Lynn Anne Burbidge

BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in women of different ethnicities undergoing testing for hereditary breast-ovarian cancer

In women at increased risk for breast and ovarian cancer, the identification of a mutation in breast cancer gene 1 (BRCA1) and BRCA2 has important implications for screening and prevention counseling. Uncertainty regarding the role of BRCA1 and BRCA2 testing in high‐risk women from diverse ancestral backgrounds exists because of variability in prevalence estimates of deleterious (disease‐associated) mutations in non‐white populations. In this study, the authors examined the prevalence of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in an ethnically diverse group of women who were referred for genetic testing.

The PREMM1,2,6 Model Predicts Risk of MLH1, MSH2, and MSH6 Germline Mutations Based on Cancer History

BACKGROUND & AIMS We developed and validated a model to estimate the risks of mutations in the mismatch repair (MMR) genes MLH1, MSH2, and MSH6 based on personal and family history of cancer. METHODS Data were analyzed from 4539 probands tested for mutations in MLH1, MSH2, and MSH6. A multivariable polytomous logistic regression model (PREMM(1,2,6)) was developed to predict the overall risk of MMR gene mutations and the risk of mutation in each of the 3 genes. The discriminative ability of the model was validated in 1827 population-based colorectal cancer (CRC) cases. RESULTS Twelve percent of the original cohort carried pathogenic mutations (204 in MLH1, 250 in MSH2, and 71 in MSH6). The PREMM(1,2,6) model incorporated the following factors from the probands and first- and second-degree relatives (odds ratio; 95% confidence intervals [CIs]): male sex (1.9; 1.5-2.4), a CRC (4.3; 3.3-5.6), multiple CRCs (13.7; 8.5-22), endometrial cancer (6.1; 4.6-8.2), and extracolonic cancers (3.3; 2.4-4.6). The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves were 0.86 (95% CI, 0.82-0.91) for MLH1 mutation carriers, 0.87 (95% CI, 0.83-0.92) for MSH2, and 0.81 (95% CI, 0.69-0.93) for MSH6; in validation, they were 0.88 for the overall cohort (95% CI, 0.86-0.90) and the population-based cases (95% CI, 0.83-0.92). CONCLUSIONS We developed the PREMM(1,2,6) model, which incorporates information on cancer history from probands and their relatives to estimate an individuals risk of mutations in the MMR genes MLH1, MSH2, and MSH6. This Web-based decision making tool can be used to assess risk of hereditary CRC and guide clinical management.

Genetic and Histopathologic Evaluation of BRCA1 and BRCA2 DNA Sequence Variants of Unknown Clinical Significance

Classification of rare missense variants as neutral or disease causing is a challenge and has important implications for genetic counseling. A multifactorial likelihood model for classification of unclassified variants in BRCA1 and BRCA2 has previously been developed, which uses data on co-occurrence of the unclassified variant with pathogenic mutations in the same gene, cosegregation of the unclassified variant with affected status, and Grantham analysis of the fit between the missense substitution and the evolutionary range of variation observed at its position in the protein. We have further developed this model to take into account relevant features of BRCA1- and BRCA2-associated tumors, such as the characteristic histopathology and immunochemical profiles associated with pathogenic mutations in BRCA1, and the fact that approximately 80% of tumors from BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers undergo inactivation of the wild-type allele by loss of heterozygosity. We examined 10 BRCA1 and 15 BRCA2 unclassified variants identified in Australian, multiple-case breast cancer families. By a combination of genetic, in silico, and histopathologic analyses, we were able to classify one BRCA1 variant as pathogenic and six BRCA1 and seven BRCA2 variants as neutral. Five of these neutral variants were also found in at least 1 of 180 healthy controls, suggesting that screening a large number of appropriate controls might be a useful adjunct to other methods for evaluation of unclassified variants.

Prevalence and Phenotypes of APC and MUTYH Mutations in Patients With Multiple Colorectal Adenomas

CONTEXT Patients with multiple colorectal adenomas may carry germline mutations in the APC or MUTYH genes. OBJECTIVES To determine the prevalence of pathogenic APC and MUTYH mutations in patients with multiple colorectal adenomas who had undergone genetic testing and to compare the prevalence and clinical characteristics of APC and MUTYH mutation carriers. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Cross-sectional study conducted among 8676 individuals who had undergone full gene sequencing and large rearrangement analysis of the APC gene and targeted sequence analysis for the 2 most common MUTYH mutations (Y179C and G396D) between 2004 and 2011. Individuals with either mutation underwent full MUTYH gene sequencing. APC and MUTYH mutation prevalence was evaluated by polyp burden; the clinical characteristics associated with a pathogenic mutation were evaluated using logistic regression analyses. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE Prevalence of pathogenic mutations in APC and MUTYH genes. RESULTS Colorectal adenomas were reported in 7225 individuals; 1457 with classic polyposis (≥100 adenomas) and 3253 with attenuated polyposis (20-99 adenomas). The prevalence of pathogenic APC and biallelic MUTYH mutations was 95 of 119 (80% [95% CI, 71%-87%]) and 2 of 119 (2% [95% CI, 0.2%-6%]), respectively, among individuals with 1000 or more adenomas, 756 of 1338 (56% [95% CI, 54%-59%]) and 94 of 1338 (7% [95% CI, 6%-8%]) among those with 100 to 999 adenomas, 326 of 3253 (10% [95% CI, 9%-11%]) and 233 of 3253 (7% [95% CI, 6%-8%]) among those with 20 to 99 adenomas, and 50 of 970 (5% [95% CI, 4%-7%]) and 37 of 970 (4% [95% CI, 3%-5%]) among those with 10 to 19 adenomas. Adenoma count was strongly associated with a pathogenic mutation in multivariable analyses. CONCLUSIONS Among patients with multiple colorectal adenomas, pathogenic APC and MUTYH mutation prevalence varied considerably by adenoma count, including within those with a classic polyposis phenotype. APC mutations predominated in patients with classic polyposis, whereas prevalence of APC and MUTYH mutations was similar in attenuated polyposis. These findings require external validation.

Clinical significance of large rearrangements in BRCA1 and BRCA2

Current estimates of the contribution of large rearrangement (LR) mutations in the BRCA1 (breast cancer 1, early onset) and BRCA2 (breast cancer 2, early onset) genes responsible for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer are based on limited studies of relatively homogeneous patient populations. The prevalence of BRCA1/2 LRs was investigated in 48,456 patients with diverse clinical histories and ancestries, referred for clinical molecular testing for suspicion of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer.

Prevalence of five previously reported and recurrent BRCA1 genetic rearrangement mutations in 20,000 patients from hereditary breast/ovarian cancer families

Many rearrangement mutations in the BRCA1 gene have been identified. It is becoming clear that some of these mutations are prevalent, and therefore their detection is necessary in order for clinical genetic tests to have high sensitivity. Published information on particular rearrangements is frequently limited to a single patient, small groups of patients, or patients of a particular ethnicity. The objectives of this work included characterizing the prevalence of five specific rearrangement mutations in a large North American patient population. A mutation‐specific multiplex PCR assay was used for determining the prevalence of five BRCA1 rearrangement mutations that previously had been reported to occur in unrelated patients. The mutation status of these rearrangements, which came from 20,712 patients at high risk for hereditary breast and/or ovarian cancers who had submitted specimens for clinical genetic testing, is presented. The results, obtained from 2,634 mutation carriers, showed a 6‐kb duplication of exon 13, identified in 53 patients (2.01%); a 26‐kb deletion encompassing exons 14–20, detected in seven patients (0.27%); a 510‐bp deletion of exon 22, detected in 5 patients (0.19%); and a 3.4‐kb deletion of exon 13, detected in one patient (0.04%). A previously reported 7.1‐kb deletion of exons 8–9 was not found. The high frequency of the exon 13 duplication makes it the fourth most prevalent mutation in these patients. These results provide an accurate picture of the prevalence of these mutations in hereditary breast/ovarian cancer patients undergoing genetic testing in North America.

Founder mutation versus full sequencing of MYH for increasing clinical sensitivity.

343 Background: MYH-associated polyposis is an autosomal recessive syndrome caused by biallelic mutations in the base excision repair gene MYH. Initial reports indicated that a majority of European biallelic individuals carried two founder mutations, Y165C and G382D. A common MYH analysis strategy involves evaluation of the two founder mutations (FMs) with subsequent full sequencing only if one of the FMs is identified. This study aimed to determine the sensitivity of full MYH sequencing over the strategy described above in a cohort of individuals that has undergone genetic testing by a commercial laboratory. Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed on 1,522 individuals who had clinical MYH testing ordered either independently or in conjunction with APC gene analysis. All patients underwent MYH analysis for Y165C and G382D. Subsequent full gene sequencing was performed for all patients, except for those biallellic for the two FMs. Demographic, personal, and family cancer histories were collected on...

Mutation prevalence in a large series of patients with Lynch Syndrome

11097 Background: Deleterious mutations in MLH1, MSH2 and MSH6 are known to cause Lynch Syndrome (HNPCC). The aim of this study was to determine the percentage of deleterious mutations represented ...

Large rearrangement analysis of MLH1 and MSH2 in patients undergoing clinical HNPCC testing

9514 Background: Hereditary Nonpolyposis Colorectal Cancer (HNPCC) is an autosomal dominant cancer syndrome that accounts for ∼5% of colorectal and endometrial cancers in the US. HNPCC is caused by mutations in one of several mismatch repair genes, with mutations in MLH1 and MSH2 accounting for >90% of cases. We compared the number of mutations in MLH1 and MSH2 detected by sequencing to the number detected by Southern blot (SB) analysis. Methods: DNA was extracted from consecutive blood samples submitted for MLH1 and MSH2 analysis by patients across the US. All exons and immediately adjacent intronic regions were sequenced by standard methods. Standard SB analysis was performed on three separate restriction enzyme digests and analyzed by three independent reviewers. Results: Of the first 288 samples analyzed, 30 (10%) were positive for a deleterious mutation by sequencing (20 MSH2, 10 MLH1) and 11 (4%) were positive for large deletions by SB analysis (8 MSH2, 3 MLH1), consistent with previously published ...