Lynn McFadyen

Activity, pharmacokinetics and safety of lersivirine (UK-453,061), a next-generation nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor, during 7-day monotherapy in HIV-1-infected patients.

Objective:To investigate the effects on viral load and assess dose–response relationships, pharmacokinetics, safety and tolerability of lersivirine (UK-453,061), a next-generation nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor, in asymptomatic HIV-1-infected patients. Design:Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel group, multicenter phase IIa clinical study. Methods:Forty-eight HIV-1-infected patients were enrolled for the study of once-daily or twice-daily lersivirine at total daily doses ranging from 20 to 1000 mg. The primary endpoint was the change in log10 plasma HIV-1 RNA viral load from baseline to day 8. Secondary endpoints related to pharmacokinetics, safety and tolerability and potential development of viral resistance and genotyping patterns. Results:Patients treated with lersivirine achieved day 8 mean viral load reductions of 0.3, 0.8, 1.3 and 1.6 log10 after receiving 10, 30, 100 and 500 mg twice daily, respectively, and 0.9, 1.7 and 1.8 log10 after receiving 100, 500 and 750 mg once daily, respectively. Mean changes from baseline to day 8 were small in patients receiving placebo. For all dose regimens, plasma exposure increased approximately in line with lersivirine dose. Median plasma concentrations of lersivirine at steady state were above the IC90 for lersivirine at once-daily doses of at least 500 mg and twice-daily doses of at least 100 mg. The most commonly reported treatment-emergent adverse events were headache, fatigue and nausea. Conclusion:Seven-day monotherapy with lersivirine achieved mean viral load reductions up to 1.8 log10. Lersivirine was safe and well tolerated. Further studies of lersivirine in combination with other antiretroviral drugs to assess long-term durability of antiviral response, safety and tolerability are warranted.

The use of the SAEM algorithm in MONOLIX software for estimation of population pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic-viral dynamics parameters of maraviroc in asymptomatic HIV subjects

Using simulated viral load data for a given maraviroc monotherapy study design, the feasibility of different algorithms to perform parameter estimation for a pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic-viral dynamics (PKPD-VD) model was assessed. The assessed algorithms are the first-order conditional estimation method with interaction (FOCEI) implemented in NONMEM VI and the SAEM algorithm implemented in MONOLIX version 2.4. Simulated data were also used to test if an effect compartment and/or a lag time could be distinguished to describe an observed delay in onset of viral inhibition using SAEM. The preferred model was then used to describe the observed maraviroc monotherapy plasma concentration and viral load data using SAEM. In this last step, three modelling approaches were compared; (i) sequential PKPD-VD with fixed individual Empirical Bayesian Estimates (EBE) for PK, (ii) sequential PKPD-VD with fixed population PK parameters and including concentrations, and (iii) simultaneous PKPD-VD. Using FOCEI, many convergence problems (56%) were experienced with fitting the sequential PKPD-VD model to the simulated data. For the sequential modelling approach, SAEM (with default settings) took less time to generate population and individual estimates including diagnostics than with FOCEI without diagnostics. For the given maraviroc monotherapy sampling design, it was difficult to separate the viral dynamics system delay from a pharmacokinetic distributional delay or delay due to receptor binding and subsequent cellular signalling. The preferred model included a viral load lag time without inter-individual variability. Parameter estimates from the SAEM analysis of observed data were comparable among the three modelling approaches. For the sequential methods, computation time is approximately 25% less when fixing individual EBE of PK parameters with omission of the concentration data compared with fixed population PK parameters and retention of concentration data in the PD-VD estimation step. Computation times were similar for the sequential method with fixed population PK parameters and the simultaneous PKPD-VD modelling approach. The current analysis demonstrated that the SAEM algorithm in MONOLIX is useful for fitting complex mechanistic models requiring multiple differential equations. The SAEM algorithm allowed simultaneous estimation of PKPD and viral dynamics parameters, as well as investigation of different model sub-components during the model building process. This was not possible with the FOCEI method (NONMEM version VI or below). SAEM provides a more feasible alternative to FOCEI when facing lengthy computation times and convergence problems with complex models.

