Lynn C. Goldstein

Immunohistochemical Detection Using the New Rabbit Monoclonal Antibody SP1 of Estrogen Receptor in Breast Cancer Is Superior to Mouse Monoclonal Antibody 1D5 in Predicting Survival

PURPOSE Estrogen receptor (ER) expression predicts improved breast cancer-specific survival and reduced risk of recurrence and is targeted in breast cancer therapy. A high-quality antibody to identify ER-positive patients plays an important role in clinical decision making for women with breast cancer. This study evaluates immunohistochemistry using two anti-ER antibodies, a new rabbit monoclonal antibody (SP1) and the mouse monoclonal antibody (1D5), in relation to biochemical ER assay results and clinical data on survival and adjuvant systemic therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS A population-based tissue microarray series of 4,150 invasive breast cancers was constructed. All patients had staging, pathology, treatment, and follow-up information. The median follow-up was 12.4 years and the median age at diagnosis 60 years. Survival analysis and log-rank tests were used to evaluate the prognostic value of ER status and correlations with clinical data. RESULTS Among the 4,105 samples interpretable for both antibodies, SP1 detected ER positivity in 69.5% and 1D5 in 63.1% of cases. Both monoclonal antibodies are demonstrated to be good prognostic indictors for breast cancer-specific and relapse-free survival. In multivariate analysis, including age, tumor size, grade, and lymphovascular and nodal status, SP1 was a better independent prognostic factor than 1D5. Among patients with discrepant ER results, the 8% of patients who were SP1 positive/1D5 negative showed good outcomes, and the 2% SP1-negative/1D5 positive had poor outcomes. Maintaining the same 92% specificity and 98% positive predictive value, SP1 is 8% more sensitive than 1D5 using biochemical assay as gold standard. CONCLUSION SP1 represents an improved standard for ER immunohistochemistry assessment in breast cancer.

Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Assessment in a Case-Control Study: Comparison of Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization and Quantitative Reverse Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction Performed by Central Laboratories

PURPOSE The optimal method to assess human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) status remains highly controversial. Before reporting patient HER2 results, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)/College of American Pathologists (CAP) guidelines mandate that laboratories demonstrate ≥ 95% concordance to another approved laboratory or methodology. Here, we compare central laboratory HER2 assessed by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and quantitative reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) using Oncotype DX in lymph node-negative, chemotherapy-untreated patients from a large Kaiser Permanente case-control study. PATIENTS AND METHODS Breast cancer specimens from the Kaiser-Genomic Health study were examined. Central FISH assessment of HER2 amplification and polysomy 17 was conducted by PhenoPath Laboratories (ratios > 2.2, 1.8 to 2.2, and < 1.8 define HER2 positive, HER2 equivocal, and HER2 negative, respectively). HER2 expression by RT-PCR was conducted using Oncotype DX by Genomic Health (normalized expression units ≥ 11.5, 10.7 to < 11.5, and < 10.7 define HER2 positive, HER2 equivocal, and HER2 negative, respectively). Concordance analyses followed ASCO/CAP guidelines. RESULTS HER2 concordance by central FISH and central RT-PCR was 97% (95% CI, 96% to 99%). Twelve percent (67 of 568 patients) and 11% (60 of 568 patients) of patients were HER2 positive by RT-PCR and FISH, respectively. HER2-positive patients had increased odds of dying from breast cancer compared with HER2-negative patients. Polysomy 17 was demonstrated in 12.5% of all patients and 33% of FISH-positive patients. Nineteen of 20 FISH-positive patients with polysomy 17 were also RT-PCR HER2 positive. Although not statistically significantly different, HER2-positive/polysomy 17 patients tended to have the worst prognosis, followed by HER2-positive/eusomic, HER2-negative/polysomy 17, and HER2-negative/eusomic patients. CONCLUSION There is a high degree of concordance between central FISH and quantitative RT-PCR using Oncotype DX for HER2 status, and the assay warrants additional study in a trastuzumab-treated population.

Determining true HER2 gene status in breast cancers with polysomy by using alternative chromosome 17 reference genes: implications for anti-HER2 targeted therapy.

