the criteria that patients must fulfil to undergo body contouring surgery on the NHS. At present, these criteria are locally determined and represent a postcode lottery. CONCLUSION The NICE guidelines on obesity recommend that patients undergoing bariatric surgery should have information on, or access to plastic surgery where appropriate, but this standard is not being achieved. National guidelines on post-bariatric body contouring surgery are needed to improve the comprehensive treatment of these patients. The clinical and cost effectiveness of bariatric surgery has been well established. Further studies focussing on the outcome of body contouring after massive weight loss could support this becoming and integral part of the bariatric surgery pathway.
European Journal of Plastic Surgery | 2011
Lyndsey Highton; Chidi Ekwobi
The AccuVein AV300 device (AccuVein LLC, New York) was initially developed as an aid to venepuncture. It is a portable, handheld device that emits infrared light which is absorbed by haemoglobin, illuminating the position of superficial veins. In this article, we describe a novel application of this device in providing a map of superficial veins to aid vein graft harvest and other plastic surgery procedures.
Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open | 2017
Lyndsey Highton; Richard Johnson; Cliona C. Kirwan; John Murphy
Background: The development of acellular dermal matrices (ADMs) has facilitated single-stage implant breast reconstruction (IBR) following skin-sparing mastectomy. The conventional approach of postpectoral implant placement with lower pole ADM confers a good cosmetic result by improving lower pole projection and control, while minimizing issues of implant visibility, palpability, and rippling. This is balanced with potential disadvantages including pain, disruption of pectoral muscle function, and animation. We report the results of a prospective study of prepectoral IBR with total ADM coverage. Methods: Prepectoral IBR with total ADM coverage was performed in 106 patients (166 breasts) in our institution from 2013 to 2017. The cohort included patients undergoing immediate IBR (113 breasts) and revision of existing submuscular IBR (53 breasts). Patient demographics, surgical complications, and outcomes from a prospective database were analyzed. Results: At a mean follow-up of 485 days, patient satisfaction and cosmetic outcomes have been good, with no significant capsular contractures or animation deformity. Minor complications including delayed healing, red breast, or seroma occurred in 14 breasts (8.4%). Major complications including necrosis and implant loss occurred in 5 breasts (3 patients), with a total explantation rate of 3%. No patients required more than an overnight stay in hospital, and there were no delays to adjuvant treatment in therapeutic cases. Conclusion: Prepectoral implant placement with ADM cover is emerging as an alternative approach for IBR. This method facilitates breast reconstruction with a good cosmetic outcome for patients who want a quick recovery without potential compromise of pectoral muscle function and associated problems.
Journal of Plastic Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery | 2018
N.M. Pantelides; Lyndsey Highton; Andrew Lamb; P. Foden; Robert I.S. Winterton
AIMS Cosmetic surgery is an essential component of Plastic Surgery training. Our study demonstrates the average cosmetic surgery experience of UK Plastic Surgery registrars over their 6-year training scheme. Comparison is made with the operative requirements for the Certificate of Completion of Training (CCT) and the Royal College of Surgeons (RCS) Cosmetic Certification scheme. METHODS By using the web-based eLogbook, we analysed all the cosmetic surgery operations recorded by Plastic Surgery registrars during their specialist training. The weighted mean average number of procedures was calculated for different areas of cosmetic surgery practice, according to the level of supervision. The number of RCS cosmetic credits acquired for eight domains of cosmetic surgery was calculated, thus enabling comparison with the operative requirements for certification. RESULTS eLogbook data were collated for 454 registrars from 2010 to 2016 inclusive. Trainees participated in a mean of 122 cosmetic operations during their training (50% as an assistant), which satisfies the requirement of 100 procedures for CCT. The majority of trainee involvement (66%) was with cosmetic breast and body contouring cases. Comparison with the criteria for cosmetic certification reveals that on average, trainees could certify in cosmetic breast and body contouring surgery but would be unable to accredit in other areas of practice. CONCLUSIONS Current UK training affords sufficient cosmetic surgery exposure for CCT but offers a limited breadth of exposure. Trainees who wish to certify in cosmetic surgery of the head and neck region will likely be required to seek additional experience outside their deanery training programme.
Journal of Plastic Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery | 2017
Lyndsey Highton; Andrew Lamb; Aidan Fitzgerald; Simon H. Wood; Vivien C. Lees; Robert I.S. Winterton
INTRODUCTION We performed a comprehensive analysis of the operative experience of UK Plastic Surgery Trainees using the web-based eLogbook. METHODS An analysis of data recorded prospectively by Plastic Surgery Registrars 2010-2014 in eLogbook. RESULTS The eLogbook data of 336 Specialty Registrars entered from 2010 to 2014 was analysed. Over the six-year training programme, trainees participated in a mean of 2117 procedures and performed a mean of 1571 procedures with or without supervision. We also determined the mean number of procedures for 14 indicative operative domains performed during training and compared these to current (2012) indicative numbers required prior to the award of a Certificate of Completion of Training (CCT). CONCLUSION The eLogbook contains valuable data to determine the operative experience of UK Plastic Surgery trainees. This new data will be reflected in the updated indicative numbers required for CCT. Both trainees and trainers may use the data to monitor the acquisition of operative experience over time and target training where necessary.
Ejso | 2018
Gareth Irwin; Lyndsey Highton; John Murphy
Ejso | 2018
Gareth Irwin; Lyndsey Highton; Richard K. Johnson; Cliona C. Kirwan; James Harvey; John Murphy
Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open | 2017
Lyndsey Highton; John Murphy
Ejso | 2017
Lyndsey Highton; John Murphy
Ejso | 2017
Lyndsey Highton; John Murphy
Collaboration
Dive into the Lyndsey Highton's collaboration.
University Hospital of South Manchester NHS Foundation Trust
View shared research outputsUniversity Hospital of South Manchester NHS Foundation Trust
View shared research outputsUniversity Hospital of South Manchester NHS Foundation Trust
View shared research outputsUniversity Hospital of South Manchester NHS Foundation Trust
View shared research outputsUniversity Hospital of South Manchester NHS Foundation Trust
View shared research outputs