Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Lynn C. Thomason is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Lynn C. Thomason.


Current protocols in molecular biology | 2007

E. coli Genome Manipulation by P1 Transduction

Lynn C. Thomason; Nina Costantino; Donald L. Court

This unit describes the procedure used to move portions of the E. coli genome from one genetic variant to another. Fragments of approximately 100 kb can be transferred by the P1 bacteriophage. The phage is first grown on a strain containing the elements to be moved, and the resulting phage lysate is used to infect a second recipient strain. The lysate will contain bacterial DNA as well as phage DNA, and genetic recombination, catalyzed by enzymes of the recipient strain, will incorporate the bacterial fragments into the recipient chromosome.


Current protocols in molecular biology | 2007

Recombineering: Genetic Engineering in Bacteria Using Homologous Recombination

Lynn C. Thomason; Donald L. Court; Mikail Bubunenko; Nina Costantino; Helen R. Wilson; Simanti Datta; Amos B. Oppenheim

The bacterial chromosome and plasmids can be engineered in vivo by homologous recombination using PCR products and synthetic oligonucleotides as substrates. This is possible because bacteriophage‐encoded recombination functions efficiently to recombine sequences with homologies as short as 35 to 40 bases. This recombineering allows DNA sequences to be inserted or deleted without regard to location of restriction sites. This unit first describes preparation of electrocompetent cells expressing the recombineering functions and their transformation with dsDNA or ssDNA. Support protocols describe a two‐step method of making genetic alterations without leaving any unwanted changes, and a method for retrieving a genetic marker (cloning) from the E. coli chromosome or a co‐electroporated DNA fragment and moving it onto a plasmid. A method is also given to screen for unselected mutations. Additional protocols describe removal of defective prophage, methods for recombineering.


Journal of Bacteriology | 2004

Identification of the Escherichia coli K-12 ybhE Gene as pgl, Encoding 6-Phosphogluconolactonase

Lynn C. Thomason; Donald L. Court; Atin R. Datta; Rita Khanna; Judah L. Rosner

We report identification of the Escherichia coli ybhE gene as the pgl gene that encodes 6-phosphogluconolactonase. A tentative identification was first made based on the known approximate location of the pgl gene and the similarity of the presumptive ybhE-encoded protein sequence to a known Pgl enzyme. To test this notion, the ybhE gene was deleted and replaced with a drug marker. Like previously characterized pgl mutants, the ybhE deletion mutant had a Blu- phenotype (dark-blue staining with iodine due to accumulation of starch after growth on minimal maltose) and demonstrated impaired growth on minimal glucose medium when combined with a pgi mutation. Biochemical assay of crude extracts for 6-phosphogluconolactonase enzymatic activity showed that ybhE encodes this activity. The ybhE gene was transferred from the E. coli chromosome to an expression vector. This ybhE clone complemented both the precise deletion of the ybhE gene and a larger deletion, pglDelta8, for the Blu- phenotype and for phosphogluconolactonase activity, confirming that ybhE is the pgl gene. A newly observed phenotype of pgl strains is a lowered frequency of appearance of Bgl+ mutants that can utilize the beta-glucoside salicin. This is likely due to poor growth of Bgl+ pgl strains on salicin due to the accumulation of 6-phosphogluconolactone.


Nucleic Acids Research | 2013

Positive and negative selection using the tetA-sacB cassette: recombineering and P1 transduction in Escherichia coli

Xin-tian Li; Lynn C. Thomason; James A. Sawitzke; Nina Costantino; Donald L. Court

The two-step process of selection and counter-selection is a standard way to enable genetic modification and engineering of bacterial genomes using homologous recombination methods. The tetA and sacB genes are contained in a DNA cassette and confer a novel dual counter-selection system. Expression of tetA confers bacterial resistance to tetracycline (TcR) and also causes sensitivity to the lipophillic chelator fusaric acid; sacB causes sensitivity to sucrose. These two genes are introduced as a joint DNA cassette into Escherichia coli by selection for TcR. A medium containing both fusaric acid and sucrose has been developed, in which, coexpression of tetA-sacB is orders of magnitude more sensitive as a counter-selection agent than either gene alone. In conjunction with the homologous recombination methods of recombineering and P1 transduction, this powerful system has been used to select changes in the bacterial genome that cannot be directly detected by other counter-selection systems.


