Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where M. A. Lara-Lopez is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by M. A. Lara-Lopez.


Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society | 2015

Galaxy And Mass Assembly (GAMA): end of survey report and data release 2

J. Liske; Ivan K. Baldry; Simon P. Driver; Richard J. Tuffs; Mehmet Alpaslan; E. Andrae; Sarah Brough; Michelle E. Cluver; M. W. Grootes; M. L. P. Gunawardhana; Lee S. Kelvin; J. Loveday; Aaron S. G. Robotham; Edward N. Taylor; Steven P. Bamford; Joss Bland-Hawthorn; Michael J. I. Brown; Michael J. Drinkwater; Andrew M. Hopkins; Martin Meyer; Peder Norberg; J. A. Peacock; Nicola K. Agius; Stephen K. Andrews; Amanda E. Bauer; J. H. Y. Ching; Matthew Colless; Christopher J. Conselice; Scott M. Croom; Luke J. M. Davies

The Galaxy And Mass Assembly (GAMA) survey is one of the largest contemporary spectroscopic surveys of low redshift galaxies. Covering an area of ∼286 deg2 (split among five survey regions) down to a limiting magnitude of r < 19.8 mag, we have collected spectra and reliable redshifts for 238 000 objects using the AAOmega spectrograph on the Anglo-Australian Telescope. In addition, we have assembled imaging data from a number of independent surveys in order to generate photometry spanning the wavelength range 1 nm–1 m. Here, we report on the recently completed spectroscopic survey and present a series of diagnostics to assess its final state and the quality of the redshift data. We also describe a number of survey aspects and procedures, or updates thereof, including changes to the input catalogue, redshifting and re-redshifting, and the derivation of ultraviolet, optical and near-infrared photometry. Finally, we present the second public release of GAMA data. In this release, we provide input catalogue and targeting information, spectra, redshifts, ultraviolet, optical and near-infrared photometry, single-component Sersic fits, stellar masses, Hα-derived star formation rates, environment information, and group properties for all galaxies with r < 19.0 mag in two of our survey regions, and for all galaxies with r < 19.4 mag in a third region (72 225 objects in total). The data base serving these data is available at http://www.gama-survey.org/.


Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society | 2013

Galaxy And Mass Assembly (GAMA): spectroscopic analysis

Andrew M. Hopkins; Simon P. Driver; Sarah Brough; Matt S. Owers; Amanda E. Bauer; M. L. P. Gunawardhana; Michelle E. Cluver; Matthew Colless; Caroline Foster; M. A. Lara-Lopez; I. G. Roseboom; Rob Sharp; Oliver Steele; Daniel Thomas; Ivan K. Baldry; Michael J. I. Brown; J. Liske; Peder Norberg; Aaron S. G. Robotham; Steven P. Bamford; Joss Bland-Hawthorn; Michael J. Drinkwater; Jon Loveday; Martin Meyer; J. A. Peacock; Richard J. Tuffs; Nicola K. Agius; Mehmet Alpaslan; E. Andrae; E. Cameron

The Galaxy And Mass Assembly (GAMA) survey is a multiwavelength photometric and spectroscopic survey, using the AAOmega spectrograph on the Anglo-Australian Telescope to obtain spectra for up to ∼300 000 galaxies over 280 deg2, to a limiting magnitude of rpet < 19.8 mag. The target galaxies are distributed over 0 < z ≲ 0.5 with a median redshift of z ≈ 0.2, although the redshift distribution includes a small number of systems, primarily quasars, at higher redshifts, up to and beyond z = 1. The redshift accuracy ranges from σv ≈ 50 km s−1 to σv ≈ 100 km s−1 depending on the signal-to-noise ratio of the spectrum. Here we describe the GAMA spectroscopic reduction and analysis pipeline. We present the steps involved in taking the raw two-dimensional spectroscopic images through to flux-calibrated one-dimensional spectra. The resulting GAMA spectra cover an observed wavelength range of 3750 ≲ λ ≲ 8850 A at a resolution of R ≈ 1300. The final flux calibration is typically accurate to 10–20 per cent, although the reliability is worse at the extreme wavelength ends, and poorer in the blue than the red. We present details of the measurement of emission and absorption features in the GAMA spectra. These measurements are characterized through a variety of quality control analyses detailing the robustness and reliability of the measurements. We illustrate the quality of the measurements with a brief exploration of elementary emission line properties of the galaxies in the GAMA sample. We demonstrate the luminosity dependence of the Balmer decrement, consistent with previously published results, and explore further how Balmer decrement varies with galaxy mass and redshift. We also investigate the mass and redshift dependencies of the [N II]/Hα versus [O III]/Hβ spectral diagnostic diagram, commonly used to discriminate between star forming and nuclear activity in galaxies.


Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society | 2013

Galaxy And Mass Assembly: evolution of the Hα luminosity function and star formation rate density up to z < 0.35

M. L. P. Gunawardhana; Andrew M. Hopkins; Joss Bland-Hawthorn; Sarah Brough; Rob Sharp; Jon Loveday; Edward N. Taylor; D. H. Jones; M. A. Lara-Lopez; Amanda E. Bauer; Matthew Colless; Matt S. Owers; Ivan K. Baldry; A. R. Lopez-Sanchez; Caroline Foster; Steven P. Bamford; Michael J. I. Brown; Simon P. Driver; Michael J. Drinkwater; J. Liske; Martin Meyer; Peder Norberg; Aaron S. G. Robotham; J. H. Y. Ching; Michelle E. Cluver; Scott M. Croom; Lee S. Kelvin; M. Prescott; Oliver Steele; Daniel Thomas

Measurements of the low-z H alpha luminosity function, Phi, have a large dispersion in the local number density of sources (similar to 0.5-1 Mpc(-3) dex(-1)), and correspondingly in the star formation rate density (SFRD). The possible causes for these discrepancies include limited volume sampling, biases arising from survey sample selection, different methods of correcting for dust obscuration and active galactic nucleus contamination. The Galaxy And Mass Assembly (GAMA) survey and Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) provide deep spectroscopic observations over a wide sky area enabling detection of a large sample of star-forming galaxies spanning 0.001 < SFRH alpha (M-circle dot yr(- 1)) < 100 with which to robustly measure the evolution of the SFRD in the low-z Universe. The large number of high-SFR galaxies present in our sample allow an improved measurement of the bright end of the luminosity function, indicating that the decrease in Phi at bright luminosities is best described by a Saunders functional form rather than the traditional Schechter function. This result is consistent with other published luminosity functions in the far-infrared and radio. For GAMA and SDSS, we find the r-band apparent magnitude limit, combined with the subsequent requirement for H alpha detection leads to an incompleteness due to missing bright H alpha sources with faint r-band magnitudes.


Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society | 2013

Galaxy and mass assembly (GAMA): A deeper view of the mass, metallicity and SFR relationships

M. A. Lara-Lopez; Andrew M. Hopkins; A. R. Lopez-Sanchez; Sarah Brough; M. L. P. Gunawardhana; Matthew Colless; Aaron S. G. Robotham; Amanda E. Bauer; Joss Bland-Hawthorn; Michelle E. Cluver; Simon P. Driver; Caroline Foster; Lee S. Kelvin; J. Liske; Jon Loveday; Matt S. Owers; T. J. Ponman; Rob Sharp; Oliver Steele; Edward N. Taylor; Daniel Thomas

A full appreciation of the role played by gas metallicity (Z), star formation rate (SFR) and stellar mass (M*) is fundamental to understanding how galaxies form and evolve. The connections between these three parameters at different redshifts significantly affect galaxy evolution, and thus provide important constraints for galaxy evolution models. Using data from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey–Data Release 7 (SDSS–DR7) and the Galaxy and Mass Assembly (GAMA) surveys, we study the relationships and dependences between SFR, Z and M*, as well as the Fundamental Plane for star-forming galaxies. We combine both surveys using volume-limited samples up to a redshift of z ≈ 0.36. The GAMA and SDSS surveys complement each other when analysing the relationships between SFR, M* and Z. We present evidence for SFR and metallicity evolution to z ∼ 0.2. We study the dependences between SFR, M*, Z and specific SFR (SSFR) on the M*–Z, M*–SFR, M*–SSFR, Z–SFR and Z–SSFR relations, finding strong correlations between all. Based on those dependences, we propose a simple model that allows us to explain the different behaviour observed between low- and high-mass galaxies. Finally, our analysis allows us to confirm the existence of a Fundamental Plane, for which M* = f(Z, SFR) in star-forming galaxies.


Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society | 2015

Galaxy And Mass Assembly (GAMA): deconstructing bimodality – I. Red ones and blue ones

Edward N. Taylor; Andrew M. Hopkins; Ivan K. Baldry; J. Bland-Hawthorn; Michael J. I. Brown; Matthew Colless; Simon P. Driver; Peder Norberg; Aaron S. G. Robotham; Mehmet Alpaslan; Sarah Brough; Michelle E. Cluver; M. L. P. Gunawardhana; Lee S. Kelvin; J. Liske; Christopher J. Conselice; Scott M. Croom; Caroline Foster; Thomas Harold Jarrett; M. A. Lara-Lopez; J. Loveday

We measure the mass functions for generically red and blue galaxies, using a z 8.7 field galaxies from the Galaxy And Mass Assembly (GAMA) survey. Our motivation is that, as we show, the dominant uncertainty in existing measurements stems from how ‘red’ and ‘blue’ galaxies have been selected/defined. Accordingly, we model our data as two naturally overlapping populations, each with their own mass function and colour–mass relation, which enables us characterize the two populations without having to specify a priori which galaxies are ‘red’ and ‘blue’. Our results then provide the means to derive objective operational definitions for the terms ‘red’ and ‘blue’, which are based on the phenomenology of the colour–mass diagrams. Informed by this descriptive modelling, we show that (1) after accounting for dust, the stellar colours of ‘blue’ galaxies do not depend strongly on mass; (2) the tight, flat ‘dead sequence’ does not extend much below log M* ∼ 10.5; instead, (3) the stellar colours of ‘red’ galaxies vary rather strongly with mass, such that lower mass ‘red’ galaxies have bluer stellar populations; (4) below log M* ∼ 9.3, the ‘red’ population dissolves into obscurity, and it becomes problematic to talk about two distinct populations; as a consequence, (5) it is hard to meaningfully constrain the shape, including the existence of an upturn, of the ‘red’ galaxy mass function below log M* ∼ 9.3. Points 1–4 provide meaningful targets for models of galaxy formation and evolution to aim for.


Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society | 2014

Galaxy And Mass Assembly (GAMA) : galaxy close pairs, mergers and the future fate of stellar mass

Aaron S. G. Robotham; Simon P. Driver; Luke J. M. Davies; Andrew M. Hopkins; Ivan K. Baldry; Nicola K. Agius; Amanda E. Bauer; Joss Bland-Hawthorn; Sarah Brough; Michael J. I. Brown; Michelle E. Cluver; R. De Propris; Michael J. Drinkwater; Benne W. Holwerda; Lee S. Kelvin; M. A. Lara-Lopez; J. Liske; A. R. Lopez-Sanchez; Jon Loveday; Smriti Mahajan; Tamsyn McNaught-Roberts; Amanda J. Moffett; Peder Norberg; Danail Obreschkow; Matt S. Owers; Samantha J. Penny; Kevin A. Pimbblet; M. Prescott; Edward N. Taylor; E. van Kampen

We use a highly complete subset of the Galaxy And Mass Assembly II (GAMA-II) redshift sample to fully describe the stellar mass dependence of close pairs and mergers between 10 8 and 10 12 M� . Using the analytic form of this fit we investigate the total stellar mass accreting on tomoremassive galaxies across allmassratios.Depending onhow conservatively weselect our robust merging systems, the fraction of mass merging on to more massive companions is 2.0–5.6percent. Using the GAMA-II data we see no significant evidence for a change in the close pair fraction between redshift z = 0.05 and 0.2. However, we find a systematically higher fraction of galaxies in similar mass close pairs compared to published results over a similar redshift baseline. Using a compendium of data and the function γ M = A(1 + z) m to predict the major close pair fraction, we find fitting parameters of A = 0.021 ± 0.001 and m = 1.53 ± 0.08, which represents a higher low-redshift normalization and shallower power-law slope than recent literature values. We find that the relative importance of in situ star formation versus galaxy merging is inversely correlated, with star formation dominating the addition of stellar material below M ∗ and merger accretion events dominating beyond M ∗ . We find mergers have a measurable impact on the whole extent of the galaxy stellar mass function (GSMF), manifest as a deepening of the ‘dip’ in the GSMF over the next ∼Gyr and an increase in M ∗ by as much as 0.01–0.05 dex.


Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society | 2013

Galaxy And Mass Assembly (GAMA): Linking Star Formation Histories and Stellar Mass Growth

Amanda E. Bauer; Andrew M. Hopkins; M. L. P. Gunawardhana; Edward N. Taylor; Ivan K. Baldry; Steven P. Bamford; Joss Bland-Hawthorn; Sarah Brough; Michael J. I. Brown; Michelle E. Cluver; Matthew Colless; Christopher J. Conselice; Scott M. Croom; Simon P. Driver; Caroline Foster; D. Heath Jones; M. A. Lara-Lopez; J. Liske; A. R. Lopez-Sanchez; Jon Loveday; Peder Norberg; Matt S. Owers; Kevin A. Pimbblet; Aaron S. G. Robotham; Anne E. Sansom; Rob Sharp

We present evidence for stochastic star formation histories in low-mass (M* < 1010 M⊙) galaxies from observations within the Galaxy And Mass Assembly (GAMA) survey. For ˜73 000 galaxies between 0.05 < z < 0.32, we calculate star formation rates (SFR) and specific star formation rates (SSFR = SFR/M*) from spectroscopic Hα measurements and apply dust corrections derived from Balmer decrements. We find a dependence of SSFR on stellar mass, such that SSFRs decrease with increasing stellar mass for star-forming galaxies, and for the full sample, SSFRs decrease as a stronger function of stellar mass. We use simple parametrizations of exponentially declining star formation histories to investigate the dependence on stellar mass of the star formation time-scale and the formation redshift. We find that parametrizations previously fit to samples of z ˜ 1 galaxies cannot recover the distributions of SSFRs and stellar masses observed in the GAMA sample between 0.05 < z < 0.32. In particular, a large number of low-mass (M* < 1010 M⊙) galaxies are observed to have much higher SSFRs than can be explained by these simple models over the redshift range of 0.05 < z < 0.32, even when invoking mass-dependent staged evolution. For such a large number of galaxies to maintain low stellar masses, yet harbour such high SSFRs, requires the late onset of a weak underlying exponentially declining star formation history with stochastic bursts of star formation superimposed.


Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society | 2016

Galaxy And Mass Assembly (GAMA): Panchromatic Data Release (far-UV-far-IR) and the low-z energy budget

Simon P. Driver; A. H. Wright; Stephen K. Andrews; Luke J. M. Davies; Prajwal R. Kafle; Rebecca Lange; Amanda J. Moffett; Elizabeth Mannering; Aaron S. G. Robotham; Kevin Vinsen; Mehmet Alpaslan; E. Andrae; Ivan K. Baldry; Amanda E. Bauer; Steven P. Bamford; Joss Bland-Hawthorn; N. Bourne; Sarah Brough; Michael J. I. Brown; Michelle E. Cluver; Scott M. Croom; Matthew Colless; Christopher J. Conselice; Elisabete da Cunha; Roberto De Propris; Michael J. Drinkwater; Loretta Dunne; Stephen Anthony Eales; A. C. Edge; Carlos S. Frenk

We present the Galaxy And Mass Assembly (GAMA) Panchromatic Data Release (PDR) constituting over 230 deg2 of imaging with photometry in 21 bands extending from the far-UV to the far-IR. These data complement our spectroscopic campaign of over 300k galaxies, and are compiled from observations with a variety of facilities including: GALaxy Evolution eXplorer, Sloan Digital Sky Survey, Visible and Infrared Telescope for Astronomy (VISTA), Wide-field Infrared Survey Explorer, and Herschel, with the GAMA regions currently being surveyed by VLT Survey Telescope (VST) and scheduled for observations by Australian Square Kilometer Array Pathfinder (ASKAP). These data are processed to a common astrometric solution, from which photometry is derived for ∼221 373 galaxies with r < 19.8 mag. Online tools are provided to access and download data cutouts, or the full mosaics of the GAMA regions in each band. We focus, in particular, on the reduction and analysis of the VISTA VIsta Kilo-degree INfrared Galaxy data, and compare to earlier data sets (i.e. 2MASS and UKIDSS) before combining the data and examining its integrity. Having derived the 21-band photometric catalogue, we proceed to fit the data using the energy balance code magphys. These measurements are then used to obtain the first fully empirical measurement of the 0.1–500 μm energy output of the Universe. Exploring the cosmic spectral energy distribution across three time-intervals (0.3–1.1, 1.1–1.8, and 1.8–2.4 Gyr), we find that the Universe is currently generating (1.5 ± 0.3) × 1035 h70 W Mpc−3, down from (2.5 ± 0.2) × 1035 h70 W Mpc−3 2.3 Gyr ago. More importantly, we identify significant and smooth evolution in the integrated photon escape fraction at all wavelengths, with the UV escape fraction increasing from 27(18) per cent at z = 0.18 in NUV(FUV) to 34(23) per cent at z = 0.06. The GAMA PDR can be found at: http://gama-psi.icrar.org/.


Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society | 2013

Galaxy and mass assembly: Resolving the role of environment in galaxy evolution

Sarah Brough; Scott M. Croom; Rob Sharp; Andrew M. Hopkins; Edward N. Taylor; Ivan K. Baldry; M. L. P. Gunawardhana; J. Liske; Peder Norberg; Aaron S. G. Robotham; Amanda E. Bauer; Joss Bland-Hawthorn; Matthew Colless; Caroline Foster; Lee S. Kelvin; M. A. Lara-Lopez; A. R. Lopez-Sanchez; Jon Loveday; Matt S. Owers; Kevin A. Pimbblet; M. Prescott

We present observations of 18 galaxies from the Galaxy And Mass Assembly (GAMA) survey made with the SPIRAL optical integral field unit (IFU) on the Anglo-Australian Telescope. The galaxies are selected to have a narrow range in stellar mass (6 × 109 0.77 Mpc−2), and 5/11 (45+15−13 per cent) galaxies in low-density environments (<0.77 Mpc−2). We find a weak but not significant relationship of the total SFRs of star-forming galaxies with environment. Due to the size of our sample and the scatter observed we do not draw a definitive conclusion about a possible SFR dependence on environment. Examining the spatial distribution of the Hα emission, we find no evidence for a change in shape or amplitude of the radial profile of star-forming galaxies with environment. If these observations are borne out in larger samples, this would infer that any environment-driven star formation suppression must either act very rapidly (the ‘infall-and-quench’ model) or that galaxies must evolve in a density-dependent manner (an ‘in situ evolution’ model).


Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society | 2014

Galaxy And Mass Assembly (GAMA): the large-scale structure of galaxies and comparison to mock universes

Mehmet Alpaslan; Aaron S. G. Robotham; Simon P. Driver; Peder Norberg; Ivan K. Baldry; Amanda E. Bauer; Joss Bland-Hawthorn; Michael J. I. Brown; Michelle E. Cluver; Matthew Colless; Caroline Foster; Andrew M. Hopkins; Eelco van Kampen; Lee S. Kelvin; M. A. Lara-Lopez; J. Liske; A. R. Lopez-Sanchez; Jon Loveday; Tamsyn McNaught-Roberts; Alex Merson; Kevin A. Pimbblet

MA acknowledges funding from the University of St Andrews and the International Centre for Radio Astronomy Research. ASGR is supported by funding from a UWA Fellowship. PN acknowledges the support of the Royal Society through the award of a University Research Fellowship and the European Research Council, through receipt of a Starting Grant (DEGAS-259586). MJIB acknowledges the financial support of the Australian Research Council Future Fellowship 100100280. TMR acknowledges support from a European Research Council Starting Grant (DEGAS-259586).

Collaboration


Dive into the M. A. Lara-Lopez's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Simon P. Driver

University of New South Wales

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Andrew M. Hopkins

Australian Astronomical Observatory

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Sarah Brough

University of New South Wales

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Aaron S. G. Robotham

University of Western Australia

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Michelle E. Cluver

University of the Western Cape

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Ivan K. Baldry

Liverpool John Moores University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Matthew Colless

Australian National University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge