M.A.J. van Waas

Patients' perception of sensory disturbances of the mental nerve before and after implant surgery: a prospective study of 110 patients

In a randomized controlled clinical trial 110 edentulous patients with severe mandibular bone loss have been treated with ITI-dental implants using three different treatment strategies: (1) a mandibular overdenture supported by two implants with ball attachments, (2) two implants with an interconnecting bar or (3) by four interconnected implants. As implant surgery involves elevation of the mucoperiosteum, bone remodelling at the implant site and insertion of implants close to the mental foramen, altered sensations of the mental nerve caused by the surgery are to be expected. An altered sensation of the lower lip can also be caused by pressure of an ill-fitting lower denture on the mental foramen, or in the case of severe bone loss of the alveolar ridge, on the alveolar nerve itself. This article presents the results of the patients perception of the sensation of their lower lip before, 10 days after and 16 months after implant surgery in the mandible. It shows that 25% of the patients describe a sensory disturbance before treatment. This 25% also showed high scores on the Hopkins Symptoms Check List indicating a tendency to somatize complaints. Eleven percent of the patients report a sensory disturbance in the lower lip 10 days after surgery. Ten percent report a sensory disturbance 16 months after surgery of which one third also reported a disturbance before the treatment. This implies the risk of a sensory disturbance of the lower lip to be a possible complication after implant surgery. Therefore patients must be informed about this phenomenon before treatment.

Patient satisfaction with implant-retained mandibular overdentures. A comparison with new complete dentures not retained by implants— a multicentre randomized clinical trial

OBJECTIVESnThe aim of this study was to establish the treatment outcome of full denture treatment with or without implant support, in which the outcome assessment focuses on the patients subjective evaluation (denture-satisfaction).nnnDESIGNnA multicenter randomized clinical trial.nnnSUBJECTSnThirty-two men and 118 women (mean age 56 +/- 9, range 35-84 years) participated in the study. The mean height of the mandible was 13 +/- 2 mm, measured on a lateral cephalometric radiograph. The patients were randomly assigned to either a group treated with implant-retained mandibular overdentures and a new maxillary denture, or to a control group treated with a new set of complete dentures.nnnMAIN OUTCOME MEASURESnDenture satisfaction was assessed using questionnaires focusing on denture-related complaints and a general satisfaction rate.nnnRESULTSnBased on the baseline data, from the denture complaints questionnaire six interpretable factors could be extracted. One factor did not vary following treatment and was excluded from the outcome analysis. At the 1-year evaluation three out of five factors showed significantly better scores for the group treated with implants than for the control-group. The same was found for the general satisfaction rate.nnnCONCLUSIONnFor patients with a severely resorbed mandible, overdentures retained by dental implants appear to provide a more satisfactory solution to their denture-related problems.

An eight-year follow-up to a randomized clinical trial of participant satisfaction with three types of mandibular implant-retained overdentures

Studies have shown that mandibular implant overdentures significantly increase satisfaction and quality of life of edentulous elders. Improved chewing ability appears to have a positive impact on nutritional state. Therefore, it is important to determine the best design of this prosthesis over the long term. In this randomized controlled trial, three groups of edentulous participants with atrophic mandibles wore 3 types of implant overdentures. During an eight-year follow-up, only seven of the 110 participants had dropped out of this study. Almost all participants were still satisfied with their overdentures. Participant satisfaction concerning retention and stability of the mandibular overdenture had decreased significantly in the two-implant ball attachment group, whereas the opinion of participants in the single- and triple-bar groups was still at the same level. The long-term results suggest that a mandibular overdenture retained by 2 implants with a single bar may be the best treatment strategy for edentulous people with atrophic ridges.

An Eight-year Follow-up to a Randomized Clinical Trial of Aftercare and Cost-analysis with Three Types of Mandibular Implant-retained Overdentures

Mandibular implant overdentures increase satisfaction and the quality of life of edentulous individuals. Long-term aftercare and costs may depend on the type of overdentures. One hundred and ten individuals received one of 3 types of implant-retained overdentures, randomly assigned, and were evaluated with respect to aftercare and costs. The follow-up time was 8 years, with only seven drop-outs. No significant differences (Kruskal-Wallis test) were observed for direct costs of aftercare (p = 0.94). The initial costs constituted 75% of the total costs and were significantly higher in the group with a bar on 4 implants, compared with the group with a bar on 2 implants and the group with ball attachments on 2 implants (p = 0.018). The last group needed a significantly higher number of prosthodontist-patient aftercare contacts, mostly for re-adjustment of the retentive system. It can be concluded that an overdenture with a bar on 2 implants might be the most efficient in the long term.

A Clinical Evaluation of Implants in Irradiated Oral Cancer Patients

In this prospective study, we determined the effects of the time interval between irradiation and implant therapy, implant location, bone-resection surgery, and irradiation dose on implant survival. We analyzed the survival of 446 implants inserted after radiotherapy over a period of up to 14 years in 130 consecutive patients treated for oral cancer. The 10-year overall Kaplan-Meier implant survival percentage is 78%. The difference in survival percentages of implants inserted < 1 year and ≥ 1 year after irradiation (76% and 81%, respectively) is not significant. We concluded that implant survival is significantly influenced by the location (maxilla or mandible, 59% and 85%, respectively; p = 0.001), by the incidence of bone-resection surgery in the jaw where the implant was installed (p = 0.04), and by the irradiation dose at the implant site (< 50 Gray or ≥ 50 Gray, p = 0.05).