Dual Protection Against Sexually Transmitted Infections and Pregnancy In South Africa

Promotion of simultaneous protection against sexually transmitted infections (STIs) and unintended pregnancy, referred to as dual protection, represents an important public health intervention. We investigated its prevalence and correlates in South Africa. A cross-sectional survey of 929 sexually active women, aged 15-49 years, was conducted in 89 public primary health care clinics, with dual method use and use of condom alone at last sexual intercourse as outcomes. At last intercourse, 12% of women were protected from both STIs and pregnancy. In multivariate analysis, higher education, being unmarried, and multiple sex partnership in the past year were predictors of dual method use, while younger age, higher education and awareness of the dual function of condoms were predictors of condom use alone. Dual protection is low in this population. The predominance of hormonal contraceptive use in South Africa means that increasing barrier method use among hormonal contraceptive users is an important strategy for increasing dual protection.

A population pharmacokinetic meta‐analysis of maraviroc in healthy volunteers and asymptomatic HIV‐infected subjects

AIMS To develop a population pharmacokinetic model for maraviroc, a noncompetitive CCR5 antagonist, after oral administration of tablets to healthy volunteers and asymptomatic HIV-infected subjects and to quantify the inherent variability and influence of covariates on the parameters of the model. METHODS Rich pharmacokinetic data available from 15 studies in healthy volunteers (n = 365) and two studies in asymptomatic HIV-infected subjects (n = 48) were analysed using NONMEM. Maraviroc was administered as single or multiple oral tablet doses under fasted and fed conditions. Doses ranged from 100 to 1800 mg day(-1). RESULTS A two-compartment model parameterized to separate out absorption and clearance components on bioavailability was used. Absorption was described by a lagged first-order process. A sigmoid E(max) model described the effect of dose on absorption. A visual predictive check and nonparametric bootstrap evaluation confirmed that the model was a good description of the data. Typical CL, V(c) and V(p) values for a 30-year-old non-Asian are 51.5 l h(-1), 132 l and 277 l, respectively. CONCLUSIONS For the typical non-Asian subject, fasted bioavailability increased asymptotically with dose from 24% at 100 mg to 33% at 600 mg. A high-fat meal taken with maraviroc reduced exposure by 43% for a 100-mg dose to approximately 25% at doses of 600 mg. The typical Asian subject had a 26.5% higher AUC than the typical non-Asian subject irrespective of dose, a difference not considered to be clinically relevant. None of the other covariates tested had any clinically relevant effects on exposure.

The use of clinical irrelevance criteria in covariate model building with application to dofetilide pharmacokinetic data

To characterise the pharmacokinetics of dofetilide in patients and to identify clinically relevant parameter–covariate relationships. To investigate three different modelling strategies in covariate model building using dofetilide as an example: (1) using statistical criteria only or in combination with clinical irrelevance criteria for covariate selection, (2) applying covariate effects on total clearance or separately on non-renal and renal clearances and (3) using separate data sets for covariate selection and parameter estimation. Pooled concentration-time data (1,445 patients, 10,133 observations) from phase III clinical trials was used. A population pharmacokinetic model was developed using NONMEM. Stepwise covariate model building was applied to identify important covariates using the strategies described above. Inclusion and exclusion of covariates using clinical irrelevance was based on reduction in interindividual variability and changes in parameters at the extremes of the covariate distribution. Parametric separation of the elimination pathways was accomplished using creatinine clearance as an indicator of renal function. The pooled data was split in three parts which were used for covariate selection, parameter estimation and evaluation of predictive performance. Parameter estimations were done using the first-order (FO) and the first-order conditional estimation (FOCE) methods. A one-compartment model with first order absorption adequately described the data. Using clinical irrelevance criteria resulted in models containing less parameter–covariate relationships with a minor loss in predictive power. A larger number of covariates were found significant when the elimination was divided into a renal part and a non-renal part, but no gain in predictive power could be seen with this data set. The FO and FOCE estimation methods gave almost identical final covariate model structures with similar predictive performance. Clinical irrelevance criteria may be valuable for practical reasons since stricter inclusion/exclusion criteria shortens the run times of the covariate model building procedure and because only the covariates important for the predictive performance are included in the model.

Once-daily maraviroc versus tenofovir/emtricitabine each combined with darunavir/ritonavir for initial HIV-1 treatment.

Objective:The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of maraviroc along with darunavir/ritonavir, all once daily, for the treatment of antiretroviral-naive HIV-1 infected individuals. Design:MODERN was a multicentre, double-blind, noninferiority, phase III study in HIV-1 infected, antiretroviral-naive adults with plasma HIV-1 RNA at least 1000 copies/ml and no evidence of reduced susceptibility to study drugs. Methods:At screening, participants were randomized 1 : 1 to undergo either genotypic or phenotypic tropism testing. Participants with CCR5-tropic HIV-1 were randomized 1 : 1 to receive maraviroc 150 mg once daily or tenofovir/emtricitabine once daily each with darunavir/ritonavir once daily for 96 weeks. The primary endpoint was the proportion of participants with HIV-1 RNA less than 50 copies/ml (Food and Drug Administration snapshot algorithm) at Week 48. A substudy evaluated bone mineral density, body fat distribution and serum bone turnover markers. Results:Seven hundred and ninety-seven participants were dosed (maraviroc, n = 396; tenofovir/emtricitabine, n = 401). The Data Monitoring Committee recommended early study termination due to inferior efficacy in the maraviroc group. At Week 48, the proportion of participants with HIV-1 RNA less than 50 copies/ml was 77.3% for maraviroc and 86.8% for tenofovir/emtricitabine [difference of −9.54% (95% confidence interval: −14.83 to −4.24)]. More maraviroc participants discontinued for lack of efficacy, which was not associated with non-R5 tropism or resistance. Discontinuations for adverse events, Category C events, Grade 3/4 adverse events and laboratory abnormalities were similar between groups. Conclusion:A once-daily nucleos(t)ide-sparing two-drug regimen of maraviroc and darunavir/ritonavir was inferior to a three-drug regimen of tenofovir/emtricitabine and darunavir/ritonavir in antiretroviral-naive adults.

Translational pharmacokinetic–pharmacodynamic modelling; application to cardiovascular safety data for PF-00821385, a novel HIV agent

AIM To assess the translation of pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) relationships for heart rate effects of PF-00821385 in dog and man. METHODS Cardiovascular telemetric parameters and concentration data were available for animals receiving active doses (0.5-120 mg kg(-1), n= 4) or vehicle. PF-00821385 was administered to 24 volunteers and pharmacokinetic and vital signs data were collected. PK-PD models were fitted using nonlinear mixed effects. RESULTS Compartmental models with linear absorption and clearance were used to describe pharmacokinetic disposition in animal and man. Diurnal variation in heart and pulse rate was best described with a single cosine function in both dog and man. Canine and human heart rate change were described by a linear model with free drug slope 1.76 bpm microM(-1)[95% confidence interval (CI) 1.17, 2.35] in the dog and 0.76 bpm microM(-1) (95% CI 0.54, 1.14) in man. CONCLUSIONS The preclinical translational of concentration-response has been described and the potential for further interspecies extrapolation and optimization of clinical trial design is addressed.

A receptor theory-based semimechanistic PD model for the CCR5 noncompetitive antagonist maraviroc

