Lynn O'Donnell

Improved nonrelapse mortality and infection rate with lower dose of antithymocyte globulin in patients undergoing reduced-intensity conditioning allogeneic transplantation for hematologic malignancies.

We sought to reduce the risk of infectious complications and nonrelapse mortality (NRM) associated with the use of antithymocyte globulin (ATG) without compromising control of acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) in patients undergoing reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) transplantation. As part of an ongoing quality improvement effort, we lowered the dose of rabbit ATG from 7.5 mg/kg of ATG (R-ATG) (n = 39) to 6.0 mg/kg of ATG (r-ATG) (n = 33) in association with fludarabine (Flu) and busulfan (BU) RIC transplantation and then monitored patients for adverse events, relapse, and survival. Of the 72 mostly high risk (82%) patients studied, 89% received unrelated donor allografts, 25% of which were HLA-mismatched. No differences in posttransplantation full donor-cell chimerism rates were observed between the 2 ATG-dose groups (P > .05). When R-ATG versus r-ATG patients were compared, we observed no significant difference in the cumulative incidence of grade II-IV aGVHD (32% versus 27%; P = .73) or grade III-IV aGVHD (23% versus 11%; P = .28). However, the r-ATG group had significantly less cytomegalovirus (CMV) reactivation (64% versus 30%; P = .005) and bacterial infections (56% versus 18%; P = .001), a better 1-year cumulative incidence of NRM (18% versus 3%; P = .03), and a trend for better 1-year overall survival (OS) (64% versus 84%; P = .07) compared to R-ATG patients. A seemingly modest reduction in the dose of rabbit ATG did not compromise control of aGVHD or achievement of donor chimerism, but led to a significant decrease in the risk of serious infections and NRM in high-risk RIC allograft recipients.

Autotransplantation following busulfan, etoposide and cyclophosphamide in patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

The purpose of the study was to determine the toxicities and effectiveness of a novel preparative regimen of busulfan (Bu) 14 mg/kg, etoposide 50 or 60 mg/kg, and cyclophosphamide (Cy) 120 mg/kg in non-Hodgkins lymphoma (NHL) and to analyze results using doses based on different body weight parameters and the two different etoposide doses. Three hundred and eighty-two patients aged 16 to 72 underwent first autologous transplantation with mobilized peripheral blood progenitor cells between August 1992 and December 1998 at either of two transplant centers. Mucositis was the most common toxicity. Hepatic toxicity was the most common life-threatening toxicity; severe hepatic VOD occurred in 11 patients (2.9%). Ten patients (2.6%) died from treatment-related toxicity. The 3-year progression-free survival (PFS) for the entire group was 46.9% (95% CI, 40.5–53.3%). Elevated LDH, resistance to chemotherapy, and intermediate/aggressive histology were significant adverse prognostic factors. For patients in sensitive first relapse PFS was 47.0% (95% CI, 37–57%). Neither etoposide dose nor body weight parameter utilized significantly affected outcome. In conclusion, the novel preparative regimen of Bu, etoposide and Cy results in a low incidence of treatment-related mortality and is effective in the treatment of patients with NHL. Bone Marrow Transplantation (2000) 25, 1243–1248.

Positioning a Scientific Community on Unproven Cellular Therapies: The 2015 International Society for Cellular Therapy Perspective

Currently, there are many unproven or insufficiently proven cell-based treatments commercially available for hopeful individuals seeking cures for a variety of conditions. Typically, these so-called “therapies” are currently being advertised, sold and administered to patients, although they fail to achieve recognized biological/medical standards of proof for safety or efficacy. In addition, they are often expensive and offered outside the cover of routine clinical care for treatments, outside the realm of conventional clinical trials supervised and monitored by regulatory agencies. This paper summarizes a position document to be published by the International Society for Cellular Therapy (ISCT) as an open manuscript intended for professionals and patient associations. Avoiding a systematic overview of the relevant peer-reviewed literature and investigations, its purpose is to examine multiple aspects of unproven cell therapy interventions including definitions, manufacturing issues, regulations, economic factors and communication. With this document, the ISCT intends to promote a cooperative approach to facilitate the development of safe and effective therapies while minimizing and balancing risks for patients to ultimately establish a coalition of stakeholders that fulfill the vision of a broad, pro-patient cell therapy alliance...

Effects of induction with novel agents versus conventional chemotherapy on mobilization and autologous stem cell transplant outcomes in multiple myeloma.

Multiple myeloma (MM) is the top indication for high-dose chemotherapy (HDC) with autologous stem cell transplantation (SCT), a strategy which improves progression-free survival and potentially overall survival (OS). Novel induction regimens incorporating the immunomodulatory (IMID) agents, such as thalidomide and lenalidomide and the proteosome inhibitor bortezomib improve response rates and survival for newly diagnosed patients. Recent data temper enthusiasm for these treatments by illustrating difficulty in some circumstances with mobilizing CD34(+) hematopoietic stem cells for subsequent HDC/SCT. We compare conventional induction regimens with novel agent-based induction strategies and the associated effects on stem cell mobilization and HDC/SCT outcome in 224 patients. Although patients exposed to novel agent inductions collected generally fewer CD34(+) cells than patients induced with chemotherapy, these differences did not translate into adverse consequences with subsequent HDC/SCT. We show that an improvement in OS after HDC/SCT may be related to induction therapy with novel agents as opposed to chemotherapy. Our data extrapolate on prior work and expand on ongoing controversies about optimal induction regimens for patients with MM planned for subsequent HDC/SCT and optimal sequencing of therapies.

Part 6: The role of communication in better understanding unproven cellular therapies

Division of Hematology, Cell Therapy Laboratory,The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA, International Society for Cellular Therapy (ISCT) Global Secretary 2013–2016, Editor in Chief of Telegraft, University of Minnesota Center for Bioethics and School of Public Health, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA, Member at Large of the ISCT Presidential Task Force on the Use of Unproven Cellular Therapies, and School of Public Policy, Georgia Institute of Technology,Atlanta, Georgia, USA, Member at large of the ISCT Presidential Task Force on the Use of Unproven Cellular Therapies

Safety Profile of Good Manufacturing Practice Manufactured Interferon γ‐Primed Mesenchymal Stem/Stromal Cells for Clinical Trials

Mesenchymal stem/stromal cells (MSCs) are widely studied by both academia and industry for a broad array of clinical indications. The collective body of data provides compelling evidence of the clinical safety of MSC therapy. However, generally accepted proof of therapeutic efficacy has not yet been reported. In an effort to generate a more effective therapeutic cell product, investigators are focused on modifying MSC processing protocols to enhance the intrinsic biologic activity. Here, we report a Good Manufacturing Practice‐compliant two‐step MSC manufacturing protocol to generate MSCs or interferon γ (IFNγ) primed MSCs which allows freshly expanded cells to be infused in patients on a predetermined schedule. This protocol eliminates the need to infuse cryopreserved, just thawed cells which may reduce the immune modulatory activity. Moreover, using (IFNγ) as a prototypic cytokine, we demonstrate the feasibility of priming the cells with any biologic agent. We then characterized MSCs and IFNγ primed MSCs prepared with our protocol, by karyotype, in vitro potential for malignant transformation, biodistribution, effect on engraftment of transplanted hematopoietic cells, and in vivo toxicity in immune deficient mice including a complete post‐mortem examination. We found no evidence of toxicity attributable to the MSC or IFNγ primed MSCs. Our data suggest that the clinical risk of infusing MSCs or IFNγ primed MSCs produced by our two‐step protocol is not greater than MSCs currently in practice. While actual proof of safety requires phase I clinical trials, our data support the use of either cell product in new clinical studies. Stem Cells Translational Medicine 2017;6:1868–1879

An effective mobilization strategy for lymphoma patients after failed upfront mobilization with plerixafor.

In an otherwise eligible patient, inadequate mobilization of PBSCs is a limiting factor to proceeding with an auto-ASCT. In such situations, plerixafor is commonly added to improve PBSC collection yields along with cytokine (G-CSF alone) or chemomobilization (chemotherapy+G-CSF). Individually, both strategies are proven to be safe and effective. Here we report six patients who underwent successful mobilization with combination chemomobilization plus plerixafor after upfront failure of cytokine mobilization plus plerixafor. The median CD34+ cell yield after chemomobilization was 2.48 × 106/kg (range 0.99–8.49) after receiving one to two doses of plerixafor. All patients subsequently underwent ASCT without major unforeseen toxicities and engrafted successfully. No significant delays in time to neutrophil recovery were observed. Our experience highlights the safety and effectiveness of chemomobilization with plerixafor after G-CSF plus plerixafor (G+P) failure and suggests this is a viable salvage strategy after initial failed G+P mobilization.

Part 3: Understanding the manufacturing of unproven cellular therapy products

University of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center,Advanced Cellular Therapeutics Facility, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA. ISCT North America, Past RegionalVice President 2012–2014, Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute,Tampa, Florida, USA. Chair, ISCT NA LRA Committee, 2014–2016 and Co-Editor of the Telegraft, St Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis,Tennessee, USA. ISCT Past Co-Chair, NA LRA Committee 2011–2014. ISCT North America, RegionalVice President 2014–2016, and Division of Hematology, Cell Therapy Laboratory,The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA. ISCT Global Secretary, 2013–2016 and Editor in Chief of Telegraft

A single center's experience using four different front line mobilization strategies in lymphoma patients planned to undergo autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation.

In an otherwise eligible patient with relapsed lymphoma, inadequate mobilization of hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) is a limiting factor to proceeding with an autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (auto-HCT). Multiple strategies have been used to mobilize an adequate number of HSCs with no obvious front-line strategy. We report a single institutional experience mobilizing HSCs using four different approaches in lymphoma patients. We prospectively collected mobilization outcomes on patients planned to undergo auto-HCT at Ohio State University. We report results of first mobilization attempts for all relapsed or refractory lymphoma patients between 2008 and 2014. We identified 255 lymphoma patients who underwent mobilization for planned auto-HCT. The 255 lymphoma patients underwent the following front line mobilization strategies: 95 (37%) G-CSF alone, 38 (15%) chemomobilization (G-CSF+chemotherapy), 97 (38%) preemptive day 4 plerixafor, and 25 (10%) rescue day 5 plerixafor. As expected, there were significant differences between cohorts including age, comorbidity indices, histology, and amount of prior chemotherapy. After controlling for differences between groups, the odds of collecting 2 × 106/kg HSCs on the first day of collection and 5 × 106/kg HSCs in total was the highest in the cohort undergoing chemomobilization. In conclusion, our experience highlights the effectiveness of chemomobilization.

Erratum to "Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor-Mobilized Allografts Contain Activated Immune Cell Subsets Associated with Risk of Acute and Chronic Graft-versus-Host Disease" [Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 22(2016):658-668].

DOI of original article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bbmt.2015.12.015. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant -: 1 (2016) 2016 American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bbmt.2016.03.033 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164