M. Bonomo

Perinatal outcomes associated with the use of glargine during pregnancy

Aims  Insulin glargine (IG), with its non‐peaking action profile, might be useful in diabetic pregnancy. However, data on its safety are limited and its use during pregnancy is not recommended. This study focused on the effects of IG on perinatal outcome, particularly to estimate the rate of congenital anomalies and birthweight.

Type 1 diabetes control and pregnancy outcomes in women treated with continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) or with insulin glargine and multiple daily injections of rapid-acting insulin analogues (glargine-MDI).

AIM The best way to treat pregnant patients who have type 1 diabetes is still unclear. For this reason, the present study compared metabolic control and maternal-fetal outcomes in patients treated with continuous subcutaneous infusions of rapid-acting insulin analogues (CSII) or with insulin glargine and multiple daily injections of rapid-acting insulin analogues (glargine-MDI). METHODS This retrospective multicentre study involved 144 women with type 1 diabetes, 100 of whom were using CSII and 44 glargine-MDI. Outcomes analyzed were metabolic control, diabetes complications, pregnancy outcome, perinatal morbidity and mortality, and fetal malformations. RESULTS The two groups were comparable for age, prepregnancy BMI, primiparous rate and diabetes complications, although patients using CSII had longer duration of diabetes (P=0.03) and higher White classifications (P=0.04). In both groups, metabolic control improved during pregnancy, but good control was reached earlier among patients using CSII. At parturition, patients using CSII had lower HbA(1c) (6.2±0.7% vs 6.5±0.8%; P=0.02) and required less insulin (P<0.01). Weight gain was similar in both groups, and maternal-fetal outcomes did not differ. CONCLUSION In pregnant patients with type 1 diabetes, MDI and CSII are equivalent in terms of metabolic control and fetal-maternal outcomes, although patients using CSII achieved good control earlier and with less insulin.

Diabetic pregnancy outcomes in mothers treated with basal insulin lispro protamine suspension or NPH insulin: a multicenter retrospective Italian study

Abstract Objective: The aim of this study was to study the efficacy and safety of long-acting insulin analog insulin lispro protamine suspension (ILPS) in diabetic pregnant women. Methods: In a multicenter observational retrospective study, we evaluated pregnancy outcome in 119 women affected by type 1 diabetes and 814 with gestational diabetes (GDM) treated during pregnancy with ILPS, compared with a control group treated with neutral protamine hagedorn (NPH) insulin. Results: Among type 1 diabetic patients, fasting blood glucose at the end of pregnancy was significantly lower in ILPS-treated than in NPH-treated patients. HbA1c levels across pregnancy did not differ between groups. Caesarean section and preterm delivery rates were significantly lower in the ILPS-women. Fetal outcomes were similar in the ILPS and NPH groups. Among GDM women, fasting blood glucose at the end of pregnancy was significantly lower in ILPS-treated than in NPH-treated patients. Duration of gestation was significantly longer, caesarian section and preterm delivery rates were lower in the ILPS-treated group. In addition, there were significantly fewer babies with an excessive ponderal index or neonatal hypoglycemic episodes in the ILPS group than in the NPH group. Conclusions: Association of ILPS with rapid-acting analogs in pregnancy is safe in terms of maternal and fetal outcomes.

Care of diabetes in pregnancy in Italy: structural and organizational aspects.

© 2008 The Authors. Journal compilation