AIM To develop a novel combined viral dynamics/operational model of (ant-)agonism that describes the pharmacodynamic effects of maraviroc, a noncompetitive CCR5 inhibitor, on viral load. METHODS A common theoretical framework based on receptor theory and the operational model of (ant-)agonism has been developed to describe the binding of maraviroc to the CCR5 receptor and the subsequent decrease in viral load. The anchor point of the operational model in the differential equations of the viral dynamic model is the infection rate constant; this is assumed to be dependent on the number of free activated receptors on each target cell. RESULTS The new model provides one explanation for the apparent discrepancy between the in vivo binding of maraviroc to the CCR5 receptor (K(D) = 0.089 ng ml(-1)) and the estimated in vivo inhibition (IC(50) = 8 ng ml(-1)) of the infection rate. The estimated K(E) value of the operational model indicates that only 1.2% of free activated receptors are utilized to elicit 50% of the maximum infection rate. CONCLUSIONS The developed model suggests that the target cells, when activated, express more receptors (spare receptors) than needed. In the presence of maraviroc these spare receptors first require blocking before any decrease in the infection rate, and consequently in the viral load at equilibrium, can be detected. The model allows the simultaneous simulation of the binding of maraviroc to the CCR5 receptor and the change in viral load after both short- and long-term treatment.

Population Pharmacokinetics of Rifapentine and Its Primary Desacetyl Metabolite in South African Tuberculosis Patients

ABSTRACT This study was designed to describe the population pharmacokinetics of rifapentine (RFP) and 25-desacetyl RFP in a South African pulmonary tuberculosis patient population. Special reference was made to studying the influence of previous exposure to rifampin (RIF) and the variability in pharmacokinetic parameters between patients and between occasions and the influence of different covariates. Patients were included in the study if they had been receiving first-line antimycobacterial therapy (rifampin, isoniazid, pyrazinamide, and ethambutol) for not less than 4 weeks and not more than 6 weeks and were divided into three RFP dosage groups based on weight: 600 mg, <45 kg; 750 mg, 46 to 55 kg; and 900 mg, >55 kg. Participants received a single oral dose of RFP together with concomitant antimycobacterial agents, excluding RIF, on study days 1 and 5 after they ingested a soup-based meal. The RFP and 25-desacetyl RFP concentration-time data were analyzed by nonlinear mixed-effect modeling using NONMEM. The pharmacokinetics of the parent drug were modeled separately, and the individual pharmacokinetic parameters were used as inputs for the 25-desacetyl RFP pharmacokinetic model. A one-compartment disposition model was found to best describe the data for both the parent and the metabolite, and the metabolite was assumed to be formed only from the central compartment of the parent drug. Prior treatment with RIF did not alter the pharmacokinetics of RFP but appeared to increase the excretion of 25-desacetyl RFP in a nonlinear fashion. The RFP oral clearance and volume of distribution were found to increase by 0.049 liter/h and 0.691 liter, respectively, with a 1-kg increase from the median weight of 50 kg. The oral clearance of 25-desacetyl RFP was found to be 35% lower in female patients. The model developed here describes the population pharmacokinetics of RFP and its primary metabolite in tuberculosis patients and includes the effects of prior administration with RIF and covariate factors.

Assessment of Maraviroc Exposure-Response Relationship at 48 Weeks in Treatment-Experienced HIV-1-Infected Patients in the MOTIVATE Studies.

Efficacy exposure–response relationships of the CCR5 antagonist maraviroc were evaluated across two phase III clinical trials. This post‐hoc analysis used 48‐week efficacy data from 841 treatment‐experienced patients infected with CCR5‐tropic human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV‐1), identified by the enhanced sensitivity Trofile assay. Probability of treatment success (viral RNA <50 copies/ml) was modeled using generalized additive logistic regression, testing exposure, clinical, and virologic variables. Prognostic factors for treatment success (in decreasing order of Akaike information criterion (AIC) change) were: maraviroc treatment, high‐weighted overall susceptibility to background treatment, absence of an undetectable maraviroc concentration, high baseline CD4 count (BCD4), low viral load (VL), race (other than black), absence of non‐R5 baseline tropism (BTRP), and absence of fosamprenavir (FPV). No concentration–response relationship was found with treatment (maraviroc vs. placebo) and presence/absence of undetectable maraviroc concentration (adherence marker) in the model. The maraviroc doses studied (300 or 150 mg with potent CYP3A4 inhibitors once (q.d.)/twice daily (b.i.d.)) deliver concentrations near the top of the concentration–response curve.