M. Baron

How botulinum toxin in neurogenic detrusor overactivity can reduce upper urinary tract damage

Intradetrusor injections of botulinum toxin are the cornerstone of medical treatment of neurogenic detrusor overactivity. The primary aim of this treatment is to ensure a low pressure regimen in the urinary bladder, but the mechanisms leading to long-term protection of the urinary tract remain poorly understood. In this paper, we highlight the potential benefits of intradetrusor injections of botulinum toxin regarding local effects on the bladder structures, urinary tract infections, stone disease, vesico ureteral reflux, hydronephrosis, renal function based on a comprehensive literature review.

Intradetrusor Injections of Botulinum Toxin A in Adults with Spinal Dysraphism

Purpose: The aim of the current study was to determine the outcomes of botulinum toxin A intradetrusor injections in adult patients with spina bifida. Materials and methods: All patients with spinal dysraphism who underwent intradetrusor injections of botulinum toxin A from 2002 to 2016 at a total of 14 centers were retrospectively included in analysis. The primary end point was the global success of injections, defined subjectively as the combination of urgency, urinary incontinence and detrusor overactivity/low bladder compliance resolution. Univariate and multivariate analysis was performed to seek predictors of global success. Results: A total of 125 patients were included in study. The global success rate of the first injection was 62.3% with resolution of urinary incontinence in 73.5% of patients. All urodynamic parameters had improved significantly by 6 to 8 weeks compared to baseline, including maximum detrusor pressure (–12 cm H2O, p <0.001), maximum cystometric capacity (86.6 ml, p <0.001) and compliance (8.9 ml/cm H2O, p = 0.002). A total of 20 complications (3.6%) were recorded for the 561 intradetrusor botulinum toxin A injections, including 3 muscular weakness complications. The global success rate of the first injection was significantly lower in patients with poor compliance (34.4% vs 86.9%, OR 0.08, p <0.001). On multivariate analysis poor compliance was associated with a lower global success rate (OR 0.13, p <0.001). Female gender (OR 3.53, p = 0.01) and patient age (OR 39.9, p <0.001) were predictors of global success. Conclusions: Intradetrusor botulinum toxin A injections were effective in adult patients with spina bifida who had detrusor overactivity. In contrast, effectiveness was much lower in adult patients with spina bifida who had poor bladder compliance. The other predictors of global success were female gender and older age.

Long-term outcomes of I-Stop TOMS™ male sling implantation for post-prostatectomy incontinence management

OBJECTIVES To report long-term outcomes after I-Stop TOMS™ implantation for PPI. PATIENTS AND METHODS A retrospective evaluation was conducted in three tertiary reference centers. All consecutive patients implanted with an I-Stop TOMS™ sling between 2007 and 2012 for mild to moderate PPI (24-hour Pad test<400g) without history of pelvic radiation therapy were included. Evaluation had been conducted preoperatively, at one and six months postoperative and yearly thereafter. The main outcome criterion was the number of pads per day. Secondary criteria were International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire (ICIQ), SF-36 questionnaire, and complications. RESULTS A hundred patients were evaluated with a median follow-up of 58months [19-78]. Pad use was significantly reduced and quality of life improved at last follow-up (P<0.0001). The percentage of patients dry and socially continent (0 or 1 pad) were 40% and 77% at 1 year, then dropped to 15% and 22%, respectively after 5years. Twelve patients were treated by artificial urinary sphincter implantation, five by ProACT™ balloons and one by a re-do I-Stop TOMS™. No severe complications were recorded at last follow-up. CONCLUSIONS I-Stop TOMS™ implantation is a safe and effective option in the short-term for mild to moderate PPI management. However, a significant trend to recurrence of leakage has been established after long-term follow-up. If confirmed by further studies, these results may substantially impact patient information before male sling implantation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 4.

[HoLEP learning curve: Toward a standardised formation and a team strategy].

AIM Holmium laser enucleation of prostate (HoLEP) is renowned for the difficulty of its learning curve. Our aim was to evaluate the interest of a three-step tutorial in the HoLEP learning curve, in a university center. METHODS It is a retrospective, monocentric study of the 82 first procedures done consecutively by the same operator with a proctoring in early experience and after 40 procedures. For all patients were noted: enucleation efficiency (g/min), morcellation efficiency (g/min), percentage of enucleated tissue (enucleated tissue/adenome weigth evaluated by ultrasonography. g/g), perioperative morbidity (Clavien), length of hospital stay, length of urinary drainage, functional outcomes at short and middle term (Qmax, post-void residual volume [PVR], QOL scores and IPSS at 3 and 6months). RESULTS Enucleation and morcellation efficiency were significantly higher after the second proctoring (0.87 vs 0.44g/min; P<0.0001 and 4.2 vs 3.37g/min, P=0.038, respectively) so as the prostatic volume (43.5 vs 68.1mL, P=0.0001). Percentage of enucleated tissue was higher in the second group, however, the difference was not significant (69.5% vs 80.4%, P=0.03). Per- and postoperative complications, hospital length of stay, urinary drainage length and functional results at 3 and 6months were not significantly different. CONCLUSION The learning curve did not interfere with functional results. The second proctoring was essential to us in order to grasp the technique. These data underlined the necessity of a pedagogic reflexion in order to built a standardized formation technique to the HoLEP. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 4.

Intradetrusor Injections of Botulinum Toxin Type A in Children With Spina Bifida: A Multicenter Study

OBJECTIVE To assess the effectiveness of intradetrusor injections of botulinum toxin type A (IDBTX-A) in children with spina bifida. METHODS All patients aged less than 16 years old who underwent IDBTX-A between 2002 and 2016 at 6 institutions were included in a retrospective study. Our primary endpoint was the success rate of IDBTX-A defined as both clinical improvement (no incontinence episodes between clean intermittent catheterizations [CICs], absence of urgency, and less than 8 CICs per day) and urodynamic improvement (resolution of detrusor overactivity and normal bladder compliance for age) lasting ≥12 weeks. Predictive factors of success were assessed through univariate analysis. RESULTS Fifty-three patients with a mean age of 8.5 years were included. All patients were under CIC and 88.7% had received anticholinergics with either poor efficacy or bothersome adverse events. The global success rate of the first injection (clinical and urodynamic) was 30%. Patients with closed spinal dysraphism had a significantly better success rate than patients with myelomeningocele (P = .002). The clinical success rate was 66% and was significantly associated with maximum urethral closure pressure (34 cm H2O vs 54.4 cm H2O, P = .02). The urodynamic success rate was 34%. Maximum cystometric capacity (P <.0001) and compliance (P = .01) significantly improved after the first IDBTX-A and maximum detrusor pressure tended to decrease (P = .09) except in the subgroup of patients with poor compliance. After a mean follow-up of 3.7 years, 23 patients (43.4%) required augmentation cystoplasty. Excluding 6 patients who were lost to follow-up, 38.3% of patients were still undergoing botulinum toxin injections at last follow-up. CONCLUSION In this series, despite the fact that IDBTX-A enabled clinical improvement in 66% patients, urodynamic outcomes were poor resulting in a low global success rate (30%).

Long-term discontinuations of botulinum toxin A intradetrusor injections for neurogenic detrusor overactivity: a multicenter study

Purpose: Data are lacking on long-term outcomes of intradetrusor injections of botulinum toxin A for neurogenic detrusor overactivity. The aim of this study was to assess the outcomes of intradetrusor injections of botulinum toxin A for neurogenic detrusor overactivity after more than 10 years of followup. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the charts of all consecutive neurological patients who had received onabotulinumtoxin A or abobotulinumtoxin A intradetrusor injections for neurogenic detrusor overactivity between January 2002 and November 2007 at a total of 3 academic centers. The primary outcome measure was the 10-year discontinuation rate. Other outcomes of interest were failure, reasons for discontinuation and subsequent treatments of neurogenic detrusor overactivity. Discontinuation-free and failure-free survival was estimated by Kaplan-Meier analyses. Results: A total of 140 patients were included in study. The 10-year discontinuation-free and failure-free survival rates were 49.1% and 73%, respectively. The most common reason for discontinuation was failure in 43.7% of cases, which was primary and secondary in 17.2% and 26.5%, respectively. Secondary failure occurred after a median of 8 injections and a median of 80.1 months from the first injection. Other reasons for discontinuation were patient decision in 28.1% of patients, nonbotulinum toxin A related improvement of urinary incontinence in 14.1%, neurological condition progression in 12.5% and an adverse event in 1.6%. Discontinuation-free survival was significantly poorer in patients with spina bifida than in patients with multiple sclerosis or spinal cord injury (p = 0.02). Conclusions: More than half of the patients with neurogenic detrusor overactivity discontinued intradetrusor botulinum toxin A within the first 10 years after the initial injection. Patients with spina bifida are at high risk for discontinuation.

Medical Aspects of the Treatment of LUTS/BPH: Alpha-Blockers

Abstract Alpha-blockers are the mainstay of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) in relation with benign prostatic obstruction (BPO). Their use is extensively recommended in men with LUTS as a firstline therapy with LUTS/BPO in case of voiding symptoms, alone or mixed with storage symptoms, based on level 1 evidence. The main hypothesis regarding their mechanism of action is the relaxation of smooth muscle cells in the bladder neck and inside the prostate. While alpha-blockers have the ability to improve symptoms of the voiding phase (and the filling phase in some cases), there is poor and limited evidence regarding the fact that these drugs improve flow rate, decrease obstruction, or modify urodynamic parameters. The most frequent adverse events include hypotension and ejaculatory dysfunction, and evaluation of efficacy and tolerance is mandatory in the short and long term. Whereas some patients with stay under alpha-blocker therapy for the rest of their life, some will require additional drugs and/or surgery related to disease progression.

The maximum detrusor pressure as a predictive factor of success after sphincterotomy in detrusor-sphincter dyssynergia

To evaluate the impact of the pre‐operative maximum detrusor pressure (MDP) on efficacy outcomes after incontinentation by sphincterotomy or urethral stent placement in male patients with neurogenic detrusor‐sphincter dyssynergia (DSD).

PD64-08 CAN WE AVOID BLADDER AUGMENTATION IN CASE OF FAILURE OF A FIRST INTRADETRUSOR BOTULINUM TOXIN INJECTIONS IN PATIENTS WITH SPINAL DYSRAPHISM?

courses per patient). The urodynamic patterns were detrusor overactivity in 48.6% of patients, isolated poor compliance in 33.6% of patients and combination of poor compliance and detrusor overactivity in 17.8%. The toxin used was in the vast majority onabotulinum toxin A at a dosage of 200 U in 43 patients (34.7%) and 300 U in 62 patients (49.2%). Twenty patients (16.1%) received initially abobotulinum toxin A 750 injections. Global success rate of the first injection was 68.8% with resolution of urinary incontinence in 73.5% of patients. Ninety-six patients (76.8%) underwent a second injection and the mean interval between the first and second injections was 7.5 months. Success rate was significantly lower in case of poor compliance (49% vs. 87%; p<0.0001). In contrast, success rates did not differ significantly between open and closed spinal dysraphism (66.7% vs. 72.3%; p1⁄40.51). The two other predictors of success were female vs. male gender (83.3% vs. 51.7%; p1⁄40.0002) and age (OR1⁄40.1; p1⁄40.005). Out of 561 injections, 20 adverse events were noted (3.6%) including three fatigue/muscular weakness. CONCLUSIONS: IDBTI seems effective in spina bifida patients showing detrusor overactivity regardless of the type of spinal dysraphism (open or closed). In contrast, the effectiveness is much lower in spina bifida patients with poor compliance bladder. The safety of IDBTI in patients with spinal dysraphism is statisfactory

PD64-07 INTRADETRUSOR INJECTIONS OF BOTULINUM TOXIN A IN ADULT PATIENTS WITH SPINAL DYSRAPHISM: RESULTS OF A MULTICENTER STUDY

METHODS: The charts of all patients who underwent a switch to IDI of ATA after failure of an IDI of OTA at six departments of neurourology were retrospectively reviewed. The main outcomes of interest were the bladder diary data and four urodynamic parameters: maximum cystometric capacity (MCC), maximum detrusor pressure (PDET max) and volume at first uninhibited detrusor contraction (UDC). Data were compared before and after treatment with OTA and ATA, using Stuart, Wilcoxon and paired-t tests for paired samples and univariate logistic regression was performed to seek for predictors of switch success. RESULTS: Out of 57 patients included, 38.6% were primary non-responders to Botox, and in secondary non-responder a median number of 5 OTA IDI were performed before failure (range 1-17). Persistent urinary incontinence was observed in 84.2% patients, and 75.4% had persistent detrusor overactivity. Six weeks after the first injection of Dysport, no adverse events were reported. A significant decrease in number of urinary incontinence episodes per day was observed in 52.63% of patients (p <0.001) and all patients experienced a reduction in PDET Max (-8.1 cmH20 on average; p1⁄40.003). MCC significantly increased by a mean of 41.2 ml (p1⁄40.02). The proportion of patients with no UDC increased significantly at after ATA injections (from 15.79% to 43.9%; p1⁄40.0002). Hence, 32 patients draw clinical and/or urodynamic benefits from the botulinum toxin switch from OTA to ATA (56.14%). After a median follow up of 21 months, 87% of responders to BTA switch were still treated successfully with BTA. In univariate analysis, three variables were associated with BTA switch success: low MCC before first ATA IDI (OR1⁄420.4;p1⁄40.01) and dose of ATA (OR1⁄4 10.9; p1⁄40.048) were predictive of increased success rates; poor compliance was predictive of lower success rate (OR1⁄40.2; p1⁄40.04). CONCLUSIONS: Most patients refractory to OTA (Botox) (56.14%) draw benefits from the switch to ATA (Dysport). Low MCC and dose of ATA were predictive of success of BTA switch while poor compliance was predictive of failure.