Lynn G. Tarkington

ACC/AHA 2007 guidelines on perioperative cardiovascular evaluation and care for noncardiac surgery: Executive summary - A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (writing committee to revise the 2002 guidelines on perioperative cardiovascular evaluation for noncardiac surgery)

WRITING COMMITTEE MEMBERS Lee A. Fleisher, MD, FACC, FAHA, Chair; Joshua A. Beckman, MD, FACC¶; Kenneth A. Brown, MD, FACC, FAHA†; Hugh Calkins, MD, FACC, FAHA‡; Elliot L. Chaikof, MD#; Kirsten E. Fleischmann, MD, MPH, FACC; William K. Freeman, MD, FACC*; James B. Froehlich, MD, MPH, FACC; Edward K. Kasper, MD, FACC; Judy R. Kersten, MD, FACC§; Barbara Riegel, DNSc, RN, FAHA; John F. Robb, MD, FACC

2010 ACCF/AHA/AATS/ACR/ASA/SCA/SCAI/SIR/STS/SVM guidelines for the diagnosis and management of patients with thoracic aortic disease: Executive summary: A report of the american college of cardiology foundation/american heart association task force on practice guidelines, american association for thoracic surgery, american college of radiology, american stroke association

2010 ACCF/AHA/AATS/ACR/ASA/SCA/SCAI/SIR/STS/SVM Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Patients With Thoracic Aortic Disease A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines, American Association for Thoracic Surgery, American College of Radiology, American Stroke Association, Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Interventional Radiology, Society of Thoracic Surgeons, and Society for Vascular Medicine

2007 focused update of the ACC/AHA 2004 guidelines for the management of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines.

Elliott M. Antman, MD, FACC, FAHA, Co-Chair*†; Mary Hand, MSPH, RN, FAHA, Co-Chair; Paul W. Armstrong, MD, FACC, FAHA‡§; Eric R. Bates, MD, FACC, FAHA; Lee A. Green, MD, MPH ; Lakshmi K. Halasyamani, MD¶; Judith S. Hochman, MD, FACC, FAHA**; Harlan M. Krumholz, MD, FACC, FAHA††; Gervasio A. Lamas, MD, FACC**; Charles J. Mullany, MB, MS, FACC; David L. Pearle, MD, FACC, FAHA; Michael A. Sloan, MD, FACC; Sidney C. Smith, Jr, MD, FACC, FAHA§§

2007 Focused Update of the ACC/AHA 2004 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction

Elliott M. Antman, MD, FACC, FAHA, Chair Daniel T. Anbe, MD, FACC, FAHA Paul W. Armstrong, MD, FACC, FAHA Eric R. Bates, MD, FACC, FAHA Lee A. Green, MD, MPH Mary Hand, MSPH, RN, FAHA Judith S. Hochman, MD, FACC, FAHA Harlan M. Krumholz, MD, FACC, FAHA Frederick G. Kushner, MD, FACC, FAHA

2007 Focused Update of the ACC/AHA/SCAI 2005 Guideline Update for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Sidney C. Smith, JR, MD, FACC, FAHA, Chair Ted E. Feldman, MD, FACC, FSCAI[‡][1] John W. Hirshfeld, JR, MD, FACC, FAHA,FSCAI[‡][1] Alice K. Jacobs, MD, FACC, FAHA, FSCAI Morton J. Kern, MD, FACC, FAHA, FSCAI[‡][1] Spencer B. King III, MD, MACC, FSCAI Douglass A. Morrison, MD, PhD, FACC

ACC/AHA/HRS 2008 Guidelines for device-based therapy of cardiac rhythm abnormalities.

the American College of Cardiology Foundation Board of ssociation Science Advisory and Coordinating Committee, oard of Trustees in February 2008. iology Foundation, American Heart Association, and Heart s document be cited as follows: Epstein AE, DiMarco JP, I, Freedman RA, Gettes LS, Gillinov AM, Gregoratos G, y MA, Newby LK, Page RL, Schoenfeld MH, Silka MJ, CC/AHA/HRS 2008 guidelines for device-based therapy of report of the American College of Cardiology/American n Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the deline Update for Implantation of Cardiac Pacemakers and oll Cardiol 2008;51:e1–62. This article h 2008 issue of H Copies: Thi College of C americanheart.o document, plea reprints@elsevie Permissions: tion of this doc College of Ca Society. Pleas elsevier.com. avid L. Hayes, MD, FACC, FAHA, FHRS* ark A. Hlatky, MD, FACC, FAHA . Kristin Newby, MD, FACC, FAHA ichard L. Page, MD, FACC, FAHA, FHRS ark H. Schoenfeld, MD, FACC, FAHA, FHRS ichael J. Silka, MD, FACC ynne Warner Stevenson, MD, FACC, FAHA‡ ichael O. Sweeney, MD, FACC*

