M. Carpo

High‐dose intravenous immunoglobulin therapy in multifocal motor neuropathy

We treated five consecutive patients with multifocal motor neuropathy (MMN) with high-dose intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg). Four patients had increased levels of anti-asialo-GM1 IgM and two of anti-GM1 IgM as well; one patient had no reactivity. We treated them twice with 0.4 g/kg IVIg for 5 consecutive days at a 2-month interval, followed by maintenance infusions up to 6 to 12 months. All patients with high anti-asialo-GM1 had a consistent clinical improvement starting 3 to 10 days after the first IVIg course; in one patient, recovery was complete and persistent for 12 months without additional treatment, while in three patients, improvement only lasted 20 to 30 days. There was a similar improvement in these patients after the second course of IVIg which was maintained by periodic 2-day IVIg infusions. Clinical improvement in these patients was associated with a reduction of conduction block in most, but not all, motor nerves, while antibody titers were not consistently modified by treatment. There was no clinical or electrophysiologic improvement in the patient without antiglycolipid activity after 6 months of IVIg. IVIg may be a safe and effective therapy for MMN.

Thalidomide sensory neurotoxicity: A clinical and neurophysiologic study

The clinical and neurophysiologic data from 65 patients taking thalidomide were reviewed. Thalidomide sensory neurotoxicity was found to be cumulative dose dependent but occurs only when the total dose is relatively high (>20 g). The risk of developing sensory neuropathy is around 10% below this threshold but increases with higher doses.

How long is IVIg effective in multifocal motor neuropathy

The authors treated 10 patients with multifocal motor neuropathy (MMN) responding to an initial course of IV immunoglobulin (IVIg) with periodic infusion for 5 to 12 years (mean 8.2 years). At last follow-up, only two patients had maintained the maximal improvement achieved during therapy while eight worsened despite increasing Ig dosage. This decline started after 3 to 7 years (mean 4.8 years) of therapy and correlated with a reduction of distal compound muscle action potential amplitudes (p < 0.019). The effectiveness of IVIg in MMN often declines after several years possibly associated with the development of axonal degeneration.

Deterioration of multifocal motor neuropathy after plasma exchange

We report a patient with motor neuropathy in whom plasma exchange (PE) was followed by a pronounced clinical worsening with the appearance of conduction blocks in previously clinically unaffected motor nerves, leading to the diagnosis of multifocal motor neuropathy (MMN). This report highlights the different response to therapy of MMN and chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) because not only steroids but also PE, which is often effective in CIDP, do not improve and at times may even worsen MMN.

Guillain-Barré syndrome associated with high titers of anti-GM1 antibodies

We found high titers of anti-GM1 antibodies (1/1280 or more) in 3 of 14 consecutive patients (21%) with Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) and in 2 additional patients who developed GBS, 10-11 days after starting parenteral treatment with gangliosides. Antibodies were IgG in 4 patients and IgM in one, and they all bound to asialo-GM1, and, in 3, to GD1b as well. Although the clinical features in all the patients with high anti-GM1 titers fulfilled the criteria for the diagnosis of GBS and in 4 of them, proteins but not cells were elevated in cerebrospinal fluid, electrodiagnostic studies in 3 patients showed prominent signs of axonal degeneration, that in one case were confirmed by morphological studies on sural nerve biopsy. No recent antecedent infection was reported by these patients, but in 3, including patients treated with gangliosides, anti-Campylobacter jejuni antibodies were elevated. In 3 patients a consistent decrease in anti-GM1 levels was observed after the acute phase of the disease suggesting that the frequent occurrence of these antibodies in patients with GBS and their frequent association with a prominent axonal impairment may have pathogenetic relevance.

Anti-GM1, IgM antibodies in motor neuron disease and neuropathy

We found anti-GM1 IgM antibodies in 23% of 56 patients with motor neuron disease (MND), in 19% of 69 patients with neuropathy, and in 7% of 107 controls with other neurologic and nonneurologic diseases. Most of these patients had anti-GM1 IgM antibody titers of 1:80 or less; slightly higher antibody titers (up to 1:640) were found in 3 patients, 1 with MND and 2 with neuropathy, and very high titers (1:20,480) in a patient with MND and an IgMμ: M protein that reacted with GM1, GD1b, and asialo GM1 Six other patients with anti-GM1 IgM had serum IgM that also bound to GD1b. Reactivity with GD1b did not correlate with anti-GM1 titers but was only present in patients with MND or neuropathy. Anti-GM1 IgM antibodies may be a normal constituent of the human antibody repertoire but their frequency and, in some cases, their levels are higher in patients with MND and neuropathy. The origin and the pathogenetic role of these antibodies in neural impairment remain to be established.

Predictors of response to rituximab in patients with neuropathy and anti–myelin associated glycoprotein immunoglobulin M

Abstract  We evaluated the efficacy and safety of rituximab in an open‐label, uncontrolled study of 13 patients with polyneuropathy associated with antibodies to myelin‐associated glycoprotein (MAG) and correlated the response to therapy with clinical and laboratory features. One year after rituximab therapy, anti‐MAG immunoglobulin M (IgM) titers were significantly reduced. At that time, eight patients (62%) had improved in both the inflammatory neuropathy cause and treatment (INCAT) sensory sumscore and the Medical Research Council sumscore for muscle strength and seven of them also in the INCAT disability score. The improvement in the mean INCAT sensory sumscore was significant at 12 months and correlated with lower anti‐MAG antibody at entry and at follow‐up. This study suggests that rituximab may be efficacious in patients with anti–MAG associated neuropathy and particularly on sensory impairment and in those with moderately elevated antibody titers. These findings suggest that antibody reduction below a critical level may be necessary to achieve clinical improvement.

Multifocal motor neuropathy: clinical and immunological features and response to IVIg in relation to the presence and degree of motor conduction block

Objective: To determine whether patients with clinically typical multifocal motor neuropathy (MMN) with or without definite or probable conduction block (CB) differ in terms of clinical presentation, immunological findings, or response to treatment with intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg). Methods: 23 consecutive patients were studied with the typical clinical features of MMN, consisting of a progressive multineuropathic motor impairment with minimal or no sensory loss. In 14 patients, electrophysiological studies disclosed the presence of a definite or probable CB according to the criteria proposed by the American Association of Electrodiagnostic Medicine (AAEM) in at least one motor nerve. Six patients had possible CB, defined as a degree of CB 10% less than that required by the AAEM for probable CB, while no CB was detected in three patients. Results: Patients with possible CB did not differ from those with a definite or probable CB in terms of age at disease onset (mean 38.8 v 38.2 years, respectively), distribution and severity of limb weakness, clinical impairment (mean Rankin score 2.2 in both), and frequency of antiganglioside antibodies (33% v 29%). Patients with possible CB had a longer mean disease duration (9 v 5.9 years, p < 0.05) and a less frequent consistent response to IVIg (67% v 86%) than those with a definite or probable CB. Patients without a detectable CB had a similar frequency of antiganglioside antibodies (33%) but had a longer disease duration (20.3 years), greater impairment (Rankin score 2.7), and more frequent signs of axonal degeneration (41% of examined motor nerves) than patients with CB (13–15%, p < 0.005). Only one patient without detectable CB (33%) consistently improved with IVIg. Conclusions: Patients with possible CB were clinically and immunologically indistinguishable from those with definite or probable CB, albeit with a slightly less frequent response to IVIg. This finding suggests that failure to fulfil AAEM criteria for CB in patients with otherwise clinically typical MMN should not preclude this diagnosis and consequently a treatment trial with IVIg. Whether the longer duration and greater severity of the disease and more frequent axonal impairment in patients without detectable CB than in those with CB explain their lower response to IVIg remains to be established.

Clinical presentation and outcome of Guillain-Barré and related syndromes in relation to anti-ganglioside antibodies

We correlated the clinical features of 78 patients with Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) or related variants, with the presence of serum antibodies to the gangliosides GM1, GM2, GD1a, GD1b and GQ1b in order to determine whether these antibodies may influence the clinical presentation or outcome of GBS. Sixty-three patients had typical GBS (81%), nine a pure motor form (11%), three a paraparetic form (4%), and three had Miller Fisher syndrome (MFS). IgG or IgM (or both) anti-ganglioside antibodies were found by ELISA in 37% of patients, including 36% with typical, 33% with pure motor and 100% with MFS. Beside the constant occurrence of anti-GQ1b antibodies in patients with MFS (P<0.00001), the other clinical forms were not associated with a specific anti-ganglioside reactivity. Anti-GM1 and anti-GD1a antibodies tended to be associated with a worse disability at 6 month than other or no reactivity and, similarly to anti-GM2 antibodies, with a more frequent respiratory impairment. Anti-GM2 and anti-GD1b antibodies were always associated with typical GBS and, in all but one patient, with a complete recovery; still they were found in only 13 and 3%, respectively, of the patients with this presentation. Anti-GQ1b antibodies, though always associated with ophthalmoplegia and ataxia in both MFS and GBS, were found in only 36 and 26%, respectively, of patients with these symptoms. Even if different anti-ganglioside antibodies tend to be associated with some clinical features possibly suggesting that they may influence the clinical presentation or outcome, with the exception of anti-GQ1b antibodies for ophthalmoplegia and ataxia, they do not permit to predict the clinical presentation or outcome in individual patients.

How useful are anti-neural IgM antibodies in the diagnosis of chronic immune-mediated neuropathies?

Antibodies against several neural antigens have been associated with different chronic immune-mediated neuropathies but their practical clinical relevance remains unclear. To determine the possible diagnostic usefulness of these antibodies we reviewed the clinical correlate of IgM antibodies to the myelin-associated glycoprotein (MAG), sulfatide, the gangliosides GM1, GM2, GD1a and GD1b in 539 consecutive patients examined for neuropathy or related diseases in our Neuropathy Clinics and tested for these antibodies in our laboratory since 1985. 302 patients (56%) had an established diagnosis of definite or possible chronic immune-mediated neuropathy while 237 had a neuropathy of non-immune-mediated origin or of unknown aetiology or a closely related disease. Antibodies to one or more antigen were more frequent (chi(2)=63.32; p<0.00001) in patients with chronic immune-mediated neuropathy (37.7%) than with other neuropathy or related diseases (7.2%) and their presence was associated in 87% of the patients with an immune-mediated neuropathy, incrementing by 31% the probability of having this form. Testing for MAG permitted to identify 24.8% of patients with an immune-mediated neuropathy, GM1 an additional 9.9%, while GM2, GD1b, GD1a and sulfatide altogether an additional 3% of the patients. Concerning clinical correlations, all 75 patients with anti-MAG IgM had neuropathy and IgM monoclonal gammopathy (PN+IgM) with a positive predictive value for this neuropathy of 100%. A similarly high predictive value for neuropathy (91.4%) was observed among 269 patients with IgM monoclonal gammopathy including 103 patients without neuropathy. Anti-sulfatide IgM, though rare, were also significantly and constantly associated with PN+IgM and permitted to identify few patients not bearing anti-MAG IgM. Anti-GM1 IgM were significantly associated with multifocal motor neuropathy (MMN) (29.2%) but where also found in a few patients with other immune or non-immune neuropathies or related diseases with a positive predictive value for MMN of 25.5%. Anti-GM2 IgM were also significantly associated with MMN and increased the sensitivity (36.2%) for MMN obtained with anti-GM1 IgM only, without affecting its specificity and positive predictive value. Anti-GD1a, GD1b, though not significantly more frequent in patients with immune-mediated neuropathy, were associated in 80 to 100% of patients with these neuropathies. In conclusion anti-neural IgM antibodies may help in identifying patients with a chronic immune-mediated neuropathy, even if only anti-MAG and anti-sulfatide IgM appear to be strictly associated with a definite clinical syndrome.