Comminution of Food with Mandibular Implant-retained Overdentures:

When complete-denture wearers are treated with from four to six implants and mandibular implant-borne prostheses, masticatory performance improves. No significant improvement has been observed with two implants and implant-mucosa-borne overdentures, suggesting that the masticatory performance of edentulous subjects depends on the degree of support for their mandibular prostheses by implants or alveolar mucosa. To verify this hypothesis, we studied, in a randomized clinical trial, the comminution of an artificial test food during mastication. The trial involved the provision of a new maxillary denture and either a new conventional mandibular denture, a mandibular overdenture retained by two permucosal cylindric implants through a single bar-clip attachment, or a mandibular overdenture retained by a transmandibular implant through five clips on a triple-bar construction with cantilever extensions. In comparison with the subjects wearing mandibular implant-retained overdentures, the subjects with conventional complete dentures needed between 1.5 and 3.6 times more chewing strokes to achieve an equivalent reduction in particle size. No differences in masticatory performance and efficiency were found between the subjects who had received two permucosal cylindric implants and those who had received a transmandibular implant. The results suggest that the increased retention and stability of the mandibular denture, rather than the degree of support by implants or alveolar mucosa, determine the wearers ability to comminute food during mastication.

Clinical aspects of a multicenter clinical trial of implant-retained mandibular overdentures in patients with severely resorbed mandibles

In a multicenter clinical trial treatment, the effects of overdentures on different implant systems in patients with severely resorbed mandibles were compared 1 year after the insertion of new dentures. The implant systems used were the transmandibular implant (TMI), the IMZ (IMZ), and the Brånemark system (BRA). Treatment was randomly assigned to 88 patients according to a balanced allocation method. Evaluation included peri-implant and radiographic parameters. According to the Delphi method a Clinical Implant Performance scale (CIP) was constructed based on all conceivable complications of the different implant systems. During the healing period, one IMZ and one BRA implant were lost, and one TMI implant was removed after functional loading. The results of the peri-implant and radiographic parameters and the CIP scale revealed no significant differences between the three implant systems.

Differences Two Years after Tooth Extraction in Mandibular Bone Reduction in Patients Treated with Immediate Overdentures or with Immediate Complete Dentures

In a randomized controlled clinical trial, 74 patients who required immediate dentures were randomly treated with immediate overdentures on two lower canines or with immediate complete dentures. Mandibular bone reduction was measured by use of oblique lateral cephalometric radiographs made at baseline and the results compared with those of one year and two years after denture treatment. Analysis of the data showed that the average bone reduction in the lower canine regions in the first year was 0.9 mm in the immediate-overdenture group and 1.8 mm in the immediate complete-denture group. In the posterior parts of the mandible, the bone reductions were, respectively, 0.7 mm and 1.9 mm. The differences were statistically significant in all measured regions. During the second year, no significant differences in bone reduction were found. The sums of differences in the first two years were significant in all regions except the molar region, preserving the initial difference. Retention of roots of canines beneath a mandibular denture in immediate denture patients, even when they were in poor condition, reduced the collapse of the alveolar processes in all regions of the mandible.

Osseointegrated Oral Implants in Head and Neck Cancer Patients

After cancer treatment in the head and neck area, mastication and speech are often affected. Some of the problems encountered can be solved by adequate dental rehabilitation. However, dental rehabilitation is often compromised for various reasons. The change in anatomy due to surgery often results in lack of denture‐bearing mucosa. The effects of radiotherapy on the salivary glands and the mucosa result in dry oral tissue and diminished retention of removable dentures. Osseointegrated oral implants can help to solve these problems. Although implant treatment for patients with cancer of the head and neck is covered by the Dutch national health insurance, and there is therefore no financial obstacle, implants have not, so far, been widely used with these patients. In order to establish the possible reasons for this, an analysis was performed. Retrospective data on 95 consecutive patients were collected from records. The indication for the use of oral osseointegrated implants was reviewed. Analysis of the data showed that 45% did not need specific prosthetic rehabilitation. An indication for the use of osseointegrated implants was found in 25% of the patients. For various reasons, only 3% actually received implants. In striving to completely rehabilitate a cancer patient, the possible use of osseointegrated oral implants should be evaluated before the initial oncological treatment begins. The insertion of implants during the initial surgical procedure should be considered more often, with a view to reducing the number of surgical procedures.

Facial Disfigurement after Cancer Resection: A Problem with an Extra Dimension

Treatment of patients with maxillofacial defects includes not only the technical procedures involved in producing a prosthesis, but also the psychosocial aspects. In all cases, these patients must learn to live with a severe facial disfigurement. People born with congenital defects grow up with disfigurement. For cancer patients, in addition to the mutilation, fear of the tumor plays a significant role. This paper reports on research into this specific treatment aspect. Such patients first must learn to cope with the possibility of premature death. They then must learn to accept facial disfigurement and the fact that society will respond differently to them.