Current Protocols in Molecular Biology | 2003

UNIT 1.16 Recombineering: Genetic Engineering in Bacteria Using Homologous Recombination

Lynn C. Thomason; Donald L. Court; Mikail Bubunenko; Nina Costantino; Helen R. Wilson; Simanti Datta; Amos B. Oppenheim

The bacterial chromosome and bacterial plasmids can be engineered in vivo by homologous recombination using PCR products and synthetic oligonucleotides as substrates. This is possible because bacteriophage‐encoded recombination proteins efficiently recombine sequences with homologies as short as 35 to 50 bases. Recombineering allows DNA sequences to be inserted or deleted without regard to location of restriction sites. This unit first describes preparation of electrocompetent cells expressing the recombineering functions and their transformation with dsDNA or ssDNA. It then presents support protocols that describe several two‐step selection/counter‐selection methods of making genetic alterations without leaving any unwanted changes in the targeted DNA, and a method for retrieving onto a plasmid a genetic marker (cloning by retrieval) from the Escherichia coli chromosome or a co‐electroporated DNA fragment. Additional protocols describe methods to screen for unselected mutations, removal of the defective prophage from recombineering strains, and other useful techniques. Curr. Protoc. Mol. Biol. 106:1.16.1‐1.16.39.


PLOS Genetics | 2014

The Kil Peptide of Bacteriophage λ Blocks Escherichia coli Cytokinesis via ZipA-Dependent Inhibition of FtsZ Assembly

Daniel P. Haeusser; Marina Hoashi; Anna Weaver; Nathan Brown; James Pan; James A. Sawitzke; Lynn C. Thomason; Donald L. Court; William Margolin

Assembly of the essential, tubulin-like FtsZ protein into a ring-shaped structure at the nascent division site determines the timing and position of cytokinesis in most bacteria and serves as a scaffold for recruitment of the cell division machinery. Here we report that expression of bacteriophage λ kil, either from a resident phage or from a plasmid, induces filamentation of Escherichia coli cells by rapid inhibition of FtsZ ring formation. Mutant alleles of ftsZ resistant to the Kil protein map to the FtsZ polymer subunit interface, stabilize FtsZ ring assembly, and confer increased resistance to endogenous FtsZ inhibitors, consistent with Kil inhibiting FtsZ assembly. Cells with the normally essential cell division gene zipA deleted (in a modified background) display normal FtsZ rings after kil expression, suggesting that ZipA is required for Kil-mediated inhibition of FtsZ rings in vivo. In support of this model, point mutations in the C-terminal FtsZ-interaction domain of ZipA abrogate Kil activity without discernibly altering FtsZ-ZipA interactions. An affinity-tagged-Kil derivative interacts with both FtsZ and ZipA, and inhibits sedimentation of FtsZ filament bundles in vitro. Together, these data inspire a model in which Kil interacts with FtsZ and ZipA in the cell to prevent FtsZ assembly into a coherent, division-competent ring structure. Phage growth assays show that kil+ phage lyse ∼30% later than kil mutant phage, suggesting that Kil delays lysis, perhaps via its interaction with FtsZ and ZipA.


Methods of Molecular Biology | 2009

Modifying Bacteriophage \lambda with Recombineering

Lynn C. Thomason; Amos B. Oppenheim; Donald L. Court

Recombineering is a recently developed method of in vivo genetic engineering used in Escherichia coli and other Gram-negative bacteria. Recombineering can be used to create single-base changes, small and large deletions, and small insertions in phage lambda as well as in bacterial chromosomes, plasmids, and bacterial artificial chromosomes (BACS). This technique uses the bacteriophage lambda generalized recombination system, Red, to catalyze homologous recombination between linear DNA and a replicon using short homologies of 50 base pairs. With recombineering, single-stranded oligonucleotides or double-stranded PCR products can be used to directly modify the phage lambda genome in vivo. It may also be possible to modify the genomes of other bacteriophages with recombineering.


Annual Review of Genetics | 2002

Genetic engineering using homologous recombination.

Donald L. Court; James A. Sawitzke; Lynn C. Thomason


Methods in Enzymology | 2007

Recombineering: In Vivo Genetic Engineering in E. coli, S. enterica, and Beyond

James A. Sawitzke; Lynn C. Thomason; Nina Costantino; Mikhail Bubunenko; Simanti Datta; Donald L. Court


Virology | 2004

In vivo recombineering of bacteriophage λ by PCR fragments and single-strand oligonucleotides

Amos B. Oppenheim; Alison J Rattray; Mikhail Bubunenko; Lynn C. Thomason; Donald L. Court

Collaboration


Dive into the Lynn C. Thomason's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Donald L. Court

National Institutes of Health

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Nina Costantino

Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

James A. Sawitzke

National Institutes of Health

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Amos B. Oppenheim

Hebrew University of Jerusalem

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Mikhail Bubunenko

Science Applications International Corporation

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Donald L. Court

National Institutes of Health

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Anna Weaver

National Institutes of Health

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Daniel P. Haeusser

University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

James Pan

National Institutes of Health

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge