Lynne Wilbraham
University of Central Lancashire
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Lynne Wilbraham.
Clinical Radiology | 2003
Hans-Ulrich Laasch; Lynne Wilbraham; K Bullen; Andrew S Marriott; Jeremy A L Lawrance; Richard J Johnson; S H Lee; R E England; G E Gamble; D F Martin
AIM To compare percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) with radiologically inserted gastrostomy (RIG) and assess a hybrid gastrostomy technique (per-oral image-guided gastrostomy, PIG). MATERIALS AND METHODS Fifty PEGs and 50 RIGs performed in three centres were prospectively compared and the endoscopic findings of 200 PEGs reviewed. A fluoroscopy-guided technique was modified to place 20 F over-the-wire PEG-tubes in 60 consecutive patients. RESULTS Technical success was 98%, 100% and 100% for PEG, RIG and PIG, respectively. Antibiotic prophylaxis significantly reduced stoma infection for orally placed tubes (p=0.02). Ten out of 50 (20%) small-bore RIG tubes blocked. Replacement tubes were required in six out of 50 PEGs (12%), 10 out of 50 RIGs (20%), but no PIGs (p<0.001). No procedure-related complications occurred. The function of radiologically placed tubes was significantly improved with the larger PIG (p<0.001), with similar wound infection rates. PIG was successful in 24 patients where endoscopic insertion could not be performed. Significant endoscopic abnormalities were found in 42 out of 200 PEG patients (21%), all related to peptic disease. Insignificant pathology was found in 8.5%. CONCLUSION PIG combines advantages of both traditional methods with a higher success and lower re-intervention rate. Endoscopy is unlikely to detect clinically relevant pathology other than peptic disease. PIG is a very effective gastrostomy method; it has better long-term results than RIG and is successful where conventional PEG has failed.
European Radiology | 2010
Stavros Stivaros; L. R. Williams; C. Senger; Lynne Wilbraham; Hans-Ulrich Laasch
BackgroundWe present our initial experience with a new biodegradable (BD) esophageal stent in two patients, one for a therapy-resistant benign esophageal stricture, and the other as a temporary measure during curative radiotherapy for oesophageal carcinoma. MethodsThe BD stents need to be loaded into a conventional pull-back delivery system but are then placed in a standard fashion. Pre-dilatation should be avoided to reduce the risk of migration, however if migration occurs the stents can be left to dissolve in the stomach. The stents are radiolucent but easily identified on CT with minimal artefact and thus might even aid with radiotherapy planning. ResultsBD stents offer an exciting new strategy for therapy-resistant benign strictures as well as a supportive measure for oesophageal cancer undergoing non-surgical treatment.
Radiology | 2002
Hans-Ulrich Laasch; Angelina Marriott; Lynne Wilbraham; Sharon Tunnah; Ruth E. England; Derrick F. Martin
Endoscopy | 2003
Hans-Ulrich Laasch; A. Tringali; Lynne Wilbraham; A. Marriott; Ruth E. England; M. Mutignani; V. Perri; G. Costamagna; Derrick F. Martin
Endoscopy | 2003
Hans-Ulrich Laasch; Lynne Wilbraham; A. Marriott; Derrick F. Martin
Endoscopy | 2006
Derrick F. Martin; Hans-Ulrich Laasch; A.-M. Kelly; R. Hammonds; Lynne Wilbraham; S. Sastry; A. England
Clinical Radiology | 2004
P. Marriott; Hans-Ulrich Laasch; Lynne Wilbraham; A. Marriott; Ruth E. England; Derrick F. Martin
Clinical Radiology | 2013
Nabil Kibriya; Lynne Wilbraham; Damien Mullan; Paula Puro; Sviatlana Vasileuskaya; Derek William Edwards; Hans-Ulrich Laasch
Gastrointestinal Endoscopy | 2008
Yogananda Reddy; Jayapal Ramesh; Lynne Wilbraham; Derrick F. Martin
Gastrointestinal Endoscopy | 2007
Kiran K. Peddi; Lynne Wilbraham; Ruth E. England; Derrick F. Martin