M Canova

The kaleidoscope of glucorticoid effects on immune system.

Glucocorticoids (GCs) are potent anti-inflammatory and immunosuppressive agents which exert multiple effects on immune cell functions. Although their use dates back 60 years, their functions and mode of action have not been completely elucidated yet. GCs act through different genomic and non genomic mechanisms which are mediated by the binding to cytosolic glucocorticoid receptor as well as to cell membrane receptors, or by interacting directly with enzymes and other cell proteins. T cell subtypes have a different sensitivity and response to GCs; in fact, GCs have an immunosuppressive effect on pro-inflammatory T cells, while they stimulate regulatory T cell activity. The effect of GCs on B cells is less clear. Interestingly, treatment with GCs may determine apoptosis of autoreactive B cells by reducing the B cell activator factor (BAFF). Tolerogenic dendritic cells which express low levels of Major Histocompatibility Complex class II, co-stimulatory molecules and cytokines, such as IL-1β, IL-6, and IL-12, can be induced by GCs. GCs at low levels stimulate and at high levels inhibit macrophage activity; moreover, they reduce the number of basophils, stimulate the transcription of inhibitors of leukocyte proteinases and the apoptosis of neutrophils and eosinophils. Finally, GCs inhibit the synthesis and function of some cytokines, particularly T helper type 1 cytokines, and to a lesser extent the secretion of chemokines and co-stimulatory molecules from immune and endothelial cells.

Infections as triggers and complications of systemic lupus erythematosus

A growing body of experimental and clinical evidence supports the pivotal role of infections in the induction or exacerbation of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Infections can be responsible for aberrant immune response leading to a loss of tolerance towards native proteins. Molecular mimicry, especially between Sm or Ro autoantigens and EBV Nuclear Antigen-1 response, as well as the over-expression of type 1 INF genes are among the major contributors to SLE development. On the other hand infections are very common in SLE patients, where they are responsible for 30-50% of morbidity and mortality. Several factors, either genetic, including complement deficiencies or mannose-binding lectin deficiency or acquired such as severe disease manifestations or immunosuppressant use, predispose SLE patients to infections. All types of infections, including bacterial, viral and opportunistic infections, have been reported and the most frequently involved sites of infections are the same as those observed in the general population, including respiratory, skin, and urinary tract infections. Some preventive measures could be adopted in order to reduce the rate of infections in SLE patients: i.e. screening for Mycobacterium tuberculosis and for some chronic viral infections before immunosuppressive treatment; adequate prophylaxes or drug adjustments when indicated, and pneumococcal and influenza vaccinations in patients with stable disease.

SLE diagnosis and treatment: when early is early.

Around 1980 antinuclear antibody testing became widely used in routine laboratory practice leading to a tapering in the lag time between SLE onset and diagnosis. Since then nothing relevant has been introduced which could help us in making the diagnosis of SLE earlier than now. Notably, there is increasing evidence that early diagnosis and treatment could increase SLE remission rate and improve patient prognosis. Although it has been shown that autoantibodies appear before clinical manifestations in SLE patients, currently we cannot predict which autoantibody positive subjects will eventually develop the disease. Thus, great effort should be made in order to identify new biomarkers able to improve our diagnostic potential. B lymphocyte stimulator (BLyS), anti-ribosomal P protein and anti-C1q antibodies are among the most promising. In recent years, some therapeutic options have emerged as appropriate interventions for early SLE treatment, including antimalarials, vitamin D, statins and vaccination with self-derived peptides. All these immune modulators seem to be particularly useful when introduced in an early stage of the disease.

Anti-annexins autoantibodies: Their role as biomarkers of autoimmune diseases

Annexins are a group of 12 highly conserved proteins which exert several regulatory functions on cell biology. There are involved in numerous cell processes including vesicle trafficking, calcium signaling, cell growth, division, and apoptosis. Autoantibodies directed toward annexin I, II, V and XI have been reported, but their role and their clinical correlates are controversial. Annexin I exerts an anti-inflammatory effect by suppressing the generation of inflammatory mediators and anti-annexin I antibodies were detected in patients affected with rheumatoid arthritis, systemic (SLE) and cutaneous lupus erythematosus. Annexin II and V have a high affinity for phospholipids playing a pivotal role in the regulation of coagulation cascade. Anti-annexin II and anti-annexin V antibodies were found in patients with arterial or venous thrombosis, especially in those with autoimmune rheumatic diseases (ARD) such as SLE, primary antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) or systemic sclerosis. Anti-annexin V antibodies were also found in patients with pregnancy loss with or without APS. Annexin XI is involved in several biological pathways, particularly apoptosis and cell proliferation. Anti-annexin XI antibodies have been found in patients with SLE, undifferentiated connective tissue disease, rheumatoid arthritis, Sjögrens syndrome and APS. The metanalysis of studies published up to now showed that the Odds Ratio for having an ARD in anti-annexin XI positive patients was 5.08 (95% CI 2.06-12.58).

Preventive strategies in systemic lupus erythematosus

Despite the improvement of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) survival observed in the last decades, the long-term prognosis of these patients remains poor mainly due to complications of the disease and/or of its treatment. Therefore, in order to improve SLE prognosis, we should try to avoid long-term complications by adopting, early in the disease course, some strategies directed to prevent infections, atherosclerosis and cancer. Moreover, since it has been shown that autoantibodies appear before clinical manifestations in SLE, the question of whether or not asymptomatic individuals with a reliable positive serology should be treated arises. Other than advising these individuals to avoid sun exposure, drugs implicated in drug-induced lupus and cigarette smoking, the use of vitamin D and hydroxychloroquine could be considered. Finally, early SLE diagnosis has led to a modification of disease clinical spectrum at disease onset with an increased frequency of mild disease manifestations over severe ones. Thus great effort should be made in order to identify early in the disease course risk factors for the development of severe SLE manifestations. Finally patients with mild disease carrying factors predictive of severe manifestations should be treated more aggressively than we have done up to now.

Pregnancy and vasculitis: a systematic review of the literature.

Primary systemic vasculitis are uncommon diseases that may affect young women in their childbearing age. To date, patients affected with primary systemic vasculitis are often diagnosed and treated earlier than in the past, due to improvement in diagnostic skills and a larger availability of effective drugs. The progressive achievement of a longer life expectancy and a better quality of life have progressively led to an increased number of pregnancies observed during the course of such diseases. Here, we review 567 pregnancies among patients with primary systemic vasculitis, in order to define the relationship between pregnancy and these conditions and to suggest guidelines for their management. However, data on pregnancy outcomes are limited and knowledge about their gestational risk is mostly provided by single case reports or at best by retrospective studies which may result in intrinsic observational bias; unfortunately, long term prospective studies are still lacking. Analysis of the data highlighted a reciprocal influence between disease course and gestational outcome, although no definite effects can be outlined. Indeed, either improvement or worsening of the different vasculitis can occur, probably due to diverse genetic, clinical and immunological background of the patients. Since disease course may vary over time, careful management of systemic vasculitis during gestation is required. Furthermore, organ failure or damage must be carefully considered, since it can lead to adverse obstetrical and fetal outcomes.

Mycophenolate mofetil in lupus glomerulonephritis: effectiveness and tolerability.

Abstract:  Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) is an immunosuppressive agent initially used in the treatment of transplant recipients. MMF has been used in renal, heart, and liver transplantation, where it seems more effective than other immunosuppressive regimens in reducing the incidence of acute rejection episodes. MMF has a variety of immunosuppressive effects, including selective suppression of T and B lymphocyte proliferation, and has been more recently used in many autoimmune inflammatory conditions. Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is an autoimmune disease that can potentially involve any organ or system of the human body. Glomerulonephritis (GLN) has been recognized as the most frequent severe manifestation of SLE, leading to poor long‐term prognosis. In the treatment of lupus GLN, several therapeutic approaches, all including immunosuppressive drugs, such as cyclophosphamide, azathioprine, or cyclosporine A, have been used. The short‐ and long‐term toxicity of these drugs limits their use in a substantial number of patients. Over the last few years, MMF has emerged as an alternative therapeutic regimen in lupus GLN, mainly for patients refractory to other therapies. These studies have shown that it is highly effective and generally well tolerated.