PURPOSE The ratio of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) to CEP17 by fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) with the centromeric probe CEP17 is used to determine HER2 gene status in breast cancer. Increases in CEP17 copy number have been interpreted as representing polysomy 17. However, pangenomic studies have demonstrated that polysomy 17 is rare. This study tests the hypothesis that the use of alternative chromosome 17 reference genes might more accurately assess true HER2 gene status. PATIENTS AND METHODS In all, 171 patients with breast cancer who had HER2 FISH that had increased mean CEP17 copy numbers (> 2.6) were selected for additional chromosome 17 studies that used probes for Smith-Magenis syndrome (SMS), retinoic acid receptor alpha (RARA), and tumor protein p53 (TP53) genes. A eusomic copy number exhibited in one or more of these loci was used to calculate a revised HER2-to-chromosome-17 ratio by using the eusomic gene locus as the reference. RESULTS Of 132 cases classified as nonamplified on the basis of their HER2:CEP17 ratios, 58 (43.9%) were scored as amplified by using alternative chromosome 17 reference gene probes, and 13 (92.9%) of 14 cases scored as equivocal were reclassified as amplified. Among the cases with mean HER2 copy number of 4 to 6, 41 (47.7%) of 86 had their HER2 gene status upgraded from nonamplified to amplified, and four (4.7%) of 86 were upgraded from equivocal to amplified. CONCLUSION Our results support the findings of recent pangenomic studies that true polysomy 17 is uncommon. Additional FISH studies that use probes to the SMS, RARA, and TP53 genes are an effective way to determine the true HER2 amplification status in patients with polysomy 17 and they have important potential implications for guiding HER2-targeted therapy in breast cancer.

High concordance between immunohistochemistry and fluorescence in situ hybridization testing for HER2 status in breast cancer requires a normalized IHC scoring system

The American Society of Clinical Oncologists and College of American Pathologists have recently released new guidelines for laboratory testing of HER2 status in breast cancer, which require high levels (95%) of concordance between immunohistochemistry positive (3+) and fluorescence in situ hybridization-amplified cases, and between immunohistochemistry negative (0/1+) and fluorescence in situ hybridization-nonamplified cases; these required levels of concordance are significantly higher than those found in most published studies. We tested the hypothesis that a modification of the HER2 immunohistochemistry scoring system could significantly improve immunohistochemistry and fluorescence in situ hybridization concordance. A total of 6604 breast cancer specimens were evaluated for HER2 status by both immunohistochemistry and fluorescence in situ hybridization using standard methodologies. Results were compared when the standard immunohistochemistry scoring system was replaced by a normalized scoring system in which the HER2 score was derived by subtracting the score on the non-neoplastic breast epithelium from that on the tumor cells. Among the 6604 tumors, using a non-normalized immunohistochemistry scoring system, 267/872 (30.6%) of the immunohistochemistry 3+ cases proved to be fluorescence in situ hybridization nonamplified, whereas using the normalized scoring system only 30/562 (5.3%) of immunohistochemistry 3+ cases proved to be ‘false positive’. The concordance rate between immunohistochemistry 3+ and fluorescence in situ hybridization-amplified cases using the normalized scoring method was 94.7%, whereas the concordance using the non-normalized method was only 69.4%. Extremely high concordance between immunohistochemistry and fluorescence in situ hybridization assessment of HER2 status in breast cancer is achievable, but to attain this high level of concordance, modification of the FDA-approved immunohistochemistry scoring system is required.

Thyroid transcription factor-1 expression in breast carcinomas.

Immunostaining for thyroid transcription factor-1 (TTF-1) is frequently used to help assess the site of origin of metastatic carcinomas. TTF-1 expression is most frequently seen in carcinomas of thyroid and lung origin. Furthermore, it has been assumed that the expression of TTF-1 in a carcinoma excludes the possibility of a breast origin. We have recently encountered in our consultation practice 4 cases of invasive breast carcinoma (confirmed by clinical findings and other immunophenotypic features) that showed unequivocal tumor cell expression of TTF-1. However, the frequency with which TTF-1 expression is observed in breast carcinomas is unknown. To address this, we carried out immunostaining for TTF-1 on 546 primary breast carcinomas submitted for routine estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and/or HER2 testing. Cases were considered TTF-1 positive if they showed any nuclear staining for this marker. TTF-1 expression was identified in 13 cases (2.4%). Expression varied from focal and weak to diffuse and strong and was seen in both invasive and in situ components. We conclude that a small proportion of breast carcinomas show TTF-1 expression. Therefore, the presence of TTF-1 immunoreactivity in a carcinoma cannot by itself be used to exclude the possibility of a breast origin.

