Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Lynn M. Marshall is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Lynn M. Marshall.


Journal of the American Geriatrics Society | 2009

A Comparison of Frailty Indexes for the Prediction of Falls, Disability, Fractures, and Mortality in Older Men

Kristine E. Ensrud; Susan K. Ewing; Peggy M. Cawthon; Howard A. Fink; Brent C. Taylor; Jane A. Cauley; Thuy-Tien L. Dam; Lynn M. Marshall; Eric S. Orwoll; Steven R. Cummings

OBJECTIVES: To compare the validity of a parsimonious frailty index (components: weight loss, inability to rise from a chair, and poor energy (Study of Osteoporotic Fractures (SOF) index)) with that of the more complex Cardiovascular Health Study (CHS) index (components: unintentional weight loss, low grip strength, poor energy, slowness, and low physical activity) for prediction of adverse outcomes in older men.


Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine | 2002

Types of Alternative Medicine Used by Patients with Breast, Colon, or Prostate Cancer: Predictors, Motives, and Costs

Ruth E. Patterson; Marian L. Neuhouser; Monique M. Hedderson; Stephen M. Schwartz; Leanna J. Standish; Deborah J. Bowen; Lynn M. Marshall

OBJECTIVE Assess predictors and costs of various types of alternative medicine used by adult patients with cancer. DESIGN, LOCATION, SUBJECTS: Telephone survey of 356 patients with colon, breast, or prostate cancer identified from the population-based Cancer Surveillance System of western Washington. RESULTS Overall, 70.2% of patients used at least one type of alternative medicine, with 16.6% seeing alternative providers, 19.1% using mental/other therapy, and 64.6% taking dietary supplements. Compared to males, females were five times more likely to see an alternative provider and about twice as likely to use mental therapies or supplements (p < 0.05 for all). Older patients were less likely to use mental/other therapy. Higher education (but not income) was associated with use of all types of alternative medicine. Patients with multiple medical treatments were two times more likely to take dietary supplements compared to patients having only surgery (p < 0.01). Varying by the type of alternative therapy, 83%-97% of patients reported that they used alternative medicine for general health and well-being while 8% to 56% reported use for treatment of cancer. Almost all patients reported that the alternative therapy improved their well-being. Expenditures for alternative medicine averaged


Journal of Bone and Mineral Research | 2009

Finite element analysis of the proximal femur and hip fracture risk in older men

Eric S. Orwoll; Lynn M. Marshall; Carrie M. Nielson; Steven R. Cummings; Jodi Lapidus; Jane A. Cauley; Kristine E. Ensrud; Nancy E. Lane; Paul R Hoffmann; David L. Kopperdahl; Tony M. Keaveny

68 per user per year, but ranged from


Journal of Bone and Mineral Research | 2008

Proximal Femoral Structure and the Prediction of Hip Fracture in Men: A Large Prospective Study Using QCT

Dennis M. Black; Mary L. Bouxsein; Lynn M. Marshall; Steven R. Cummings; Thomas Lang; Jane A. Cauley; Kristine E. Ensrud; Carrie M. Nielson; Eric S. Orwoll

4 to


The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism | 2009

The Effects of Serum Testosterone, Estradiol, and Sex Hormone Binding Globulin Levels on Fracture Risk in Older Men

Erin LeBlanc; Carrie M. Nielson; Lynn M. Marshall; Jodi Lapidus; Elizabeth Barrett-Connor; Kristine E. Ensrud; Andrew R. Hoffman; Gail A. Laughlin; Claes Ohlsson; Eric S. Orwoll

14,659. CONCLUSIONS Given the high prevalence of use and that patients believed that alternative medicine improved their well-being, clinicians should show an open mind toward these treatment choices and encourage frank discussion. Familiarity and some knowledge regarding use of alternative medicine is important in cases where interactions between conventional and alternative medicine may occur. It is also important to identify potential patient needs for mental health support beyond conventional care and support patients who want to make healthful lifestyle changes. Longitudinal investigations are urgently needed to investigate associations of alternative medicine use with survival and quality of life in patients with cancer.