2011 ACCF/AHA guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy

Bernard J. Gersh, MB, ChB, DPhil, FACC, FAHA, Co-Chair*†; Barry J. Maron, MD, FACC, Co-Chair*†; Robert O. Bonow, MD, MACC, FAHA‡; Joseph A. Dearani, MD, FACC§ ; Michael A. Fifer, MD, FACC, FAHA*†; Mark S. Link, MD, FACC, FHRS*¶; Srihari S. Naidu, MD, FACC, FSCAI*#; Rick A. Nishimura, MD, FACC, FAHA†; Steve R. Ommen, MD, FACC, FAHA†; Harry Rakowski, MD, FACC, FASE†**; Christine E. Seidman, MD, FAHA†; Jeffrey A. Towbin, MD, FACC, FAHA††; James E. Udelson, MD, FACC, FASNC‡‡§§; Clyde W. Yancy, MD, FACC, FAHA

On-Pump Versus Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery in a Matched Sample of Women A Comparison of Outcomes

Background—Women have consistently higher mortality and morbidity than men after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Whether elimination of cardiopulmonary bypass and performance of coronary artery bypass grafting off-pump (OPCAB) have a beneficial effect specifically in women has not been defined. Methods and Results—From January 1998 through March 2002, 21 902 consecutive female patients at 82 hospitals underwent isolated CABG, as reported in an administrative database. Propensity score computer matching was performed based on 13 variables representing patient characteristics and preoperative risk factors to correct for and minimize selection bias. A total of 7376 (3688 pairs) women undergoing CABG surgery were able to be successfully matched. In a propensity score computer-matched cohort, multivariate logistic regression (odds ratio) revealed that women undergoing on-pump surgery had a 73.3% higher mortality (P=0.002) and a 47.2% higher risk of bleeding complications (P=0.019). Conclusions—In a retrospective analysis of women undergoing CABG, computer-matched to minimize selection bias, off-pump surgery led to decreased mortality and morbidity including bleeding complications.

Outcomes experience with off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery in women.

BACKGROUND It has been well documented that women have higher morbidity and mortality rates than men following coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery. In view of this evidence, we investigated the following question: compared with on-pump CABG surgery, is there benefit to off-pump CABG surgery in women? METHODS Our investigation analyzes patient mortality and 13 procedure complications controlling for 35 variables representing patient characteristics and comorbid conditions, and for procedure characteristics for a population of 16,871 consecutive women undergoing off-pump and on-pump CABG surgery at 78 hospitals for the period January 1998 to June 2001. RESULTS Mean comparisons reveal that the mortality rate for women undergoing off-pump CABG surgery is nearly a percentage point lower than for women undergoing on-pump surgery (3.12 vs 3.90; p = 0.052). The complication rates for all complications analyzed (shock/hemorrhage, neurologic, cardiac, respiratory, renal, acute renal failure, adult respiratory distress syndrome, implant infection, postoperative infection, septicemia, pneumonia, and peripheral vascular) were lower for women off-pump than women on-pump with the exception of mechanical complications. Logistic regression results reveal, after controlling for 35 relevant patient characteristics, comorbid conditions and procedure characteristics, that women undergoing on-pump CABG surgery experience a 42% higher mortality rate (p = 0.0239) than women undergoing off-pump CABG surgery. CONCLUSIONS Evidence suggests that off-pump CABG surgery may be better for women than on-pump CABG surgery because it appears to reduce mortality and respiratory complications, shorten lengths-of-stay, and increases discharges directly home. None of the 12 other complications investigated demonstrated an advantage for women undergoing on-pump surgery relative to those receiving off-pump surgery.

Comparing clinical outcomes in high-volume and low-volume off-pump coronary bypass operation programs

UNLABELLED sites and then analyzed the patient and hospital characteristics that had an impact on clinical outcomes. RESULTS The mortality rates for the high- and low-volume OPCAB facilities both averaged 2.9% (p = NS). Patients at the high-volume OPCAB facilities had significantly lower rates of major complications (shock/hemorrhage, neurologic, renal, and cardiac) than those at the low-volume OPCAB facilities. Of the seven minor complications, rates for six were lower in the high-volume OPCAB facilities, but none of the differences reached statistical significance. High-volume OPCAB sites were significantly more likely to discharge their patients directly home than were low-volume OPCAB sites (80% versus 66%; p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS The results suggested that surgical team experience and choice of approaches to performing CABG had an impact on patient outcomes.