Molecular Phenotyping of Thyroid Tumors Identifies a Marker Panel for Differentiated Thyroid Cancer Diagnosis

BackgroundCurrently, a large proportion of individuals undergo thyroidectomy as a diagnostic procedure for cancer. The objective of this work was to evaluate the molecular phenotype of differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) and benign thyroid lesions to identify molecular markers that allow for accurate thyroid cancer diagnosis.MethodsTissue microarrays consisting of 100 benign and 105 malignant thyroid lesions, plus 24 lymph node samples, were stained for a panel of 57 molecular markers. Significant associations between marker staining and tumor pathology (DTC versus benign) were determined using contingency table and Mann-Whitney U (MU) tests. A Random Forests classifier algorithm was also used to identify useful/important molecular classifiers.ResultsOf the 57 diagnostic markers evaluated 35 (61%) were significantly associated with a DTC diagnosis after multiple testing correction. Of these, in DTC compared with benign thyroid tumors, 8 markers were downregulated and 27 upregulated. The most significant markers for DTC diagnosis were: Galectin-3, Cytokeratin 19, Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor, Androgen Receptor, p16, Aurora-A, and HBME-1. Using the entire molecular marker panel, a Random Forests algorithm was able to classify tumors as DTC or benign with an estimated sensitivity of 87.9%, specificity of 94.0%, and an accuracy of 91.0%.ConclusionEvaluation of the DTC and benign thyroid tumor molecular phenotype has allowed for identification of a marker panel, composed of both established and novel markers, useful for thyroid cancer diagnosis. These results suggest that further study of the molecular profile of thyroid tumors is warranted, and a diagnostic molecular marker panel may potentially improve patient selection for thyroid surgery.

Utility of a Comprehensive Immunohistochemical Panel in the Differential Diagnosis of Spindle Cell Lesions of the Urinary Bladder

Spindle cell lesions of the urinary bladder are uncommon, but when encountered in clinical practice, pose a difficult diagnostic challenge as the differential diagnostic considerations are vast. Pseudosarcomatous processes significantly overlap with malignant tumors (sarcomatoid urothelial carcinoma and leiomyosarcoma) in their morphology and published immunohistochemical profile [pancytokeratin pan (CK), smooth muscle actin (SMA), and desmin]. p63 has been studied rarely and CK 5/6 and CK 34βE12 have not been analyzed in the bladder in this diagnostic context. In the current study, 45 typical examples of spindle cell lesions [10 pseudosarcomatous myofibroblastic proliferations (PMP), 22 sarcomatoid urothelial carcinomas, and 13 smooth muscle tumors] of the urinary bladder were immunostained with a panel containing broad spectrum anticytokeratin antibodies (OSCAR or AE1/AE3), as well as antibodies to CK 34βE12, CK 5/6, p63, SMA, and anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK). The immunoreactivity was as follows: PMP-CK (OSCAR) 7/10 (70%), CK (AE1/AE3) 7/9 (78%), CK 34βE12 0/10 (0%), CK 5/6 0/9 (0%), p63 0/9 (0%), SMA 10/10 (100%), ALK 2/10 (20%); sarcomatoid urothelial carcinoma—CK (OSCAR) 15/22 (68%), CK (AE1/AE3) 14/20 (70%), CK 34βE12 5/20 (25%), CK5/6 6/22 (27%), p63 11/22 (50%), SMA 16/22 (73%), ALK 0/22 (0%); and smooth muscle tumors—CK (OSCAR) 7/13 (54%), CK (AE1/AE3) 7/12 (58%), CK 34βE12 0/12 (0%), CK 5/6 0/12 (0%), p63 3/13 (23%), SMA 11/13 (85%), ALK 0/13 (0%). Positivity for keratin was typically focal to moderate in smooth muscle tumors and more commonly moderate to diffuse in sarcomatoid carcinomas and PMP. Our data indicate that there is significant immunohistochemical overlap between the different spindle cell lesions, each of which has unique clinicopathologic, prognostic, and therapeutic ramifications. Within the context of morphology, an immunohistochemical panel composed of broad-spectrum antibodies to cytokeratin as well as antibodies to SMA, ALK, p63, and CK 5/6 will be a useful diagnostic adjunct: a combination of pankeratin, SMA, and ALK positivity favors PMP; expression of several cytokeratin and especially CK 34βE12 and CK 5/6 with p63 favors sarcomatoid carcinoma and SMA positivity with overall absence of other markers favors leiomyosarcoma.

HER2 in well differentiated breast cancer: is testing necessary?

Background In addition to providing a timely and accurate diagnosis, pathologists routinely provide prognostic and predictive information to assist in the treatment of patients with invasive breast cancer. As our understanding of breast cancer at the molecular and genetic level improves, sophisticated new treatment options have become available to patients. The demonstrated improvements in disease-free and overall survival with the use of trastuzumab (Herceptin) has made HER2 testing a standard of care in the evaluation of patients with breast cancer. Specialized breast centers have accumulated sufficient experience to recognize that HER2 positive tumors tend to be of higher grade and to be estrogen receptor negative, whereas well-differentiated breast cancers rarely are HER2 positive. Methods To determine whether HER2 testing is necessary in well-differentiated breast cancer, we analyzed the frequency of HER2 positivity among 1,162 cases from 7 major breast centers or commercial laboratories in the United States and Europe. Results Well-differentiated breast cancers, defined by either nuclear grading or the Scarff-Bloom-Richardson system, rarely are HER2 positive (mean 1.6%, range 0–2.8%). Conclusions Given the low rate of well differentiated HER2 positive tumors, falling within the range reported for false negative IHC tests for HER2, and the absence of published data demonstrating a beneficial effect of trastuzumab therapy in this subset of patients, HER2 testing should not be considered a standard of care for all patients with well-differentiated breast cancer.

The Knowns and the Unknowns in HER2 Testing in Breast Cancer

The 2007 American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)/College of American Pathologists (CAP) guidelines for HER2 immunohistochemical and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) testing in breast cancer address the potential impact of several “knowns” (eg, effect of fixative composition and fixation time).1,2 However, data continue to be generated that shed further light on the impact of “unknowns,” ie, selected preanalytic, analytic, and postanalytic (ie, interpretive) factors, on HER2 immunohistochemical testing. The study by Manion and colleagues3 in the June 2011 issue of the Journal focuses on 1 analytic factor that was not addressed by the ASCO/CAP guidelines, namely, the impact of the choice of antibody clone used for HER2 immunohistochemical testing. Manion et al3 reported that by switching from the rabbit polyclonal antibody A0485 (the same antibody that is part of the HeceptTest kit, DAKO, Carpinteria, CA) to the rabbit monoclonal antibody SP3, they could essentially halve the number of 2+ cases, at the price of a probably statistically insignificant increase in the false-negative rate (ie, FISH-positive, immunohistochemically negative cases). Can their results be extrapolated to other laboratories wanting to optimize HER2 immunohistochemical testing? As noted by the authors themselves, the apparent differences in performance of the A0485 rabbit polyclonal vs the SP3 rabbit monoclonal noted in their study have not necessarily been corroborated by other investigators.4–7 And in a study from our laboratory published in abstract form,8 involving a …

Concordance Between Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Testing by Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction and Fluorescent In Situ Hybridization

tumor biology provide a novel approach to prognosis and may guide the selection of therapeutic targets in multiple myeloma. J Clin Oncol 27:4197-4203, 2009. Erratum in: J Clin Oncol 30:572, 2012 7. Rao AV, Valk PJ, Metzeler KH, et al: Age-specific differences in oncogenic pathway dysregulation and anthracycline sensitivity in patients with acute myeloid leukemia. J Clin Oncol 27:5580-5586, 2009. Erratum in: J Clin Oncol 30:572-573, 2012