M. Baccarani

Dexamethasone plus rituximab yields higher sustained response rates than dexamethasone monotherapy in adults with primary immune thrombocytopenia

Previous observational studies suggest that rituximab may be useful in the treatment of primary immune thrombocytopenia (ITP). This randomized trial investigated rituximab efficacy in previously untreated adult ITP patients with a platelet count of 20 x 10(9)/L or less. One hundred three patients were randomly assigned to receive 40 mg/d dexamethasone for 4 days with or without 375 mg/m(2) rituximab weekly for 4 weeks. Patients who were refractory to dexamethasone alone received salvage therapy with dexamethasone plus rituximab. Sustained response (ie, platelet count > or = 50 x 10(9)/L at month 6 after treatment initiation), evaluable in 101 patients, was greater in patients treated with dexamethasone plus rituximab (n = 49) than in those treated with dexamethasone alone (n = 52; 63% vs 36%, P = .004, 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.079-0.455). Patients in the experimental arm showed increased incidences of grade 3 to 4 adverse events (10% vs 2%, P = .082, 95% CI, -0.010 to 0.175), but incidences of serious adverse events were similar in both arms (6% vs 2%, P = .284, 95% CI, -0.035 to 0.119). Dexamethasone plus rituximab was an effective salvage therapy in 56% of patients refractory to dexamethasone. The combination of dexamethasone and rituximab improved platelet counts compared with dexamethasone alone. Thus, combination therapy may represent an effective treatment option before splenectomy. This study is registered at http://clinicaltrials.gov as NCT00770562.

European LeukemiaNet recommendations for the management and avoidance of adverse events of treatment in chronic myeloid leukaemia

Most reports on chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML) treatment with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) focus on efficacy, particularly on molecular response and outcome. In contrast, adverse events (AEs) are often reported as infrequent, minor, tolerable and manageable, but they are increasingly important as therapy is potentially lifelong and multiple TKIs are available. For this reason, the European LeukemiaNet panel for CML management recommendations presents an exhaustive and critical summary of AEs emerging during CML treatment, to assist their understanding, management and prevention. There are five major conclusions. First, the main purpose of CML treatment is the antileukemic effect. Suboptimal management of AEs must not compromise this first objective. Second, most patients will have AEs, usually early, mostly mild to moderate, and which will resolve spontaneously or are easily controlled by simple means. Third, reduction or interruption of treatment must only be done if optimal management of the AE cannot be accomplished in other ways, and frequent monitoring is needed to detect resolution of the AE as early as possible. Fourth, attention must be given to comorbidities and drug interactions, and to new events unrelated to TKIs that are inevitable during such a prolonged treatment. Fifth, some TKI-related AEs have emerged which were not predicted or detected in earlier studies, maybe because of suboptimal attention to or absence from the preclinical data. Overall, imatinib has demonstrated a good long-term safety profile, though recent findings suggest underestimation of symptom severity by physicians. Second and third generation TKIs have shown higher response rates, but have been associated with unexpected problems, some of which could be irreversible. We hope these recommendations will help to minimise adverse events, and we believe that an optimal management of them will be rewarded by better TKI compliance and thus better CML outcomes, together with better quality of life.

Treatment and outcome of 2904 CML patients from the EUTOS population-based registry

The European Treatment and Outcome Study (EUTOS) population-based registry includes data of all adult patients newly diagnosed with Philadelphia chromosome-positive and/or BCR-ABL1+ chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) in 20 predefined countries and regions of Europe. Registration time ranged from 12 to 60 months between January 2008 and December 2013. Median age was 55 years and median observation time was 29 months. Eighty percent of patients were treated first line with imatinib, and 17% with a second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor, mostly according to European LeukemiaNet recommendations. After 12 months, complete cytogenetic remission (CCyR) and major molecular response (MMR) were achieved in 57% and 41% of patients, respectively. Patients with high EUTOS risk scores achieved CCyR and MMR significantly later than patients with low EUTOS risk. Probabilities of overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival for all patients at 12, 24 and 30 months was 97%, 94% and 92%, and 95%, 92% and 90%, respectively. The new EUTOS long-term survival score was validated: the OS of patients differed significantly between the three risk groups. The probability of dying in remission was 1% after 24 months. The current management of patients with tyrosine kinase inhibitors resulted in responses and outcomes in the range reported from clinical trials. These data from a large population-based, patient sample provide a solid benchmark for the evaluation of new treatment policies.

The molecular anatomy of the FIP1L1-PDGFRA fusion gene

The FIP1L1-PDGFRA fusion gene is a recurrent molecular abnormality in patients with eosinophilia-associated myeloproliferative neoplasms. We characterized FIP1L1-PDGFRA junction sequences from 113 patients at the mRNA (n=113) and genomic DNA (n=85) levels. Transcript types could be assigned in 109 patients as type A (n=50, 46%) or B (n=47, 43%), which were created by cryptic acceptor splice sites in different introns of FIP1L1 (type A) or within PDGFRA exon 12 (type B). We also characterized a new transcript type C (n=12, 11%) in which both genomic breakpoints fell within coding sequences creating a hybrid exon without use of a cryptic acceptor splice site. The location of genomic breakpoints within PDGFRA and the availability of AG splice sites determine the transcript type and restrict the FIP1L1 exons used for the creation of the fusion. Stretches of overlapping sequences were identified at the genomic junction site, suggesting that the FIP1L1-PDGFRA fusion is created by illegitimate non-homologous end-joining. Statistical analyses provided evidence for clustering of breakpoints within FIP1L1 that may be related to DNA- or chromatin-related structural features. The variability in the anatomy of the FIP1L1-PDGFRA fusion has important implications for strategies to detect the fusion at diagnosis or for monitoring response to treatment.

Reply to Constance et al.

trial), bosutinib (6% in the BELA trial > 30 months) and ponatinib (27% in the PACE 2-year trial). Related to pulmonary AEs, reported incidences of pleural effusions may reach > 39% in more advanced phases, and the particularly devastating complication of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is increased with dasatinib, which has resulted in warnings from Regulatory agencies. It is therefore surprising that no specific recommendations were proposed for their management. There seems to be an imbalance in the review and recommendations made for CV complications. This imbalance may lead to a preference of using one drug over another, in this case dasatinib over nilotinib in second-generation therapy, without consideration of true risks. Overall, we noticed that throughout the recommendations, wherever there are warnings related to CVEs, nilotinib is specifically mentioned, whereas the data and drug labeling (such as Canadian labeling) for many of the other TKIs indicate similar incidence rates. Similarly, the incidences of PAOD with nilotinib, which are similar to those of PAH with dasatinib, are presented as more serious than the latter, notably since nilotinib is singled out in the summary recommendations. The preference for dasatinib is difficult to understand as the risk of pulmonary hypertension with dasatinib is worrying as much as the vascular risk with nilotinib. Some drugs that have increased rates of PAH have been removed from the market by the FDA. Second-generation TKIs seem to provide a better response in patients with CML. Unlike the accurate exploration of risk of PAH with TKIs, which was investigated by pulmonary hypertension experts, there are important differences in the definitions of CVEs in the CML studies, as compared with the carefully-adjudicated CVE definitions commonly accepted in the CV community. These differences are leading to a possibly exaggerated impression of increased safety issues related to CVEs. As a result, avoidance of management of the CV risk factors or avoidance of CVEs may lead to CML patients not receiving adequate or optimal care compared with the general population with CV risk and without CML. For optimal patient outcome, continuous cross-specialty management should occur as for any other patients without a CML diagnosis, and that management should result in the choice of a TKI being based on the nature of the CML rather than other considerations.