Journal of Bone and Mineral Research | 2011

BMI and fracture risk in older men: The osteoporotic fractures in men study (MrOS)

Carrie M. Nielson; Lynn M. Marshall; Annette L. Adams; Erin LeBlanc; Peggy M. Cawthon; Kristine E. Ensrud; Marcia L. Stefanick; Elizabeth Barrett-Connor; Eric S. Orwoll

Low areal BMD (aBMD) is associated with increased risk of hip fracture, but many hip fractures occur in persons without low aBMD. Finite element (FE) analysis of QCT scans provides a measure of hip strength. We studied the association of FE measures with risk of hip fracture in older men. A prospective case‐cohort study of all first hip fractures (n = 40) and a random sample (n = 210) of nonfracture cases from 3549 community‐dwelling men ≥65 yr of age used baseline QCT scans of the hip (mean follow‐up, 5.6 yr). Analyses included FE measures of strength and load‐to‐strength ratio and BMD by DXA. Hazard ratios (HRs) for hip fracture were estimated with proportional hazards regression. Both femoral strength (HR per SD change = 13.1; 95% CI: 3.9–43.5) and the load‐to‐strength ratio (HR = 4.0; 95% CI: 2.7–6.0) were strongly associated with hip fracture risk, as was aBMD as measured by DXA (HR = 5.1; 95% CI: 2.8–9.2). After adjusting for age, BMI, and study site, the associations remained significant (femoral strength HR = 6.5, 95% CI: 2.3–18.3; load‐to‐strength ratio HR = 4.3, 95% CI: 2.5–7.4; aBMD HR = 4.4, 95% CI: 2.1–9.1). When adjusted additionally for aBMD, the load‐to‐strength ratio remained significantly associated with fracture (HR = 3.1, 95% CI: 1.6–6.1). These results provide insight into hip fracture etiology and demonstrate the ability of FE‐based biomechanical analysis of QCT scans to prospectively predict hip fractures in men.


The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism | 2009

Vitamin D deficiency in older men.

Eric S. Orwoll; Carrie M. Nielson; Lynn M. Marshall; Lori Lambert; Kathleen F. Holton; Andrew R. Hoffman; Elizabeth Barrett-Connor; James M. Shikany; Tien Dam; Jane A. Cauley

The structure of the femoral neck contributes to hip strength, but the relationship of specific structural features of the hip to hip fracture risk is unclear. The objective of this study is to determine the contribution of structural features and volumetric density of both trabecular and cortical bone in the proximal femur to the prediction of hip fracture in older men. Baseline QCT scans of the hip were obtained in 3347 men ≥65 yr of age enrolled in the Osteoporotic Fractures in Men Study (MrOS). All men were followed prospectively for an average of 5.5 yr. Areal BMD (aBMD) by DXA was also assessed. We determined the associations between QCT‐derived measures of femoral neck structure, volumetric bone density, and hip fracture risk. Forty‐two men sustained incident hip fractures during follow‐up: an overall rate of 2.3/1000 person‐years. Multivariable analyses showed that, among the QCT‐derived measures, lower percent cortical volume (hazard ratio [HR] per SD decrease: 3.2; 95% CI: 2.2–4.6), smaller minimal cross‐sectional area (HR: 1.6; 95% CI: 1.2–2.1), and lower trabecular BMD (HR: 1.7; 95% CI: 1.2–2.4) were independently related to increased hip fracture risk. Femoral neck areal BMD was also strongly related to hip fracture risk (HR: 4.1; 95% CI: 2.7–6.4). In multivariable models, percent cortical volume and minimum cross‐sectional area remained significant predictors of hip fracture risk after adjustment for areal BMD, but overall prediction was not improved by adding QCT parameters to DXA. Specific structural features of the proximal femur were related to an increased risk of hip fracture. Whereas overall hip fracture prediction was not improved relative to aBMD, by adding QCT parameters, these results yield useful information concerning the causation of hip fracture, the evaluation of hip fracture risk, and potential targets for therapeutic intervention.


Environmental Health Perspectives | 2000

Epidemiologic contributions to understanding the etiology of uterine leiomyomata.

Stephen M. Schwartz; Lynn M. Marshall; Donna D. Baird

CONTEXT The relationship between sex steroids and fracture is poorly understood. OBJECTIVE The objective of the study was to examine associations between nonvertebral fracture risk and bioavailable estradiol (bioE2), bioavailable testosterone (bioT), and SHBG. DESIGN This was a case-cohort study. SETTING The Osteoporotic Fractures in Men Study (MrOS) was conducted in a prospective U.S. cohort in 5995 community-dwelling men 65 yr old or older. PARTICIPANTS Participants included a subcohort of 1436 randomly chosen white men plus all 446 minorities and all those with incident hip and other nonvertebral fractures. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Baseline testosterone and estradiol were measured by mass spectrometry (MS) and SHBG by RIA. RESULTS Men with the lowest bioE2 (<11.4 pg/ml) or highest SHBG (>59.1 nm) had greater risk of all nonvertebral fractures [adjusted hazard ratio (HR) [95% confidence interval]: 1.5 (1.2-1.9) and 1.4 (1.1-21.8), respectively]. Men with the lowest bioT (<163.5 ng/dl) had no increased fracture risk after adjustment for bioE2 [adjusted HR 1.16 (0.90-1.49)]. A significant interaction between SHBG and bioT (P = 0.03) resulted in men with low bioT and high SHBG having higher fracture risk [HR 2.1 (1.4-3.2)]. Men with low bioE2, low bioT, and high SHBG were at highest risk [HR 3.4 (2.2-5.3)]. CONCLUSIONS Older men with low bioE2 or high SHBG levels are at increased risk of nonvertebral fracture. When SHBG levels are high, men with low bioT levels have higher risk. The strongest association occurred when all measures were considered in combination.


Journal of Bone and Mineral Research | 2007

Race and Ethnic Variation in Proximal Femur Structure and BMD Among Older Men

Lynn M. Marshall; Joseph M. Zmuda; Benjamin K. S. Chan; Elizabeth Barrett-Connor; Jane A. Cauley; Kristine E. Ensrud; Thomas Lang; Eric S. Orwoll

Low body mass index (BMI) is a risk factor for fracture, but little is known about the association between high BMI and fracture risk. We evaluated the association between BMI and fracture in the Osteoporotic Fractures in Men Study (MrOS), a cohort of 5995 US men 65 years of age and older. Standardized measures included weight, height, and hip bone mineral density (BMD) by dual‐energy X‐ray absorptiometry (DXA); medical history; lifestyle; and physical performance. Only 6 men (0.1%) were underweight (<18.5 kg/m2); therefore, men in this category were excluded. Also, 27% of men had normal BMI (18.5 to 24.9 kg/m2), 52% were overweight (25 to 29.9 kg/m2), 18% were obese I (30 to 34.9 kg/m2), and 3% were obese II (35 to 39.9 kg/m2). Overall, nonspine fracture incidence was 16.1 per 1000 person‐years, and hip fracture incidence was 3.1 per 1000 person‐years. In age‐, race‐, and BMD‐adjusted models, compared with normal weight, the hazard ratio (HR) for nonspine fracture was 1.04 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.87–1.25] for overweight, 1.29 (95% CI 1.00–1.67) for obese I, and 1.94 (95% CI 1.25–3.02) for obese II. Associations were weaker and not statistically significant after adjustment for mobility limitations and walking pace (HR = 1.02, 95% CI 0.84–1.23, for overweight; HR = 1.12, 95% CI 0.86–1.46, for obese I, and HR = 1.44, 95% CI 0.90–2.28, for obese II). Obesity is common among older men, and when BMD is held constant, it is associated with an increased risk of fracture. This association is at least partially explained by worse physical function in obese men.


Journal of Bone and Mineral Research | 2006

Dimensions and Volumetric BMD of the Proximal Femur and Their Relation to Age Among Older U.S. Men

Lynn M. Marshall; Thomas Lang; Lori Lambert; Joseph M. Zmuda; Kristine E. Ensrud; Eric S. Orwoll

CONTEXT Vitamin D deficiency is not adequately evaluated in older men. OBJECTIVE The aim of the study was to determine the prevalence of vitamin D deficiency and identify risk factors for its occurrence. DESIGN AND SETTING We conducted a cross-sectional evaluation of 1606 older men in the general community who were enrolled in the Osteoporotic Fractures in Men Study. PARTICIPANTS A randomly selected subcohort of a large population of men from six U.S. communities participated in the study. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Serum concentrations of 25-hydroxyvitamin D(2) [25(OH)D(2)] and 25(OH)D(3) were measured using mass spectrometry. RESULTS Deficiency [25(OH)D <20 ng/ml] was present in 26%, and insufficiency (<30 ng/ml) was present in 72%. Deficiency was particularly common among men during the winter and spring (especially in the northern communities) and in the oldest and more obese men. For instance, in Caucasian men in winter or spring who were >80 yr old, did not engage in lawn/garden work, and had a body mass index greater than 25 kg/m(2) and vitamin D intake below 400 IU/d, the prevalence of vitamin D deficiency was 86%. 25(OH)D(2) levels were present in a small fraction of men and accounted for a low proportion of total 25(OH)D levels. The use of vitamin D supplements was reported by 58% of men, but supplement use had a small effect on total 25(OH)D levels and, despite supplement use, low levels remained frequent. CONCLUSIONS Vitamin D deficiency is common in older men and is especially prevalent in obese, sedentary men living at higher latitudes. Use of vitamin D supplements at levels reported here did not result in adequate vitamin D nutrition.

Collaboration


Dive into the Lynn M. Marshall's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jane A. Cauley

University of Pittsburgh

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Peggy M. Cawthon

California Pacific Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge