M. Asem Abdul-Malak
American University of Beirut
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by M. Asem Abdul-Malak.
Knowledge Based Systems | 1998
Toufic Mezher; M. Asem Abdul-Malak; Billal Maarouf
Managers, by human nature, are not optimal decision-makers. There are several errors that hinder the decision-making process, e.g. cognitive biases, accidents, cultural motivations and missing knowledge. These errors can lead to serious consequences. This paper discusses the four errors and their impact on the decision analysis process. In addition, the paper introduces expert critiquing systems. These collaborative systems can help managers or decision-makers reduce the above-mentioned errors in an automated environment. The critiquing theory is also discussed. Finally, a critiquing example details the application of expert critiquing systems in an automated environment. The example shows how a knowledge-based system was used to reduce judgmental human errors.
Construction Research Congress 2012 | 2012
Ayman Makarem; M. Asem Abdul-Malak; Issam Srour
Construction project participants are becoming more aware of the costly and lengthy resolution of claims and disputes. This has led them to give more attention to the management of the resolution process. The International Federation of Consulting Engineers (FIDIC) included in its contract conditions a claim-dispute resolution timeline involving several steps starting with the minute a claim arises until a party initiates arbitration, in order to help parties involved in a certain project better administer claims. However, the period following the Engineer’s determination and preceding the Dispute Adjudication Board (DAB)’s or Engineer’s decision remained unregulated. The Literature does not tackle this specific period and the reason behind keeping it unregulated. This paper explores, through an in-depth reading of the 1999 FIDIC’s conditions for contracts, this unregulated period by associating the claims during this period with various statuses. A framework is offered that shows how the status of a claim progresses during this period. The paper then sets follow-up steps for the statuses in the proposed framework. Finally, some concluding remarks and recommendations are proposed to manage this period.
Journal of Management in Engineering | 2005
Toufic Mezher; M. Asem Abdul-Malak; Ibrahim Ghosn; Maher Ajam
Journal of Management in Engineering | 2002
M. Asem Abdul-Malak; Mustafa M. H. El-Saadi; Marwan G. Abou-Zeid
Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management | 2002
Fuad Mrad; M. Asem Abdul-Malak; Salah Sadek; Ziad Khudr
Journal of Management in Engineering | 1999
Toufic Mezher; M. Asem Abdul-Malak; Marwan Dayya
india software engineering conference | 2011
Maysaa Ramadan; M. Issam Srour; M. Asem Abdul-Malak; Ali A. Yassine
india software engineering conference | 2011
Mostapha Fattal; Issam Srour; M. Asem Abdul-Malak
Construction Congress VI | 2000
M. Asem Abdul-Malak; Mustafa M. H. El-Saadi
india software engineering conference | 2013
M. Asem Abdul-Malak; Issam Srour; Vivian Jreig