M. Antonini

Locoregional versus general anesthesia in carotid surgery: Is there an impact on perioperative myocardial ischemia? Results of a prospective monocentric randomized trial

PURPOSE The incidence of cardiac morbidity and mortality in patients who undergo carotid surgery ranges from 0.7% to 7.1%, but it still represents almost 50% of all perioperative complications. Because no data are available in literature about the impact of the anesthetic technique on such complications, a prospective randomized monocentric study was undertaken to evaluate the role of local anesthesia (LA) and general anesthesia (GA) on cardiac outcome. METHODS From November 1995 to February 1998, 107 patients were classified by the cardiologist as cardiac patients (IHD; history of myocardial infarction, previous myocardial revascularization procedures, or myocardial ischemia documented by means of positive electrocardiogram [ECG] stress test results) or noncardiac patients (NIHD; no history of chest pain or negative results for an ECG stress test). The patients were operated on after the randomization for the type of anesthesia (general or local). Continuous computerized 12-lead ECG was performed during the operative procedure and 24 hours postoperatively. The end points of the study were ECG modifications (upsloping or downsloping more than 2 mm) of the sinus tachycardia (ST) segment. RESULTS Fifty-five patients were classified as IHD, and 52 were classified as NIHD. Twenty-seven of the 55 IHD patients (49%) and 24 of 52 NIHD patients (46%) were operated on under GA. Thirty-six episodes of myocardial ischemia occurred in 22 patients (20.5%). Episodes were slightly more frequent (58%) and longer in the postoperative period (intraoperative, 10 +/- 5 min; postoperative, 60 +/- 45 min; P <. 001). As expected, the prevalence of myocardial ischemia was higher in the group of cardiac patients than in noncardiac group (15 of 55 patients [27%] vs 7 of 52 patients [13%]; P <.02). By comparing the two anesthetic techniques in the overall population, we found a similar prevalence of patients who had myocardial ischemia (GA, 12 of 52 [23%]; LA, 10 of 55 [18%]; P = not significant) and a similar number of ischemic episodes per patient (GA, 1.5 +/- 0.4; LA, 1.8 +/- 0.6; P = not significant). Episodes of myocardial ischemia were similarly distributed in intraoperative and postoperative periods in both groups. It is relevant that under GA, IHD patients represent most of the population who suffered myocardial ischemia (83%). On the contrary, in the group of patients operated on under LA, the prevalence was equally distributed in the two subpopulations. CONCLUSION The results confirm the different hemodynamic impact of the two anesthetic techniques. Patients who received LA had a rate of myocardial ischemia that was half that of patients who had GA. The small number of cardiac complications do not permit us to make any definitive conclusion on the impact of the two anesthetic techniques on early cardiac morbidity, but the relationship between perioperative ischemic burden and major cardiac events suggests that LA can be used safely, even in high-risk patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy.

General anaesthesia versus cervical block and perioperative complications in carotid artery surgery

PURPOSE To compare the influence of anaesthetic technique on perioperative complications in patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy. MATERIAL AND METHODS In a retrospective study of 1020 consecutive patients who underwent carotid artery surgery over 10 years, perioperative neurologic and cardiologic complications and the use of an internal carotid artery shunt were compared in 337 patients (33%) treated under general anaesthesia and 683 (67%) under cervical block. The two groups had similar characteristics. The most frequent surgical indication was symptomatic carotid artery disease (91.5%). The remaining patients had asymptomatic severe internal carotid lesions (> 70%). RESULTS The overall perioperative stroke rate was 1.9%, the death-stroke rate 0.7% and the cardiac complication rate 0.8%. The perioperative stroke rate was higher in the general anaesthesia group than in the cervical block group (3.2% vs 1.3%, p = 0.01). Cardiac complication rates were similar in the two groups. A carotid artery shunt was used in 75 patients (22%) receiving general anaesthesia and in 92 patients (13%) receiving cervical block (p = 0.0004). The causes of stroke in the cervical block group were intraoperative embolism (4 cases, 26%), perioperative thromboembolism (7 cases, 58%) and clamping ischaemia (1 case, 16%). Mechanisms causing stroke in the general anaesthesia group remained unidentified or uncertain. CONCLUSIONS Cervical block anaesthesia yields better perioperative results than general anaesthesia probably because it allows more reliable cerebral monitoring, reducing or even eliminating perioperative strokes related to clamping ischaemia. It facilitates detection of the mechanism underlying intraoperative stroke allowing surgical techniques and intraoperative management to be modified accordingly. Cervical block anaesthesia significantly reduces the need for internal carotid artery shunting.

Intraoperative Transcranial Doppler Sonography Monitoring during Carotid Surgery under Locoregional Anaesthesia

OBJECTIVES Studies comparing transcranial Doppler ultrasonography (TCD) with other intraoperative monitoring techniques for detecting clamping ischaemia during carotid endarterectomy under general anaesthesia suggest that a reduction of > two-thirds in the mean middle cerebral artery velocity (mMCAv) or a reduction of > 0.4 in the preclamping mMCAv: clamping mMCAv ratio warrants cerebral protection. Our aim was to study the relationship between mMCAvs and clamping ischaemia during carotid endarterectomy in awake patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS In a consecutive series of 57 patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy under locoregional anaesthesia 51 were monitored by intraoperative TCD, continuous EEG, and neurologic awake testing. RESULTS Five of the 51 (9.8%) patients had transient clamping ischaemia, which carotid shunting reversed. TCD showed that these five patients had significant lower mean mMCAvs than the other 46 patients, who had no deficits (1.8 +/- 1.1 cm/s vs. 26.2 +/- 8.5, p = 0.0003). Current TCD criteria indicated that four other patients (7.8%) should have been shunted. All four had significantly higher clamping mMCAvs than the five shunted patients (11.5 +/- 1.9 vs. 1.8 +/- 1.1, p = 0.0012). CONCLUSIONS Intraoperative TCD detected cerebral ischaemia and yielded no false-negative. An mMCAv of 10 cm/s or less may indicate the risk of clamping ischaemia better than the higher threshold currently proposed. This would avoid unnecessary shunting due to false-positives.

Hemodynamic and metabolic effects of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) during anesthesia for orthotopic liver transplantation.

Recently, the tranjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) has been advocated as a safe bridge to orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). We retrospectively studied 53 consecutive cirrhotic patients who underwent OLT: 27 patients with TIPS were compared to 26 controls. Hemodynamic and oxyphoretic data (Fick method) were collected during six phases of OLT. There were no significant differences in demographic data and Child-Pugh class, nor in surgical time and blood product requirements before the anhepatic phase between TIPS patients and controls. In the TIPS group, we observed a marked hyperdynamic profile with a lower systemic vascular resistance index, higher cardiac index, and depressed oxygen consumption before native liver removal. During the same period, the TIPS group developed a greater acidosis and was treated with a larger amount of Na-HCO3. Following the anhepatic phase, no differences between the two groups were detected. All transplantations were successful, and no complications related to TIPS were observed. These results seem to be the consequence of a reduced liver function reserve with a direct hemodynamic effect due to the TIPS.